Affirmative Action Speech

593 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The Importance Of Affirmative Action

I. Introduction

A. There are two kids applying to a college. Both have the same GPA, extracurricular activities, and test grades. They should score the same on their admission policies, but one has a grandfather who came from Mexico. That person qualifies as being a poorly represented ethnicity and all of the sudden qualifies for acceptance when the other person does not. That just isn't fair.

B. Affirmative Action is a poor attempt of ending racism because it is in fact only justifying racism by its own actions of taking preferences.

C. Today we will go over three main areas involved with why affirmative action is such a poor policy:

1. Because AA uses discrimination to end previous discrimination.

2. Its unfairness towards you and me.

3. and Because it is unfair to give special privileges.

II. Body

A. Affirmative Action uses discrimination to end the previous discrimination of our ancestors. This is a large and growing problem in our country.

1. It was originated by President Johnson to ensure that applicants are employed, and that employees are treated without regard to their race, creed, color, or national origin.

# Affirmative Action grew rapidly and is now used in most college and job admission programs.

# Today its policies judge people solely on skin color and gender and sex.

# Its use today is now going against what it's intentions were in in 1965.

2. This problem is caused by the many colleges and companies using this program and being stubborn in their views over a possible change.

# At Stanford, there has been discrimination in favor of racial minorities in admissions.

# The Students began protesting because the racial preferences promoted in Affirmative Action were actually just promoting discrimination.

3. Affirmative Action causes so many problems because it is very common that the best candidate does not get admitted into a college or for a job.

4. Many students here, in this classroom, will or has seen the affects through their college admissions.

B. Affirmative Action should be abolished completely for all levels of admission.

1. There should be no program used for admissions that involves any preferences whether it deals with legacy, race, or location.

2. There would be no costs, no time involved, but just that each admission program looks at ones qualities, not their skin color.

Show More
Related

  • Pros And Cons Of Selective Incorporation

    906 Words  | 2 Pages

    3.The term Affirmative action has played a huge role in the past one hundred years of American politics. It is simply defined as an action or policy favoring those who tend to suffer. Civil Rights of American citizens have drastically changed because of Affirmative action. With almost anything in politics, there is a debate for and against Affirmative action. Supporters of this say that this helps encourage e...

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action Rhetorical Analysis

    744 Words  | 2 Pages

    Another article titled “The Painful Truth About Affirmative Action” (Source B) by Richard Sander and Stuart Taylor Jr. takes a similar stance, but walks the reader through an alternative route in reaching a conclusion by discussing the negative aspects of AA on minority students. A third article by the name of “Actually, we still need affirmative action for African Americans in college admissions. Here’s why” (Source C) by Valerie Strauss provides input from the other side of the spectrum by arguing that AA is still needed. While source A provides an extremely biased perspective on affirmative action and does little to persuade the audience with its weak language, source B presents a slightly stronger argument against affirmative through its descriptive language and academic tone, which appeals to the reader but fails to address the opposite side of the dispute. However, source C offers the most compelling argument through its thorough analysis of affirmative action that considers both sides of the spectrum with strong diction and formal tone to effectively convey its ideas to the

    Read More

  • None of This is Fair by Mr. Richard Rodriguez

    664 Words  | 2 Pages

    The Affirmative Action Law was formed as a solution to the long history of animosity towards minorities, and to eradicate the segregation between minorities and majorities. The program certainly aided many of disadvantage people living in the United States. The Affirmative Action encouraged many individuals, particularly, women, and group of people that belongs to different ethnic groups to have hopes and dreams due to the fair chance that were being given by the program. However, even though the Affirmative Action Law’s aim is to provide equal human rights for all the citizens of the United States, there will always be a group of people who will oppose, because each individuals’ have different notion and needs.

    Read More

  • Hopwood Vs Texas

    1474 Words  | 3 Pages

    America has had a problem with racism and discrimination since before our independence. After the Civil Rights movement in the 1960’s, a new way to help make up for wrong doings in the past. Affirmative action was first created to attempt to make up for past discriminations against minorities and women in colleges, universities, and the business world. It’s a program designed to have minorities or women selected, rather than a white man so as to not discriminate against them. While needed back then, should it still have a place over 50 years later? Having affirmative action no longer in place will eliminate reverse discrimination and the possible questioning of those effected by it. Individuals took a survey to voice their opinion about having

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action

    1139 Words  | 3 Pages

    majority, does not advance the cause of minorities in a meaningful way, and needs to be

    Read More

  • Reverse Discrimination In College Admissions

    1249 Words  | 3 Pages

    Affirmative action, the act of giving preference to an individual for hiring or academic admission based on the race and/or gender of the individual has remained a controversial issue since its inception decades ago. Realizing its past mistake of discriminating against African Americans, women, and other minority groups; the state has legalized and demanded institutions to practice what many has now consider as reverse discrimination. “Victims” of reverse discrimination in college admissions have commonly complained that they were unfairly rejected admission due to their race. They claimed that because colleges wanted to promote diversity, the colleges will often prefer to accept applicants of another race who had significantly lower test scores and merit than the “victims”. In “Discrimination and Disidentification: The Fair-Start Defense of Affirmative Action”, Kenneth Himma responded to these criticisms by proposing to limit affirmative action to actions that negate unfair competitive advantages of white males established by institutions (Himma 277 L. Col.). Himma’s views were quickly challenged by his peers as Lisa Newton stated in “A Fair Defense of a False Start: A Reply to Kenneth Himma” that among other rationales, the Fair-Start Defense based on race and gender is a faulty justification for affirmative action (Newton 146 L. Col.). This paper will also argue that the Fair-Start Defense based on race and gender is a faulty justification for affirmative action because it cannot be fairly applied in the United States of America today. However, affirmative action should still be allowed and reserved for individuals whom the state unfairly discriminates today.

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action: Giving Preferential Admissions to Minority Students

    1316 Words  | 3 Pages

    Charles, Camille Z., et al. "Affirmative-Action Programs for Minority Students: Right in Theory, Wrong in Practice." The Chronicle of Higher Education 55.29 (2009). Academic OneFile. Web. 9 Aug. 2011.

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action in College Admissions

    1570 Words  | 4 Pages

    According to the Encyclopædia Britannica, affirmative action is “an active effort to improve employment or educational opportunities for members of minority groups and women.” However, despite its well-intentioned policies, it has been the source of much controversy over the years. Barbara Scott and Mary Ann Schwartz mention that “proponents of affirmative action argue that given that racism and discrimination are systemic problems, their solutions require institutional remedies such as those offered by affirmative action legislation” (298). Also, even though racism is no longer direct, indirect forms still exist in society and affirmative action helps direct. On the other hand, opponents to affirm...

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action and Racial Tension

    1704 Words  | 4 Pages

    Subconscious prejudices, self-segregation, political correctness, reverse discrimination, and ignorance all wade in the pool of opinions surrounding affirmative action and racial animosity. With racial tensions ever present in this country, one might question whether the problems can be solved by affirmative action.

    Read More

  • Disparate Treatment

    1099 Words  | 3 Pages

    ... I believe the inconsistent nature of the selection process and the lack of a clearly defined procedure for the selection of candidates, led to the court’s decision that some classes of candidates were treated unfairly. Employers and government agencies alike should utilize legal services to ensure that hiring and testing processes are equitable and legal. The Lewis v. City of Chicago case was found in favor of the plaintiffs that may have been an oversight in which the city simply desired to create a manageable hiring list. Illegal classifications and hiring projection errors created a case where a class action group was victims of disparate treatment.

    Read More

  • Is Affirmative Action still needed?

    973 Words  | 2 Pages

    Today there is considerable disagreement in the country over Affirmative Action with the American people. MSNBC reported a record low in support for Affirmative Action with 45% in support and 45% opposing (Muller, 2013). The affirmative action programs have afforded all genders and races, exempting white males, a sense of optimism and an avenue to get the opportunities they normally would not be eligible for. This advantage includes admission in colleges or hiring preferences with public and private jobs; although Affirmative Action has never required quotas the government has initiated a benefits program for the schools and companies that elect to be diversified. The advantages that are received by the minorities’ only take into account skin color, gender, disability, etc., are what is recognized as discriminatory factors. What is viewed as racism to the majority is that there ar...

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action

    1127 Words  | 3 Pages

    The discrimination against Caucasian and Asian American students a long with the toleration of lower quality work produced by African American students and other minority students is an example of the problems caused by Affirmative Action. Although affirmative action intends to do good, lowering the standards by which certain racial groups are admitted to college is not the way to solve the problem of diversity in America's universities. The condition of America's public schools is directly responsible for the poor academic achievement of minority children. Instead of addressing educational discrepancies caused by poverty and discrimination, we are merely covering them up and pretending they do not exist, and allowing ourselves to avoid what it takes to make a d... ... middle of paper ... ...

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action on Social Inequality

    1665 Words  | 4 Pages

    Pursuing this further, in the beginning, from the sociological perspective, affirmative action was approved in order to reprimand the African Americans who have suffered from discrimination through the years. Now this policy has spread to all minorities and are now seen as quotas where one minority has an advantage over another. That is why there are many people who do not agree with affirmative action. Certain groups can create an opportunity for themselves and only gain advantages that the p...

    Read More

  • Affirmative Action Violates Constitutional Rights

    2154 Words  | 5 Pages

    Stephanopoulos, George, and Christopher Edley, Jr. "OTHER FEDERAL POLICIES: THE FCC AND THE DEPARTMENTS OF TREASURY AND AGRICULTURE." Affirmative Action Review Report to the President. 19 July 1995. 16 Dec. 2002 <http://clinton2.nara.gov/WH/EOP/OP/html/aa/aa11.html>

    Read More

  • The Pros and Cons of Affirmative Action

    3452 Words  | 7 Pages

    The purpose ofAffirmative Action is a simple one, it exists to level the playing field, so to speak, in the areas of hiring and college admissions based on characteristics that usually include race, sex, and/or ethnicity. A certain minority group or gender may be underrepresented in an arena, often employment or academia, in theory due to past or ongoing discrimination against members of the group. In such a circumstance, one school of thought maintains that unless this group is concretely helped to achieve a more substantial representation, it will have difficulty gaining the critical mass and acceptance in that role, even if overt discrimination against the group is eradicated. For this reason, more effort must be made to recruit persons from that background, train them, and lower the entrance requirements for them. (Goldman, 1976, p. 179) Proponents of affirmative action argue that affirmative action is the best way to corre...

    Read More

More about Affirmative Action Speech

Open Document