Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of media on culture and society
Effects of media on culture and society
How does the media shape popular culture
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of media on culture and society
Released in the 1980s, Tom Wolfe’s, Bonfire of the Vanities, slotted itself into a time of great racial unrest and tension. In the wake of the Tawana Brawley and Bernie Goetz affairs, Wolf’s novel seems to foresight the insanity that would befall all following cases of similar topic: the rampant witch-hunt by the media to find a ‘Great White Defendant ’in order to right the racial wrongs of America. Demonstrated by the fate of Sherman McCoy, it is evident that the press played a crucial role in fanning the fires of racism, sweeping all facts aside in order to paint a crime of class warfare that would rack up falsified views and public support. As the novel unfolds, it becomes evident that the McCoy case, rather than having an outcome of lawful …show more content…
justice, is the vilification of a white defendant, regardless of his possible innocence, against a black victim in order to avenge social inequality. Although a simple hit and run that would normally pass unnoticed under the noses of the press, the McCoy case blew up into a mass hysteria egged on by the media and twisted by Peter Fallow, a reporter for The City Light. By bending information fed to him by Al Vogel, Fallow manipulates the story to create maximum sympathy for Lamb in the hearts and minds of the public. Such chicanery is particularly evident in a phone call between Fallow and Mr Rifkind, Lamb’s English teacher, ‘“You’re thinking about ‘honor students’ and ‘higher achievers’ and all that, and that’s natural enough, as I say. But at Colonel Jacob Ruppert High School, an honor student is somebody who attends class, isn’t disruptive, tries to learn, and does all right at reading and arithmetic. “ “Well, lets use that standard. By that standard, is Henry Lamb an honor student?” “By that standard, yes.”(Wolfe. ch. 9) When the article is published, Fallow refers to Lamb as an ‘honor student’ destined for college, regardless that from the context of the conversation this is clearly not what Lamb’s teacher meant. This presents the ease and willingness at which the press distorts a story in order to mold it into one that will acerbate racial unrest. Not only will Fallow receive credit as a star reporter on the crusade for justice but also Reverend Bacon and Al Vogel who will both gain fraudulent profit from lawsuits they will file in Lamb’s name. Additionally, Fallow relies heavily on stereotypes to get his point across. Depicting Lamb as a special case, an innocent anomaly in the midst of the typical delinquents found in the ghetto, is eminent for Lamb to be worthy of media consumption. This is incredibly patronizing for the Lamb family as it suggests they would not have been taken notice of if represented in any other way. More than anyone else, Fallow stresses the narrative of ‘poor’ ‘black’ ‘honorable’ Bronx versus ‘rich ‘white’ ‘malicious’ Manhattan. As a result, Fallow effectively sets the stage for a fight of ‘good’ versus ‘evil’ that would evidently have drastic consequences on the lives of those involved, as Kenneth S. Lynn states, ‘The life of Wolfe’s thirty-eight-year-old protagonist, the imperious but hardly evil Sherman McCoy, becomes a hell as a result of the media’s vile eagerness to destroy respectable reputations’. (Lynn) The media has little concern for the truth but rather is driven by the opportunity to tear down Sherman McCoy, ‘the Great White Defendant’ who in their eyes is the representative for the white power structure that is controlling Manhattan. Accompanying the embellished and crooked words of The City Light, Channel 1 invited by Reverend Bacon, displays its own devious influence in promoting the McCoy case. This comes in the form of a fraudulent demonstration at the Edgar Allen Poe housing projects. As the protesters gather it becomes obvious that it is a setup, a publicity stunt staged for television cameras rather than a spontaneous reaction of the people. Kramer watching the action from afar, duly notes the artificiality of the situation in a conversation with Detective Goldberg: “What the hell’s is that?” “That’s the lesbos and gaybos.” “What are they doing here?” “Don’t ask me. The unity of the oppressed, they call it. Any of these groups need bodies.”(Wolfe ch.13) The broadcasters, parallel to Fallow and his way with words, capture misleading footage that is intended to lead viewers to believe the whole ordeal is much bigger than it really is.
In doing so, the media has found yet another way to stir the pot of racial upheaval creating an exaggerated illusion of an angry mob advancing on their victim: the white upper class of New York. However, in reality the protesters have very little heart and show up either for a chance to be on a TV photo op or simply out of curiosity. Additionally many who show up as stated by Detective Goldberg, aren’t even associated with Lamb. Nonetheless, the media doesn’t care; their aim was to make it appear as if the entire force of the population of the Bronx was behind Lamb ready to take down Sherman McCoy and New York. As restated in ‘The Fire This Time’, ‘TV crews ….the curling lip of a multi-racial, multi-ethnic tidal wave of the disadvantaged, in which the varied elements of the city’s historic stability are fated to drown if they have not done so …show more content…
already.”(Lynn) It is at a public meeting in Harlem, where the Mayor of New York up for reelection is giving a speech, that the media’s tidal wave of provoked black versus white anger and resentment comes crashing down.
The Mayor’s audience, a restless crowd consisting mostly of blacks, is depicted spewing slews of racially offensive insults towards him. They accuse the mayor of racism, but ironically, they are the ones shouting the racial abuse at him. This scene is mostly one of obvious confusion, contradictions and racial hatred, however amidst the chaos are a distinct few that are thoroughly enjoying what they are witnessing. As Lynn’s observes, “The TV crews in attendance, their cameras coming out of their heads like horns, are diabolically delighted by the spectacle, “They’re eating it up! They’re here for the brawl!…They’re cowards! Parasites! The lice of public life!”(Lynn, Wolfe. prologue) The media is truly exposed for all their grotesque ways and untalented cheats as they watch in pride as their monstrous creation finally splinters. They have successfully pinned black against white, poor against rich, the Bronx against
Manhattan. Throughout The Bonfire of the Vanities, Tom Wolfe exposes the media’s manipulative and deceptive role in fueling black versus white tension. Sherman McCoy, a rich WASP working as a bond trader, is involved in a hit and run that results in a black boy, who lives in the Edgar Allen Poe project housing, falling into a fatal coma. As the case unfolds, it becomes irrelevant whether Sherman is innocent or not; he has become a sacrifice destined to be fed to the voracious race baited media in order to avenge social injustice. The media, through their twisted ways, gleefully portrays Sherman as a villainous ‘Great White Defendant’, pinning him against an innocent black victim. As facts are swept aside, lawful justice is no longer important trumped by the raging racial madness taking hold of the city. According to Al Vogel, the central issue of the McCoy’s case is, “How much is a human life worth. Is a black life worth less that a white life?’ (Wolfe ch.17) However such a question ineffectively embodies this case for it is clearly a much bigger matter than that of a single life. The whole affair ultimately is not about Sherman McCoy versus the justice system, or even Sherman McCoy against Henry Lamb. The issue has become far bigger than just two people, they are just pawns in a much more important game: Park Avenue versus the Bronx.
Journalist Charles Lane learned about the Colfax Massacre case while he was on The Washington Post case. In his book “The Day Freedom Died: The Colfax Massacre, The Supreme Court, and The Betrayal of Reconstruction”, Lane spotlights the Colfax Massacre of 1873 and the result of that event. Lane gives an insightful and detailed analysis of the conditions in Louisiana during this time of reconstruction, both politically and socially. He describes the death of over 60 blacks as a result of the horrific attack that took place at the Colfax court house. Lane recounts the Federal and the Supreme Court trials and the aftermath of the criminals’ not guilty verdict.
In one incident when a white teenager Deryl Dedman ran over his truck over Black guy James Craig Anderson by passing a racial slur, “ I ran that nigger over” (Rankine 94)(10). This shows the white’s extra ordinary powers to oppress the black community and the failure of legal system
On August 28, 1955, fourteen year old Emmett Till was beaten, tortured and shot. Then with barbed wire wrapped around his neck and tied to a large fan, his body was discarded into the Tallahatchi River. What was young Emmett’s offense that brought on this heinous reaction of two grown white men? When he went into a store to buy some bubblegum he allegedly whistled at a white female store clerk, who happened to be the store owner’s wife. That is the story of the end of Emmett Till’s life. Lynchings, beatings and cross-burning had been happening in the United States for years. But it was not until this young boy suffered an appalling murder in Mississippi that the eyes of a nation were irrevocably opened to the ongoing horrors of racism in the South. It sparked the beginning of a flourish of both national and international media coverage of the Civil Rights violations in America.
...lusions—not only in regards to who the lynchers were, but also in regards to the identities of the victims (230), and, worst of all, whether or not the issues central to the Moore’s Ford lynching have been settled, and are past. In these senses, conclusiveness about these issues encourages falseness, precludes justice, and makes the audience let go of things that ought not to be let go—and this, short of the lynching itself, is one of the greatest possible wrongs (244). It is by refusing to conclude, then, that Laura Wexler achieves the greatest success of her outstanding narrative, and is able to successfully navigates the lies and deception of a muddled historical event by adeptly presenting them in the context of larger historical truths.
The first social issue portrayed through the film is racial inequality. The audience witnesses the inequality in the film when justice is not properly served to the police officer who executed Oscar Grant. As shown through the film, the ind...
In the end, justice was served where it was due, but not without the intense prejudice and discrimination that rocked a nation. Works Cited Dufresne, Marcel (October 1991). "Exposing the Secrets of Mississippi Racism". American Journalism Review. The.. Evers-Williams, Myrlie; Marable, Manning (2005).
Touching upon one specific case of this growing problem, she incorporates “Michael Brown,” who was an “18-year old unarmed black man shot down by a white police officer.” As heartbreaking as it sounds, it has happened on several occasions to men similar to “Michael Brown.” Accordingly, Myers formulates that it “is the same story. It is just different names.” Myers logically lists the other names of several black men who unfortunately fell victim to hate crimes, (Amadou Diallo, Sean Bell, Oscar Grant, Trayvon Martin), as well as flashing their images on the screen. Not only does Verna Myers use imagery in order to show that there is an evident issue with brutality and racism, but she knows it will tug on her viewers heartstrings. Likewise, this makes her audience become wary and sympathetic towards the situation at
The article “Lynch Mob: A Misuse of Languages” feels the catalyst of the Baltimore Riots was the angst, frustration and sadness felt by the unanswered questions of how the life of yet another young person of color was taken after an encounter with police officers. The author also defines the Baltimore Riots as “not a lynch mob”. He states that the continued invocation of the term ‘lynch mob’ to mean a protest of the killing of people of color is an egregious use of the word, a slander of the citizens who are protesting and moreover, a diminutive of the horrible history of lynch mobs in this country and especially in Maryland. “Nothing that political partisans or protesters have done — nothing! — comes remotely close to the barbarism executed
As Elie Wiesel once stated, “I swore never to be silent whenever and wherever human beings endure suffering and humiliation. We must always take sides. Neutrality helps the oppressor, never the victim. Silence encourages the tormentor, never the tormented” (“Elie Wiesel Quote”). Michelle Alexander’s book The New Jim Crow, which discusses criminal justice and its role in mass incarceration, promotes a similar idea regarding silence when America’s racial caste system needs to be ended; however, Alexander promotes times when silence would actually be better for “the tormented.” The role of silence and lack of silence in the criminal justice system both contribute to wrongly accused individuals and growing populations behind bars.
This incident would have produced nothing more than another report for resisting arrest had a bystander, George Holliday, not videotaped the altercation. Holliday then released the footage to the media. LAPD Officers Lawrence Powell, Stacey Koon, Timothy Wind and Theodore Brisino were indicted and charged with assaulting King. Superior Court Judge Stanley Weisberg ordered a change of venue to suburban Simi Valley, which is a predominantly white suburb of Los Angeles. All officers were subsequently acquitted by a jury comprised of 10 whites, one Hispanic and one Asian, and the African American community responded in a manner far worse than the Watts Riots of 1965. ?While the King beating was tragic, it was just the trigger that released the rage of a community in economic strife and a police department in serious dec...
A Look Into the Chicago Race Riots The Civil War was fought over the “race problem,” to determine the place of African-Americans in America. The Union won the war and freed the slaves. However, when President Lincoln declared the Emancipation Proclamation, a hopeful promise for freedom from oppression and slavery for African-Americans, he refrained from announcing the decades of hardship that would follow to obtaining the new “freedom”. Over the course of nearly a century, African-Americans would be deprived and face adversity to their rights.
The Chicago riot was the most serious of the multiple that happened during the Progressive Era. The riot started on July 27th after a seventeen year old African American, Eugene Williams, did not know what he was doing and obliviously crossed the boundary of a city beach. Consequently, a white man on the beach began stoning him. Williams, exhausted, could not get himself out of the water and eventually drowned. The police officer at the scene refused to listen to eyewitness accounts and restrained from arresting the white man. With this in mind, African Americans attacked the police officer. As word spread of the violence, and the accounts distorted themselves, almost all areas in the city, black and white neighborhoods, became informed. By Monday morning, everyone went to work and went about their business as usual, but on their way home, African Americans were pulled from trolleys and beaten, stabbed, and shot by white “ruffians”. Whites raided the black neighborhoods and shot people from their cars randomly, as well as threw rocks at their windows. In retaliation, African Americans mounted sniper ambushes and physically fought back. Despite the call to the Illinois militia to help the Chicago police on the fourth day, the rioting did not subside until the sixth day. Even then, thirty eight
In John Grishams’ (1996) film “A Time to Kill” issues surrounding the racism in the Deep South take place and based on a true life experience of John Grisham. The novel, like the movie, opens with a very brutal rape scene. It’s the socio-politics that give this film an energetic and confrontational feel of southern racial politics. Racism was still very strong even some 20 years after the civil war (Ponick 2011). Hollywood and John Grisham wanted to make bold statement about racism and they accomplished this in the closing argument of the courtroom scene.
The court scenes that Kramer is part of reveal the disgusting habits behind prosecuting minorities and the vulnerable. However, that changes once Sherman McCoy is brought to court. Tom Wolfe’s novel The Bonfire of the Vanities criticizes the way the media, society, and the judicial system treats minorities compared to how they treat those in power using themes of greed and white male vanity.
In this narrative essay, Brent Staples provides a personal account of his experiences as a black man in modern society. “Black Men and Public Space” acts as a journey for the readers to follow as Staples discovers the many societal biases against him, simply because of his skin color. The essay begins when Staples was twenty-two years old, walking the streets of Chicago late in the evening, and a woman responds to his presence with fear. Being a larger black man, he learned that he would be stereotyped by others around him as a “mugger, rapist, or worse” (135).