Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Refugee Problems Introduction, Body, conclusion
Immigrants assimilating into American society
Refugee Problems Introduction, Body, conclusion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Refugee Problems Introduction, Body, conclusion
There are many oppressive factors that exist in contemporary Canadian society that disadvantages and often alienates refugees. These oppressive factors exist in social, religious, cultural, political, and economic spheres within society. There are many political barriers that exist that oppress and limit the amount of refugees that can safely flee to Canada. An example of political and social barriers that inhibit the admission of refugees is increased border security. Border security has reached a point where it is too difficult for some refugees to safely flee a harmful environment, and this violates international law which outlines that each state has to respect an individual’s right to seek refuge in any nation. Implementing more restrictive …show more content…
This has caused a decrease in refugees since 2009 (textbook). This impacts the practice of social work with refugees, because social workers cannot help refugees if they are discouraged from being admitted into Canada, and if the refugee does make it to Canada, political and social barriers exist from the very start that alienate refugees from the larger Canadian society. Furthermore, another political and social form of oppression is that some members of the Canadian public, specifically politicians and the media, have represented some refugees as “safer” to the Canadian public. Specifically, that refugees who come to Canada straight away out of fear, are inferior and abuse Canada’s refugee system (textbook). This is a form of social oppression that alienates refugees from mainstream Canadian society, and labels them as “bad”. This is another oppressive factor surrounding refugee’s access to claim refuge in Canada, because certain refugees are deemed “acceptable” while others are not, all based on how they seek refuge and leave dangerous …show more content…
For a large portion of history, Canadian legislation on refugees banned certain individuals from finding asylum in Canada. Specifically, individuals who were previously seen as a burden on social welfare were refused access into Canada. This proves that national policies, as well as social welfare legislations, saw refugees as a burden on social welfare (textbook). To clarify, refugees were being seen as a waste of social welfare resources, and policies were put into place that legitimized this negative viewpoint of refugees. This shows that the discrimination and oppression of refugees was present even in a system that was set up to help all members of Canadian society, including those that come to Canada seeking asylum. Therefore, the development of social welfare with refugees in Canada started off as labelling refugees as a “burden”, and there are still examples of this mindset in current policies and practices of social work with refugees. Such as the fact that refugees face extreme barriers in accessing health and social services (voices article). This is due to many factors, including the individual and systematic discrimination refugees face that might deter them from wanting to receive help, as well as prejudicial behaviors by health and social service organizations (textbook). Furthermore, there are political barriers that exist that
Historically, Canada has held a world renowned reputation as nation with a magnanimous ideological approach to providing asylum to those individuals subjected to marginalization and persecution in their homeland – regardless of their nation of origin (Ismaili, 2011, p.89 & 92). Indeed, providing sanctuary to refugees who would otherwise experience significant hardships ranging from blatant discrimination and racism to torture and genocide, has very much become an institutionalized aspect of Canadian society. However, recent changes to Canada’s immigration policy delineated in the Immigration and Refugee Protection Act and Bill C-31 may have perhaps put this ideology in peril (Immigration and Refugee Protection Act, 2001).
...a’s immigration policy becoming fairer. From 1991-1997, 607 Rwandan refugees were allowed into Canada. From 1992-1997, close to 13,000 thousand Bosnian refugees were allowed into Canada. The acceptance of these refugees from Bosnia and Rwanda show how much Canada’s immigration policy has changed since 1914, when many immigrants and refugees trying to enter Canada were rejected.
Stakeholders: Three of the most affected stakeholders in this situation are the Syrian refugees, Canadian citizens and the Canadian government. The Syrian refugees need a place to go as they are fleeing from their dangerous country. The Canadian citizens also are important stakeholders because they are the ones that are paying for the government funding and also they are the ones who will be feeling the effects of Syrian refugees in Canada. The Canadian government is also a stakeholder in the arrival of Syrian refugees because they are hoping to increase the population to increase the amount
Downey, Michael. “Canada’s ‘Genocide’: Thousands Taken from Their Homes Need Help.” Acting on Words: An Integrated Rhetoric, Research Guide, Reader, and Handbook. Ed. David Brundage, Michael Lahey. Toronto: Pearson Canada Inc., 2012. 445-448. Print.
Right now Canada is facing immigration numbers that we have not seen in years and how we welcome and process these immigrants into our society will decide if they pass or fail. The article written by Sana Malik Arriving in a Place Where Almost No One Looks Like You and the study Immigrants’ perceptions of quality of life in three second- or third-tier Canadian cities done by a collaboration of Canadian scholars from across the country. They take a look at immigrant life, what it is like for them after moving, and some of the challenges that they face. Sana Malik’s article talks about her journey as an immigrant coming to Canada in 1993, and settling in Cape Breton. Her Pakistani family came over together and were welcomed by a small group of
The conditions of Australia’s immigration detention policies have also been cause for concern for probable contraventions of Articles 7 and 10 of the ICCPR. Whilst in Sweden, asylum seekers are afforded free housing whilst their applications are being processed, Australia’s methods are much more callous. Under the Pacific Solution, maritime asylum seekers are sent to impoverished tropical islands with no monitoring by human rights organisations allowed (Hyndman and Mountz, 2008). The UNHCR criticised Australia’s offshore processing centres stating that “significant overcrowding, cramped living quarters, unhygienic conditions, little privacy and harsh tropical climate contribute to the poor conditions of… Nauru and Papua New Guinea” (Morales
Every year, over 250,000 people make Canada their new home. Attracted by its education system, economy and universal healthcare system, there are few other places in the world like it. All Canadians are guaranteed equality before the law and equality of opportunity, regardless of where they are from. However, some might argue that Canadian policy has not been put into practice as well as it should be. Is the concept of true equality a far-fetched idea? It seems that Canada has taken great measures to promote the integration of immigrants socially, but can the same be said for their integration economically? Politically? To judge whether or not Canada has been successful at promoting the integration of immigrants in these realms, a deeper understanding of Canadian policy must be considered.
During the month of October, Canada’s political scene was very busy due to the 2015 federal election held on the 19th. Throughout the previous months, the public held great interest towards the campaigns of each party as well as their platforms in order to choose the party that the public wanted as the new government of Canada. In the campaigns, a major topic that was included in every party’s plan was the Syrian refugee crisis that is currently an issue in many countries around the globe. This crisis has taken the media by storm and is a concern for many citizens in Canada. As a country known to be peaceful and generous, many people would assume that Canada would be one of the first to step in and help those in need but that is not the case. The general population does not know that the current laws in place make becoming a refugee in Canada a long and unfair process. Acquiring refugee status in Canada, protecting Canada’s Immigration System Act, health care for refugees and the current stance of Canada in regards to the refugee crisis are all factors that the general public must be more aware about. The current laws regarding refugees of Canada must change.
In this essay, I will be talking about social work problems faced in the UK and how they are addressed. I will be focusing on asylum seekers particularly Unaccompanied asylum seeking children (UASC). These are children who are under 18yrs of age and applying for asylum in their own rights. I aim to highlight key areas in understanding the needs of these children while recognising that these are by no means homogenous, and therefore explain how these needs are addressed by social policies, legislature and social workers.
Canada had not always been a loving and accepting country. In the 20th century, Canada had committed countless acts of racism, hatred, and discrimination towards people who lived in the country. Yet over the years, Canada has evolved from this status and has proven its humanitarianism by fulfilling many acts of greatness. Humanitarian countries have earned this title by altering the conditions of a person by improving lifestyles, helping, and sharing general concern for the common man. Canada showed this trait by firstly making numerous peacekeeping acts to benefit others and themselves. Secondly, Canada has continued to better the lives of its residents by giving multiple benefits to those who are citizens. And lastly, Canada is one of the most culturally diverse nations and will accept all, based on the Charter of Rights and Freedoms. No matter the cruelty Canada has shown in its past, the efforts it has made to redeem itself is more than anyone can ever overlook. Canada’s acts even today continue to show its ability to be a humanitarian nation.
Migration has been a major part of human living and also animals, people migrate for various reasons such as seeking better lives, family, job opportunity, availability of social amenities etc. immigration policies were put in place to monitor and decide who immigrate to a country and these policies have been present since 1906, and these polices have had different reasons for their enactment and these reasons change as time and era changes (Baglay, 2014). The early policies were racially based restriction, economic growth, multiculturalism, restriction on refugee and economic immigration (Baglay, 2014). The Communitarian approach used by Michael Walzer to explain immigration policy is similar to Canadian immigration policy. This paper seeks to discuss and analyze the articles by Joseph Carens and Michael Walzer, explaining the different perspectives of explaining immigration policies. The paper would summarize and contrast the author’s main arguments. It would take a stand on which argument is more persuasive in explaining immigration policy and give reason for this position. It would also use other articles to support or refute each argument made by Joseph Carens and Michael Walzer. Lastly this paper would explain and come to a conclusion of if any of these arguments apply to Canadian immigration policy and give examples of these similarities. Carens and Walzer had very different view on immigration and open border, Carens used the Liberal perspective of explaining open border.
First of all, when refugees immigrate to Canada, they’ll get many benefits. First, in Lebanon, refugees are suffering from many social and economical problems. To specify, they are excluded from social life and they are barred from owning property. In addition, a lot of them are enduring from vagrancy, hunger, and illiteracy. Indeed, many refugees live in poor condition homing where there are water leaking through walls and roof made from corrugated iron and wood. In addition, they are not well-educated .to clarify, most of them have not received brevet or left schools early .Also, all the dimensions of poverty, such as economic status, housing, health, food security, and education can be applied to these refugees . A3. UNRWA and the American University in Beirut, socioeconomic survey of Palestinian Refugees in
Another casual night: the air is sticky, and the water is scarce, all throughout the country the sound of gunshots are ringing through the air. For most people, this “casual” night is beyond their wildest imagination, but for Syrians it is an ongoing nightmare. Faced with the trauma of a civil war, Syrian refugees seek protection and a more promising future than the life they currently live in their oppressive country. Many seek refuge in other Middle East countries like Turkey and Jordan, but others search for hope in the icon of freedom, the United States of America. However, in America, there is an ongoing debate about whether or not Syrian refugees should be accepted. America needs to accept the Syrian refugees because if they do not, the
ALthough these people need help, many countries, including the US have made it difficult to find asylum. An Afghan named Naser Mozaffari had converted to Buddhism from Islamic. Mozaffari applied for asylum in Germany days after a threat was made to his family by the Afghan government, because he was involved with a Buddhist temple. Two weeks after his application was sent, him along with his family, was hunted down and torchered for three years in a prison camp. Once released, Mozaffari finds that Germany had still not given him asylum (Salahuddin 1). Countries have been making laws to make refuge more difficult. For example, Hungary lets no refugees in it’s borders, Germany has increased border security, and many other countries have made hundreds of political hoops people must jump through to achieve asylum legally ( Hoekstra 1 ). The US needs to let these refugees in. However, precautions need to be taken a flood of these people come. There has been incidents of refugees causing harm to native born people. Suicide bombers have attacked Germany’s cities calling themselves refugees, others that have disguised themselves as people in need have raped people in the streets of Nice, France, and a Syrian al-Qaida fighter killed 19 people in a Norwegian cafe ( Hoekstra 1 ). Despite these concerns, the US is smart and powerful enough to monitor and filter the refugees seeking asylum. “ Our faith summons us to
As Singer says, "if we can help without sacrificing anything of comparable moral importance, then we ought to help” (1972); therefore, it is quite evident that we are in the position to help, as letting in more refugees will not lead to us sacrificing anything comparable to what the refugees are facing. Overall, Canada as a country is quite wealthy and is capable of supporting more people. Although we may be at different levels of wealth, overall, we are quite privileged. We also have an obligation to refugees because these people are not normal immigrants. These people are seeking a safe place to settle, as they have no other choice but to turn to other countries for protection. If they had the choice, they would not want to leave, whereas, normal immigrants are coming into Canada voluntarily (Parekh, S.,