Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Judith butlers conception of gender is post modern
Gender studies judith butler
Judith Butler's view on gender and sex in his essay
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Judith butlers conception of gender is post modern
Judith Butler makes the argument, in her most influential book “Gender Trouble,” that She also creates the theory that sex is seen to cause gender which is seen to cause desire. Also,gender is a performance; it 's what the gender do at particular times, rather than universal standards of gender, which creates gender. This philosophical difference between universal and performance at particular times and how universal specifications are unsuccessful in capturing the true existence of gender, a philosophical difference that by Samira Sasani and Diba Arjmandi states, “by this view, she regards body as a way of practice of norms through repetition, which has led to the false, misleading and permanent belief of body while still this false belief …show more content…
What’s more, the pictures around the house exemplify that Alex gender performance would be founded on both her sex and identification as a female. This expectation of the audience remains true for less than about a third of the film when the film discloses that they had to move to the coast because of an altercation Alex had with a boy concerning Alex’s body, an event unseen during the film. The presence of the coast is important because they can protect Alex from society, a necessary protection because of Alex’s medical condition of having both male and female reproductive organs, known as “Klinefelter syndrome (KS), which is caused by the karyotype XXY” (Xuqi, Chen 2). After this instance, the presence of both ovarian and testicular tissue created a discourse within her parents, Karken, and Suli, to choose the construction of her gender, which ultimately lead to the choice to raise her a girl. From this revelation, Butler’s theory of gender and her difference between the universal and the performance is critical in finding Alex’s true gender. For example, even though her sex is a girl, her gender does not reflect the same identification because of a premeditated performance force; Alex and this premeditated performance, causing not having control of the situation, as cited by Margaret Frohlich: “as a child, Alex’s ability to determine how her body may be treated is subject to the power of adults, primarily her parents” (161). This adapted gender or forced identification of gender for Alex, by her parents, began to cast doubt and ambiguity towards the true gender identification of herself reflecting a scene near the beginning of the movie: “Liminality is featured as one of Alex’s innate characteristics. In the first scene after the opening credits, Alex, sitting under the front porch of the family home, occupies a liminal
Throughout my reading of Deborah Blum’s, “The Gender Blur: Where Does Biology End and Society Take Over?” I have to admit that I had some mixed feelings. My initial reaction upon first glance, was that the essay was very intriguing. The title was inviting, the topic was argumentative, and the opening was captivating. However, after reading further and analyzing it from a rhetorical perspective, I admit that I was disappointed. Although Blum did indeed demonstrate examples of each ethos, pathos, and logos appeals, filling her writing with facts after facts, the overall writing was not well put together.
In Karen Horney's "The Distrust Between the Sexes," she attempts to explain the problems in the relationships between men and women. She writes that to understand the problem you must first understand that problems stem from a common background. A large amount of suspiciousness is due to people's intensity of emotions.
At birth, we are a blank slate, regardless of gender. We are introduced into a world that wrongly believes gender defines who we are and what we shall be. Everything we see, hear, taste, smell, and feel impacts our minds and how we react. Therefore, behaviors between the sexes are learned from our interactions with the opposite sex and how we, as individuals, see our world. In the literary piece, The Distrust between the Sexes, Karen Horney asks this question: “…What special factors in human development lead to the discrepancy between expectations and fulfillment and what causes them to be of special significance in particular cases” (Horney)?
Reading Chapter 11, “Genders and Sexualities,” written by Carrie Hintz was to construct and enact alternatives for these two traditional categories. Data is clearly indicated that sexual material is some of the most controversial content in literature. Children’s literature that is involved with adolescent’s childhood are key battlegrounds for attitudes about gender and sexuality. The significance of gender and sexuality in children’s literature is the persistent investment in what is perceived to be the innocence of children. Innocence is defined in part by children’s enforced ignorance of sexual matters. According to James Kincaid, “Youth and innocence are two of the most eroticized constructions of the past two centuries. Innocence was that
perspective on the concept, arguing that gender is a cultural performance. Her careful reading of
Feminism in Like Water for Chocolate by Laura Esquivel. There are many different definitions of feminism. Some people regard feminism as the idea that women deserve the same amount of respect that men deserve. There are the other schools of feminist thought that hold women superior to men.
Gender is a performance according to Judith Butler . All bodies, she claims, are gendered from birth; sometimes even earlier now we can determine sex in the womb . For Butler society dictates ones gender and the individual reinforces that gender through performance . “The deeds make the doer” in Butler’s words; there is no subject prior to performance. Butler’s concept of gender, however, leads us to question: what of those who are incapable of performing the gender ascribed to them? If one is unable to perform are they left genderless, lacking subjectivity and social identity? If no human is without gender , as Butler claims, then where does this leave her theory? Either gender is more than simply performance or one can exist without gender.
Judith Butlers book entitled ‘Bodies that Matter’ examines and questions the belief that certain male-female behaviors are natural within our society. The behaviors that Dr. Butler has distinguished between in this book are femininity and masculinity. She believes that through our learned perception of these gendered behaviors this is an act or performance. She implies that this is brought to us by normative heterosexuality depicted in our timeline. In which, takes on the role of our language and accustomed normalization of society. Butler offers many ideas to prove some of her more radical idea’s such as examples from other philosophers, performativity, and worldwide examples on gender/sex. Some philosophers that seem to be of relevance to her fighting cause are Michel Foucault, Edmund Husserl, Maurice Merleau-Ponty, and George Herbert Mead. Her use of the doctrine of constitution takes ‘the social agent as an object rather than the subject of constitutive acts” (Performative). In other words, Dr. Butler will question the extent to which we as a human race assume the given individualism between one another. She has said that “this will constitute him-or herself” (Butler 13). She also wonders to what extent our acts are reputable for us, rather, by our place within dialect and convention. Dr. Butlers followings being of a postmodernist and poststructuralist practice, decides to use the term “subject” rather than “individual” or “person” in order to underline the linguistic nature of her position. This approach should be of credit to philosopher Jacques Lacan because symbolic order gives the system and signs of convention that determines our perception of what we see as reality.
There is an ongoing debate on the issue of gender and some scholars, present gender as being similar to sex. However, according to Butler (270) defines sex as the state of being either biologically female or male; with this definition, Butler refutes the traditional binary opposition amid biological sexes, holding that the conception of binary biological sex is a product of social construction. On the other hand, gender is defined as the behavioral, psychological, cultural traits that are traditionally associated with the binary conception of biological sexes that is either male or female. In the traditional setting, gender or rather gender identity was believed to be a direct expression of an individual’s biological sex, but Butler refuted this assumption
The presence of gender through this the twenty-first century is no longer black and white (nor was it ever explicitly male or female at anytime). In a time of push towards acceptance of all people, no matter their social standpoint, the time of questionnaires and government documents asking whether one is male or female, has become extremely complex. “Gender” as a concept represented through the body is not simply a configuration of how the body formed. Rather, gender is performed and represented through and using the body – hence referring to Waskul and Vannini’s theory of the body being embodied when they state in their piece Body/ Embodiment: Social Interaction and the Sociology of the Body (2006),
Traditional gender roles exist in Gabriel Garcia Marquez’ novel One Hundred Years of Solitude, but traditional distribution of power between the genders does not. In analyzing each character and their life, it’s easy to see how Marquez presented each in terms of his own view on gender constructs. Marquez portrays femininity and masculinity very differently. But why would Marquez choose to make such a clear distinction between the roles of each gender? Marquez sees women as spiritual and overpowered by traditional standards, and men doomed by their own obsessions. Men are wily and therefore vulnerable, whereas women are dignified and durable, and survive for much longer.
Jamaica Kincaid’s “Girl” shows in society how a woman should be placed and what it means to be a woman. A women doesn’t question her partner, instead she is subservient to him. A woman’s duties include staying at home taking care of the children and cooking; while the man works and brings home the money. A feministic approach to Kincaid’s “Girl” points to the idea of the stereotypes that women can only be what they do in the home, they should only be pure and virtuous, and their main focus should be satisfying their husband.
The following paper explores two different theories, gender schema theory and Psychoanalytic theory, which seek to explain sex and/or gender. Both theories that will be depicted throughout this paper has its own orientation towards what gender is, where it is located, and what this means for every day.
In order to grasp the concept of social construction of gender, it is essential to understand the difference between sex and gender. Biologically, there are only two reproductive genital organs that are determinants of sex: the vagina and the penis. Sex is established solely through biological structures; in other words, genitalia are the basis of sex. Once a sex category is determined, gender, a human categorization socially attached to sex, is assigned based on anatomy. Gender typically references social or cultural differen...
Therefore, gender brings is the action through which what it names is brought into being; masculinity or feminism. It is the language that constitutes and construct gender identities meaning gender comes after language. The extent to which a person performs the gender determine how much real a gender is. An outside gendered self or a self-preceding isn’t there; gender identity is not necessarily constructed by “I “or “we”. Social conventions enactments which is due to our retrospective reality results in subjectivity characterised by self-willingness and independence as contended by Butler. From this we learn the prerogative nature of gender identity, is determined by the situation in which one is in like society, contact etc. therefore certain social positions can potentially produce a privileged