Analysis Of Friedrich Nietzsche And Sigmund Freud

1939 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Morality versus ethics essay

Bailey Ott
CC
April 17,2014
Who is to Decide What is Wrong or Right?
Read quickly, Friedrich Nietzsche and Sigmund Freud’s interesting takes on moral imperatives can seem to have indistinguishable views, but there are differences between the two. Where you can find similarities, their explanations and techniques are different. Nietzsche is far more negative in his view of mankind. His personal pessimism might be making his view of the world pessimistic. Nietzsche was mostly concerned with the outer person, where Freud was most concerned with the inner person. Freud is more interested in examining one’s past, analyzing the disturbed psyche, to find the reasons that drive one to act a certain way, and talk through the memories to make life easier so that the person no longer feels overwhelmed by their terrible experience. Moral imperatives are stricken by pain, pleasure, success and failure. The greatest impact on morality does not even come from the mind of the person making decisions, but from society.
Nietzsche was interested in the individual. His book On The Genealogy of Morals was a vision for individuals. He glorifies the individual without the harm principle; the harm principle being the moral standard that constrains the actions of individuals to only being able to prevent harm to other individuals. For individuals and all humankind Nietzsche believes that we should not hold grudges, because it feeds into slave morality. Instead of blaming others, he believes people should change their mental frame, because we can create out own realities instead of letting the world get us down. He says that morality of pity has made Europeans ill (Nietzsche 19). Nietzsche rejects the idea of pity, along with morality based on virtue ...

... middle of paper ...

...e things are always going to be desired by man, which has created a black market in society. Ironically, throughout history those in power who develop many moral laws for society are ones who partake in the underground world of society’s forbidden fruits, which is what troubles Freud and many others.
Both Freud and Nietzsche find flaws with human morality, but Freud is the one who attempts finding a solution. On The Genealogy of Morals is one long story about the triumph of values that should not triumph. Nietzsche believes we value common man for no good reason (Nietzsche 28). Freud in Civilization and its Discontents, attempts to break down how our moral standards have developed from society and our instincts, while attempting to create a solution to salvage civilization, because although Freud is not an enemy of society, he does believe it can be improved.

Show More
Related

  • Compare And Contrast Nietzsche And Martin Luther King

    560 Words  | 2 Pages

    Friedrich Nietzsche was a brilliant and outspoken man who uses ideas of what he believe in what life is about. He did not believe in what is right and wrong because if who opposed the power. Nietzsche was against Democracy because how they depend on other people to make some different or change, while Nietzsche believe they should of just pick the ones that were gifted and talent to choose what to change. Nietzsche also does not believe in Aristocracy because how they depend on an individual person to create the rules or change those benefits for him. As you see Nietzsche did not like how they depend on one person to decide instead of each person to decide for himself for their own benefits.

    Read More

  • Essay Comparing Nietzsche And Martin Luther King

    567 Words  | 2 Pages

    However, Nietzsche’s idea of the powerful forcing their will on common people resonates with me. It is something we see in our modern society, wealthy people seem to have a higher influence over the average American. Examples of powerful people controlling others are found in politics, economy, media, and religion. Common people are lead to think in certain ways that the powerful need them to. Nietzsche said that people will only be equal as long as they are equal in force and talent, people who have a higher social group are more influential in decisions because average people look to them for information. The thing I do not agree with Nietzsche on his view as Christianity as a weakness because religion is a main cause of people’s decision

    Read More

  • Sigmund Freud Civilization And Its Discontents And Primo Leli Analysis

    1322 Words  | 3 Pages

    It can perhaps be inferred from the title that Freud’s work will have a languished tone. When describing the workings of civilization, Freud chooses words with negative connotations, such as “restriction” and “perversion” (Freud 49, 59). He ends the work by bleakly asking “may we not be justified that under the influence of cultural urges…possibly the whole of mankind—have become neurotic?” (Freud 110). He sees no feasible solution to the conflicts between human tendencies and civilization. In Survival in Auschwitz, Primo Levi outlook is despondent and fatalistic. His anecdotes focus solely on the horrible experiences he and his fellow prisoners must endure at the work camp. This tone changes, however, once he begins to form relationships with other men in the camp; he becomes focused on survival and abandons the forlorn tone to focus on survival. As Auschwitz is abandoned and the prisoners left are striving to survive, he recounts that he gave everyone nasal drops of camphorated oil “for pure propaganda purposes…I assured Sertelet that they would help him; I even tried to convince myself” (Levi 168). Instead of wallowing in their state as Sigmund Freud does, Primo Levi looks for ways to be optimistic and instill hope in his

    Read More

  • Freud's Attack On Christianity Essay

    782 Words  | 2 Pages

    of this essay is to identify the influence Marx and Nietzsche had on Freud’s critique of

    Read More

  • The Communist Manifeo And Freud's Civilization And Its Discontents

    1505 Words  | 4 Pages

    In chapter 5, Freud tangentially discusses communism, and why he thinks that it wouldn’t solve the problem of misery. Freud states that, “The communists believe … man is wholly good and is well disposed to his neighbor; but the institution of private property has corrupted his nature… If private property were abolished, ill-will and hostility would disappear among men” (Freud 96-97). He counters the communist ideas by stating that, “In abolishing private property we deprive the human love of aggression one of its instruments…but we have in no way altered the differences in power and influence which are misused by aggressiveness, nor have we altered anything in its nature” (97). To Freud, there isn 't an easy fix for human misery, and suggestions such as communism just serve to direct the problem elsewhere. It seems that Freud lacks a solution and, with World War II on the horizon, concludes with the suggestion that either Eros or Thanatos will need to assert itself, but none can foresee the

    Read More

  • Compare And Contrast Freudis And Nietzsche

    862 Words  | 2 Pages

    “To call either man optimistic about human nature would be stretching a point. They point out flaws, and Freud, at least, attempts to find a means to cure them. According to both, the human spirit simply does not soar, and frustrations and unhappiness continue to keep human nature from finding happiness.” (1)

    Read More

  • The Question of Free Will: Descartes, Hume, and Nietzsche

    2066 Words  | 5 Pages

    Enquiry Concerning Human Understanding. Indianapolis: Hackett Publishing Company, 1993, ed. Print. The. Strander, Brian. “Nietzsche’s Moral and Political Philosophy.”

    Read More

  • William Golding's Lord Of The Flies

    1124 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sigmund Freud was born in 1856 to Jewish Galician parents in the Moravian town of Pribor in the Austrian Empire (“Sigmund Freud” n. pag). During his education in the medical field, Freud decided to mix the career fields of medicine and philosophy to become a psychologist (“Sigmund Freud” n. pag). During his research as a psychologist, he conceived the Structural Model Theory, which he discussed in his essay Beyond the Pleasure Principle. The theory states that the human psyche is divided into three main parts: the id, ego, and super-ego (“Id, Ego, and Super-ego” n. pag). He concluded that the id was the desire for destruction, violence and sex; the ego was responsible for intellect and dealing with reality; and the super-ego was a person’s sense of right and wrong and moral standards (Hamilton, n. pag). Freud argued that a healthy individual will have developed the strongest ego to keep the id and super-ego in check (“Id, Ego, and Super-ego” n. p...

    Read More

  • Human Suffering: Preventing Humans From Achieving True Happiness

    2124 Words  | 5 Pages

    Sigmund Freud took a different approach to the question of human happiness. In an excerpt from his book, which is titled Civilization and Its Discontents, Freud identified what he felt were the three main sources of human suffering. He says “...the three sources from which our suffering comes: the superior power of nature, the feebleness of our bodies and the inadequacies of the regulations which adjust the mutual relationships of human being in the family, the state and society” (Zwann, Junyk, & Zielinski, 2010). That is to say that Freud identified the origins of human suffering in rejecting and controlling our natural human instincts, the limitations of our human bodies, and the conflict between being true to ourselves and being a civilized individual. Furthermore, Freud was of the opinion that though we eventually accept, though are dissatisfied with the first two components of struggling, we are constantly at war with ourselves due to the last attribute. I find that I can agree with Freud on quite a few topics in his discussion, but that a lot of questions are ultimately raised from his thoughts. I plan on discussing and addressing all of these issues in this paper.

    Read More

  • Comparison Of Mead Vs. Mead

    847 Words  | 2 Pages

    Freud believed that a human must go through certain stages in their lives or they will not socially develop to their full extent. He also made claims that a human is always struggling between their human, and instinctual nature. This was a very controversial topic because Freud concluded there was a lack of individuality of the human race. If Freud’s theory was the case then humans would have less of a choice in their life, and are truly slaves to their instinctual nature. While an intelligent figure of his time, I believe that Freud went in the wrong direction when approaching his theory. While humans do have a large amount of urges that he described, the person themselves can choose what to do based not solely on society, but their wants and needs as well. Had Freud been alive today I’m sure that his theory would have theorized much different things about the human nature. I think it is important to analyze the distinct cultural setting behi...

    Read More

  • Explanations of Personality Development

    686 Words  | 2 Pages

    According to Sigmund Freud, what we do and why we do it, who we are

    Read More

  • Nietzsche's Critique of Religion

    1196 Words  | 3 Pages

    Others still have pity for the poor and needy etc. Nietzsche dislikes religion especially Christianity because it encourages and promotes slave morality. Nietzsche says that we should be striving towards master morality, but Christianity has the completely opposite values to those of the master morality. For example, religion wants us to be like slaves and give things up instead of trying to be great. He talks about a slave revolt in morality, which leads to the dominance of slave values over master values.

    Read More

  • The Illusion of the Good

    1562 Words  | 4 Pages

    (1) S. Freud, Civilisation and its Discontents, (trans.) J. Strachey, W.W. Norton Company, Inc. 1961, pp. 71-72.

    Read More

  • The Psychology of Religion: Views from Sigmund Freud

    1256 Words  | 3 Pages

    Sigmund Freud was a psychologist known as the ‘father of psychoanalysis’ who believed that our sense of moral understanding is a result of the conditioning of a growing being.

    Read More

  • Sigmund Freud Essay

    666 Words  | 2 Pages

    Throughout Freud’s time, he came up with many different theories. One of his theories was Life and Death Instincts. This theory evolved throughout his life and work. He believed that these drives were responsible for much of behavior. He eventually came to believe that these life instincts alone couldn’t explain all human behavior. Freud then determined that all instincts fall into one of 2 major classes: the life instincts or the death instincts. Life instincts deal with basic survival, reproduction, and pleasure. Death instincts are apparent after people experience a traumatic event and they often reenact the experience. In Freud’s view, self-destructive behavior is an expression of the energy that is created by the death instincts.

    Read More

More about Analysis Of Friedrich Nietzsche And Sigmund Freud

Open Document