Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media stereotyping and prejudice
Media stereotyping and prejudice
Media stereotyping and prejudice
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Media stereotyping and prejudice
Juries have the tough decision on whether a person is guilty or not, and the judge decides their sentence. Sometimes, a person’s guilt is enough to convict them of a crime, but oftentimes, there is more to the story. Tom Wolfe’s novel The Bonfire of the Vanities follows a cast of characters and their rise and fall in New York. The main character, Sherman McCoy, is a very successful bond salesman who lives with his wife and daughter in their lush apartment. Despite having an amazing life with his wife, he craves more, seeking affairs and more wealth. McCoy’s girlfriend is named Maria, and they both end up seriously injuring a young black man, Henry Lamb, in Sherman’s car. A subplot follows Kramer, a prosecutor who works in the inner city. Kramer …show more content…
is a relatively poor man, who does not have a lot of power or influence; however, he still strives to become famous. Later, he is chosen for the court case about the hit-and-run on Henry Lamb.
The court scenes that Kramer is part of reveal the disgusting habits behind prosecuting minorities and the vulnerable. However, that changes once Sherman McCoy is brought to court. Tom Wolfe’s novel The Bonfire of the Vanities criticizes the way the media, society, and the judicial system treats minorities compared to how they treat those in power using themes of greed and white male vanity. Sherman McCoy’s actions promote the theme of the negative consequences associated with vanity and egotism. Sherman McCoy continues an affair despite having a loving wife and daughter. Sherman leaves his apartment under the pretense of walking his dog, his true motive is seeing Maria, and he grabs a payphone to call her. Sherman realizes he has called his wife, “The woman said: ‘Sherman? Is that you?’ Christ! It’s Judy! He’s dialed his own apartment! He’s aghast-paralyzed!” (40). Sherman feels no remorse at what he is doing towards his family, and quickly shrugs off the incident saying he will deny the call to his wife. Sherman’s greed has led him to conduct an affair, because he is no longer happy with his wife, just because of her age. While having an affair is bad enough on its own, it is the …show more content…
catalyst that destroys Sherman’s life. Because of his vanity, he is with Maria, who then causes the death of Henry Lamb. It is safe to assume that if he could have been happy with what he had in life, that he would not be associated with Henry Lamb at all. Sherman’s ego only makes matters worse for him during the investigation into the murder of Henry. Because Sherman believes he is better than everyone, he upsets the investigating police officers. He convinced himself he is some great power, a “master of the universe”, but really he is not. “Time to cut it off, assert himself. But what tone to take? These two were connected by an invisible line to a dangerous …Power” (668). Sherman does not allow them to view his car, because he does not want them to know he had been driving the night of Henry Lamb’s incident. Sherman’s actions have caught up to him. His vindictive attitude led him to be rude towards everyone who he viewed as below his. One of these people is Dan, the garage attendant who would gladly give information about Sherman. Sherman cannot trust anyone in his life, and he realizes at this point that he is truly alone. The attitudes that made him rich; the greed and avarice, are the same ones that turns people against him. As Sherman begins collapsing in upon himself, the consequences of white male vanity are shown. Sherman’s fate compares the results of his actions towards others, making his punishment justified.
As Sherman’s life is turned upside down, he needs to deal with the convictions charged against him. His means he needs to reveal his mistress was driving the car at the time, forcing him in a tough situation. First, he tells Judy, his wife everything that happened that night, revealing his affair. This permanently damages their relationship, and she takes their daughter, Campbell and leaves. He is then forced to wear a wire when he meets with Maria in hopes of recording her admitting to driving the car. She moves to hug him, feeling the wire, and exiles him from her home. “’That’s right, run! Drag your tail between your legs!’ It was true. Hobbling down the stairs with the tape deck dangling ignominiously down his back-side” (1261). Tom Wolfe carefully documents Sherman’s fall, and the sequence of events adds to the theme of the work. Slowly, over time, Sherman has been losing his friends and family, obsessing over work. Material objects are the only things that are important to Sherman, and if he lost his money first, he would realize the value of his family. Instead, he focuses on money, so losing his wife and daughter hurt less. Eventually, he loses his mistress too, leaving him with nobody, and he faces the trial alone and despairing. After the trial, and his revealed innocence, he loses his money as well. Only at that point does he begin to value relationships. “At one
point, Mr. McCoy looked toward his wife, smiled slightly, and raised his left hand in a clenched-fist salute” (1382). This is reference to when Sherman and Judy first met, and Sherman was just a young man, trying to be an individual in the terrifying bond business. His attempt to rekindle their relationship is a foil to the earlier Sherman. There is nothing of monetary value that he can gain by being with Judy, which is different than before, where Sherman would only look for new objects and more money. His wife and family were just a side part of his life, and now that he is broke and isolated, he finally values them. The ironic twist is that now it is too late for repair. Lawyer Samuel Pillsbury comments on punishment, “The first and perhaps hardest question for any modern theory of deserved punishment is whether free choice is possible. The answer involves the interrelationship of three fundamental concepts: reason, cause, and freedom” (Pillsbury 723). While from a free will aspect, McCoy was free to reveal to the police that Maria hit Henry Lamb, because of his previous actions, he can no longer do that. Since he cannot discuss the actions to his wife, the only person he can be influenced by is Maria, who is looking out for herself. So, Sherman is not truly free at all, he is quite oppressed. This is all his fault, and he has nobody else to blame but his greed. Lawrence Kramer’s character arc is a perfect example of how constantly wanting more can cause one’s downfall. Lawrence Kramer is a lawyer who works for the city as a prosecutor. While initially he wants to stand up for what is right, he caves to materialism in the city and lust for a woman on the jury of one of his cases. “What holds him from pressing his lips upon those lips with brown lipstick?” (64). Again, another character has fallen to wanting other women besides his wife. Kramer is by no means rich, and he is constantly shown what life is like for richer men, being part of city life. The similarities between Sherman and Kramer are astounding, despite only Kramer being impoverished, they both obsess over power and influence. Kramer uses the court systems as an outlet to push his frustration and “assert his dominance”. He is remorseless on a court case where a man fired a weapon in self-defense. However, he is not working on the side of justice, instead, he is showing off. He wants to prove himself to the “girl with brown lipstick”, Shelly. His toxic attitude has changed his once pristine morals, much like the city of New York has changed. His relationship with Shelly begins, and he takes her out to lunch. As he talks, he begins an egocentric monologue, “The words were gushing out, in torrents, all the marvelous things about his bravery and talent for the fray that he had no one to tell about” (545). His idealistic nature for himself projects an image that he wants people to see. He wants people to see him as a defender of the innocent, someone who locks up evil. The irony is that in cultivating this image for himself, he ends up losing sight of what it really means. This draws him further and further away, until he is willing to commit perjury. Kramer’s character arc from an honorable lawyer, to an absorbed egocentric maniac is the cause of his downfall.
Regardless of a personal dislike of reading about history, the book was captivating enough to get through. Ann Field Alexander, author of “Race Man: The Rise and Fall of the ‘Fighting Editor,’ John Mitchell Jr”, explains the hardships of a black male activist in the same time period as Lebsock’s novel. The main character Mitchell was president of a bank and ran for a political office, but was tried with fraud. After Mitchell was sentenced as guilty, the case was found faulty and was dismissed. Mitchell was still bankrupt and full of shame when he died. On the same subject of Lucy Pollard’s death, “Murder on Trial: 1620-2002”, written by Robert Asher, included the Pollard murder in chapter three of the novel. The aspect that any well written historically based novel brings to its readers is the emotion of being involved in the development and unraveling of events. As was said before, one who enjoys a steady but often slow novel that sets out a timeline of events with more than enough information to be satisfactory, then “A Murder in Virginia” is a riveting
The purpose of this essay is to compare three very similar cases, the Scottsboro Trials, Brown v. Mississippi, and the fictional trial of Tom Robinson in Harper Lee’s To Kill a Mockingbird; and to prove why the defendant of the third trial never had a chance. Each took place in the rural South in the 1920’s and 30’s and involved the unfair conviction of young black males by all-white juries pressured by the threat of mob violence. Each lacked the evidence sufficient for conviction, most especially for the death penalty. Last, heroes emerged from each trial and made small but solid steps towards equal justice for all.
Today in Maycomb County, there was a trail against a local African American man named “Tom Robinson.” He was accused for raping and beating up a white girl named “Mayella.” His lawyer is “Atticus Finch” is facing off against “Mr. Gilmer” the district attorney. Judge Taylor, appears to be sleeping through out the trial, yet pays attention and tends to chew his cigar. The supposed crime occurred in Mayella’s home, when Tom Robinson went to fix something and then he raped her.
Revenge, the abuse of authority and the desire for power are all present in both Arthur Miller’s play The Crucible and the case regarding the West Memphis Three.
In the book, “To Kill a Mockingbird,” a lawyer named Atticus Finch attempts to convince a jury that a Negro should be found innocent in a case of lies and prejudice. The Negro, Tom Robinson, was sent to court because a man, Robert Ewell, accused Tom of raping his daughter, when in fact, he beat his own daughter for trying to kiss Tom. Atticus strives to change the stereotypical minds of the jury by looking past race. Atticus uses ethos, connotation, and a simile to challenge the jury’s pre-existing minds about race.
...r as if they were in the courtroom of a murder trial. In some ways, the use of advanced diction could cause problems for the reader to comprehend it, however the author has worked in small descriptions of what some of the more advanced judiciary terms are. Finally, the author uses a very advanced characterization of virtually all the characters mentioned within the story, from the mature and well-respected Theodore Boone to the every-so opinionated office secretary Elsa. Without a doubt, Theodore Boone: Kid Lawyer entices the reader into the mystery that is will Mr. Duffy be proved innocent or guilty? John Grisham does a great job into hooking the reader into wanting more of this eye-opening crime and drama novel.
Perseverance pushes people towards what they believe in, a person’s perseverance is determined upon their beliefs. A person with strong beliefs will succeed greater to someone who does not. In the novel Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, Guy Montag perseveres against society as well as himself in order to demolish censorship. Perseverance embraces values and drives people closer to their goals.
One's identity is a very valuable part of their life, it affects the Day to day treatment others give them which can lead to how the individual feels emotionally. Atticus, defending Tom Robinson, who is an african american man from the plaintiff of the case, Mayella Ewell, who is a caucasian woman, accusing that Tom raped her is supposivly a lob sided case. During the great depression, any court session that contained a person of color against a caucasian would always contain the “white” individual winning the case. The cause of the bias outcome comes from the lawyer of the african american does not try to defend or the jury goes against the person of color simply because their black, this shows the effect of racism to anyone’s identity in the courtroom for a case simply because of race. Atticus, deciding to take Tom Robinson’s case seriously sacrifices his identity as the noble man he is, to being called many names for this action, such as “nigger lover”. He is questioned by
The first social issue portrayed through the film is racial inequality. The audience witnesses the inequality in the film when justice is not properly served to the police officer who executed Oscar Grant. As shown through the film, the ind...
One of the major events in Harper Lee’s award-winning novel To Kill a Mockingbird is Tom Robinson’s trial. It is based on the Scottsboro Case that took place in 1931 in Alabama, in which several black men were accused of raping two white women. Both the Scottsboro Boys and Tom Robinson are unfairly judged, however, because of prejudice against colored people. The racial discrimination makes whites’ testimony more believable even when it contradicts itself. The same happens in To Kill a Mockingbird. As we delve deeper into the case and get increasingly closer to the truth, it is quite suprising to see that Mayella Ewell is the true villain rather than a victim. She shall and must bear full responsibility for her actions because she makes the decision to tempt Tom Robinson, gives false testimony in court that directly leads to Tom’s death, and has been well aware of the consequences of her behaviors.
In the tale Barn Burning, the author William Faulkner formally known for his short stories with a constant theme of Southern Renaissance, racism and modernism uses these themes as a constant reference throughout the story. Faulkner focuses in depth on the antagonist, Abner Snopes and his actions and how they impact other characters throughout the story. I believe Abner was continuously portrayed as a negative character throughout the short story by Abner’s aggressiveness towards everyone he comes in contact with, Faulkner’s depiction of Abner’s selfishness, and his jealousy for those around him and what he did not have.
In the book Fahrenheit 451 the theme is a society/world that revolves around being basically brain washed or programmed because of the lack of people not thinking for themselves concerning the loss of knowledge, and imagination from books that don't exist to them. In such stories as the Kurt Vonnegut's "You have insulted me letter" also involving censorship to better society from vulgarity and from certain aspects of life that could be seen as disruptive to day to day society which leads to censorship of language and books. Both stories deal with censorship and by that society is destructed in a certain way by the loss of knowledge from books.
The Dark Tower – Stephen King The Dark Tower is a series of stories that follow the main character, Roland "The Last Gunslinger", as he travels across a harsh desert on a mission to find the "man in black". His mission is to make it safely to the Tower in order to save himself and the very existence of the universe. The entire series revolves around the tower and how essential it is. The tower is a central point where different planes of existence merge and if Roland doesn't make it there before it gets destroyed then everything else will be destroyed along with it.
... It should be understood that Morrison's novel is filled with many characters and many examples of racism and sexism and the foundations for such beliefs in the black community. Every character is the victim or aggressor of racism or sexism in all its forms. Morrison succeeds in shedding light on the racism and sexism the black community had to endure on top of racism and sexism outside of the community. She shows that racism and sexism affect everyone's preconceived notions regarding race and gender and how powerful and prevalent the notions are.
While Sherman is having the affair with Maria, there is no thought that his wife Judy would leave him. Sherman has the image of himself as "the Master of the Universe", which gives off the impression that he is able to do whatever he pleases without any consequences. Sherman is taught to love himself which goes a little too far and he thinks he should indulge every whim. Sherman keeps wanting more, but it will never be enough to satisfy his sense of entitlement. By acting superior over everyone, even his wife refuses to be by his side while he goes through his trial and jail time. When in need, the most important person in his life is not showing sympathy or helping him while he is being destroyed. Judy and Sherman eventually separate after the scandal, but he continues to try to win her back. As Sherman was lying in bed realizing that he was going to be put in jail, he wanted Judy next to him and "he would have put his arms around her and held on for dear life. He wanted to embrace her, longed for it “(Wolfe, 427). Sherman is finally realizing that he should have never took advantage of Judy by having a mistress, but since he was the "Master of the Universe" , he had anything what at his fingertips. Before Sherman was charged with the crime, he never needed Judy, but after Maria led the police to believe that the crime was Sherman's fault, he realizes that Judy was a true women that he took