Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on evolution of english language
Essay on evolution of english language
Development of the English Language
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on evolution of english language
In Robert MacNeil’s article “Do You Speak American?” MacNeil discusses how the United States English started to become more diverse through the ongoing changes in the way English is being spoken throughout the States.MacNeil includes different demographics, groups of people and dialects to depict the progress that has come about over the years. With this in mind, he wants people to view this change as a step in the right direction.He aims to persuade people who are against this shift, so they can grow to tolerate and view this growth in a more positive manner. Since this article was published after his show on PBS in USA magazine he aims to convince people who have an above average knowledge of the English language to view change as a progressive …show more content…
Using personal anecdotes allows MacNeil to connect with the opposing audience at a more personal level, thus allowing him to persuade them to understand and see this change in a more positive light. An example of this is in the first paragraph of “Do You Speak American?” he describes a personal instance in where he experienced the subtle changes that American English was going to (306). In this anecdote, MacNeil describes a time a young woman used the word “guys” in a complete platonic and friendly way to speak to him and his wife. The way he uses this example is to show that in modern American English, a word like “guys” can mean anything and not be disrespectful in any way.Putting this example shows the diversity and tolerance that generations have grown to use on a daily basis. Which in return helps explain to the educated traditionalist that change is not bad, especially when it is being embraced by the majority of the American public. Another personal anecdote that MacNeil uses is when he describes the time when he was 21 years old and came to Massachusetts to try to make it as an actor (313).In this anecdote, MacNeil describes an instance in where he noticed that the United States had different forms of spoken English depending on the region one is located. Since he uses an intimate example that shows the audience that America is a country of diversity and acceptance, it helps them connect to MacNeil’s words a lot better, since it reaches the audience 's heart. In other words, he attempts to use pathos, through personal anecdotes to connect with his audience at a more personal level that encourages them to see the positive side that diversity in the English language brings, especially if it was experienced first-hand by the writer. Overall using personal anecdotes allows to the audience to see real emotional instances in where change has been a positive
By using an anecdote at the start of her article the writer directly engages the audience to a familiar person that they feel invested in, this allows them to want to make a change in the issue. Elliot
In the article “Do You Speak American?,” Robert MacNeil is trying to reach the american public, especially those who do not have a complete understanding of the ongoing changes that are happening to the English that is spoken throughout the United States. He uses a multitude of examples to prove this very fact. For one he wants to inform the people that one reason for this change is that average people now have more influence in the way language is spoken.Which to him is a good thing. He enjoys the new evolution that American English has undertaken. He believes that it is a step in the right direction. Another, example he uses are the changes different regions and/or group of people have made on the English language. He uses the different accents and dialect to show the growth and improvement that occurred. Even though, some linguist view these changes as wrong, MacNeil views them as necessary and as something that is unique to the United States. In essence, a necessary growth that only makes the United States grow into a better country. Thus, making it more diverse.
Finegan says this is something “living languages must do”. For me, I was raised in a military home in which we moved to a new region every couple of years. Coming from Germany, moving to Rochester, and then to Lowville, my dialect is a combination of all three speech communities. It is different than my parents, and will mostly be passed down to my children. As I age and move locations it is opted to change again as well. So it is not that I speak differently or incorrect than the rest of my family, my speech community is merely growing and changing as it is passed generation to generation. Richard Lederer stated in his article, “We are a teeming nations within a nation, a country that is like a world.” (150) He was portraying how our country, with a universal language, can be so diverted by each region’s version of the English language. I agree completely that although we all “sing” the same song of the American language, “we talk in melodies of infinite variety.” (150) The way our country was built was by different American regions doing their own work, for example, the south had plantations, where my ancestors were small town farmers who worked with manufacturing in mills and
When we discuss the topic of diversity, half of the class and Jena McGregor will agree that America does not cherish diversity. In Patel's story he supports that America does cherish diversity. Based on the debate, I believe the opposite of the class and Jena McGregor, and I agree with Patel by making the claim that America does cherish diversity.
Bogard first introduces his argument through ethos, using an anecdote to establish his credibility among readers. In his anecdote, Bogard recounts how the night sky looked when he was away from the city’s lights. In sharing this experience, Bogard opens up to his audience, allowing them to trust his viewpoint to a certain degree. Furthermore, his use of personal pronouns, such as “I” or “We” strengthens
It is apparent that there are many types of dialect within American English. The coexisting of two or more languages, either serving together in the same area or servicing different areas, is as old as language itself (Pei 106). This has happened throughout time and appears to be inevitable. It is impossible to believe an entire country could conform to one language, and then only one dialect of that language. Throughout history societies have survived for some time using different languages until these language barriers tore territories apart. It is apparent how, in America, barriers between dialects separate black men from white men even more than physical conditions.
David Foster Wallace, author of the essay “Authority and American Usage*,” praises and advocates for “good” writers who have a strong rhetorical ability, which he defines as “the persuasive use of language to influence the thoughts and actions of an audience” (Wallace 628). To have a strong rhetorical ability, an author needs to be aware of whom their audience is, in order to present their information in a way that will be influential on their audience. Wallace recognizes that an author who applies a strong rhetorical ability will be able to connect with the audience so that they respond “not just to [their] utterance but also to [them]” (Wallace 641). An author needs to take into consideration not just content, syntax and grammatical structure (their “utterance”) but also how their character will be perceived by their audience. A positive tone will make the author seem more pleasant and relatable, whereas a negative tone connotes arrogance and pretentiousness. That is why it is crucial for an author to recognize that an audience will respond to “them” and not just their “utterance,” as an author’s appearance to their readers can also shape how impactful their writing is.
Another difficulty cultures deal with is language and the way people speak. In some cases, people struggle to belong by making changes in the way they speak the English language just to be assimilated. They attempt to use words and letters, as well as body language that fit in the norm; all in an attempt to denounce their original intonation and style of pronunciation. One ...
The statistics of those not speaking English could lead to the idea that English is diminishing in certain sections of the United States. An example of this is shown in the article “Why the U.S. Needs an Official Languag...
...influenced. This correspondence leads to individual growth because it pushes our understanding. As we begin to see the individual as a person and not as an “other,” we can, as a country, grow stronger. Regardless of our growing humanitarian stance towards immigration reform, many Americans still insist on having English as our national language. Though speaking the language would greatly close the distance witnessed in towns like Shelbyville, we must provide methods for language acquisition by working through difference. With the transition towards inclusiveness, an increasingly global perspective should also follow suit.
One example is stating that the Founding Fathers would likely have seen achieving literacy as an important goal. He chose this because the Founding Fathers are generally much important people, and connecting them with MacNeil’s argument against television adds weight to what he says. Another example that MacNeil uses is Yale University law professor Charles L. Black, Jr. wrote: "...forced feeding on trivial fare is not itself a trivial matter.” He used the Yale professor because Yale is a very well respect university and the Yale professor is supporting why watching TV is detrimental to society around
In the article "Why Good English is Good For You," by John Simon, the intended audience is English speaking Americans. Simon stresses the importance of keeping good English alive, and spreading it. He explains how the influence of adults can greatly impact the future of the upcoming generations. Simon makes it clear to the audience, which consists of young adults, adults, and professionals, that language is a daily necessity that should not be used in a way that makes Americans appear illiterate. Simon uses many rhetorical devices such as analogies, personification, asyndeton, and anaphoras to demonstrate the importance of utilizing English in a proper manner. Those who use English must train themselves to exert the language in the correct
The United States has been significantly impacted by migration. The year “2013 had a great impact with 41.3 million immigrants living in the U.S”. Having such a high quantity of immigrants and different dialects being spoken one would expect it to become a norm. However, English is still the main language that everyone is expected to speak and comprehend. This becomes a challenge for immigrants; who are now pressured to learn a completely new language.
Even other influences contributed and played a part in the development to Amerienglish such include: the Chinese, Japanese, Puerto Rican, Cuban and French Canadians. Taking into consideration the numerous divergent influences, it is clear to see why the United States has developed so many variations of Amerenglish, with each “standard” variation serving validity in their own respective
In a sociolinguist perspective “the idea of a spoken standardized language is a hypothetical construct” (Lippi-Green, 2012, pp. 57). They are the form of Britain English and American English that are used in textbooks and on broadcasting. Giles and Coupland observe that “A standard variety is the one that is most often associated with high socioeconomic status, power and media usage in a particular community” (1991, p. 38). Both native speakers and learners of English, where English is taught as a second or foreign language (hereafter ESL/EFL), speak dialect of English in everyday conversation (Kachru, 2006, pp. 10-11; Owens 2012, p.