Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
First russian revolution
First russian revolution
First russian revolution
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
The Fall of the Czarist Regime in 1917
Long-Term Causes:
Source A, the Russian wedding cake was quite a big cause. Russian
society was being held up by the peasants and workers. If it weren't
for the peasants, the Czarist regime would have fallen a long time
before it did. Society was fine until the peasants rioted and revolted
in 1917 and then the whole country collapsed. This contributed to the
Czar's fall in 1917 because he was not helping the peasants and
looking after them so eventually the peasants infuriated and stopped
working for Russia.
Source C was quite an important source as well because Nicholas II did
not seek the power of ruling such a large country. He served the
country the best he could and to the best of his ability. Because he
had not sought power, he was not very good at exercising it. 'He was
very kind, sensitive, generous… [The situation] would probably have
destroyed any man who sat on the throne.' This helped towards his fall
because he was not strong enough and did not know exactly what was
going on in the whole of Russia.
Source D says the opposite. It says that Czar Nicholas II was wholly
out of touch with his people. 'He heard of the blood and tears of the
thousands upon thousands only through governmental documents, in which
they were represented as 'measures' taken by the authorities 'in the
interests of the safety and peace of the state. Such reports did not
convey him to the pain and suffering of the victims.'
It also mentions that the Czar did was not interested in ruling a
country. 'He did not care for anything except his wife, his son and
his four daughters.' This was true, he wasn't really interested in
politics because he did not look for power he was not very good in
controlling it. The source also says that he wanted to be a free man,
he'd much rather spend time with his family: 'How I am glad that I
growing up and he was also ignorant. He lacked common sense when he was faced with new
war often, for the sake of his country, but when he did he put in a
everything he was about to the people and didn't hold anything back, and it wore on him
applause of the crowd for his own praise. He often confused the will of God with his own social and political agenda. He even sometimes compared the gospel of Jesus Christ with special interest and American foreign policy.
The Transformation of Bolshevik Position Between February and October 1917 Most historians think that the Bolshevik’s position went from playing almost no role in February 1917; they had only 150 members in the Pultilov Works which had 20,000 workers, to taking control of the country in October by a combination of luck and skill. It was said of the Bolshevik party in early 1917 that “The Communist Party existed solely in the leaders.” Many historians think Lenin’s leadership was the joint main reason for making the party into the leading revolutionary group in Russia, along with the luck the Bolsheviks had in the circumstances under the Provisional Government. A few historians claim Germany played a major role in the Bolshevik’s road to power. The Germans helped many previously exiled revolutionaries to get back to Russia when the Tsar abdicated and the Provisional Government came to power from March onwards, in the hope that they would end the war.
these things as AWTA, and claims that his “family gave their lives to unite the
good in him. The Danes reject him by confusing his outburst of sorrow as an
There are many people who have lived through and within the Bolshevik Revolution, so there are a multitudinous variety of perspectives, thoughts, and insights about the revolution. The Bolshevik Revolution is known for many things; some say that the revolution helped women become free of control, and others proclaim that it did nothing but continue to hold women captive of their desired rights. The Bolshevik Revolution article states the side of a history professor Richard Stites, who argues yes the revolution benefited the women whilst the other side is declared no the revolution did no justice for women at all, which was argued by a Russian scholar, Lesly A. Rimmel. The opposing arguments both create an effective view on the revolution, and
His craven actions led to him being left behind by the group for him to starve to
education. He says: " Why was I born to be the laughingstock of a world in
it related to his own life and the events going on around him at the
Tsar's Survival of the 1905 Revolution In 1905 tsarism suffered a dreadful battering, Tsar Nicolas III had to cope with opposition from all sides. The workers and the army were unhappy with their working conditions; they wanted minimum wage and more rights. The peasants wanted more land and the liberals wanted a better political system that was more democratic and gave them more say in how the country was run. He had to contend with numerous strikes, uprisings, assassinations and mutinies. It is surprising, therefore than the Tsar managed to remain in his throne throughout 1905.
said he is like a child who doesn't remember all that his family has done for
him to go to the land where his brothers were fighting a war against the
his nation, and from the convictions which have grown up in his mind without the