Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Justification for dropping an atomic bomb
The decision to drop the atomic bomb
What was one of the justifications for dropping the atomic bomb
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Justification for dropping an atomic bomb
Imagine a society where everyone has a different opinion about dropping an atomic bomb to country that they are fighting with. What is an atomic bomb? An atomic bomb is a bomb which derives its destructive power from the rapid release of nuclear energy by fission of heavy atomic nuclei, causing damage through heat, blast, and radioactivity. The atomic bomb is a tremendously questionable topic. Nonetheless, these literary selections give comprehension on the decision about dropping the atomic bomb for military purposes. For example, the “Speech to the Association of Los Alamos Scientists” by Robert Oppenheimer, argues that we should have drop the atomic bomb, “A Petition to the President of the United States” by 70 scientists, asks President …show more content…
Truman to not drop the bomb, and “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” President Truman contributes his decision to drop the bomb. To begin with, the speech argues that the United States should have drop the bomb.
For example, in the speech “the “Speech to the Association of Los Alamos Scientists” by Robert Oppenheimer states,”But when you come right down to it the reason that we did this job is because it was an organic necessity.” This substantiates that Robert thought that it was a wonderful idea to drop the atomic bomb because it was a necessary but we could have talked with the Japanese instead of just doing it. In the speech it states,”that it is a good turn over to mankind at large the greatest possible power to control the world,” This demonstrates that he thought that dropping the bomb could have made us powerful but he did not think about the damage and the trouble it would cause after people found out about it. As a result, Robert Oppenheimer thought that creating and dropping the atomic bomb was the best thing that could have happen to the United states of …show more content…
America. Additionally, the petition to President Truman request to the president to not drop the atomic bomb.
For instance, in the petition,” A Petition to the President of the United States” by 70 scientists states,”We feel, however, that such attacks on Japan could not be justified, at least not unless the terms which will be imposed after the war on Japan were made public in detail and Japan were given opportunity to surrender.” This substantiates that the scientist thought that before the United States uses the atomic bomb they should tell Japan so they can have a choice. For example, it states,” If after this war a situation is allowed to develop in the world which permits rival powers to be in uncontrolled possession of these new means of destruction, the cities of the United States as well as the cities of other nations will be in continuous danger of the sudden annihilation.” This demonstrates that they do not want to drop the atomic bomb because they fell that if the United States does use it will cause a lot of danger in the world. Also, it shows that they are not only thinking about the present, they are also thinking about what could happen in the future. Hence, the 70 scientists thought that the president was not going to make a smart choice by dropping the bomb and that dropping the atomic bomb was going to cause
problems. Moreover, in the passage “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” President Truman shares his decision to drop the atomic bomb. For example, in the passage “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” it states,”Truman stated that his decision to drop the bomb was purely military.” This substantiates that President Truman was really thinking about what dropping the bomb would cause and how would that affect the future of the world. For instance, in the passage it states,” Truman saw little difference between atomic bombing Hiroshima and fire bombing Dresden or Tokyo.” This demonstrates that President Truman was not looking at the possibilities and the future because a atomic bomb kills about 130,000 to 160,000. Therefore, President Truman’s decision to drop the bomb was only so the United States could win the war. Also, this shows that President Truman did not really cared about the well being of the people and what could happen in the future after the atomic bomb was dropped. Furthermore,these literary selections give awareness on the decision about dropping the atomic bomb for military purposes. For example, the “Speech to the Association of Los Alamos Scientists” by Robert Oppenheimer, oppose that we did the right thing by dropping the atomic bomb. Also, “A Petition to the President of the United States” by 70 scientists, inquire President Truman to not drop the bomb. Likewise, “The Decision to Drop the Bomb” President Truman grants his decision to drop the atomic bomb. Therefore, the atomic bomb is a controversial topic because people have different opinions about what the United States had to do. Having different opinions is like life with no music.
A young scientist who was very smart and intelligent was the creator of a bomb that killed millions. The bomb was the most powerful weapon that was ever manufactured. He changed the course of World War II. This man is Robert Oppenheimer, creator of the atomic bomb. The book “Bomb” by Steve Sheinkin, is a book that includes teamwork and how Americans made a deadly bomb that changed the course of the war. The book engages the reader through how spies share secret information with enemies. Because the physicists were specifically told not to share any information, they were not justified in supplying the Soviet Union with the bomb technology.
In today’s society, many countries and even citizens of the United States question the U.S. government’s decision to get involved in nuclear warfare. These people deemed it unnecessary and stated that the U.S. is a hypocrite that preaches peace, but causes destruction and death. Before and during World War II the U.S. was presented with a difficult decision on whether or not to develop and use the atomic bomb. The U.S. decided to develop the atomic bomb based on the fear they had for the safety of the nation. In August 1939 nuclear physicists sent manuscripts to Albert Einstein in fear the Germany might use the new knowledge of fission on the uranium nucleus as way to construct weapons.
Japan refused to accept an unconditional surrender, which was demanded by the allied powers in order to stop the war against them. On August 6, 1945 Truman allowed Enola Gay to drop the atomic bomb on top of Hiroshima and later Nagasaki to end the war. The revisionists and the orthodox views have different opinions on President Truman’s decision to use the atomic bomb. The revisionists believed that Truman’s decision was wrong and that there could have been alternatives. They say that the bomb was unnecessary and it was only used as a “diplomatic tool” and to show the power of the US to the world....
The war was coming to a victorious conclusion for the Allies. Germany had fallen, and it was only a matter of time until Japan would fall as well. Secretary of War Henry L. Stimson was at the forefront of the American war effort, and saw atomic weaponry as a way out of the most monumental war ever. As discussed in Cabell Phillips’ book, The Truman Presidency: The History of a Triumphant Succession, Stimson was once quoted as saying that the atomic bomb has “more effect on human affairs than the theory of Copernicus and the Law of Gravity” (55). Stimson, a defendant of dropping the bomb on Japan, felt that the world would never be the same. If the world would change after using atomic weapons, could it possibly have changed for the better? One would think not. However, that person might be weary of the biased opinion of White House personnel. He or she should care more for the in depth analytical studies done by experts who know best as to why America should or should not have dropped the atomic bomb. As more and more evidence has been presented to researchers, expert opinion on whether or not the United States should have dropped the two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki has also changed. More and more researchers seem to feel that the atomic bomb should never have been used (Alperovitz 16). Despite several officials’ claims to enormous death estimations, an invasion of Japan would have cost fewer total lives. In addition, post atomic bomb repercussions that occurred, such as the Arms Race, were far too great a price to pay for the two atomic drops. However, possibly the most compelling argument is that Japan would have surrendered with or without the United States using the atomic bomb. In defiance of top...
In Prompt and Utter Destruction, J. Samuel Walker provides the reader with an elaborate analysis of President Truman’s decision behind using the atomic bomb in Japan. He provokes the reader to answer the question for himself about whether the use of the bomb was necessary to end the war quickly and without the loss of many American lives. Walker offers historical and political evidence for and against the use of the weapon, making the reader think critically about the issue. He puts the average American into the shoes of the Commander and Chief of the United States of America and forces us to think about the difficulty of Truman’s decision.
This investigation assesses President Harry Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on both Hiroshima and Nagasaki. It will determine whether or not his decision was justified. This investigation will scrutinize the reasons that made Harry Truman feel inclined to drop atomic bombs over Hiroshima and Nagasaki. Preventing further casualties along with the desire to end the war are two argumentative points that will be analyzed to determine if they were strong enough to justify the dropping of the atomic bombs. Excerpts from Truman’s memoirs and a variety of different titles were consulted in order to undertake this investigation. Section C will evaluate two sources for their origins purposes values and limitations. The first is a book titled The Invasion of Japan written by John Stakes in 1955. And the second is a book titled Prompt & Utter Destruction written by J. Samuel Walker.
Upon reading “Prompt and Utter Destruction: Truman and the Use of Atomic Bombs Against Japan” by J. Samuel Walker, a reader will have a clear understanding of both sides of the controversy surrounding Truman’s decision to drop atomic bombs on the cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki during World War II. The controversy remains of whether or not atomic bombs should have been used during the war. After studying this text, it is clear that the first atomic bomb, which was dropped on the city of Hiroshima, was a necessary military tactic on ending the war. The second bomb, which was dropped on Nagasaki, however, was an unnecessary measure in ensuring a surrender from the Japanese, and was only used to seek revenge.
Most writers take sides, either for or against the atom bomb. Instead of taking sides, he challenges his readers to make their own opinions based on their personal meditations. One of the key questions we must ask ourselves is “Are actions intended to benefit the large majority, justified if it negatively impacts a minority?” The greatest atrocity our society could make is to make a mistake and not learn from it. It is important, as we progress as a society, to learn from our mistakes or suffer to watch as history repeats itself.
Maddox, Robert. “The Biggest Decision: Why We Had to Drop the Atomic Bomb.” Taking Sides: Clashing View in United States History. Ed. Larry Madaras & James SoRelle. 15th ed. New York, NY. 2012. 280-288.
One of the most argued topics today, the end of World War II and the dropping of the atomic bombs still rings in the American ear. Recent studies by historians have argued that point that the United States really did not make the right choice when they chose to drop the atomic bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Also with the release of once classified documents, we can see that the United States ...
Under President Franklin D. Roosevelt’s administration the atomic bomb was being developed. After Roosevelt died, his vice president Harry Truman was appointed President of the United States. Truman was never informed about the bombs development until an emergency cabinet meeting (Kuznick 9). Truman had to make the fatal decision on whether the bomb was to be dropped on Japan. With the idea of going to war, Truman had to think about the lives of the thousand American soldiers. The American soldiers had begun using the method of island hopping, because the bomb was not available. The idea of dropping a bomb was that the war itself could possibly end in its earliest points. The dropping of the atomic bomb could also justify the money spent on the Manhattan Project (Donohue 1). With a quote by Franklin D. Roosevelt “This will be a day that will live in infamy”, Pearl Harbor was a tragic day for Americans. The United States had lost many soldiers, which they had claimed that they will eventually get revenge. The alternates of dropping the bomb was also discussed at the Interim Committee. The American government was trying to get an invitation response from the Japanese government. If the United States did not drop the bomb and ‘Operation Downfall’ ha...
“The atomic bomb certainly is the most powerful of all weapons, but it is conclusively powerful and effective only in the hands of the nation which controls the sky” (Johnson 1). Throughout World War II, the war was in pieces. The Germans were almost at world domination along with their allies, the Italians and Japanese. The Japanese and United states had remained at combat with each other since the bombarding of the Pearl Harbor ("U.S. Drops Atomic Bomb on Japan "1). There was abundant controversy as to whether the United States should have used the atomic bombs or not. There were many factors as to the argument relating to the atomic bombs leading to the United States final decision. Many people had arguments for the bombing and others had arguments against the bombings but it is still not determined if the United States made the right decision.
The dropping of atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, Japan were ethical decisions made by President Harry Truman and the United States government. By the time of the atom bomb was ready, the U.S. had been engaged in military conflict for over four years and lost over 400,000 soldiers. Truman claimed, "We would have the opportunity to bring the world into a pattern in which the peace of the world and our civilization can be saved" (Winkler 18). The bomb was aimed at ending the war immediately and avoiding prolonged battle in the Pacific Theater and the inevitable invasion of Japan. President Truman hoped that by showing the Japanese the devastating weapon the U.S. possessed, that the war could be brought ...
There are many people who oppose the use of the atomic bombs; though there are some that believe it was a necessity in ending the war. President Truman realized the tragic significance of the atomic bomb and made his decision to use it to shorten the agony of young Americans (“Was the Atomic Bombing”). The president knew of the way the Japanese fought. They fought to the death and they were brutal to prisoners of war. They used woman and children as soldiers to surprise bomb the enemy. They made lethal weapons and were taught to sacr...
In Bomb, the main point is to talk about how this deadly weapon came about and how it changed history forever. Towards the end of the book, after Robert Oppenheimer saw the effects of the bombing on Hiroshima, he realizes the dangers of this deadly weapon, when the scene said, “‘The safety of this nation,' he insisted, ‘cannot lie wholly or even primarily in its scientific or technical powers. It can be based only making future wars impossible.' The only hope, he believed, was for the United States to stop building bombs and to somehow convince the Soviet Union not to start, ”(Sheinkin 214). In this quote, we see that Robert Oppenheimer now sees the horrible effects caused by this bomb and he wants the U.S to avoid making these bombs. This quote shows the impact of the discovery, creation, and testing of the atomic bomb because it shows that this bomb is the most dangerous thing on the planet and it should be stopped from being produced. The impact of the discovery, creation, and testing of the atomic bomb is that the discovery of uranium fission led to theories of making bombs with it, which caused the creation of the uranium atomic bomb by Robert Oppenheimer and his team. Now countries have thousands of nuclear weapons that they can use