Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Mass media effects on electoral process
Essays on civic engagement
Civic engagement contoh
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Canada is a society built on the promise of democracy; democracy being defined as “government by the people; a form of government in which the supreme power is vested in the people and exercised directly by them or by their elected agents under a free electoral system.” In order to operate at full potential, the people of Canada must voice their opinions and participate fully in the political system. This is why it’s shocking to see that people are becoming less engaged in politics and the voter turnout has steadily been declining over the last 20 years. This lack of participation by Canadians is creating a government that is influenced by fewer people, which is detrimental to the democratic system Canada is built on. Out of all Canadian age groups, the voter turnout for young voters is the most disappointing. In specific today’s youth are less likely to vote, less interested in politics, and know less about politics compared to all other Canadians. This brings about a great deal of concern, as young people are the future of this country, and are expected to uphold the expectations put on them by their older counterparts. Youth are still being affected by the consequences brought about by politics; they still go to school, get jobs, get sick, and so forth, so why is it that they feel indifferent? Research has brought about an abundance of reasons why youth are becoming less engaged in the political process. Education, absence of political knowledge, the media and family influence, indifference to election campaigns, inadequate amount of change, and lack of motivation are all possible factors in influencing the youth voter turnout. The younger the person the less exposure they’ve had to the world of politics, therefor the less ... ... middle of paper ... ...CPRN. de Broucker, Patrice. 2005b. Without a Paddle: What to do About Canada's Young Drop-Outs. CPRN Research Report. Ottawa: Canadian Policy Research Networks. October. Elections Canada. 2007. Voter Turnout at Federal Elections and Referendums, 1867-2006. Ottawa: Elections Canada. O’Neill, Brenda. 2007. “Human Capital, Civic Engagement and Political Participation: Turning Skills and Knowledge into Engagement and Action.” In Garnett Picot, Ron Saunders and Arthur Sweetman (eds). Fulfilling Potential, Creating Success: Perspectives on Human Capital Development. Kingston: McGill-Queen’s University Press. Pammett, Jon, and Lawrence LeDuc. 2003. Explaining the Turnout Decline in Canadian Federal Elections: A New Survey of Non-Voters. Ottawa: Elections Canada. York, Geoffrey. 2007. “Text-messages: the new Chinese protest tool.” Globe and Mail, Friday, June 1: A13.
One may be surprised to learn that the turnout rate of individuals voting in Canada's federal elections has never reached 80% (Elections Canada). In fact, it has been decreasing since the middle of the twentieth century, as shown by an increase in voter apathy. An electoral system is designed to provide those who live in democratic governments with the opportunity to vote – in an election – for the candidate whose platform coincides with their political beliefs. This can be achieved through a direct democracy, where citizens are directly involved in the decision-making process, or through an indirect democracy, where citizens elect a delegate to act on their behalf. In a direct democracy, all citizens would be present during governmental meetings and have the opportunity to give verbal input. As one may expect, this would be extremely difficult to coordinate with Canada's population of 34.88 billion (Statistics Canada). Canada uses an indirect democracy, which allows for two basic forms of electoral systems in which representatives are elected. In the simple plurality electoral system, the candidate who receives the greatest number of votes is elected, regardless of a majority or not. It is commonly known as the “first-past-the-post” system, which alludes to a horse race; the winner passes the post with the highest number of votes, and only need to garner more votes than their opponents. The successful candidate wins all the seats in their riding or constituency while the candidates who places second or third will receive no seats, regardless of how many votes they lose by. Proportional representation is the second form of electoral system used in Canada; the percentage of the votes received by a party is proportionate to the numb...
The issue of electoral reform has become more important than ever in Canada in recent years as the general public has come to realize that our current first-past-the-post, winner-take-all system, formally known as single-member plurality (SMP) has produced majority governments of questionable legitimacy. Of the major democracies in the world, Canada, the United States, and the United Kingdom are the only countries that still have SMP systems in place. Interestingly enough, there has been enormous political tension and division in the last few years in these countries, culminating with the election results in Canada and the USA this year that polarized both countries. In the last year we have seen unprecedented progress towards electoral reform, with PEI establishing an electoral reform commissioner and New Brunswick appointing a nine-member Commission on Legislative Democracy in December 2003 to the groundbreaking decision by the British Columbia Citizen’s Assembly on October 24, 2004 that the province will have a referendum on May 17, 2005 to decide whether or not they will switch to a system of proportional representation. This kind of reform is only expected to continue, as Ontario Premier Dalton McGuinty decided to take BC’s lead and form an independent Citizen’s Assembly with the power to determine whether or not Ontario will have a referendum regarding a change to a more proportional system. There is still much work to do however, and we will examine the inherent problems with Canada’s first-past-the-post system and why we should move into the 21st century and switch to a form of proportional representation.
There are more 16 year olds getting involved in politics then there are with elder folk. When younger people register to vote they tend to get more involved for the the next election to come. During this past election there were less turnouts than ever, people didn’t go out to vote because they either didn’t like any of the candidates or they just weren’t sure of who to choose. These teens are getting more educated about elections because of schools and the classes that they take.
In Australia the young adults “are less likely to be enrolled to vote than older groups. An estimated 300,000 Australians aged 18 to 25 do not vote in elections because they have not enrolled” (31,2006). While in the United States, “19% of all votes cast in 2012 came from young voters” (2016). While voting does not effect young children since they cannot vote, however when teens vote it allows them to become more educated in their country and their political system. Since most of the teens in Australia do not vote, they do not have copious amount of knowledge from their countries political system. Having this knowledge will allow students to use this knowledge in their school life helping them understand history and government
A large concern for voters under 18 is that they, myself included, can be easily influenced without even knowing it. This would put additional pressure on high school teachers, parents, and other well meaning adults. Politics is a divisive enough issue without bringing younger kids into the mix. The current system in place for high schools is to take politics in the students' sophomore years, which is typically ages 15-16. These teachers have immense power to bias voting towards their favored candidate, even perhaps without realizing it. Familial fighting over politics is
Although many aspects are taken into account to form a political system and create outcomes that will improve the strength of a nation, none are more controversial than the debate on voting age and if modifications should be made. Minimum voting age can be argued as the most effective way to ensure a sufficiently adroit electorate. However even if voting was lowered to a particular age, this would not affect the outcome of voter turn-out, considering the many other age groups choosing not to vote, or even non-resident/citizens being restricted to this opportunity for that matter. With respect to this, a person in favour of keeping the voting age where it is at would argue that countries who are rather surplus on an economic standpoint, still have higher voting ages, allowing only their mature, educated citizens make these important contributions to a country. On the contrary, a person in favour on lowering the voting age could argue how bringing teenagers into this democratic process will bring more competition on different views and a higher turnout, however we must keep in mind that people below the age of eighteen have other responsibilities to attend too and could very likely vote based on ideas that they see best fit as an immature, foolish minor, or on the ideas their elders put on them. The purpose of this essay will be to emphasis why voting ages should not be lowered, and what could potentially be an alternate outcome to increase voter-turnout besides giving our youth the vote.
As Current Events comments, “They want a candidate to win because of style and looks rather than the candidate's ideas. Some kids only support a candidate because their parents do.” (“Current Events”). This quotation is important because it shows how the mind of a teenager functions and what they would base decisions on. The quotation proves my thesis statement because it shows how their mind works, and that it shows they make their decisions based on impulses. Ronnie Lankford believes, “According to recent studies reported in the Chicago Tribune, adolescents, defined as members of our population in the age group of 14 year olds to 18 year olds, lack a developed mindset that is necessary to make a decision based on facts.” (Lankford). This quotation is important because it shows statistics about what kind of mindset adolescents have and use. This proves my thesis statement because it states that adolescents don’t have a mindset that lets them make decisions based on facts, which shows they naturally make decisions based on their impulses. Another reason why sixteen year olds shouldn’t be able to vote is because they don’t know much about politics or the
Teenagers should be involved in politics and it will help in later generations. Society and its rules are uncompromising and, in some cases, very hard on the younger generations. All throughout life people have always been told they have an opinion on political views. When one wants to be a part of a party, but is not able to chose according to the so called “rule” in one’s house. Is a choice not a choice, and is it not what one who choses what to be, or is it a lifestyle one is stuck with? Teens are opinionated and have confidence that one is old enough to vote. “Some young people believed the only way to engage them would be to lower the voting age to 16. Views, however, were divided about the merits of such a suggestion,...
Before the problem of low turnout can be solved, it must be understood why it is a problem. Essentially, the less people vote, the less representative the government is of the people. If only the upper-middle class turns out at the polls, politicians can concentrate on the issues pertaining to that group of people and tiptoe around more important issues like education and income distribution. Similarly, if young people don't turnout to vote, politicians can ignore their views altogether. It is almost as if they don't exist at all, as long as they don't mobilize and force government officials to listen to them. This causes bills to be passed without any regard for the young voter. It needs to be understood why young adults are so apathetic and why...
Voting is also not an easy task. It takes a lot of effort and research to distinguish which Member of Parliament would be the best to vote for. Some representatives may even come door to door to persuade you to vote or them and since they would be aware that young teens now have a say in elections, they would use their sneaky minds and somehow promise something attractive to youths, possibly a four day school week or three months summer of summer break as opposed to two. Surveys have shown that teens are much more gullible then adults and this could also cause a problem within a group of friends. e.g.(Hey man! Who are you voting for? Umm… The Reforms. All right sounds good to me, I'll choose them too.
Before discussing the improvements that could be made, it is important to analyze why less young people vote than other
While there is truth in the fact that older people are more a custom to voting as shown by the 70% of older people who participated in voting from 1948 to 2012, that was 4 years ago and since then the younger community of people have started to show more intrest in political problems because by the age of 16 those things start to affect us as well. We are starting to realize our real world problems and are becoming more familiar with Americas politics. It's not only
The purpose of this project is to discuss the election system in the United States. For instance, the process for registering and voting in New York State will be described in this paper, and make some possible suggestions to help improve the voting process. Also, a discussion of political socialization is represented regarding the most important factors that influence how the young people gain their political views. Moreover, five unregistered potential voters will be provided with a voter registration card, and asked to fill it out. This paper will record the response from each individual whether they are going to participate in voting. In order to discuss the differences or similarities of the voting participation level between the United States and other countries, we will compare the voting participation level among young people in the US to young people from Canada, Britain and Germany respectively. In the conclusion, this paper will comment on the main reasons that many young people do not vote. We will also talk
Nowadays in the classrooms, social studies class gives an unbiased perspective on the current day politics, which should ensure that the American students are well-taught on our current society and the governmental actions that surround it. According to the Economist, “those who do not take it (voting) young may never start. That could lead to ever-lower participation rates in decades to come.” Basically, this says that if teenagers do not start voting at a younger age, then they will feel as if voting isn’t one-hundred percent necessary, although the importance of voting skyrockets yearly. Although some argue that lowering the voting age is a question of maturity, others suggest more pivotal dangers, like the drop in voting numbers. To explain this further, in this same article, it describes the consistency of a drop in percentage of teenagers voting, and an increase in the over 65 voting percentage. The quote is as follows: “Turnout of American voters under 25 at presidential elections fell from 50% in 1972 to 38% in 2012; among over-65s it rose from 64% to 70%” The point that is being made is that the possible lack of maturity is of the contrary when you think about the future, and it’s possible unfortunate
Many young people think they have the knowledge they need in order to vote. Some of them do. Kids nowadays have there eyes on elections more than ever. In the age of social media teens see everything that's going on in this country. Some kids pay better attention to elections and other news because they’re constantly on social media and see stuff everyday. Social media