Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Stalin's rise to power ib
The role of Lenin in the Russian revolution 1917
Stalin's rise to power ib
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Bolshevik Consolidation of Power
The dissolution of the constituent assembly
· Lenin had never thought about winning support from the masses, so he
concentrated on creating a party that could seize power when the time
was right. This was why he didn't join the opposition movements or
support the provisional government.
· Lenin had originally supported the Constituent Assembly but when the
election happened and his party won less than a quarter of the seats,
dissolved the assembly after just one session as he thought it would
have been impossible for his party to govern along side an assembly
that was non-Bolshevik.
· Lenin's move prompted criticism from within his party and from
foreign communists both arguing that he had destroyed democracy and
the idea that the people should have say in the running of the
country.
The Treaty of Brest-Litovsk, 1918.
· The Bolsheviks had been against the war and had promised immediate
peace if they came into power. They couldn't go back on this promise.
· This is where the differences between Lenin and Trotsky become
clear. Lenin wanted peace immediately while Trotsky wanted to wait.
· Lenin realised that with the amount of desertions at the front,
Russia wouldn't mount a serious challenge to Germany for much longer
so a treaty would be a minor set back if Germany lost the war to
Britain and France.
· Trotsky took the middle road between Lenin and some Bolsheviks and
Left revolutionaries who wanted to continue the war. Although he
accepted that Russia couldn't fight on for much longer, in the hope
that Germany would collapse against France and Britain he tried to
m...
... middle of paper ...
... · The Bolshevik press tried to make the Kronstadt protestors seem like
white agents but really they were loyal socialists who felt betrayed
by Lenin's government.
· Scared by their increasing demands and numbers, Trotsky ordered the
red army to crush them.
· When the last ultimatum was rejects by the protestors, 60,000 Red
troops stormed Kronstadt. The workers/Sailor fought back savagely
before they were overcome.
· Leaders who escaped were hunted down and executed. Lenin justified
this by saying the rising was the work of the bourgeois enemies of the
October Revolution.
· Lenin had learned something however when decided to lessen the
rigours of War Communism in order to avoid another rising.
· This was the prelude to the introduction of the NEP, designed to
reduce famine and opposition to the party.
Furthermore, the Rhineland was to be permanently disarmed and occupied by the Allies for fifteen years to ensure that there would be no attacks against France that might start another war. In addition to this, it was stated that Germany would never be allowed to unite with Austria because they would form an incredibly strong fighting force. This resulted in much complaining by the Germans on the account that they believed they were being left without a military force significant enough to protect themselves. Also, the treaty did not require any of the other countries to perform even the slightest demilitarization.
for their actions. This had to be done as Germany had lost the war and
have ended there; however, the official wording of the treaty that was signed turned out to be
The Success of the Bolsheviks in Gaining Power in Russia by 1922 In February 1917, the Bolshevik party was small and irrelevant. The leadership was abroad and there was little consistency of purpose among the party in Russia. However, by the summer of 1922, the Bolsheviks had become the dominant force, and a new communist state had emerged from their success. The purpose of this essay is to explain this transformation.
Trotsky's Contribution to the Success of the Bolsheviks Up to 1922 1.a) Trotsky’s contribution to the success of the Bolsheviks up to 1922 was mainly through the military; Trotsky was a close friend of Lenin which helped Trotsky get the place at the head of the Military Revolution committee of the Petrograd soviet. Under Trotsky’s leadership, the military revolutionary committee was actually planning to seize power of the government in 1917. Trotsky was placed in a very powerful position in the Military and he desperately wanted to take power of the government. Trotsky then helped the Bolsheviks take power, and then an anti-communist group known as the whites had formed an army to fight against Trotsky.
How significant was Lenin’s leadership in the Bolshevik Consolidation of power in 1924? Lenin's leadership was a crucial factor in consolidating Bolshevik power up until his death in 1924. His pragmatic leadership helped gain some initial support as well as giving him unquestioned authority within the party. Furthermore, his push for the signing of the Treaty of Brest-Litovsk to help save the revolution from foreign invasion was crucial and his practicality was further exemplified through War Communism and the introduction of the New Economic Policy (NEP). The use of terror under Lenin's rule was also highly effective in removing political dissidents and exerting Bolshevik authority through coercive measures like the Cheka and the Red Terror.
Edward Dunes’ life as a revolutionary during Russia’s transition from a Tsarist state to that of a Marxist-Socialist regime, was propagated by many situational influences/factors stemming from his families relocation from Riga to Moscow. As a young boy in Riga, Dunes’ thirst for books along with a good educational elevated his potential to be a highly skilled worker. Dune’s childhood education coupled with factory life in Moscow along with a subsequent influential individual in his life with his father’s heavy labor socialist views, molded Dune into the Bolshevik revolutionary he became.
was able to hold on to leadership of the Soviet Union. He was able to
(p.20-21) As a result of the war, Russia was severely weakened, which greatly upset the balance of power in Europe. Taylor claims that, “What gave France independence as a Great Power was the alliance with Russia, which automatically halved German strength.” (p. 35) By the end of the war the “German Problem” remained.... ...
Meanwhile, Fuhrer Hitler and the Nazi party were continuing their domination of Europe and threatening to invade Czechoslovakia, which many felt would most likely incite another World War. To prevent this, England, France, Italy and Germany entered into an agreement, which would allow Germany to seize control of Sudetenland and is today known as the ‘Munich Pact’. Sudetenland had a large German population and its borders were in strategically strong areas for the German military. For negotiations to be successful there are many components that one must be aware of such as personalities of all parties, end goals of each person and the history of the country. England led the process with an appeasement policy as an attempt to mollify Hitler and the Nazi party and prevent war, which this pact did not.
The first step in identifying whether or not the peace settlement after World War I (WWI), would be the effectiveness of communication to the Germans. In order to properly communicate, one must simply tell the people involved what the conditions are and the consequences for not following them. In addition, the demands must be moderate and the opponent needs to be made clear that it will not favor them in the long run if they do not comply to the terms. While Germany was effectively given the terms of the Treaty of Versailles, one could argue that it was done in an unfair manner. Germany was not even present at the negotiations of the Treaty of Versailles and the Germans expected something along the lines of Wilson’s 14 point plan. At the end of the discussions,
The alliance system ideated by the German chancellor Otto von Bismarck kept peace in Europe but its main aim was, however, to forestall the possibility that, in the event of war, Germany would have to fight it on two fronts (basically France and Russia). This was achieved by diplomatically isolating France so that its dream of recapturing its lost provinces of Alsace-Lorraine couldn't be fulfilled. This was done by, firstly, the creation of the League of the Three Emperors or Dreikaiserbund. It was first projected as a meeting of the monarchs of Germany, Austria-Hungary and Russia in 1872 and confirmed the following year, the 22nd of October 1873. Here, the very general and formless agreement was given a more solid form by military agreements promising to help any country attacked by a fourth party. And all this even though that there was mutual rivalry between Russia and Austria-Hungary in the Balkans. This proved to be a concrete way to isolate France for as E. Eyck mentions, "the League ensured that neither Austria-Hungary nor Russia was available as an ally for France". At this point, Bismarck didn't consider Britain as a potential French ally as they had a long history of rivalry. Secondly, in 1887 the Reinsurance Treaty was signed with Russia in which it promised to support Russia's claims to the strait and to remain neutral in the event of war unless it attacked Austria-Hungary, the same with Russia, who promised to remain neutral unless it attacked France.
The Similarities of Tsarist and Communist Rule in Russia Both forms of government did depend on high degree of central control. However, some Tsars and Stalin exerted more central controls than others. Stalin’s stronger use of central control created differences between the two forms of government. The Tsars used different levels of central control.
which would be one of the factors that kept Germany alive in World War II. With
The results of this war were all in favour of Bismarck. the treaty of Frankfurt was signed. France had to pay compensation. of five billion francs and lost the provinces of Alsace and Lorraine. So between France and Germany there were still open wounds.