More handpicked essays just for you.
The negative impacts of technology on kids
The negative impacts of technology on kids
The negative impacts of technology on kids
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
What would you prefer, your child to watch tv and be quiet or have them learning by looking out the window? This question is important to consider when reading through the passage from “Last Child in the Woods” by Richard Louv, who criticizes how modern children care more about technology than the beauty which surrounds them. Louv uses uses a longing, disappointed tone, sincere diction, and descriptive imagery in order to illustrate how people have shifted away from nature and what the consequences will be if this continues. The tone through the essay remains the same; longing for the old times and disappointed in how people act today. Louv tells this by using a quote from Matt Ritchel “It’s time for nature to carry its weight”(Louv 8). This illustrates that people no longer see nature as a thing of beauty, but just somewhere to stick a …show more content…
logo. The author includes this in order to prove how companies have begun to develop this technique since it is convenient but it will end up impacting everyone in a negative way. The tone of longing for the past is also created when the author is describing the fun of looking outside and how “This was the landscape we watched as children”(54). The author is saying that since they did not have all the technology that we have today, they could appreciate the environment surrounding them. The adults of today understand this feeling but their children will never experience it due to their separation from nature. The author ends the essay with saying how children will be in disbelief when they hear how “we actually looked out the car window” (61). This represents longing because these days are now gone and children do not understand the enjoyment. Louv uses a sincere diction throughout the essay to depict how concerned he is about how people interact with nature today. This can be seen when the author responds to the quote said by Matt Richtel by proving how “corporations agree to affix their company logo on parks in exchange for dollars to keep the public spaces maintained” (13). The author is concerned because people would destroy nature simply to make money. Big businesses are a problem in other areas as well, they promote media systems in cars and “Their target market: parents who will pay a premium for a little backseat peace” (36-37). This expresses concerned diction because the parents are giving into these companies, but it is only hurting the kids in the long run. There is also a great use of imagery throughout the essay to illustrate what today’s children are missing out on.
Even though “the highway’s edges may not be postcard perfect” (47-48) they can still be a resource and a way for people to learn. The imagery offers an excuse some people may use, but even though it is not as “pretty” it is more beneficial than just staring at a screen. Even though kids would be bored, they found methods of entertainment in “[using] our fingers to draw pictures on fogged glass as we watched telephone poles tick by” (63-64). This may not be watching a favorite tv show, but it allowed for observations and being able to learn more about the world. Children who did not grow up with this will not gain “understanding of how cities and nature fit together was gained from the backseat.. The woods and fields and water beyond the seamy edges” (49-53). This illustrates how even though these events may be boring, one can gain insights and learn to appreciate more in life. The description of the woods explains the beauty of nature and tells what those will miss out on when they are distracted by modern
technology. Throughout the passage, there is a great array of situations which explain how our views have shifted on nature and what needs to be changed about that. Louv uses a tone which longs for the past, sincere diction about how disappointed the author is due to how kids regard nature today, and descriptive imagery to illustrate what people are missing out on and why they need to go back to appreciating it.
How could the reader benefit from reading this essay? The author want to make people realise the importance of nature and wants people to preserve environment by saying trees and animals. The author also wants the audience to realise how the people generations before us use to live without the facilities that we have in today’s world.
In my generation, I am able to catch what is relatively the tail end of this slow extinction. And to be quite honest, I had not devoted a moment of thought to this phenomenon until I read Leopold’s passages. In fact, I am always the first one to compliment a new highway project that saves me five minutes of driving or even a tidy farmstead as I pass. Now, more than ever, my thoughts are in limbo. It was just last week when my dad pointed out an area off the highway that displayed miles of slowly rolling cornfields. His reaction was to the beauty of the countryside. Mine was to question his. I found myself thinking about all of the hard work that created that beauty, and then how much more beautiful it was fifty, a hundred, or even two centuries ago. Only the mind’s eye can create this beauty now, and that is exactly why Leopold’s concerns are validated.
Richard Louv, author of Last Child in the Woods, writes about the separation between nature and people now, to nature and people in the past in his passages. He uses many rhetorical strategies, including logos and illustration, to analyze the arguments against these differences. The passages in this writing challenges these differences, and outlines what the future may hold, but also presents so many natural beauties that we choose to ignore. Louv amplifies the illustrations between how people used to ride in cars in the past, and how they find entertainment now. He asks, “why do so many people no longer consider the physical world worth watching?” Louv writes about how children are now more interested in watching movies or playing video games in the car, rather than looking at nature and
In thi sicund cheptir uf Lest Chold uf thi Wuuds, Rocherd Luav mekis thi cleom thet thiri hevi biin thrii fruntoirs on thi cuarsi uf Amirocen hostury. Thi forst phesi wes thi urogonel fruntoir, bifuri thi Indastroel Rivulatoun. Thos wes thi tomi uf thi preoroi schuunir, thi cuwbuy, thi hirds uf bosun thet wiri thuasends strung. Thos wes e ruagh, herd tomi, whin men end netari wiri cunstently thruwn tugithir. Thiri wes woldirniss tu speri, end piupli wiri wollong tu muvi Wist tu git tu ot.
When thinking about nature, Hans Christian Andersen wrote, “Just living is not enough... one must have sunshine, freedom, and a little flower.” John Muir and William Wordsworth both expressed through their writings that nature brought them great joy and satisfaction, as it did Andersen. Each author’s text conveyed very similar messages and represented similar experiences but, the writing style and wording used were significantly different. Wordsworth and Muir express their positive and emotional relationships with nature using diction and imagery.
Man has destroyed nature, and for years now, man has not been living in nature. Instead, only little portions of nature are left in the world
From the lone hiker on the Appalachian Trail to the environmental lobby groups in Washington D.C., nature evokes strong feelings in each and every one of us. We often struggle with and are ultimately shaped by our relationship with nature. The relationship we forge with nature reflects our fundamental beliefs about ourselves and the world around us. The works of timeless authors, including Henry David Thoreau and Annie Dillard, are centered around their relationship to nature.
The rhetorical questions are also an attempt to show readers a potential future in which, “people no longer consider the physical world worth watching.” The question of, “Why do so many Americans say they want their children to watch less TV, yet continue to expand the opportunities for them to watch it?”, is a literal depiction of the flawed logic of the American consumer culture. By contrasting the popular belief that too much TV entails serious cognitive drawbacks against the mass purchase of TV’s and other electronics Louv is able to slow walk his readers to the conclusion that most Americans yearn for the distractions of TV and other electronics, rather than reject them. This rhetorical strategy allows Louv to assert that Americans are constantly contradicting themselves without directly accusing any specific group of people of hypocrisy. The additional question, “Why do so many people no longer consider the physical world worth watching?”, underlines Louv’s main point that people are far more concerned with man made distractions rather than environmental
One strength of his article is that it can easily elicit an emotional response from the more sympathetic readers and outdoor enthusiasts. Duane appeals to pathos when first setting the scene of a day in the wilderness. He describes what it would be like if one had the “good fortune” to spot a Sierra Nevada bighorn sheep in the wild. He writes, “You unwrap a chocolate bar amid breathtaking views . . . the sight fills you with awe and also with gratitude for the national parks, forests, and yes, environmental regulations that keep the American dream of wilderness alive” (Duane 1). For the audience that connects to this emotional appeal, this instantly draws them in to the article and can arouse feelings of amazement and wonder toward the sight described. It can likewise leave readers wondering whether or not this scene is truly so perfect. This statement can also appear too dramatic for those less passionate. When Duane writes, “The sight fills you with . . . gratitude for the . . . yes, environmental regulations that keep the American dream of wilderness alive,” it seems almost untrue, as most people do not think twice about the environmental regulations that keep animals in their
The debate over technology being healthy for our children has been a debate that has gone on for years. It appears as though the tragedy that children are missing out on hands-on nature is definitely something we all must learn to accept. Nicholas D. Kristof hits the nail on the head when he suggest that we try to preserve nature but we don’t promote natural activity such as hiking, biking, camping, and “discovering the hard way what a wasp nest looks like”. Kristof does an effective job getting the point across on experiencing nature and limiting technology. He is a father that is destined for his young daughter to know about the outdoors with personal experimentation. Kristof’s intended audience is geared toward people that want their children and themselves to be involved in nature, but they have been consumed with this technological age.
In the book Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, there are many themes, symbols, and motifs that are found throughout the novel. For my journal response, I have chosen to discuss nature as a prevalent symbol in the book. The main character, Montag, lives in a society where technology is overwhelmingly popular, and nature is regarded as an unpredictable variable that should be avoided. Technology is used to repress the citizens, but the oppression is disguised as entertainment, like the TV parlour. On the opposite end of the spectrum, nature is viewed as boring and dull, but it is a way to escape the brainwashing that technology brings. People who enjoy nature are deemed insane and are forced to go into therapy. Clarisse says “My psychiatrist wants to know why I go out and hike around in the forests and watch the birds and collect butterflies,” (Bradbury 23) which shows she is a threat to the control that the government has put upon the people by enjoying nature.
There are so many distractions in our world today that take our minds from the real world to a virtual one. Richard Louv is one of the many people who admit this. Louv is the author of Last Child in the Woods. In this essay, he outlines the media distractions that turn our minds to a virtual reality. This is especially evident in children. Louv, in his essay, points out that children have so many things to distract them as they don’t have a developed enough mind to truly appreciate nature. In this essay, Louv relates many life experiences to describe the distractions of our world. Louv uses reference Elaine Brooks in this essay. Brooks warns, “True, our experience of natural landscape often occurs within an automobile looking
This paper will critically discuss the ‘disappearance of childhood’ debate which centres on electronic media and consider why such a debate has come into existence. This essay will critically discuss both sides of the debate that is the disappearance proponents and those who are more optimistic about the effects of technology on the lives of children. In response to both arguments, I will propose that there is a new concept of childhood which has evolved throughout history; this concept is one of changing childhoods for a whole variety of reasons. It is noteworthy that these arguments are developed from American and European opinions and do not necessarily reflect the experience of children internationally.
Children growing up in today’s modern technological society are not as active as the children were before the invention of all the new new devices we have todaygadgets . Children growing up under the Amish and/or Mennonite cultures and beliefs are also more active than the children growing up in the modern society are. The bedroom used to be primarily the place to sleep. Today the bedroom has replaced the outdoors as the children’s play area. The bedrooms of today’s modern children are equipped with televisions, game consoles, computers, and miscellaneous electronic toys that entertain them for hours. Children are missing the experiences and values that the outdoors has to offer. “The digital bedroom culture is growing all the time at the expense of the outdoors,” the University of Kent’s Frank Furedi said. “Doing physically challenging outdoor activities teaches children how to deal with risk - and they learn about their own strengths and weaknesses.”(Par. 6 Clarke)
As disclosed in the article, The Impact of Technology on the Developing Child, Chris Rowan acknowledges, “Rather than hugging, playing, rough housing, and conversing with children, parents are increasingly resorting to providing their children with more TV, video games, and the latest iPads and cell phone devices, creating a deep and irreversible chasm between parent and child” (par. 7). In the parent’s perspective, technology has become a substitute for a babysitter and is becoming more convenient little by little. It is necessary for a growing child to have multiple hours of play and exposure to the outside world each day. However, the number of kids who would rather spend their days inside watching tv, playing video games, or texting is drastically increasing. Children are not necessarily the ones to be blamed for their lack of interest in the world around them, but their parents for allowing their sons and daughters to indulge in their relationship with technology so powerfully. Kids today consider technology a necessity to life, because their parents opted for an easier way to keep their children entertained. Thus resulting in the younger generations believing that technology is a stipulation rather than a