Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Personal experience with banking concept of education
Paulo Freire his ideas on education
Analysis of banking education
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Experiencing the “Banking” Process of Education In the essay “The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education”, Paulo Freire examines the way some students are treated as a container where taught information is stored rather than partners in education. This method of teaching is explained as an “act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor” (Freire 1). By using this analogy, Freire is claiming that a teacher is reciting information quickly and the student is acting as a container for the teacher’s information, but is very rarely applying it. Freire labels this as the “banking concept of education”. Freire continues by stating, “Knowledge is a gift bestowed by those who consider themselves knowledgeable …show more content…
Basically, Freire is saying that the banking concept dulls the student’s ability to be actively involved in their own education and are simply there to collect the knowledge that the teacher thinks is worthwhile. The students accept that they must be taught regardless which, they think, gives the teacher a reason to be there.
The banking concept of information is a damaging way to teach students and by using this method, the education system is quickly deteriorating. While the instructors are justifying their own need to be there, little attention is paid to the students. The pupils sit idly by and collect the information which is temporarily stored until they need it. After the students make use of the information, it is replaced but never kept for long.
Countless times I have run across this form of education. However, I don’t recall ever retaining much information or knowledge when it has been used in a classroom setting. Most times when I have experienced this hindering concept, I have been in a math class. Throughout high school, teachers would relay information, claiming that we would need to memorize an exact formula or equation because we would need to use it in our everyday lives. We, as eager students, would try and memorize these long formulas to the best of our abilities, but we were never given a situation in our everyday life in which we would be needing to use this information. Not once were we taught how to apply this to situations in our outside lives, just that we needed to know it for those
Paulo Friere’s essay “The ‘Banking’ concept of education” is a short passage from his book "Pedagogy of the Oppressed" that explains the two primary types of education that exist according to Friere. Friere describes the two types of educating as the banking concept, which is briefly described as the transfer of the knowledgeable teacher, to the ignorant student "Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor." (Friere 1), and the problem-poser, which he describes as two way communication in which the students and teacher both teach and learn from one another "Through dialogue, the teacher-of-the-students and the students-of-the-teacher cease to exist and a new term emerges: teacher-student with
Freire believes that the “more completely they accept the passive role imposed on them, the more they tend simply to adapt to the world as it is and to the fragmented reality deposited in them” (73). Percy claims that this dependency stems from the belief that “sovereignty [must be] surrendered to a class of privileged knowers” (54). Freire believes that due to this loss of sovereignty, the ones with authority attempt to “indoctrinate[e] them to adapt to the world of oppression” (78). Consequences begin to mount as students begin to mold into the world of oppression. Freire’s strongest belief is that, due to the banking system, a student simply becomes “the possessor of a consciousness: an empty ‘mind’ passively open to the reception of deposits of reality from the world outside” (75). This mentality causes students to become constricted thinkers, or mindless robots, only letting the engineer program predetermined ideas that the engineer deems them fit enough to know. “What has taken place,” claims Percy, “is a radical loss of sovereignty” among the students because in the way education is currently being utilized, educators perceive that knowledge can simply be placed into students, however, this method is sorely inhumane
“Education thus becomes an act of depositing, in which the students are the depositories and the teacher is the depositor. Instead of communicating, the teacher issues communiqués and makes deposits which the students patiently receive, memorize, and repeat” (Freire 213).
How do teachers attempt to control the way you understand the world? Paulo Freire, author of “The ‘Banking’ Concept of Education”, declares that “Narration (with the teacher as the narrator) leads the students to memorize mechanically the narrated content. Worse yet, it turns them into ‘containers,’ into ‘receptacles’ to be ‘filled’ by the teacher” (216). Freire’s statement implies that teaching utilizing the banking concept shifts the role of students as learners to robots that receive data and execute orders given by their programmers (teachers) but do not actually recognize the significance of the information. I agree with Freire 's interpretations because even though my role in high school was a student, my continuous encounters with banking
The banking concept is “ a gift bestowed by those who consider themselves knowledgeable upon those who they consider to know nothing'; (Freire 213). The goal of the ‘banking’ concept is to deposit as much information into the students as possible. This results in disconnected memorization without the real understanding and discouragement of creative thought.They cannot think for themselves. As Marx writes, just as there are two types of learning, ‘banking’ and problem-posing, he explains that society is this way also. There is the upper class and subordinate classes. They both struggle for economic and political power and the primary way the upper class keeps its power is through their beliefs and values. They are allowed to think. The subordinate classes believe they are subordinate due to the upper classes prestige and way of thinking. Like Freire’s ‘banking’ concept, education is the way to keep students down and this works because the students accept all knowledge from the teacher, just like the dominant class in Marx’s ideology, keeps the subordinate classes submissive.
In the Freire’s “the banking ‘banking’ concept education.” he interpreted that teacher deposit themselves contains reality to students, and take the concept as if reality although it is far away from our life. This kind of education model led students to adapt the world, but not judges the world personally. T The capability of banking education to minimize or annul the students’ creative power and to stimulate their credulity serves the interest of the oppressors, who care neither to have the world revealed nor to see it transformed (Freire, Pg.217). The process of teacher’s teaching just an information transition, this act make students away from real life and world. Hence, banking education makes people apart from praxis. Apart from the way to be a fully human being in the real
In Paulo Freire’s essay “The Banking Concept of Education” he talks about how in education there is no conversation between the teachers/professors and their students. In this essay there are a few points I do disagree with, such as that there are some class in which there cannot really be any conversation or discussion, for example mathematics cannot be disproven because there are theorems and concrete facts, so teachers and professors have to teach for memorization. Another reason I disagree with Freire’s way teaching is because in the banking concept Freire is against when teachers are just telling students things and they are regurgitating them, but some students learn better using memorization for learning in the class room and also when studying. The next point I disagree with in Freire’s essay is he doesn’t really look at it from the teachers stand point, because in the United States at least the teachers are now forced to only teach certain points in their subject because of all the standardize testing that they now have in place, specifically grade school. The last thing in Freire’s essay that I disagree with is how he seems to kind of put down teachers.
After such a commencement, the author goes on for most of the work indulging in logical proof that the current system of education is not correct, but his ideas are. He does so in numerous ways, starting with making parallel’s between the students and the oppressed races of the world, and the teachers with the tyrants who wish to annul any personal desires of the students. He demonstrates this in several logical progressions, confirming that “the capability of banking education to minimize or annul the students’ creative power ... serves the interests of the oppressors” (214). The author tries to make parallels in the readers mind, which, being human, is against all that bears the name of “evil”, “oppressor”, and the such, to get the reader to feel remorse for the c...
In today's times, apart from having information flying at us from almost everywhere we turn, we also get to sit in a chair for nearly seven hours while someone tries to feed us even more information. Although it is true that our society needs some type of educational system, there is a real problem with the fact that although we are constantly changing and evolving into a brand new world, education has stayed still. In a way, we attempt to teach our children by putting them ...
Memorizing facts gets boring, and students won’t learn and understand. It is proven that students that have deeper learning generally have more success in school ("Deeper Learning: Moving Students Beyond Memorization"). Studies are showing that the lowest performing students across the world are the ones who think math is about memorizing information ("Should We Stop Making Kids Memorize times Tables?"). Memorizing can help you at times, but it benefits you the most if you understand. It helps to understand and not memorize important
The second chapter described the "banking" approach to education in which Freire suggested that students were considered empty bank accounts and that teachers were making deposits into them and receiving nothing back. The banking concept distinguishes two states. In the first, the educator cognizes a cognizable object and prepares a lesson. During the second, he expounds to his students about it. (67) Freire argued that the underclass could be empowered through literacy. He also pointed out that education could be used to create a passive and submissive citizen, but that it also has the potential to empower students by instilling in them a "critical consciousness." (45) Freire wanted the individual to form himself rather than be formed.
(2016) says, “positive transfer to real-world contexts should be a major objective in classrooms at all grade levels” (p. 207). If a student cannot put basic A,B,C’s and 1,2,3’s together they will never advance in grades or be able write their name or say how old they are. This goes for all grade levels. If the students cannot retrieve what they just learned and apply it to real life it will be forgotten. It is easier to apply something the student has learned to something in the outside world to associate it to memory.
Inclusively, the relationship between knowledge and education is dependent on the way of the process as a whole. If education is implemented as dull and uninteresting, true learning is not happening. This passage by Davidson introduces the problems the education system faces with their methods of teaching, provides an explanation on how it came to be that way, and offers a solution to improve the system by conducting an experiment. Throughout this analysis, it is clear that knowledge and education are not the same but can depend on each other if processed
...ts with loads of information and facts is not an intelligent way to educate them. On the other hand, learning without any memorization is ineffective too. We couldn't write great essay if we have difficulty in spelling words correctly. Rote learning may not be the perfect way to educate our children, but same goes to meaningful learning. There is no perfection in this world. Everything has it’s own flaws. ‘I am careful not to confuse excellence with perfection. Excellence, I can reach for; perfection is God's business.’ quote by Michael J. Fox. Owen Feltham also mentioned that perfection is immutable, but for things that are imperfect, change is the way to perfect them. So, rote memorizing should never be substituted. It should be used alongside understanding learning, which both balance up and compliment each other to create a better and effective learning style.
One of my favorite quotes from Stacey Green states, that if we don’t make learning relevant to our students, then they just learn the answer from the test and forget when it is done. (Vaques, Sneider and Comer page 2) When students learn because of memorization and are not engaged and interested in what is taught, the information becomes a victim of your short term memory, where as when it is