Analysis: The Million Student March

808 Words2 Pages

Therefore, it is accurate to say that young people are not completely oblivious to politics. If there is an interest there, then there must be a way that it is expressed. Clearly, this is not through voting.
Jeanette Mcvicker, a professor at the State University of New York at Fredonia suggests that young people have always chosen non-traditional ways of becoming politically involved. She brings up an important point in that young people have historically not been seriously considered when it comes to politics. She mentions how mainstream media has typically disregarded movements headed by young people, noting how the 1960s era feminist movement was treated as a joke and that media “challeng[ed] both [the participants’] femininity and their …show more content…

The Million Students March was an organized protest day on college campus demanding “tuition-free public college, cancellation of all student debt, and a fifteen dollar minimum wage for all campus workers” (#MillionStudentMarch, n.d.). The march occurred on November 12, 2015, and enjoyed a decent amount of success. At the University of California-Santa Barbra, an estimated 1,500 students marched, and overall, thousands marched nationwide (Mulhere, 2015). The movement also gained success on social media, once again representing a non-traditional way of political involvement. The hashtag #MillionStudentMarch on Twitter trended worldwide (Skinner, Panne, 2015) with “nearly 70,000 mentions” (Mulhere, 2015). Though these Twitter mentions were often not at all positive in regards to the movement, they show political discussion and political …show more content…

Although Mullen is clearly politically involved, she does not seem to be relatively politically educated. This interview finds her scrambling for answers and unable to back up the claims that she makes. As the organizer of such a protest, one would imagine that Ms. Mullen would know precisely what she is talking about, but most of the time she comes off as quite dumbfounded by Cavuto’s questions. Mullen claims that the “one percent” who hold the majority of America’s wealth should be the ones to pay for what she is insisting on being provided to her. Cavuto brings up the point that even all of that money would not be enough to cover three years’ worth of Medicare according to some studies, though he fatally neglects to cite where this information came from. Instead of formulating a rebuttal with cold hard numbers or reputable, cited information, Mullen simply states “I’m sorry, but I don’t believe that” (Washington Free Beacon,

Open Document