Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Importance of leadership on business success
Transformational Leadership And Its Roles In Empowerment, Productivity
Transformational Leadership And Its Roles In Empowerment, Productivity
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Importance of leadership on business success
Advanced Change Theory (ACT) is based on ten principles. The theory challenges many traditional ways of implementing change by encouraging leaders to examine themselves internally and build an empowered community through trust, respect and freedom of communication (Quinn, Spreitzer, & Brown, 2000). Traditional change models employ tactics such as logical persuasion in which data driven logic attempts to convince followers of the personal benefits of change. This strategy is called empirical-rational strategy. Power-coercive strategy uses leverage and the threat of discipline to enforce obedience to a proposed change. While ACT may employ some components of these strategies, it is a complex abstract model which requires personal development and a willingness to …show more content…
The leader of change must be willing to make uncomfortable adjustments internally and the leader must be willing to engage in activities that may put oneself at risk. The first six principles emphasize these points while the remaining four focus on the engagement of the rest of the community or group. Employing an ACT model first requires the desire to change a current system with the ultimate goal being an emergence of a community which is inclusive, open, and fosters personal development. This requires the leader to move from a position of self-interest and into a mind-set that is concerned with the greater good. According to ACT, in order to effectively accomplish this, the leader must be willing to first change internally by exhibiting the desired behavior of the rest of the group, challenging the status quo, and developing a shared vision that is beneficial to all. According to Quinn et al., (2000) the sixth principle encourages the leader to “take action to the edge of chaos” (p.153). This principle encourages unconventional actions and believes that chaos in a complex system will produce its own sense of order (Quinn et al.,
Rouda, R. H., & Kusy, M. E., Jr. (1996, May 4). MANAGING CHANGE WITH LARGE-SCALE, REAL-TIME INTERVENTIONS. Tappi Journal. Retrieved from http://alumnus.caltech.edu/~rouda/T5_LSRTOD.html
“Small Change” by Malcolm Gladwell is an essay that describes how technology has changed social movements. “Is Google Making us Stupid?” by Nicholas Carr is an essay that describes how technology has made people have declining cognitive abilities. Both of these articles are about how people are using technology to accomplish tasks and goals they set to achieve. In my essay I’m going to compare the two essays and see where they excel and where they fail to expand their essay.
Leaders benefit from building a team to create and implement change, this is a key theme in the Kotter model of change. This teambuilding engages employees throughout the process. Allowing employees to be a part of the change process gives them the opportunity and trust to be creative moving toward the future (Cochrane, 2002). Leaders can create opportunity for employees and leaders to dialogue about the change, which can help troubleshoot the process. Leaders who engage employees throughout the organization from various levels of the organization will receive perspectives from the entire organization helping them make better-informed decisions. Employees want to be allowed the opportunity to help an organization they believe in, in a way that enhances the
Change is a double-edged sword (Fullan, 2001). Change is a word that might inspire or put fear into people. Leadership is challenging when it comes to dealing with change and how individuals react within the organization to the change. Marzano, McNulty, and Waters (2005) discuss two orders of change in their book School Leadership that Works; first and second. Fullan (2001) also adds to the discussion in his book Leading in a Culture of Change, with regard to understanding change. In Change Leadership, Keagan and Wagner (2006) discuss many factors of change and the systematic approach to change. Change affects people in different ways. Leaders need to be able to respond to the individuals throughout the change process.
It is common that throughout the course of our existence the very ideas and beliefs that make up our daily activities change. These changes occur in large part due to our experiences in everyday life, primarily those experiences involving interactions with other individuals and our increased knowledge through study. As events and daily interactions begin to challenge our preconceived notions, we begin to shift our way of thinking, thus altering our mission and philosophical outlook on life. Throughout these experiences, however, we mature and begin to realize the importance of adopting health behaviors which correspond with research-based factual evidence, as well as policies and laws. For this reason, I firmly believe the social change philosophy informs my way of thinking.
A theoretical framework provides guidance as a project evolves. The end results will determine whether the knowledge learned from implementing a project should create a change in practice (Sinclair, 2007). In this project is relied on the Kurt Lewin’s Change Theory. Burnes (2004) states that despite the fact that Lewin built up this three-step model more than 60 years prior, it keeps on being a commonly referred framework to support effective change projects. The three steps are unfreezing, moving and refreezing. Lewin decided in Step 1, unfreezing, that human conduct is held in balance by driving and limiting powers. He trusted this equilibrium should be disrupted with the end goal for change to happen (Burnes, 2004). Step 2 or moving, includes learning. Learning incorporates knowledge of what the conceivable alternatives are and proceeding onward from past practices to new practices which will...
Change is the only constant in life. And therefore it should be understood as part of a continuing work in progress that calls for a much broader canvas that seeks out competing voices, and works with the resulting ambiguities, contradictions and tensions of messy reality (Graetz, F. & Smith, A., 2010). In this submission I try to show that organizational change is majorly based on the environment surrounding it much more than the desire of the members or change agents working in that organization. This view diverts from that of Lippitt, (1958) who suggests that implementing planned organizational changes successfully depends on premeditated interventions intended to modify the functioning of an organization. It also diverts from the traditional approaches to organizational change that generally follow a linear, rational model in which the focus is on controllability under the stewardship of a strong leader or ‘guiding coalition (Collis, 1998). In this discussion therefore, comparison made between the different philosophies of change and I try to show that successful change implantation largely depends on an organizations appreciation of what goes on around it rather than what they have planned as a strategic direction.
Change is inevitable and bound to happen in all aspects of life including business. Although change is important in an organization, it can also be seen as a strength and weakness. Effective leadership is about mastering change. One must be willing to change in order to grow and be successful. This paper will compare and contrast Kotter and Kurt Lewin step in their change management models. Furthermore, it will elaborate on the concepts and explain whether these methods can be used at the same time. In addition, this paper will include a Christian worldview of the information discussed and how it relates to the change management models.
Realize that perceptions of people may need to be changed over time. People often saddle themselves with perceptions that are based on old or incomplete information and find it easier to stick with a perception, even if it is wrong, than to change it. Willingness to change means making an effort to observe this person’s behavior at other times without bias and being prepared to modify your perception if the person’s behavior warrant, it. It takes strength of character to say to yourself or others, I was wrong. But communication based on outdated, inaccuracy e perceptions be more costly than revising perceptions.
However, Lewin’s central model centres on unfreezing, effecting change and then refreezing, starting from the status quo, then moving things and then continuing with the new status quo (Green, 2007). Kotter’s change model focuses on establishing urgency, guiding coalition, developing strategy, communication, empowerment, short-term wins, consolidation of gains to produce and anchor new changes (Sabri et al, 2007). Kotter does not engage with the complexity of organisational systems and potential clashing, he sees change being systematic, architectural, political and doesn’t engage strongly with the less deterministic metaphors in the latter steps (Smith et al, 2015). However, Kotter does highlight the importance of communicating the vision and keeping the communication high throughout the process although this starts with a burst of energy and in later stages its followed by delegation and distance (Cameron and green, 2009). Lewin’s change model focuses on people with the collaboration, contribution creating a force field approach to change including the power holders socially, culturally and behaviourally to drive change (Smith et al, 2015). However, Lewin’s approach ignores the metaphor of groups of people only willing to change if there is a need to do so, the model is more of a planning tool rather than an organisational development process (Cameron and green,
I am the kind of person who likes to be in an environment that doesn’t change to often. I’m not a fan of jumping into something new. Adapting to change is one of the hardest things for me and it is the one thing that I need to work on the most. Change happens all around us every day and I need to learn how to deal with it. Change can be good. Change can be bad. It’s just what I’m going to have to work on to become a better leader.
The idea of change is the most constant factor in business today and organisational change therefore plays a crucial role in this highly dynamic environment. It is defined as a company that is going through a transformation and is in a progressive step towards improving their existing capabilities. Organisational change is important as managers need to continue to commit and deliver today but must also think of changes that lie ahead tomorrow. This is a difficult task because management systems are design, and people are rewarded for stability. These two main factors will be discussed with reasons as to why organisational change is necessary for survival, but on the other hand why it is difficult to accomplish.
The change process within any organization can prove to be difficult and very stressful, not only for the employees but also for the management team. Hayes (2014), highlights seven core activities that must take place in order for change to be effective: recognizing the need for change, diagnosing the change and formulating a future state, planning the desired change, implementing the strategies, sustaining the implemented change, managing all those involved and learning from the change. Individually, these steps are comprised of key actions and decisions that must be properly addressed in order to move on to the next step. This paper is going to examine how change managers manage the implementation of change and strategies used
I was tasked with interviewing the oldest person I know about the social changes they have witnessed in their lifetime to gain a better perspective about the ideas and theories presented in class. It is important to read books and watch videos about social changes, but, getting a first-hand account from someone who has seen, and lived through, changes over time is invaluable. It is imperative that we learn from those who are older and wiser than us. They have the experience to view changes and events from a historical perspective which creates the opportunity to for us, the younger generations, to take advantage of their successes and failures.
In relation to social transformation I have gathered materials that focusses on programs provided for ‘refugees’ living in New Zealand. The purpose of my findings are based on the societies support for ‘refugees’ in terms of human security and directions of life before settling in their new destination. There are stories about ‘refugees’ that need to be shared and stories that need to be forgotten, because it can produce controversy within the society or the universe. But where can these ‘refugees’ go if the place they call home is unsafe or too risky for the lives of their families and for themselves. It’s hard enough to migrate into a new country, but it is devastating for refugees who have experienced the loss of homes and loved ones.