Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
2001 multiculturalism in canada essay
2001 multiculturalism in canada essay
Diversity and multiculturalism and federal canadian government
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: 2001 multiculturalism in canada essay
Migration has been a major part of human living and also animals, people migrate for various reasons such as seeking better lives, family, job opportunity, availability of social amenities etc. immigration policies were put in place to monitor and decide who immigrate to a country and these policies have been present since 1906, and these polices have had different reasons for their enactment and these reasons change as time and era changes (Baglay, 2014). The early policies were racially based restriction, economic growth, multiculturalism, restriction on refugee and economic immigration (Baglay, 2014). The Communitarian approach used by Michael Walzer to explain immigration policy is similar to Canadian immigration policy. This paper seeks to discuss and analyze the articles by Joseph Carens and Michael Walzer, explaining the different perspectives of explaining immigration policies. The paper would summarize and contrast the author’s main arguments. It would take a stand on which argument is more persuasive in explaining immigration policy and give reason for this position. It would also use other articles to support or refute each argument made by Joseph Carens and Michael Walzer. Lastly this paper would explain and come to a conclusion of if any of these arguments apply to Canadian immigration policy and give examples of these similarities. Carens and Walzer had very different view on immigration and open border, Carens used the Liberal perspective of explaining open border. Carens believe in equal moral worth of individual, he believed that the border should be generally open, individuals should have liberty to move and settle in a anew country and there should be few grounds (Baglay, 2014). Border and Border control mean di... ... middle of paper ... ...ee Law: Historical Overview of Canadian Immigration Policies, lecture retrieved from University of Ontario Institute of Technology, Oshawa, Ontario. Carens, J. H. (1987) "Aliens and Citizens: "The Case for Open Borders," Review of Politics, 251 ETZIONI, A. (2007). Citizenship tests: A comparative, communitarian perspective. Political Quarterly, 78(3), 353-363. doi:10.1111/j.1467-923X.2007.00864.x Scaperlanda, M. A. (1999). Immigration justice: Beyond liberal egalitarian and communitarian perspectives. Review of Social Economy, 57(4), 523-542. doi:10.1080/00346769900000020 Valadez, J. M. (2013). Immigration and liberal egalitarianism. Philosophy Study, 3(3), 165-n/a. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com.uproxy.library.dc-uoit.ca/docview/1465267690?accountid=14694 Walzer, M. (1983). Spheres of justice: a defense of pluralism and equality. New York: Basic Books.
Robert, Jean-Claude, Dr. "Immigration Acts (1866 - 2001)." Canada in the Making. N.p., n.d. Web. 08 Dec. 2013. .
Immigration is of great economic and social benefit to Canada. It’s an important role in developing our economy, and it shapes the nation into a multicultural nation. Immigration is a significant role in building our economy, providing growth in the labor force, making a strong economy, and becoming a multicultural nation.
Firstly to justify why countries limit their immigrations, there should be knowledge of the different types of immigrants as there are different reasons to leave from one country and move into another. In the last 30 years, the number of international immigrants has been estimated 191 million worldwide, two times as before. As ...
Every year, over 250,000 people make Canada their new home. Attracted by its education system, economy and universal healthcare system, there are few other places in the world like it. All Canadians are guaranteed equality before the law and equality of opportunity, regardless of where they are from. However, some might argue that Canadian policy has not been put into practice as well as it should be. Is the concept of true equality a far-fetched idea? It seems that Canada has taken great measures to promote the integration of immigrants socially, but can the same be said for their integration economically? Politically? To judge whether or not Canada has been successful at promoting the integration of immigrants in these realms, a deeper understanding of Canadian policy must be considered.
Perea, Juan. Immigrants Out! The New Nativism and the Anti-Immigrant Impulse in the United States. New York or London: New York University Press, 1997. Print.
Walker, B*. (2008). history of immigration and racism in Canada: Essential readings. Toronto: Canadian Scholars' Press.
Crean, Tom, and Will Soto. "Immigration and the Class Struggle in the US." Socialist Alternative. Committee for a Workers' International, 1 Apr. 2007. Web. 20 Nov. 2013.
Mclntyre, Tobi. "History of Canadian immigration policy : Canadian Geographic Magazine January/February 2001." History of Canadian immigration policy : Canadian Geographic Magazine January/February 2001. 2001. 19 Nov. 2013 .
Lamm, Richard D. "The U.S. Should Limit Immigration." Bender, David L. Immigration: Opposing Viewpoints. San Diego: Greenhaven Press. Inc. 1990 pp.105-112
Wellman, Christopher, and Phillip Cole. Debating the Ethics of Immigration is There a Right ti Exclude?. New York : Oxford University Press, 2011. Print.
The introduction of the story begins with some general background information on the United States immigration policy and the different trends seen throughout the years. The main section of the book has four parts, each part regarding a different section related to immigration and the government. Throughout these sections Chomsky presents her findings to provide reasoning on why each
Schrag, Peter (2011, September). Unwanted Immigration and Nativism in America. Retrieved March 9, 2012 from http://immigrationpolicy.org
The first argument suggests that immigration is a threat to the very existence of the nation state. As this threat prevails, the state has the right to act in its own self-interest and restrict immigration (Hobbes, 1969). In this instance, humanity comes in as a close second to nationality (Cole, 2000, 87). This now lends to the question, Does immigration regulation take into account the moral equality of all human beings? The immigration policy by definition excludes and treats human beings differently as per their citizenship status of a given province. The violation of universal equality is a routine practice in immigration policies (Carens, 1987; Isbister, 1996).
Khan, Adnan. “Close Encounters with US Immigration”. The Bedford Reader Tenth Edition. Ed. Kennedy, Kennedy, and Aaron. Boston, Bedford/St. Martins, 2011. 558-560. Print
This section will introduce ideas around the politics of migration and open borders, in order to lead us into my critical analysis of migration, the brain drain, and what policies can be created for the best possible outcome. As previously mentioned, brain drain is the only possible clause to which immigration can be restricted. However, only if it causes deleterious effects to the poor nation is it acceptable as a restrictive cause. Nevertheless, restrictive immigration goes against fundamental basic human liberties in which a person has the right to leave one country and go to another. I return to develop the libertarian aspects that advocate for open borders based on Carens understanding of Nozick’s work. Nozick