Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Analyze alexander the great
Character traits of alexander the great
Alexander the great personality and his fathers impact
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Analyze alexander the great
Green, P. (1991). Alexander of Macedon, 356-323 B.C.: a historical biography. Berkeley: University of California Press. (Original work published 1974) Peter Green’s, Alexander of Macedon, takes us on a journey to Ancient Macedonia, to the early beginnings of Alexander’s life right up to his controversial death. This material is a revision and expansion from Green’s book, “Alexander the Great” originally published in 1970. In this detailed narrative of Alexander the Great, Green helps the reader to better understand Alexander’s life and the world he grew up in. Green begins this historical biography with Alexander’s father, Philip II of Macedon, and how he came into power. Green, a classical scholar, unlike many of his fellow colleagues who portray Alexander as a romantic figure, in pursuit of a united world, portrays Alexander as an ambitious, power driven tyrant. In the very first chapter, Green states that Alexander was “a genius; the product of his environment. What Alexander was, Philip and Macedonia in great part made him...” This is what Green proposes in his historical biography. The author’s thesis argues that Alexander became who he was based on the society he grew up in. Green describes Alexander’s surroundings as “loud, clamorous professional soldiers, who rode or drank or fought or fornicated” (pg. 40). These were the male examples that he had in his life and his father was no different. He was also surrounded by the planning and strategy of war, treachery and conspiracies. His mother Olympia’s which is so popularly known for poisoning young Alexander’s mind against Philip, the author believes is nothing more but a psychological myth. Alexander and Olympia’s did not turn against Philip till 338 BC, when Alexander... ... middle of paper ... ...ander over the years. Although, the book does offer notes and references, maps, and a key of abbreviations I believe this narrative is most appropriate for an academic audience or for readers with knowledge of the ancient world. As someone who is not fully informed on classical studies, I was able to easily comprehend the authors writing. It was difficult for me to find any errors in this book. Perhaps the only weakness the book has is the lack of better maps. Otherwise, Green does an exemplary job of explaining who people are, the dates of when things occurred and how he believes things happened as well as the opinions other historians. Ultimately, Peter Green’s, Alexander of Macedon portrays Alexander as I always imagined him to be “a true genius as a field commander: perhaps, taken all in all, the most incomparable general the world has ever seen” (pg. 487).
Alexander the Not so Great:history through Persian eyes by Prof Ali Ansari Paragraph 1 Page
Bury, J. B.; Russell Meiggs (2000). A History of Greece to the Death of Alexander the Great
Alexander the Great, son of Philip of Macedon took the throne at nineteen years of age in 336BCE and with this single event the Hellenic culture abounded. Philip did not want Alexander to be a course and boorish Macedonian so he gave Alexander a tutor, Aristotle. Between Philip and Aristotle, Alexander was raised in the Hellenic culture. The Hellenic culture’s aim was to...
Alexander’s first battle came when he was only sixteen. Philip, his father had gone away on a campaign and left Macedonia u...
Macedonia.org, History of. Alexander the Great Alexander of Macedon biography: King of Macedonia and Conqueror of Persian Empire. 2001-2013. Document. 11 October 2013.
In the book, the reader encounters a well-researched biography that relays the life and times of Alexander in a simple but informative manner. Just as in his earlier works, however, Freeman succeeds at bringing Alexander’s egotistic, intelligent, and inspirational journey through life to the reader in an engaging manner that takes a unique approach to relaying the same information available in other resources. In essence, Freeman’s interest in this historical figure’s life is evident in the way he describes the battles that Alexander fought, as well as the contribution that he made to turning society into what it is today. From the book, the reader can discern the complex traditions that people practice and begin to understand the role that historical interactions played in their formation. Therefore, Philip Freeman’s Alexander the Great succeeds in providing an engaging and emphatic portrayal of one of the greatest historical figures and the part that their desires played in changing the
“Was it not for the careful planning and bold actions of Philip II of Macedon, Alexander would have little or no place in history” . Philip II was the basis of Macedonia’s success because without what he had already done for Macedonia, Alexander the Great would not have been able to obtain his reputable name. Before Alexander the Great became king, Philip II had already established the unification of Macedonia, an effective army, and a stable economy. This paper will cover how Philip II managed to create a successful Macedonia before his son Alexander took the throne.
"Thomas R. Martin, An Overview of Classical Greek History from Mycenae to Alexander, The Development of Athenian Tragedy." Perseus Digital Library. 14 May 2009 .
Very few reliable sources on Alexander the Great’s reign remain in existence today. Of these sources, the four major ones are histories by Plutarch, Diodorus, Arrian and Quintus Rufus. The earliest of these sources was written in the first century BC, so it is clear to see that the author’s own personal outlook may have influenced by their times and personal experiences in life that may or may not have changed since Alexander was alive since he died about three-hundred BC. In addition to the times that these histories were written, it is important to know more about the authors of these histories, Their views and approaches to writing their histories, and more about the histories in general in order to determine the accuracy and biases that
Alexander the Great was known for spreading Greek thought and culture during his travels. He is considered by many researchers for having a lasting impact on the Hellenistic culture during his reign. After his death, Alexander’s Hellenistic influence continued to spread throughout the lands. The death of Alexander in 323 B.C traditionally marks the beginning of the Hellenistic period. Alexander’s generals, his “successors”, divided the various lands of his empire into their own kingdoms. This research paper seeks to substantiate the claim that Alexander helped shape and transform the then-known world of Macedon through Hellenizing those he conquered through his kingship, prior to and even after his death. His reign further transformed and was
In 356 BC, Alexander III of Macedon, a future King of Macedonia, was born in Pella, the ancient capital of Macedonia. Alexander III, commonly known as Alexander the Great, is considered one of the utmost military geniuses of all times (Plutarch). Alexander’s leadership and supremacy influenced later conquerors and emperors, to follow his brilliant actions. Plutarch presented the young life of Alexander as he grew into the dominant leader he was and his presence changed the way Greek culture viewed their previous and future kings. Alexander was destined for greatness ever since he was a young boy due to his courage and marked his footprints in history. At the age of 16, he was a warrior, at age 18, he became a commander and by the time he was
Waldemar Heckel, the author of this book, has written numerous published articles based on the history of Alexander the Great. He has worked on a few articles with J. C. Yardley,
"The Flow of History." FC25: Alexander the Great and the Hellenistic Era (336 BCE-31 BCE). n.p., n.d. Web. 13 May 2014.
Alexander III the Great, the king of Macedonia and the conqueror of the Persian Empire is one of the most known personalities from the ancient civilization. According to the primary source “The Parallel Lives” the Greek writer Plutarch 46-119 A.D., "Alexander was born early in the month Hecatombaeon, the Macedonian name for which is Loüs, on the sixth day of the month, and on this day the temple of Ephesian Artemis was burnt"(Plutarch, “The Parallel Lives” ~ 100 A.D). He was the son of the Macedonian king Fillip the second and his wife Olympia the princess of Epirus. He spent his childhood watching his father turning Macedonia into a great military nation. He attended most of the political meetings with his father, “he entertained the ambassadors from the king of Persia, in the absence of his father, and entering much into conversation with them, gained so much upon them by his affability, and the questions he asked them, which were far from being childish or trifling...“ (Plutarch, “The Parallel Lives” ~ 100 A.D). When Alexander was 13 years his father hired the great Greece philosopher Aristotle to be his tutor. Alexander said to him, “At my parents I own my life; at my teacher i own my wellfare" (Plutarch, “The Parallel Lives” ~ 100 A.D). Aristotle taught him rhetoric, literature, science and medicine which was very important to his future life.
Alexander was deemed to be one of the greatest leaders ever born, in his prime he never lost a battle and conquered most of Europe and parts of Asia. In these great victories one can see that Alexander had grand motivation to fuel this conquest of Europe, stemming from the will to achieve greater than his father King Phillip the 2nd, the hero Achilles from the Iliad, and his will to become more than just a human. As well as how it connects to the article written about Alexander.