Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
An essay about story telling
An essay about story telling
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Authors who write creatively find themselves giving purpose for each word they place onto the page. Just as there is a purpose for each word, there is a purpose for each character, each plot twist, and each challenge faced. Lewis Nordan, author of the controversial novel, Wolf Whistle, creates a story about a story. His book is based on the well known murder of Emmett Till, along with the trial, but is not limited to the two events alone. Nordan bases the majority of the novel around the long list of major and minor characters. His purpose for centering the plot around more than just those involved in the murder and trial is to show how racism and violence create the atmosphere of the town. He also shows how those living in the Arrow Catcher …show more content…
community are challenged to change and learn from the death of Bobo, all while creating a sense of hope. The town of Arrow Catcher is full of citizens who have been living the majority of their lives within the city limits. Specifically, Roy Dale. He being on to have never been outside of the Mississippi area has only been exposed to the happenings within the town. He has a mentality that has been created by the atmosphere that the town embraces, along with the stigma that is based on race. He is a young boy still in school and therefore his mind is malleable and he has the ability to create his own opinions, something that he slowly begins to do as his character develops and the story progresses. Roy Dale is a very important minor character because of the changes he shows. At first he is seen as a character that may not provide much towards the overall story, but he soon becomes quite significant being one to first show a sign of individual change. Roy Dale has a conversation with Phillip, and mentions to him that he thinks he wants to start changing himself; “Hey, Phillip, you know what we ought to do, we ought to sign us a blood oath together…that you’ll get you some braces to straighten out them buckteeth and I’ll get my ball shortened, okay…”(page 204). Roy Dale only begins to say this after hearing that Smokey Viner had declared his stance for Bobo’s side. If Smokey Viner had never said his most important four words, “I’m for the nigger” (page 204), Roy Dale would have never been prompted to begin to think about his own change. It shows that Roy Dale was able to see Viner’s opinion as something positive, unlike the other boys they were talking to. Now, Roy Dale did not see what Viner said as something he agreed with towards the murder, but he clearly did take Viner’s proclamation as an example for himself. Smokey Viner showed a great amount of bravery when voicing his opinion and it prompted Roy Dale to be brave enough to change himself for the better. All these actions give the reader the idea that there is a possibility that the town, full of racism and violence, could hopefully change just as these characters have. Smokey Viner may be the most important minor character in the novel. He too at first seems to be unimportant, just the average weird kid that’s found in every story, except he being one who spends his free time ramming his head into walls like an animal. Viner must have a strong head on his shoulders because not only can it withstand his head butting, but he was able to have his own opinion about the the death of Bobo, and even went far enough to talk about his own opinion. He was brave to share his thoughts in a room full of boys who had been raised on the town’s racist ideas, proving his own importance to the story. Viner’s state of mind was different, he was not viewing the world and the situation of the town through race like the others, but instead he viewed it as people and events. He first shows his different mindset when he says, “It ain’t right….Y’all got to be ashamed of yourself, laughing about a boy got killed” (page 205). He didn’t allow the difference in race to change how he felt about a death, and he made it clear that it was not okay for the boys to be making jokes about somebody being murdered, regardless of race. This was far from the social norm in the town, the atmosphere was always revolving around racism and somehow leading to violence. The initial sign of violence within the story pertains to Solon Gregg and his Son Glenn.
Glenn, a young boy living with an abusive father that had created a situation so bad, Glenn decided to take it upon himself to do something to change it. He was the first to take action to try and change a problem, he didn’t just talk about it like Smokey Viner. Glenn’s problem was his father and his solution was to set him on fire to try and murder him, but unfortunately Glenn ended up catching fire. Glenn Gregg is a part of the first few chapters of the novel and his situation shows the reader how things in the town were far from ordinary, and that such a shocking scenario had little impact on the others living in Arrow Catcher. Even Glenn Gregg’s mother talked about the incident as if it was just a normal day, “Glenn poured gasoline, Glenn poured gasoline, right on his daddy’s bed; he was trying to burn up his daddy, when he burned up hisself instead” (page 17). His actions did not go unrecognized because the whole fourth grade class was taken on a field trip to visit him after the incident and the majority of the town knew as well. The act of trying to burn somebody to death is something that is not taken heavily as most violent acts revolving around murder should be taken by the characters and the town as a whole. This leads the reader to believe that violence is something that is common within the town. Having violence present and seen as something normal for Arrow Catcher does not help to provide any hope for the murder trial of
Bobo. Alice Conroy, the fourth grade class teacher, took her students on a field trip to visit their classmate, Glenn Gregg. Alice is not a minor character in the novel, she’s a main character who provides a fresh new way of viewing things to both the reader and her students. She lives her life through her conscience and wants everybody to have the ability to view things in fresh ways such as their raw state. She tries to teach her students to create their own opinions and mindsets, along with not having any pre-judgements towards things. Alice has all her own ideas and an unusual personality which helps for her to stand out. She changes, grows, and learns throughout the story which also helps to show the changes of the minor characters around her. Not only do her changes alone base the idea of change for the whole novel, but they contribute to the overall growth. Her actions and ideas developed as the plot continued and those changes and ideas helped to provide the reader with a constant sense of hope that the town would change for the better. Each minor character had their own role within the book. They gave their own contribution to the plot, whether the contribution can be seen as necessary or not. As the plot progressed the characters each showed their own individual growth as they helped the story gain depth and deepen the plot with each new idea or attitude. Nordan developed all of his characters in the best way he saw fit and created a story around the murder of Emmett Till. His creation of a story around a bigger story required him to make his minor characters stand out. By using the minor characters the way he did, they helped to provide more than just hope that other characters would show change, but also gave the glimmer of possibility that the town could change as a whole. Nordan’s list of characters was lengthy but served great purpose for the novel. Having so many characters to contribute helped to give the reader more to think about in the sense that the murder affected each person in a different way. The people of the town were pushed to decide how they felt the death of Bobo and take a side, which the majority of the town continued to think that it was justified due to living in the atmosphere (influenced by townspeople and the patrons of Red’s Goodlookin Bar and Gro) of racism and violence. They were all challenged to take a stance for what was right, and the few characters who did take their own stance helped to fuel the beginning of the much needed civil rights movement.
Every person has unalienable rights that cannot be deprived from them. This is includes people of any race and any gender. Humans would fight to their last breath to keep these rights; for the reason that it is their right to do as such. They depict themselves as noble knights who protect everyone’s rights from the evil claws of their enemies. However, are we really fighting for others’ needs? Will we actually protect the rights of others to death even if we disagree? We take a self-righteous stance to convince that we are “magnanimous, noble, and unselfish,” when in fact we are only acting so that the views and thoughts of others can better ourselves. In Walter Lippmann’s article, The Indispensable Opposition, he states this clear and coherent argument and uses various rhetorical techniques to strengthen his claim, including: tone, diction, syntax, and literary devices. All these strategies come together to for this logos based essay that is
Authors can make even the most horrible actions, such as Dustan murdering ten savages in their sleep and justify it; somehow, from both the type of mood/tone set in this piece of literature, along with the powerful word choice he used, Whittier had the ability to actually turn the tables on to the victim (i.e. the ten “savages” who were murdered in their sleep). “A Mother’s Revenge” by John Greenleaf Whittier, is a prime example of how authors can romanticize any situation into how they want to convey their
In society it is a person’s duty to teach others what they do not know. People do not need to tell others of their knowledge, but in order for society to function together people must all be taught the basics of reality. In the parable “Allegory of the Cave” the author and philosopher, Plato, uses hypothetical situation, rhetorical questions, and diction to tell his audience that a person’s reality depends on the environment they are raised in, and how it is the responsibility of the ones knowledgeable to teach others so society can thrive with most of the same beliefs.
This motivation and purpose are most evident in the quality of Wexler’s writing, made outstanding by her painstaking awareness throughout the text of, firstly, such fundamental things as setting and the introduction of characters, and, secondly, the overarching threads of, for instance, national and state politics, which set the larger stage for the story. In her text, Wexler briefly mentions a prominent figure in the NAACP, Walter White, noting his biting statements regarding the lynching a ...
Harriet Beecher Stowe’s novel, Uncle Tom’s Cabin and Olaudah Equiano’s Narrative of his Life both endeavor to stir antislavery sentiment in predominantly white, proslavery readers. Each author uses a variety of literary tactics to persuade audiences that slavery is inhumane. Equiano uses vivid imagery and inserts personal experience to appeal to audiences, believing that a first-hand account of the varying traumas slaves encounter would affect change. Stowe relies on emotional connection between the readers and characters in her novel. By forcing her audience to have empathy for characters, thus forcing readers to confront the harsh realities of slavery, Stowe has the more effective approach to encouraging abolitionist sentiment in white readers.
One's identity is a very valuable part of their life, it affects the Day to day treatment others give them which can lead to how the individual feels emotionally. Atticus, defending Tom Robinson, who is an african american man from the plaintiff of the case, Mayella Ewell, who is a caucasian woman, accusing that Tom raped her is supposivly a lob sided case. During the great depression, any court session that contained a person of color against a caucasian would always contain the “white” individual winning the case. The cause of the bias outcome comes from the lawyer of the african american does not try to defend or the jury goes against the person of color simply because their black, this shows the effect of racism to anyone’s identity in the courtroom for a case simply because of race. Atticus, deciding to take Tom Robinson’s case seriously sacrifices his identity as the noble man he is, to being called many names for this action, such as “nigger lover”. He is questioned by
Paul Simon, the musician, once said, “If you can get humor and seriousness at the same time, you've created a special little thing, and that's what I'm looking for, because if you get pompous, you lose everything” (Simon 1). Racism in the 1930s and until the 1960s was a very serious issue. As stated, authors have taken this serious issue and turned it into great pieces of literature. Many of them have truly shown the seriousness of racism in society. Even though, criticism continues. Some critics have argued that Scout, in To Kill A Mockingbird, is an unreliable narrator. This is simply because Scout is a child. They suspect she is too innocent, naïve, and has an unbiased view. However, Scout as the narrator is a reliable choice because she allows the reader to concentrate more on the exterior of situations, she allows the reader to make his/her opinion, and she gives the reader direction of how to cover events and certain actions in the novel. Scout, as a child narrator, helps the reader ‘read between the lines’.
'Young Goodman Brown,' by Hawthorne, and 'The Tell Tale Heart,' by Poe, offer readers the chance to embark on figurative and literal journeys, through our minds and our hearts. Hawthorne is interested in developing a sense of guilt in his story, an allegory warning against losing one's faith. The point of view and the shift in point of view are symbolic of the darkening, increasingly isolated heart of the main character, Goodman Brown, an everyman figure in an everyman tale. Poe, however, is concerned with capturing a sense of dread in his work, taking a look at the motivations behind the perverseness of human nature. Identifying and understanding the point of view is essential, since it affects a reader's relationship to the protagonist, but also offers perspective in situations where characters are blinded and deceived by their own faults. The main character of Poe?s story embarks on an emotional roller coaster, experiencing everything from terror to triumph. Both authors offer an interpretation of humans as sinful, through the use of foreshadowing, repetition, symbolism and, most importantly, point of view. Hawthorne teaches the reader an explicit moral lesson through the third person omniscient point of view, whereas Poe sidesteps morality in favor of thoroughly developing his characters in the first person point of view.
In this passage Dr. King stresses his anti-war stance due to the war going on in Vietnam. He says “a time comes when silence is betrayal,” meaning staying neutral is siding with the oppressor. At the time black people in the south who were anti-war were imprisoned for defying the draft. For King to stay silent while all of these events were unfolding, to him would be a crime. He says wars are an unjust way to settle differences and for our country to be on the “right side of the world revolution,” we need to stay away from immoral activities such as war.
In 1960, a novel was written to outline injustices and racism against those who were innocent, though unfairly judged because of social expectations and prejudiced beliefs. This novel not only presented these issues, but is also considered a revolutionary piece of literature, still being read by many people today, more than 50 years later. The novel, To Kill a Mockingbird, has caused some controversy about the intents of the book and the way certain people or groups are presented. Whether To Kill a Mockingbird as a narrative outshines the issue it presents is a debatable argument. However, I believe that the narrative of the novel supports the concerns exhibited for numerous reasons. In what follows, some of these are presented: the historical
Released in the 1980s, Tom Wolfe’s, Bonfire of the Vanities, slotted itself into a time of great racial unrest and tension. In the wake of the Tawana Brawley and Bernie Goetz affairs, Wolf’s novel seems to foresight the insanity that would befall all following cases of similar topic: the rampant witch-hunt by the media to find a ‘Great White Defendant ’in order to right the racial wrongs of America. Demonstrated by the fate of Sherman McCoy, it is evident that the press played a crucial role in fanning the fires of racism, sweeping all facts aside in order to paint a crime of class warfare that would rack up falsified views and public support. As the novel unfolds, it becomes evident that the McCoy case, rather than having an outcome of lawful
Juries have the tough decision on whether a person is guilty or not, and the judge decides their sentence. Sometimes, a person’s guilt is enough to convict them of a crime, but oftentimes, there is more to the story. Tom Wolfe’s novel The Bonfire of the Vanities follows a cast of characters and their rise and fall in New York. The main character, Sherman McCoy, is a very successful bond salesman who lives with his wife and daughter in their lush apartment. Despite having an amazing life with his wife, he craves more, seeking affairs and more wealth. McCoy’s girlfriend is named Maria, and they both end up seriously injuring a young black man, Henry Lamb, in Sherman’s car. A subplot follows Kramer, a prosecutor who works in the inner city. Kramer
Anderson makes effective use of fantasy to teach a moral lesson. He builds up the story in such a way that the reader does not care for the validity of the incidents. The moral lesson is that the proud and the disobedient must suffer.
this novel to be a racist one. I believe that it was written to show
"Shooting an Elephant" is perhaps one of the most anthologized essays in the English language. It is a splendid essay and a terrific model for a theme of narration. The point of the story happens very much in our normal life, in fact everyday. People do crazy and sometimes illegal moves to get a certain group or person to finally give them respect. George Orwell describes an internal conflict between his personal morals and his duty to his country to the white man's reputation. The author's purpose is to explain the audience (who is both English and Burmese) about the kind of life he is living in Burma, about the conditions, circumstances he is facing and to tell the British Empire what he think about their imperialism and his growing displeasure for the imperial domination of British Empire.