Analysis Of King Lear As A Tragic Hero

707 Words2 Pages

In the words of Aristotle, a character must possess four key components in order to make them a tragic hero. First, the character must show his good intentions by any speech or action. In Aristotle’s words, “The character will be good if the purpose is good.” (Aristotle) The second component the character must possess is propriety. Propriety simply means the conformity to what is socially acceptable in behavior or speech. The third component is the character must be true to life. The character acts out of probability and necessity, and not just because of some random traits bestowed upon the hero. The final component in completing the tragic hero persona is consistency. The character must maintain consistency in his or her actions throughout …show more content…

King Lear starts the play as being the aging king of Britain as well as the protagonist of the play. He meets all the requirements to be a tragic hero, except his consistency throughout the play and his propriety. The first big action made is when King Lear divides his kingdom and deprives Cordelia of her share. Lear vanished Cordelia from him kingdom because when he asked Cordelia, “What can you say to draw a third more opulent than your sisters? Speak” (1.1.85). Cordelia truthfully stated the love she had for her father, unlike Goneril and Regan who lied in order to satisfy the king. At this moment King Lear changed emotions instantly from being happy he was going to retire and give his land to his daughters, to absolutely furious causing the vanishing of the youngest daughter in which he actually cared for the most. Before Lear realizes it, Goneril and Regan are plotting against. Lear then practically begs his daughters to stay and they both said no he is not a king anymore therefore they do not have to listen to him. The emotions Lear presents in this play are all over the place. Lear is not inconsistently consistent because for a long

Open Document