Alexander Kerensky's Failure Of The Provisional Government

543 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Preliminary russian revolution

Alexander Kerensky, a Russian lawyer, turned Prime Ministership of Russia had huge importance in the failure of the Provisional Government. The Provisional Government, much like other temporary parliaments faced huge problems in 1917. One of course being it’s inability to connect with all class structures, particularly the lower classes. The Provisional Government also struggled immensely causing ‘divisions within the political elite and alienation of educated society from the regime1’. This growing unrest accompanied with resentful soldiers and Kerensky’s failure to pull the nation from WW1 were the determining factors for Kerensky’s failures. One of the major contributors to Kerensky’s failure to maintain power within the Provisional Government

Show More
Related

  • Assess the impact of World War I on the Fall of the Romanov Dynasty

    968 Words  | 2 Pages

    With the coinciding of a revolution on the brink of eruption and the impacts of the First World War beginning to take hold of Russia, considered analysis of the factors that may have contributed to the fall of the Romanov Dynasty is imperative, as a combination of several factors were evidently lethal. With the final collapse of the 300 year old Romanov Dynasty in 1917, as well as the fall of Nicholas II, a key reality was apparent; the impact that WWI had on autocratic obliteration was undeniable. However, reflection of Russia’s critical decisions prior is essential in the assessment of the cause of the fall of the Romanov Dynasty.

    Read More

  • World War I's Responsibility for the Collapse of the Provisional Government in 1917

    1909 Words  | 4 Pages

    lt of a variety of factors and reasons but the far-reaching effects of the war were to have devastating results in both social and economic quarters. Moreover, the war on help increase the opposition to the government and led to their downfall in October 1917. --------------------------------------------------------------------- [1] John Reed, Ten Days That Shook the World (1919) [2] Maxim Gorky, letter to his son (April, 1917) [3] E.H. Wilcox was very impressed with Kerensky and praised him in his book, Russia's Ruin (1919) [4] Morgan Philips Price, My Three Revolutions (1969) [5] Extract from an interview of Alexander Kerensky by Harold Williams [6] Extract from an interview of Alexander Kerensky by Harold Williams [7] Leon Trotsky, statement made to the Petrograd Soviet (24th October, 1917)

    Read More

  • The Failure of the Provisional Government and the Rise of the Bolsheviks

    1871 Words  | 4 Pages

    The Failure of the Provisional Government and the Rise of the Bolsheviks i. Subject of investigation. How did the failure of the Provisional Government allow for the rise of the Bolsheviks? ii. Methods to be used.

    Read More

  • Ivan Denisovich Corruption

    592 Words  | 2 Pages

    Title: Corruption of the Soviet System in One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich

    Read More

  • Analysis Of Crane Brinton's The Anatomy Of Revolution

    1532 Words  | 4 Pages

    While most of Europe had develop strong central governments and weakened the power of the nobles, Russia had lagged behind the times and still had serfs as late as 1861. The economic development that followed the emancipation of peasants in the rest of Europe created strong industrial and tax bases in those nations. Russian monarchs had attempted some level of reforms to address this inequality for almost a century before, and were indeed on their way to “economic maturity” (32) on par with the rest of Europe. But they overextended themselves and the crushing defeats of the Russo-Japanese War in 1905 and the First World War in 1917 lost them the necessary support from their subjects and created “high prices and scarcity” which were by far “the most obvious factors in the general tension”

    Read More

  • The Bolshevik Consolidation of Power

    1917 Words  | 4 Pages

    so a treaty would be a minor set back if Germany lost the war to

    Read More

  • Russian Revolution Dbq Essay

    465 Words  | 1 Pages

    It was said that the educated people, the contact with other countries should contribute to the government policy. As said in document 1 , "By 1900 there were political parties raging from far right defenders of autocracy and russian power over all other ethnicities, to far left revolutionaries calling for the overthrow of the government." The government there was autocratic, which was when the tsar had all the power/control of the government. Another cause for the Russian Revolution was the outbreak of WW1. "Even before the war urban workers all over the Russian empire had been increasingly radical, but the war brought the government's incompentence and the people's grievances into sharper relief. The first months of the war were a disaster for Russia." It is much easier to overthrow a government than to try andcreate a new government. As said in document 2,"Chaos, conflict, uncertaunty; more violence are much more common and often led to centralized, authoritarian governments." There was celebration all over the streets after the indication that the tsar was overthrown after 300 years of a tsarist government ruling. "The problem was that, after the party, governing problems arose immediately.

    Read More

  • Significance Of Trotsky

    1589 Words  | 4 Pages

    ‘The provisional government was brought down with barely a shot fired.... ... middle of paper ... ... It was hugely significant as Trotsky’s failure to pursue the leadership of the communist party with any great intent saw Stalin rise to power and ‘old bolshevism’ fall and was the dawn of a new era for the communist party in Russia.

    Read More

  • How Significant Was Lenin 's Leadership? The Bolshevik Consolidation Of Power?

    1231 Words  | 3 Pages

    The accumulation of these factors centred on Lenin's leadership helped stamp Bolshevik power across the Soviet Union. Lenin’s pragmatic leadership was the most considerable factor in helping to fortify Bolshevik power. His willingness to take power in October/November 1917 and the successes of the move, through his right-hand man, Trotsky, was critical as it helped give him unquestioned authority within the party despite members of the Central Committee i.e. Zinoviev and Kamenev suggested industrialisation needed to occur first. This highlighted Lenin’s communist ideology, which was essential to the Bolsheviks maintaining power. Following the failure of the Provisional Government, Lenin recognised that it was the Bolshevik’s priority to legitimise their government.

    Read More

  • Doctor Zhivago’s Uniquely Realistic Qualities

    1969 Words  | 4 Pages

    Mukhina, Irina. “Experiencing Russia's Civil War: Politics, Society, And Revolutionary Culture In Saratov, 1917 – 1922.” Journal Of Social History 3 (2005): 780. Academic OneFile. Web. 23 Nov. 2013.

    Read More

  • Essay On The Causes Of Russian Revolution

    1114 Words  | 3 Pages

    "Provisional Government and World War I: Could the Provisional Government have Survived if it had Pulled Russia Out of World War I?" History in Dispute. Ed. Paul du Quenoy. Vol. 21: Revolutionary Russia, 1890-1930. Detroit: St. James Press, 2005. 100-106. World History in Context. Web. 17 Dec. 2013.

    Read More

  • How accurate is it to say that Lenin’s leadership was the reason for Bolshevik success in November 1917.

    765 Words  | 2 Pages

    ...was alone, Lenin’s leadership that enabled the Bolsheviks to seize power in November 1917. On the other hand, if we consolidate the facts we have covered in the essay we can identify key points that were capitalised on by Lenin such as the weakness of the provisional government and using his influence to motivate the Bolshevik Central Committee, we cannot deny that these were some of the more crucial factors regarding the Bolshevik seizure of power and without them a November Revolution may not have happened. A result of that would be a legitimate leadership within Russia and the Bolsheviks would then be seen as the aggressors. Concluding this we can make the decision that it was not Lenin alone who was the reason for the success of the Bolshevik coup rather an overall period of instability within the Russian leadership and the Bolsheviks offered an alternative.

    Read More

  • Term Essay

    1949 Words  | 4 Pages

    This essay asks for the comparison of the three historical monographs, which offer different interpretations of the same or related topic. This essay will focus on writings about the Russian Revolution (1818-1919) particularly concentrating on the October Revolution in 1917 and the leadership of Vladimir Lenin during this period. The goal of this essay is to examine how three historians, from three separate schools of thought, have interpreted these events and how their particular political views, evidence and personal experiences have influenced these interpretations. This will be achieved by analysing the works of Richard Pipes; a western liberal-conservative, Dmitri Volkogonov; a soviet-revisionist and John Reed; a socialist.

    Read More

  • The Fall of the Czarist Regime in 1917

    790 Words  | 2 Pages

    out of touch with his people. 'He heard of the blood and tears of the

    Read More

  • The Iranian Revolution and the Russian Revolution

    1667 Words  | 4 Pages

    Wood, A. (1986). The Russian Revolution. Seminar Studies in History. (2) Longman, p 1-98. ISBSN 0582355591, 9780582355590

    Read More

More about Alexander Kerensky's Failure Of The Provisional Government

Open Document