Analysis of Two Research Papers on Identity Construction

3108 Words7 Pages

There are two papers to be investigated in this essay which deals with the (re)construction of identities due to linguistic practices and spatial movements across boundaries. The first paper is a research done by De Fina (2013) who focused on the investigation of top-down and bottom-up strategies manifested in the construction of identities of participants taking part in an interaction. In her introduction, she highlighted that these identities are constantly negotiated when one interacts with one’s surroundings. It was pointed out that traditional forms and ideas on identity construction and analysis has undergone massive changes due to the pervasive nature of modern technology and ease of mobility which defies the rather stationary nature of human beings in the past. Needless to say, interactions that shape and frame identities now occur more constantly and are less predictable than it had been previously. In addition, De Fina differentiated between top-down and bottom-up strategies in identity construction. The former is performed by those who are observers of a particular interaction, or outsiders looking into a conversation while the latter is carried out by the participants in the interactions in question, or the interlocutors of a communicative act. The interactions investigated were extracted from ‘the Spanish radio station El Zol…broadcasting in the greater Washington-Baltimore area’ (De Fina, 2013, p. 556).
The literature review was divided into three sections namely ‘globalization, mobility and linguistics’, ‘identities and transnationalism’ and ‘the role of ethnic media in transnational identity’. In the first section, the focus was on the effect of globalisation and ease of mobility on the linguistic identities of th...

... middle of paper ...

...er would expect her to. Despite the unobstructive nature of the methodology that was employed in this study, the question of whether or not it will yield enough data for a conclusive response to the research questions remains.
Both researches dealt with the newly emerged area of anthropology namely the construction of hybrid identities or transnationals by individuals that defies the traditional forms of identity classification. Both studies adopted various research methods with the aim of arriving at solid responses for the research questions stemmed from their extensive literature reviews. Generally, both studies did successfully provide conclusive evidence for their cases but later studies would have to take into consideration the appropriateness of the research methods in order to yield more substantial data for further conclusive evidence and proving of claim.

Open Document