Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Key terms of criminology
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Key terms of criminology
Such terms such as accomplice and assessor are specialized terms developed by the common law to distinguish criminal culpability. According to our textbook, accomplices are individuals involved before and during a crime (Lippman, 2014). Categories in which accessories can fall under include accessory before the fact and accessory after the fact. For accomplice, the government must prove that a defendant intentionally aided in the commission of a crime or who intends to help the crime succeed. The case involving a former New England Patriot tight end, Aaron Hernandez is a perfect example of both accomplices and accessories to a crime.
(The information in this case was provided by Fox sports and can be found at http://www.foxsports.com/nfl/story/aaron-hernandez-murder-case-timeline-051414)
On the morning of July 16, 2012, Hernandez was said to have pulled up next to a vehicle in South Boston where he opened fire and killed two immigrants. Alexander Bradley, an associate, was said to have been with Hernandez and who had witnessed the incident. Late that evening, Hernandez summoned two more associates, Carlos Ortiz and Ernest Wallace Jr., who drove to a section of Boston to pick up Odin Lloyd. Around 3am in a secluded field, Odin Lloyd was shot several times presumably by Hernandez and Wallace. Although Bradley was only charged with failing to answer a subpoena, Ortiz and Wallace were indicted to accessory after the fact but would later be charged with murder. In other words, Ortiz and Wallace could be categorized as individuals involved before and during the crime; accomplices. A cousin of Hernandez, Tanya Singleton, was charged with accessory after the fact to murder for helping Wallace flee to Florida.
Texas. Although Hernandez was undeniably guilty of his crime his conviction in the murder of Joe Espinosa was deemed unfair by the Mexican community based upon the enlistment of a partial jury of all whites. Texas authorities argued that Hernandez was legally considered white and had therefore been tried by a jury of his peers. A brilliant yet personally troubled Mexican American lawyer named Gustavo C. Garcia and equally talented Carlos Cadena took on Hernandez’s case, standing not on the claim of his innocence but on the notion that Mexican American were treated as a class apart from whites. Prior to Garcia and Cadena’s victory in the Hernandez vs. Texas case Mexican Americans had been denied protection under the 14th Amendment. The amendment was interpreted by the ruling class as a clause to protect black Americans, Mexican classification as white left them pigeon held in
ESPN reporter’s stalker gets 2 years in prison. (2010, March 15). USA Today. Retrieved from http://usatoday30.usatoday.com/life/people/2010-03-15-erin-andrews-stalker_N.htm
Adnan Syed, was arrested for the crime, and within a year, he was convicted and
The Free Lance-Star (Fredericksburg), "Tony Lee Convicted of Murder." May 25, 1972. http://news.google.com/newspapers?id=4NpNAAAAIBAJ&sjid=2YoDAAAAIBAJ&pg=2403,4982008&dq=tony+lee+convicted&hl=en (accessed April 4, 2012).
Toledo admits to killing Yessenia Suarez during an argument. He claims Suarez became aggressive and he hit her in the throat, killing her.... ... middle of paper ... ...
In July of 1994, a little girl named, Megan Kanka, was raped and strangled. They found her body near her home in Hamilton Township, New Jersey. The story of thing young girl has shocked the nation. The man responsible for this brutal act is named, Jesse Timmendequas. He had been convicted twice prior to this attack.
"The Carlos DeLuna Case: Definitive Proof That Texas Executed an Innocent Man? - The Week." The Week. N.p., n.d. Web. 31 Mar. 2014.
Kersy, Allan. “The Full Andrea Yates Story.” COURTTV.com 03 Dec. 2001. America Online. 01 Apr. 2002. Path: Texas v. Andrea Yates; Jurors Speak Out; Family Pleads for Yates Life; Penalty Phase Begins; COURTTV.com.
Aaron Hernandez was born on November 6th, 1989. He was 6ft 2inches tall and weighed 245 pounds. Aaron Hernandez died when he hung himself in his prison cell. Aaron was a wide receiver, defensive end, and tight end for his high school team the Rams. His father Dennis died in 2006, which his mother said greatly affected him. In college Aaron chose to play for the University of Florida. He started 3 games for the Gators. “Hernandez finished his college career with 111 receptions for 1,382 yards and 12 touchdowns” (1). “In 2010 Aaron was drafted into the NFL. He was drafted by the Patriots, and played until 2012. His contract was renewed, and instead of $200,000 bonus, he got a $40 million bonus.”(2) One year later, Aaron Hernandez was found guilty of murdering Odin Lloyd. Aaron was sentenced to life in prison. And to go along with that he was accused of a “homicide in 2012 of
accused him of such as being held at knife point. In the article it states a Tyler woman
In the last three years alone the list of the accused included Dante Bichette, Barry Bonds, John Daly, Scottie Pippen, Jose Conseco, Bobby Cox, Mike Tyson, Warren Moon, Michael Cooper, Darryl Strawberry, Duane Causwell, Olden Polynice, Robert Parish, and OJ Simpson( Callahan, Sports Ilustrated). And these are only the pro athletes whose wives had the courage to report the violence.
In Anatomy of a Murder, there were four expert witnesses, Dr. Smith, Dr. Harcourt, Dr. Raschid, and Dr. Dompierre, who testified during the trial and gave their respected opinions based on their expertise about the evidence and stipulations raised. An expert witness is defined as a witness who has special knowledge or training in a specialized area (Gardner & Anderson, 2013, pg.123). The opinion of an expert witness may be admissible if the opinion is being given about a subject that can clear issues in the court. To determine whether or not the expert witness testimony is admissible, it must meet the requirements of the Federal Rules of Evidence 702-704. In addition to reviewing each of the three Federal Rules of Evidence, I reviewed each of the four expert witness testimonies and analyzed whether or not each testimony complied each Federal Rule of evidence.
In the 1970’s and 1980’s, Orenthal James Simpson or OJ Simpson was a well-known celebrity within North America. He was an all American Football player who turned to acting and sports casting after he retired from the National Football League. On June 12, 1994 Nicole Brown, OJ’s ex-wife, and her friend, Ronald Goldman, were found murdered outside Nicole’s residence. The scene of the crime took place outside Ms. Brown’s condominium complex, where two murdered bodies were discovered in the entrance pathway. The police scanned the scene of the crime carefully searching for evidence. They found crucial DNA evidence that supported their idea that Mr. Simpson had been involved in committing these murders. The LAPD issued a statement to the media saying that they were allowing OJ Simpson to turn himself in by June 17 at 11:00 a.m. OJ Simpson did not report to the police station on June 11th. The infamous car chase took place while broadcasted on live television. OJ Simpson's Ford Bronco was spotted driving down the interstate, being driven by his friend Al Cowlings. Mr. Simpson was located in the rear seat with a gun pointing to his head stating that he was going to kill himself if any cop approach the vehicle. Within the video below detective Tom Lange talked to Simpson while the car chase was taking place. He pleads with Mr. Simpson to stop this chase and not to commit suicide. Every news station within the world broadcasted the chase as the police chased Mr. Simpsons white bronco at slow speeds down the highway. Citizens flocked to the overpasses to watch as the truck passed them while being followed by numerous cop cars and news helicopters. The chase finally concluded at Mr. Simpson's home and came to a dramatic end when Cowling park...
In this essay, I will describe the elements of a criminal act, address the law of factual impossibility, the law of legal impossibility, and distinguish whether the alleged crime in the scenario is a complete but imperfect attempt or an incomplete attempt. I will address the ethical or moralistic concerns associated with allowing a criminal defendant to avoid criminal responsibility by successfully asserting a legal defense such as impossibility. The court was clearly wrong to dismiss the charge against Jack of attempted murder of Bert.
There are many different crimes that people commit and many reasons for why those people commit those said crimes. Criminology is the study of crime and people that do that for a living are called criminologist. A long time ago, some criminologist came up with some theories on the reasons why and how people commit crimes. There are a group of theories under the social learning theories; one of these theories is the differential association theory. This theory states that people learn to be criminals and the criminal behavior associated with crime.