Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
How sylvia plath's life is reflected in her poem
How sylvia plath's life is reflected in her poem
How sylvia plath's life is reflected in her poem
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: How sylvia plath's life is reflected in her poem
Examine how the texts in this elective explore After the Bomb upheaval through the collision between limitation and freedom
“The upheaval of our world and the upheaval of our consciousness are one and the same.”
This statement by Carl Jung highlights the upheaval prevalent within the time After the Bomb both personally and collectively. The time After the Bomb was a collision between limitation and freedom, reflected through ways of thinking at the time that led to textual rebellions such as Sylvia Plath’s poetry, George Clooney’s film Goodnight and Good Luck and Harry Bluestein’s novel Cold War Games.
The poem “Daddy” by Sylvia Plath describes her feelings of oppression and her battle to come to grips with the issues of this power imbalance
…show more content…
between men and women. Plath’s subjugation is evident within the repetition of Jews within, “Chuffing me off like a Jew. A Jew to Dachau, Auschwitz, Belson.” and “I think I may well be a Jew” demonstrating her stifled life and inability to break free of her patriarchal childhood and marriage. The comparison of her childhood and marriage to the ways in which Jew were treated during World War II, clearly shows the feelings of anguished hopelessness and the ripping agony Plath experienced. Additionally, the reference to the Jews is able to demonstrate an upheaval in regards to the value of Jews and recognition of the severity of the holocaust. However, though the poem demonstrates the social paradigm of patriarchy surround After the Bomb, the agelessness of this poem guarantees the ongoing struggle of women to overcome the issue. However, Plath acquires wisdom from her struggles with patriarchy within her childhood and marriage, providing her a sense of freedom and power within Daddy. This is evident within the confession, “So daddy, I’m finally through” demonstrating her realisation and gain of self power and control as a woman. In addition, win the final stanza Plath eludes to the downfall of patriarchy and the gaining of power of women within the metaphor, “the villagers never liked you. They are dancing and stamping on you.” The line demonstrates how women have an understanding of the source of their oppression and their pain caused by it, leading to their need for it to end. As a result, the poem can be seen as a personal revolution and upheaval towards the social paradigm within a worldly issue. Hence, through Daddy it is seen that the through the collision of both her sense limitation and freedom within the poem, Plath is able to highlight an upheaval against the social paradigms. Similarly, Plath’s Lady Lazarus is a metaphor of rebirth; the whole idea of a new life from death demonstrating both her sense of oppression and liberty through a religious way of thinking. Within the poem Plath sees herself as the resurrected Lady Lazarus, however, unlike the story she is experiencing this rebirth many times, and through suicide. Though the poem is seen as directed towards her husband as a cry for affection, it also represents the larger worldly experience that is the holocaust highlighting a darkness within the poem. The hyperbolic, “I have nine times to die” demonstrates the obscene amount of death and pain the holocaust survivors had to endure, demonstrating their perceived lack of value. Through the exploration of Jewish victimization throughout the holocaust, ‘Lady Lazarus’ is seen to be shaped by an upheaval towards the social paradigm of patriarchy and the treatment of Jews. However, as previously mentioned, the poem is a metaphor of rebirth, entailing liberty of new life, established through the biblical allusion of ‘Lady Lazarus’ itself. Though the poem is surrounded by talk of suicide, the wonder and beauty of death and rebirth creates a lighter tone within the middle of the poem. This is evident within the repetition of “I do” within “I do it exceptionally well…I do it so it feels real” in conjunction with “dying is an art.” The two lines reveal the power Plath gains through death but as a result also demonstrates a sense of strength gained by holocaust victims after living through death. Thus it is clear that the religious way of thinking in terms of rebirth within ‘Lady Lazarus’ introduces oppression within the poem through exploring the need for suicide and the holocaust. Yet it also is able to illustrate the power and liberty gained through rebirth and surviving death. As a result, it is clear that through use of the religious paradigm, Plath demonstrates the collision of oppression by male figures and her liberty gained through death, highlighting a personal upheaval against the social paradigm. This conceptual social paradigm that is patriarchy and the struggle of women to overcome their male dominated society is also demonstrated within the Cold War Games.
The differing representations of women within the text demonstrates the limitation of American women and the freedom of Soviet women in comparison. This is represented through the collision of communism and capitalism at the 1956 Melbourne Olympics. The capitalist women are seen to lack autonomy and value as represented through the degrading tone within, “To the post war American pubic, a woman’s place was in the home.” The line demonstrates the limited and restricted lives and ways of thinking forced upon women by the patriarchal world. However, in comparison communist women are seen to have more opportunity and independence witnessed through the accumulation within “They ‘work side by side with men as miners, ditch diggers, stevedores, and in similar occupations.” The line demonstrates the freedom held by Soviet women to withhold the same occupation as men, demonstrating an upheaval against the patriarchy found within the capitalist …show more content…
world. Differently, upheaval is demonstrated through the role of dissent within Goodnight and Goodluck, though highlighting the collision between limitation and freedom in the time After the Bomb. Within the scene wherein Murrow’s team is reviewing his message, the team is situated within an intimate and compact interior space demonstrating the small number of people willing to stand up for their opinion. This is used in conjunction with the intertextuality of the newspaper reviews clearly demonstrating the upheaval caused by the collision between those who are standing against Murrow and those who find the freedom to fight for their cause. This scene shows that in society there exist individuals who are against McCarthy, yet they do not have the ability and freedom (whether burdened by fear or platform) to speak out. Murrow’s broadcast provided a stepping stone for individuals who share the same view as them to voice their opinions through creating a rebellion against the social and political paradigm. Murrow’s speech was seen to provide support and a collective group of people sharing similar views, allowing supporters to feel reassured and as though they have the freedom to fight for their beliefs. This was able to disrupt the weight of influence from political leaders like McCarthy on the populous and more specifically on the individual. This shows the prospect of progression to break the restrictions and fear created by McCarthy. As a result, it can be seen that dissent played a role within the time after the bomb. Yet due to the fear and anxiety imposed by McCarthy’s witch hunts, “Joe McCarthy was on the rampage, finding communists in every nook and cranny of the government, in Hollywood studios and even in the CIA” as stated by Harry Bluestein, society was lacking in autonomy. However, this oppression was challenged by it’s collision with the freedom and power Murrow possessed to influence the populous. Within the Cold War Games, media is represented to disagree with the values put forward by Murrow.
This role of dissent is represented by the magazine Sports illustrated, a company that was “not surprisingly…anti-communist”. Sports Illustrated presented a view that opposed that of Murrow’s See It Now, using the actions of Soviets at the 1956 Melbourne Olympics to provide reason against communism and communist sympathisers, supporting McCarthy. This is evident within “sports illustrated used the defectors to provide ‘a source of very cheap propaganda, which the American’s exploited at every opportunity.” This inference made by Bluestein demonstrates the power of influence media had over beliefs through demonstrating dissent within the capitalist world. As a result, media such as Sports Illustrated and See It Now are an upheaval against the beliefs of each other. Hence, through the freedom of media, Sports Illustrated was able to support McCarthy’s upheaval against communists through oppressing the capitalist world through fear of being associated with
communism. Hence upheaval is extremely prevalent within the time After the Bomb both personally and collectively. The time After the Bomb was a collision between limitation and freedom, reflected through ways of thinking at the time that led to textual rebellions such as Sylvia Plath’s poetry, George Clooney’s film Goodnight and Good Luck and Harry Bluestein’s novel Cold War Games.
The Revisionists and the orthodox views are different opinions on President Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb. The revisionists believed that Truman’s decision was wrong and there could have been alternatives. They say that the Bomb was unnecessary and it was only used as a “diplomatic tool” and to show the power of th...
Imagine a society where everyone has a different opinion about dropping an atomic bomb to country that they are fighting with. What is an atomic bomb? An atomic bomb is a bomb which derives its destructive power from the rapid release of nuclear energy by fission of heavy atomic nuclei, causing damage through heat, blast, and radioactivity. The atomic bomb is a tremendously questionable topic. Nonetheless, these literary selections give comprehension on the decision about dropping the atomic bomb for military purposes. For example, the “Speech to the Association of Los Alamos Scientists” by Robert Oppenheimer, argues that we should have drop the atomic bomb, “A Petition to the President of the United States” by 70 scientists, asks President
Often, we find ourselves facing dramatic events in our lives that force us to re-evaluate and redefine ourselves. Such extraordinary circumstances try to crush the heart of the human nature in us. It is at that time, like a carbon under pressure, the humanity in us either shatters apart exposing our primal nature, or transforms into a strong, crystal-clear brilliant of compassion and self sacrifice. The books Night written by Elie Wiesel and Hiroshima written by John Hersey illustrate how the usual lifestyle might un-expectantly change, and how these changes could affect the human within us. Both books display how lives of civilians were interrupted by the World War II, what devastations these people had to undergo, and how the horrific circumstances of war were sometimes able to bring out the best in ordinary people.
Most writers take sides, either for or against the atom bomb. Instead of taking sides, he challenges his readers to make their own opinions based on their personal meditations. One of the key questions we must ask ourselves is “Are actions intended to benefit the large majority, justified if it negatively impacts a minority?” The greatest atrocity our society could make is to make a mistake and not learn from it. It is important, as we progress as a society, to learn from our mistakes or suffer to watch as history repeats itself.
Maddox, Robert. “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb.” Taking Sides: Clashing View in United States History. Ed. Larry Madaras & James SoRelle. 15th ed. New York, NY. 2012. 280-288.
Sherwin, M. (1973). The atomic bomb and the origins of the cold war. American Historical Review, 78: 1-7.
Truman’s decision to use atomic weapons has long been a controversial subject throughout the decades after he used it. Many scholars and people who surrounded the president at the time published memoirs and books about the decision to use the weapon. As years went, more works of writing and information were released which added more information to the vast knowledge we have of the decision to drop the bomb and of what the Japanese faced after the event took place. J. Samuel Walker wrote a book called Prompt & utter destruction which uses new knowledge gained about the bomb and new information the Japanese released, which Walker said, “has greatly enriched our understanding of the agonizing deliberations in Tokyo over ending the war” (ix).Walker did not take any sides in the book, however, he uses what material from the first book and new sources of information to evaluate why President Truman made his decision. The main focus of Walker’s book is to answer why President Truman used atomic bombs against Japan and open more discussion to the question “was the bomb militarily necessary or was it used primarily for political/diplomatic reasons that had more to do with impressing the Soviets than winning the war against Japan?” (xii), which Walker said the question “divided specialists” (xii).
As Joseph Stalin took over the USSR in 1929, he kept a tight control over his people. Stalin did not want any of his people questioning his actions and decisions. He wanted complete control of not only the country but also of all the people that lived in it. Stalin came up with an idea that would help him achieve this: strip people of their freedom. He started to take control over what the people read, what they watched and what they listened to. Stalin glorified his name in all types of media and if anybody said otherwise they were sent to harsh labour camps. Stalin also changed the children’s history books in a way that overvalued him so that he could control the next generation ("Life in USSR under Stalin.") The novel 1984, by George Orwell, presents a post-apocalyptic world where a ruling party similarly manipulates the people’s memories in order to have infinite power and control. In this novel a man named Winston has memories of the past political state that exist before the Party’s existence which spark a desire within him to rebel, but he is caught and tortured until he believes that his memories are lies. Similarly, in the novel The Road, by Cormac McCarthy, a man and a boy travel an abandoned road in a post-apocalyptic America. The Man has dreams of the old world and he believes that these are signs that his death is near. Both 1984 and The Road are similar in the way they depict memories and dreams of the past as a symbol for a troublesome future. Both books are also similar in the way they portray love as a necessity for survival. Also, these novels are similar in the way they expose Winston and the Boy to violence in order to negatively develop their characters to enhance the books. However, the novels differ in that ...
Powers, Thomas. "THE BOMB : Hiroshima: Changing the Way We Think About War." Los Angeles Times. Los Angeles Times, 06 Aug. 1995. Web. 10 Jan. 2014.
Sylvia Plath’s jarring poem ‘Daddy’, is not only the exploration of her bitter and tumultuous relationship with her father, husband and perhaps the male species in general but is also a strong expression of resentment against the oppression of women by men and the violence and tyranny men can and have been held accountable for. Within the piece, the speaker creates a figurative image of her father by using metaphors to describe her relationship with him: “Not God but a Swastika” , he is a “… brute” , even likening him to leader of the Nazi Party; Adolf Hitler: “A man in black with a Meinkampf look .” Overall, the text is a telling recount of her hatred towards her father and her husband of “Seven years” and the tolling affect it has had on
Texts from any era are pivotal in responding to the ways of thinking that embody its ideological construction. Particularly prevalent in the period ‘After the Bomb’, Cold War texts are no exception, and successfully dissect the changing paradigmatic interpretations of post-war values. Such ways of thinking include the rise of existential philosophy, and the paranoia-inducing, ideological tensions within both the public and private spheres. The former principle is central to both Samuel Beckett’s 1953 tragicomedy Waiting for Godot, and the 1986 animated film adaptation of Raymond Briggs’ picture book ‘When the Wind Blows’. The latter characterises George Clooney’s 2005 docudrama Good Night and Good Luck, as well as Barbara Kingsolver’s 2009
Sylvia Plath’s life was full of disappointment, gloominess and resentment. Her relationship status with her parents was hostile and spiteful, especially with her father. Growing up during World War II did not help the mood of the nation either, which was dark and dreary. At age 8 Plath’s father of German ancestry died of diabetes and even though their relationship was never established nor secure, his death took a toll on her. “For Sylvia, who had been his favorite, it was an emotional holocaust and an experience from which she never fully recovered” (Kehoe 90). Since she was so young she never got to work out her unsettled feelings with him. Even at age eight, she hid when he was around because she was fearful of him. When she was in his presence his strict and authoritarian figure had left an overpowering barrier between their relationship. Sadly enough by age eight Plath instead of making memories with her dad playing in the yard she resented him and wanted nothing to do with him (Kehoe). These deep-seated feelings played a major role in Plath’s poetry writings. Along with his “hilterian figure,” her father’s attitude towards women was egotistical and dismissive, uncondemning. This behavior infuriated Plath; she was enraged about the double standard behavior towards women. Plath felt controlled in male-dominated world (Lant). “Because Plath associates power so exclusively with men, her conviction that femininity is suffocating and inhibiting comes as no surprise” (Lant 631). This idea of a male-dominated world also influenced Plath’s writing. Unfortunately, Plath married a man just like her father Ted Hughes. “Hughes abandonment apparently stirred in her the memories and feelings she had struggled with when her ...
Smirnov, Yuri, Vladislav Zubok. “Nuclear Weapons after Stalin’s Death: Moscow enters the H-Bomb Age.” Cold War International History Project. March 1994.
Daddy was written on October 12, 1962 by Sylvia Plath, shortly before her death, and published posthumously in Ariel in 1963. Throughout the poem it could be viewed from a feminist perspective, drawing attention to the misogynistic opinions and behaviours of the time it was written. Misonogy is a person who dislikes, despises, or is strongly prejudiced against women. It can be manifested in numerous ways, including sexual discrimination, denigration of women, violence against women, and sexual objectification of women. Plath uses the reversal of gender stereotypes/roles within Daddy, which could be interpreted as an attempt to empower women.
Sylvia Plath has brought the attention of many Women’s studies supporters while being recognized as a great American poet. Most of her attention has come as a result of her tragic suicide at age thirty, but many of her poems reflect actual events throughout her life, transformed into psychoanalytical readings. One of Plath’s most renowned poems is “Daddy”. In this poem there are ideas about a woman’s relationship with men, a possible insight on aspects of Plath’s life, and possible influences from the theories of Sigmund Freud.