Organizational Structure and Culture of Rolls Royce
Rolls Royce is a technology and global leader. They employ 35,200
people and operate in 48 countries.
Headquarter is based in England UK. Large manufacturing plants are
located in American, Singapore and China. A hierarchical
structure is used to manage the company. As a giant company, they
choose hierarchical structure to manage the company. It is a
traditional and effective structure for Rolls Royce to supervise and
develop the business. The Group managed by detailed systems and
procedures due to the large turnover. Their annual turnover is £5645
million. And the group enjoys 25 percentage of the engine market in
the world. The Group supplies all the major engine sectors: transport,
combat, trainer, and helicopters.
There are many layers between the top and the bottom in the group.
The top layer set up the policy and decision making. The bottom layer
would follow the guideline so they can achieve the company objectives.
The group structure is
Chairman
Board of Directors
Group of Executives
Board of Management
Group of General Management
The main departments within the group are:
Administration Division Business Division Customer Support Division
Network Development Division Production Services Division
R&D Department Finance Department Human Resources
Each division has managers for supervision. The staff in each division
needs to follow the managersÂ’ decision. Every member of staff clearly
understands their role and responsibility under the hierarchical
structure. It is because each layer gets different responsibilities.
Advantage of hieratical organisation
Employees know their objectives clear in their job task and carry out
efficiently. Beside that, every staff specialised their job. For
example: engine designers responsible for designer and develop
engine. HR staff responsible recruits and select people. Divide of
labour and specialization can be applied so that it increase the
working efficient and reduce operation cost. Clear lines of
responsibility and control functions are clear.
Disadvantage of hierarchical
Too many layers in the group, it is difficult and time consuming to
communicate between employees. Decision making are not quick enough to
react to the market.
A role culture is adopted in Rolls Royce Group.
...
... middle of paper ...
...ms between different regions and
departments. The objectives are easily achieved when good
communications are applied. Good communications also help to solve
complicated structures of the company. Most of the disadvantages are
sorted out. As Rolls Royce is a large enterprise, face to face
communication is sometimes difficult. Culture has an important role
in communication for the company. It regulates the employeesÂ’
behaviours and guides the action. It reduces the company uncertainty
and provides a balance for all the staff. Staff is well co-ordinated
so that they can achieve the objectives more smoothly.
For all those reasons, the turnover of the group is £5645 millions,
which increases 5% per year. The profit is £285 millions, which
increases 8% per year. They gained 30 per cent market share of the
global business in high quality engines. There are over 54,000 gas
turbines in service world-wide and more than 4,500 customers.
Technology and better services will continue to meet customer needs
over the next two decades. They employ around 35,000 people in 15,000
different jobs. The management ensures that all the employees perform
their best in their jobs.
The Organisation structure of a company addresses the fact that every organisation has specific units that are responsible for different roles and actions in the organisation and that no department within the organisation stands alone, they are intertwined. The organisational chart or structure should be designed to divide up the work load, responsibilities and roles to be done
ASDA's Hierarchial Structure A hierarchical structure has many levels. Each level is controlled by one person. A hierarchical company tends to be a very big company just like ASDA is. In a hierarchical company, instructions are generally passed down from one person to another until it gets to the bottom.
The Relationship between the Structure, Culture, and Management Styles in Tescos There is a clear relationship between the structure, culture and management styles in Tescos here are some examples showing this: Tescos uses power culture which has a top down (tall structure) whereby objectives are determined by the individual or individuals. This structure is also linked in with an autocratic management style as this structure tends to have a ‘them and us attitude’ which depends on where individuals stand in the hierarchy. Tescos has also adopted role culture which is structured in a hierarchal way and is divided into a number of functions which ties in with a democratic style because of the multidirectional flows of communication between organisational members means there is more likely to be a team approach. This also inter relates with the ‘flat structure’ Tescos has adopted which refers to the number of levels within the hierarchy of an organisation whereby everyone’s role, position and responsibility is made clear so that there is a clear chain of command. These cultures help Tescos to meet a range of objectives from being market leader to maximising sales and profits.
The Manifest Destiny of the 1840s set the tone for the country. The Manifest Destiny was essentially made for people for the Anglo-Saxon organization and not really for anyone else. As a matter of fact, the Manifest Destiny, has been said, to initiate the hatred among different groups of people, and light to fire to the beginnings of prejudices.
Harley-Davidson Inc. was founded in 1903 and produced most of its motorcycles to be sold to the US military during World War 1. In 1953, Harley-Davidson became the only US motorcycle manufacturer for the next 46 years (Harley Davidson Museum). In 1988, Mr. Richard Teerlink was appointed the Chief Operating Officer of Harley-Davidson Inc. until 1997 (Bloomberg). Mr. Teerlink started with Harley around 1981 as VP and CFO of Harley, which was when the company was trying to reshape its corporate culture. This was a time when the company was facing serious competition from Japanese motorcycle manufacturers like Honda, who were continuing to take up US market share since the 1960s. Harley-Davidson Inc. had to transform itself and break away from the typical corporate culture in order
Manifest destiny, the name given by John L. O’Sullivan to an aggressive territorial expansion, is responsible for the face of America today. O’Sullivan coined the movement, “Manifest Destiny” in 1845. The ideology originated long before the philosophy was named. Traces of the movement can be seen in Columbus’ exploration, and even in the developmental Jamestown colonies. Throughout America’s history, examples of the “Manifest Destiny” are apparent as ("Manifest destiny - the philosophy that created a nation") Americans gradually expanded settlements westward to increase their boundaries, however, during the 1830s and 1840s, Americans pushed farther across the continent. After the natural and inevitable travels of the new White Americans, the phenomenon of land expansion was then publicised and advertised in newspapers as the “Manifest Destiny”, it was the fuel for American expansion and for America to maintain its overall power and good morality as a country. The concept of the “Manifest Destiny” is pivotal to the nation and its future.
The organizational culture of the automotive industry is one that underwent a drastic decline between 2008 and 2009 (Goolsbee & Krueger 2015). However, within a few years the Chrysler organization made enhancing adjustments for the better. The catalyst for the transformation from negative to positive within Chrysler organization was Sergio Marchionne, who took radical measures to realign the organizational culture (Kreitner & Kinicki 2013). Through carefully adjusting the espoused value of the company and guaranteeing that they matched the enacted values he was able to generate a high Person-environment fit (PE fit) that guided the company out of bankruptcy. By using attentive deliberation of the Chrysler culture we can learn about the
Organisational Structure, Culture, and Management Style of a Business C2 An Analysis of How the Organisational Structure, Culture And Management Style of the Business Affects its Performance and Operation and Help It to Meet Its Objectives The organisation structure of Wednesbury IKEA The organisation structure in the ‘Appendix section’ belongs to the Wednesbury branch of IKEA. Wednesbury IKEA is a large formal organisation and it is best suited to a hierarchical organisational structure. This is because; there are more employees as it goes downwards from each level.
The concept of organizational cultures was first raised in 1970s, and soon became a fashionable topic. Organizational culture is the shared beliefs, values and behaviours of the group. Theorists of organizations believe that organizational culture represents the pattern of behaviours, values, and beliefs of an organization. Hence, studies around organizational culture have been seen as great helpful and essential for understanding organizations and their behaviours. Additionally, organizational culture has been considered to be an important determinant of organizational success. Therefore, leaders and managers pay more than more attentions on this topic, focusing on constructing and managing organizational cultures.
Business structure is a critical factor to determine a company 's success or failure. Generally, larger organization has a more complex organizational structure. In the case of H&M, they had adopted matrix structure, one of the traditional organizational structure, into their business. As shown in figure 1, range of functional groups is listed horizontally across the table and on the other is product/task with a manager taking control of each. The functional structure is divided
...ification as we move towards our destination IT architecture, and further strengthen our global market presence” said Neil Cameron, chief information officer at Unilever.
A strong organisational culture leads to higher organisational performance. Organisational culture can be defined as a total function of common beliefs, values, patterns of behaviour that are held and shared by the members of an organisation. It is also a valuable resource which can improve the competitiveness of a company and is used to distinguish the company (Barney 1986). From the 1970's the study of organisational culture has become an important issue and closely studied in the early 1980s. Since then, organisational culture has turned out to be one of the most important factors which affects the overall performance of a company.
Matrix structure is first introduced in the aerospace industry in the 1960s and become one of the popular organizational design options in today’s business and industry (Derven & Alexandria, 2010). Burns and Wholey (1993) poinited out that matrix structure were used in advertising agencies, aerospace firms, research and development laboratories, hospitals, government agencies, and universities. Matrix structure is the combination of two or more different structures and take the advantages of the pure functional structure and the product organizational structure (Robbins & Judge, 2011, p. 497). The employees in the matrix may have two bosses: their functional department managers and their product managers. For example, all engineers may be in one engineering department and report to an engineering manager, but these same engineers may be assigned to different projects and report to a project manager while working on that project. In many organizations, a matrix structure is implemented to address the requirement to do more with less and become more agile. The matrix structure, which focuses on horizontal as well as vertical management, has become more widespread as a result of globalization and the...
Corporate culture is the shared values and meanings that members hold in common and that are practiced by an organization’s leaders. Corporate culture is a powerful force that affects individuals in very real ways. In this paper I will explain the concept of corporate culture, apply the concept towards my employer, and analyze the validity of this concept. Research As Sackmann's Iceberg model demonstrates, culture is a series of visible and invisible characteristics that influence the behavior of members of organizations. Organizational and corporate cultures are formal and informal. They can be studied by observation, by listening and interacting with people in the culture, by reading what the company says about its own culture, by understanding career path progressions, and by observing stories about the company. As R. Solomon stated, “Corporate culture is related to ethics through the values and leadership styles that the leaders practice; the company model, the rituals and symbols that organizations value, and the way organizational executives and members communicate among themselves and with stakeholders. As a culture, the corporation defines not only jobs and roles; it also sets goals and establishes what counts as success” (Solomon, 1997, p.138). Corporate values are used to define corporate culture and drive operations found in “strong” corporate cultures. Boeing, Johnson & Johnson, and Bonar Group, the engineering firm I work for, all exemplify “strong” cultures. They all have a shared philosophy, they value the importance of people, they all have heroes that symbolize the success of the company, and they celebrate rituals, which provide opportunities for caring and sharing, for developing a spiri...
Organizational structure within an organization is a critical component of the day to day operations of a business. An organization benefits from organizational structure as a result of all it encompasses. It is used to define how tasks are divided, grouped and coordinated. Six elements should be addressed during the design of the organization’s structure: work specialization, departmentalization, chain of command, spans of control, centralization and decentralization. These components are a direct reflection of the organization’s culture, power and politics.