Analysis Of Interprofessional Communication

716 Words2 Pages

In the article Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches, the authors go into depth about the ways that all the health disciplines, including social work, can use interprofessional communication effectively and efficiently to make sure that all the patient’s safety, health, mental, and emotional needs are being met. To start off, the article’s introduction states that one of the leading causes of medical error and patient harm is due to ineffective communication of health care professionals. Specifically the article states, “A review of reports from the Joint Commission reveals that communication failures were implicated at the root of over 70% of sentinel events.”(Dingley, 2008). So basically, 70% of circumstances …show more content…

Later in the article it goes on to say that in some circumstances, nurses, social workers, and pharmacists were too intimidated by the physicians to say anything about anything that they were questioning. I believe this plays a role in the systematical hierarchy that may be set forth in the health care professional environment. Another large factor in the ineffective communication between disciplines is that all of the disciplines have varying viewpoints of what the patients need first and last and because of this, other disciplines are unaware of what the group task may be instead of what their personal diagnoses of the problem are. Other factors that were listed in the article are limited opportunities for regular synchronous interaction throughout their busy daily schedules and unpredictable environment as well as differences in …show more content…

This article points out many of the techniques that were talked about in the IPE Tegrity lectures. Some interventions that are used to increase communication skills are provide effective interprofessional communication are the SBAR, team huddles, and multidisciplinary rounds using daily goal sheets. To briefly describe each, the SBAR is a standardized means for communication in patient situations. It asks these four questions, “What is going on with the patient,” “What is the clinical background or context”, “What do I think the problem is”, and “What do I think needs to be done for the patient”(Dingley, 2008). This is used by all health care disciplines, hereby ideally eliminating hierarchy between the physician and the other disciplines. Team huddles are quick pow wows that set the flow of the rest of the day. In the article, it states that these team huddles result inlet interruptions during the rest of the day and immediate clarification of issues (Dingley, 2008). They have specific guidelines to make sure that they run as effectively as possible as well. Lastly, multidisciplinary rounds increase patient-centered communication and include any and all providers involved in the patient’s care. These are primarily focused on open communication, decision making,

Open Document