Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Organization structure essay abstract
How are organizations structured
How are organizations structured
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Organization structure essay abstract
According to our textbook, organizational structures are defined as “how job tasks are formally divided, grouped, and coordinated (Judge and Robbins 432).” Once being rigid and highly centralized, the past 50 years have brought forth a shift to these structures, now being more flexible and decentralized. There are many advantages and disadvantages that come with both of the structure types. These new flexible and decentralized structures have affected employee/manager relationships by allowing more effective decision making, improving contact between lower level to higher level workers, and motivating the employees and local managers. They have also impacted organizational strategies in various ways.
In centralized structures, only the top
…show more content…
These centralized structures had very weak contact between the different levels of an organization. The now popular decentralized and flexible structures create relationships that are much closer than centralized structures. The elimination of boundaries in decentralized structures allows close interaction and collaboration with people inside the firm. This close knit contact is highly fluid and adaptive. For example, all levels of workers in a decentralized organization would be able to collaborate together and brainstorm solutions and ideas. An organization that emphasizes collaboration and might benefit from a decentralized structure. Decentralization also fosters cooperation and motivates the employees which is further …show more content…
Based on a firm’s organizational structure, it can have direct influences on the strategies a firm might decide to utilize. The strategies an organization chooses to implement requires a proper match with the infrastructure of the firm. Organizations now use decentralized structures to implement an innovation strategy. The innovation strategy is a key factor of the success of an organization. The strategy focuses on the advancement of products and services. By allowing more people to be involved, as opposed to centralized structures, this offers a larger pool of creative and innovative ideas. A company needs this large pool of ideas in order to pick out game changing proposals. 3M and Google excercise decentralized structures in order to take advantage of the innovation strategy. In addition to the advantage of utilizing an innovation strategy, decentralized structures offer an ideal infrastructure for an effective customer service driven strategy. Effective customer service resolves problems at the first point of contact with the customer. This is ideal because the lower level workers who have contact with the customers possess decision making power in decentralized organizations. By giving lower level employees and managers autonomy, they are able to bend the rules for what they see best fitting in any given situation. An empowered employee with autonomy is able to
The Organisation structure of a company addresses the fact that every organisation has specific units that are responsible for different roles and actions in the organisation and that no department within the organisation stands alone, they are intertwined. The organisational chart or structure should be designed to divide up the work load, responsibilities and roles to be done
Top management decides the degree of centralization by picking and choosing who will be focus more on who they want to push to get the job done. If they focus more on the lower crew members, while centralizing will have them focused on the upper brass of the corporate company.
Secondly, CP should incorporate a more flexible environment using an organic structure while incorporating a horizontal approach that will allow them to delegate authority and responsibility. The organic structure would require CP to “depend heavily on an informal structure of employee networks. Astute managers are keenly aware of these interactions, and they encourage employees to work more as teammates than as subordinates who take orders from the boss”
Organizations are initially structured around tasks, and as the organization continues to grow, the structure within the organization takes on many characteristics. Not all structures are advantageous, especially if they are lacking in some areas. There is a relationship between structure and size of the organization that affect the centralization of the organization. At the highest levels, the personality of the chief executive may amend the organizations' structure. The structure within an organization helps define the roles and responsibilities among the members from each department and work group. The four general types of organization structure are functional, divisional, matrix, and project based. “Organizational structure is the skeleton of an organization” (Feigenbaum, 2013) and how these individuals relate to each another. Structure is a statement of the current affairs, not the ideas, intentions or improvement within an organization. When business leaders develop their initial plans for an organization, he or she looks at how to design a company and takes inventory of all the tasks, functions and goals of the business. The leader then develops groupings and ordering of job positions, departments, and human resources to effectively and efficiently perform these tasks. Technology, size, environment, strategy and goals affect an organizational structure and effects, whether they are categorized as mechanistic or organic.
This report summarizes the process that will follow and the proposed restructures. The proposed restructure reflects the need for new ‘‘organic’’ organizational forms. Not only does a company’s organizational structure help determine how well its workers make decisions, but it also reflects how well they respond to environment conditions. The organizational structure can influence workers attitudes toward their job. A suitable organizational structure can minimize costs, as well as maximize its efficiency, which increases its ability to compete in a global economy. For these reasons, many organizations have reconsidered with their organizational structures in recent years in order to improve their profits, sustainability and competitive edge.
The Company observes the practice of decentralization where the responsibility and authority in all decision-making for the divisions’ operations lie in its respective division managers, except those relating to overall company policy.
First of all, organizational structure determines the hierarchy, the levels of communication, and how job tasks are formally divided, grouped and coordinated within an organization (Langton, Robbins, & Judge, 2013). There are six key elements that managers need to address when they design their organization’s structure: work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, span of control, centralization and decentralization, and formalization (Langton et al., 2013). The way in which an organizational structure is constructed and implemented can affect company productivity.
Organizational structure is one of the three key organizational assets that could contribute to the effectiveness of operations of any organization (Zheng, Yan and Mclean 2009) It is joined together by different flows of information, decision processes, hierarchy of authority, specialization and working materials. (Enz 2009; Mintzberg 1980) Furthermore, it also determines the operating workflow, control of information, decision-making in the organization and the line authority (Mintzberg 1980). The facets of the organizational structure, the relationships that exist within it, and how the business processes (Bititci et al 2011) are controlled, determine the managerial style that should be utilized in addition to the strategies the organization could implement. Going further, a company’s organizational design and the parts that constitute it are seen as a contributing factor to superior performance, which ultimately provide an organization with competitive advantage over its competitors. (Enz 2009; Zheng, Yang, and Mclean 2009)
Organizational structure can be defined as the “formal arrangement of jobs within an organization” (Robbins & Coulter, 2009, p. 185). Having a defined and unified structure helps employees work more efficiently. Jacques Kemp, former CEO of ING Insurance Asia/Pacific, realized this need early on in his role. The company had been performing well and recently acquired another insurance company to become “one of the largest life insurance companies in Asia-Pacific” (Schotter, 2006, p. 4). However, Kemp’s proactive personality led him to seek out ways to achieve more efficient coordination between the regional office and business units (Robbins & Coulter, 2009). Kemp noticed that “most business unit managers did not even know the current corporate standards” and he began searching for a way to manage the managers (Schotter, 2006, p. 5). ING Insurance Asia/Pacific’s organizational structure was mechanistic and fairly well structured, but for a company that had recently been involved in a major acquisition and was divided across 12 geographically dispersed markets there was a great need to tweak this structure to unify the company (Schotter, 2006). If I had been in Kemp’s position as CEO, I would have made modifications to the organizational chain of command, formalized business processes, and used technology to stimulate collaboration amongst the region to help this company overcome organizational design challenges.
Advantage of hieratical organisation Employees know their objectives clear in their job task and carry out efficiently. Beside that, every staff specialised their job. For example: engine designers responsible for designer and develop engine. HR staff responsible recruits and select people. Divide of labour and specialization can be applied so that it increase the working efficient and reduce operation cost.
Organizations must operate within structures that allow them to perform at their best within their given environments. According to theorists T. Burns and G.M Stalker (1961), organizations require structures that will allow them to adapt and react to changes in the environment (Mechanistic vs Organic Structures, 2009). Toyota Company’s corporate structure is spelt out as one where the management team and employees conduct operations and make decisions through a system of checks and balances.
Managers and directors can use concepts from organizational structure to address these problems. In the case study, there are fourteen proposed solutions for each factor. Out of these problems, tools were invented to identify, analyze and generate solutions. These tools relied on data collected by employees, supervisors, managers and directors. Tools like the Periodic review of work processes, performance reports, job satisfaction survey and much more provide a collaborative effort to solve
Organizational structure is the way that an organization arranges people and jobs so that work can be performed and goals can be achieved. Good organizational design helps communications, productivity, and innovation. Many organization structures have been created based on organizational strategy, size, technology, and environment. Robbins and Judge (2011, p. 504) listed three common structures: simple, bureaucracy, and matrix. In this post the author will describe the matrix structure, and discuss its advantages and disadvantages.
However, there can be pros and cons to having a decentralized organization. Pros and Cons of Organizational Model
Organizational structure within an organization is a critical component of the day to day operations of a business. An organization benefits from organizational structure as a result of all it encompasses. It is used to define how tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated. Six elements should be addressed during the design of the organization’s structure: work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, spans of control, centralization and decentralization. These components are a direct reflection of the organization’s culture, power and politics.