Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Characteristics personal
Characteristics personal
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In life, people tend to talk up a big game about many things, and sometimes they can be used to hide someone’s insecurity or fear. But what is a dog who is all bark and no bite? Just as in the short story “The Sacrifice of the Hunted,” by Andrew Smock, the main character Buck begins the story as rude and cocky towards the narrator about his hunting skills, but after a deer is actually killed, he gets a greater understanding of his true feelings about hunting. This is illustrated through out the short story in many instances. From the time Buck is addressed in the story to until the deer is shot he makes fun of the narrator for not knowing much about hunting. When the deer is shot, Buck seems to get a stronger understanding of how he truly …show more content…
feels about hunting animals. Although the narrator had never gone hunting before, and came from a background that despised hunting, he thought it would be a nice activity to do with his friend. Little did he know when he signed up for it that his friend would rip on him the entire time. In the story, Buck uses cockiness and cruelness to cover up his insecurity about shooting an animal. The author shows this when he says, “I’m gonna teach you how to be a man, like me! Now shut up.” (25). This quote showcases two import growth points for Buck. It shows how he continues to tell the narrator how poor of a hunter he is which makes Buck feel better about himself. By telling the narrator that he’s gonna teach him, this is Buck’s way of saying that he is more superior to the narrator. This quote also gives off the idea that he is cocky because he is referring to himself as a man. Secondly, the author illustrates Buck’s attitude by saying, ““Now remember, we’ve only got three three shells. So, I get two, and you get one. I’ll tell you when to shoot.” Buck placed the shells rapidly in the barrels. He handed me a rifle. I took it and fumbled over its weight. He laughed, called me names, and commented on my ability to resemble a female all the time.” (25). This quotes describes how Buck sees himself as a strong, skillful hunter. He thinks that he is superior to the narrator by giving himself twice the amount of shells, which is twice as many shots. As stated before, Buck had referred to himself as a man and in this quote he refers to the narrator as the opposite, a boy. This shows how Buck can boost himself up by making others feel poorly. From the minute a child is born it begins to learn and pick up on things from its parents.
Just as in the short story, Buck goes hunting with his father all the time and has learned to love it. When he goes hunting with the narrator and not with his father he grows as a character by grasping a true understanding of about his true feeling towards hunting. The first sign of fear and insecurity shown by Buck in the story is after the narrator shot the deer when the author states, ““No you didn’t. Did you?” Buck was confused and scared. His voice trembled.” This quote is the first sign of fear in Buck. During the entire story so far Buck has held his head high on his shoulders because he is an expert in hunting and nothing would bring him down. But after the narrator shot the deer, his first idea to go to was denial. He did not want to believe it was true because he never thought it would happen and he certainly did not know how to deal with that today. He always has to stand tough for his father and not show how he truly feels. Truth is he is sad. He does not like the killing of animals, especially when the blame is on his own hands. The author conveys the truth especially when he says, “‘Let’s get out of here, man. I don’t like it.” He was really becoming hysterical.” (26). This is the moment when Buck lets his true feeling out. He does not try to hide it or even use his cockiness as a front anymore. Buck’s father’s strong opinions may have clouded his judgement about how he truly feels about hunting and killing animals. Buck may have believed that the narrator would never shoot the deer and so if he missed both times he could just blame it on something else. He never imagined that the narrator would shoot the deer and when he did Buck was in complete shock. Now he gets a greater understanding as the story progresses and in the end, he was only lying to
himself. One of the worst parts of lying is lying to oneself, and sometimes by masking only brings more misery. Buck uses his cockiness and cruel behavior towards the narrator to hide the fact that he cannot stand the death of animals. He may not of even know this is how he felt, but because his father was not there when it happened, he had the possibility to react in anyway he felt. His father was a big reason why he liked hunting so much that he did not have the ability to realize that he did not like when they would actually die because his father’s opinions may have clouded his judgement. Even the very first sentence in the story is Buck telling the narrator about what his father says about hunting. This displays how important of a role model his father was to him in the hunting aspect of life. Overall in the short story, Buck starts off cocky and rude and gets a bigger understanding of himself and comes to terms with the idea that he doesn’t have to enjoy killing animals if he does not want to. Maybe from now on when he goes hunting with his father he will only shoot them and not have to go up and look into the eyes of the animal that was just killed. There could always be an underlying reason for why Buck felt sympathy and sadness for the deer that was not shared.
Who was Chris McCandless? Many will argue that Chris was one thing or another, but one thing that I will argue is that McCandless was many things. Just like everyone on earth we all have many traits, most of us cannot be summed up into one word let alone Chris. I believe Chris to be a pioneer, stubborn and most importantly, himself. Even in a modern society where your life is almost mapped out for you; Chris blazed his own trail, and did something that no other man could do.
First, the attitude of the speaker’s father creates a contrast with other hunter’s behaviours during hunting. When the speaker goes hunting with his father, his father often adopts the technique of “[sitting] silently, motionless and endlessly patient, waiting for deer to come down the paths” (2). They sit this way for hours and are usually rewarded because “there was always an abundance of less patient hunters … noisily crashing about, keeping the deer more or less constantly on the move” (2). The sound of
For many people, hunting is just a sport, but for some it is a way of life. In Rick Bass’s “Why I Hunt” he explains how he got to where he lives now and what he thinks of the sport of hunting. There are many things in the essay that I could not agree more with, and others that I strongly disagree. Overall this essay provides a clear depiction of what goes through the mind of a hunter in the battle of wits between them and the animal.
You can write novels, poems, and short stories about it, but you’ll never truly understand the beauty of life until you experience it for yourself, until you immerse yourself in it. Every person has their own set of wants, needs, and desires. But it isn’t until you go out and do the things that you’ve imagined, that you really discover what you love. Every person has a unique mind; every person has the capacity to share different views. If you asked every person in the entire world what they believe the meaning of life is, you would receive several answers. Many would be different, but most would say something to the effect of “living a happy, healthy life.” Because we’re all so different, our own definitions of happiness are bound to differ from the next person. Christopher Mccandless' definition of happiness would have been simple. He wanted to find himself, who he really was deep down. In Into the Wild(1997) by Jon Krakauer, Mccandless didn't want to be the person his parents or society expected him to be, he instead wanted the rawness of life itself; and in order to achieve this, he left everything behind and ventured from place to place, eventually ending in Alaska. In chapter 17, Mccandless is compared to naval officer Sir John Franklin because some claim McCandless "lacked a requisite humility" and "possessed insufficient respect for the land." With these claims in consideration, McCandless is a young man who is arrogant because he is reckless and stubborn; however, he is also humble because he is gentle and kind.
Many people dream about leaving everything behind and starting a new life, but it’s not as easy as it seems. Learning how to adapt to a new environment may be a challenge. In the book Into the Wild by Jon Krakauer, Christopher McCandless has no knowledge of the conditions he’s going to face when he arrives in Alaska. I would classify Christopher McCandless as a fearless crazy guy, because he leaves his well-shaped life behind. McCandless is not prepared for his expedition to Alaska, because he’s not familiar with the different lifestyles. Making all of these changes to his life like, detaching himself from his family and changing his name to Alexander Supertramp was a bad idea; because losing all of his connections means that he has no help from the people who really know him.
Ultimate freedom is an odyssey everyone, at least once in their lifetime, tries to conquer. Chris McCandless did everything in his power to try and capture that freedom he was searching for. He ultimately gave up his own life during that quest. Did he find what he was searching for? We may never know. Very many people have diverse opinions on this character. Chris McCandless was not selfish. He was a young, well-educated boy. His parents handed him everything on a silver platter; he wanted to prove not only to himself but to everyone else he could do things on his own. His possessions did not define who he was as a person. He thought towards everyone else he was just another brick in the wall, a pretty rich boy, and that did not “fly” with him. He had to prove his worth.
Anti-Semitism is the hatred and discrimination of those with a Jewish heritage. It is generally connected to the Holocaust, but the book by Helmut Walser Smith, The Butcher’s Tale shows the rise of anti-Semitism from a grassroots effect. Smith uses newspapers, court orders, and written accounts to write the history and growth of anti-Semitism in a small German town. The book focuses on how anti-Semitism was spread by fear mongering, the conflict between classes, and also the role of the government.
Five years ago you could have found me hiding under my covers, praying to a god that I no longer believe in with my eyes shut tightly—but not anymore. These nights I offer up a two minute thanksgiving for the sake of karma; I look out into the darkness and I recognize the shadows as objects in my house rather than the faces of my dead grandfathers. It feels good to open my eyes, but I’ve traded in that old ignorant twinkle for a steady calmness. I still duck and cover when an insect the size of my pupil is within five feet of me, but from a distance I know that I am not so different from the tiny creature. If I am a predator, I am not the kind of predator who hunts but rather the one who kills out of fear. I prefer the role of the prey— it suits me well. I avoid conflict: I prefer spending time at home with my wife, I weigh less than 100lbs, and I have been notorious for becoming paralyzed with laughter upon being attacked by testosterone-laden family members. If a human or other animal my size or larger were to want me for dinner, I would be an easy target though my meat wouldn’t feed a family of four.
David W. Blight's book Beyond the Battlefield: Race, Memory and the American Civil War, is an intriguing look back into the Civil War era which is very heavily studied but misunderstood according to Blight. Blight focuses on how memory shapes history Blight feels, while the Civil War accomplished it goal of abolishing slavery, it fell short of its ultimate potential to pave the way for equality. Blight attempts to prove that the Civil War does little to bring equality to blacks. This book is a composite of twelve essays which are spilt into three parts. The Preludes describe blacks during the era before the Civil War and their struggle to over come slavery and describes the causes, course and consequences of the war. Problems in Civil War memory describes black history and deals with how during and after the war Americans seemed to forget the true meaning of the war which was race. And the postludes describes some for the leaders of black society and how they are attempting to keep the memory and the real meaning of the Civil War alive and explains the purpose of studying historical memory.
In “How to Talk to a Hunter,” the narrator struggles with separating practical intelligence from emotional intelligence.
Is society too egotistical? In Hunters in the Snow, Tobias Wolfe gives an illustration of the selfishness and self-centeredness of humankind through the actions of his characters. The story opens up with three friends going on their habitual hunting routine; their names are Frank, Kenny, and Tub. In the course of the story, there are several moments of tension and arguments that, in essence, exposes the faults of each man: they are all narcissistic. Through his writing in Hunters in the Snow, Wolfe is conveying that the ultimate fault of mankind is egotism and the lack of consideration given to others.
It is often said that a dog is a man’s best friend. In Cormac McCarthy’s novel, The Crossing, a deep affection and fondness are established between man and animal. In a particular excerpt from the novel, Cormac illustrates the protagonist’s sorrow that was prompted from the wolf’s tragic death. As blood stiffens his trousers, the main character seeks to overcome the cold weather and fatigue with hopes of finding the perfect burial site for the wolf. McCarthy uses detailed descriptions and terminology in his novel, The Crossing, to convey the impact of the wolf’s death on the protagonist, a sad experience incorporated with religious allusions and made unique by the main character’s point of view.
In The Call of the Wild, Buck finds comfort in his relationships with man. When he is initially removed from Judge Miller's house in Santa Clara Valley, he is given his first exposure to the wild where, "every moment life and limb were in peril" (London 31). But soon he finds himself not entirely ready to leave civilization and answer the call of the wild, because he must first experience love. Buck establishes a relationship with John Thornton, and "love, genuine passionate love, was his for the fir...
On a cloudless September afternoon, a hunter stands with a defeated look upon his face. He sighs in disappointment as he watches a bull run through the aspens. He is still shaking in excitement and frustration. He did everything he could, but the bull didn't live that long by being stupid. I had never had that type of rush before, even though I had been defeated I was hooked on bow hunting.
‘Thank you, I’m a hunter, not a murderer’” (Connell, 70). Richard Connell’s short story “The Most Dangerous Game”, portrays a hunter, one who feels no pity for the ones he hunts, who is suddenly in their shoes. He becomes the huntee when he meets a psychopathic murderer, and declines to hunt with him. However, he will not be let off the hook that easily. He gets three days to hide from his hunter, and if he’s discovered, he loses the “game”. It’s a game of cat and mouse, where at times the hunter will be underneath his prey, but with a gun in the hunter’s hand, the prey can’t retaliate. In “The Most Dangerous Game”, Richard Connell uses setting, characterization, and conflict in order to convey an anxious, haunting mood.