Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Exploratory essay on the factors of wrongful convictions
Wrongful conviction
Wrongful conviction
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Butler was one of many to be accused of a crime he didn’t commit. In 1993, a woman got raped and kidnapped by whom she thought was Butler. He has been falsely accused in many ways, such as not having DNA evidence, not enough information about the crime, and lastly false accusation from the women that this crime was committed on. Anyone can be falsely accused of a crime. Everyone accused of a crime deserves a fair trial, which A.B. Butler did not get. Since Butler got his request denied, they couldn't prove him innocent. This is proven when Butler appealed, repeatedly asking that the evidence collected from the victim and the scene of the crime be tested and his appeals were denied ("A.B. Butler"). This just shows it led to the wrongful conviction …show more content…
This led to the wrongful conviction because they had no evidence to prove him innocent. All these examples lead to false accusations, but so do miscommunications. Miscommunication leads to misunderstanding,Which rarely leads to anything good. Butler already had a rape record so he was in the lineup, and the women identified him. This is shown when The victim initially identified Butler from a book of mug shots and later identified him in a lineup (Neufeld and Scheck). This relates to the wrongful conviction because she identified the wrong black male. Also, when people believe they are right, they repeatedly say what they believe. This is shown when she subsequently identified him at trial ("A.B. Butler"). She may believe she is right, but everyone makes mistakes and that's something everyone has to pay the consequences for. Miscommunication might lead to a lot of misunderstanding, which may make crimes harder to understand. Not everyone who commits a crime is a criminal. A.B. Butler did not do what the woman accused him of such as being held at knife point. In the article it states a Tyler woman …show more content…
He was also picked because the women abducted "identified" him. Butler, who was on 10 years probation at the time for a previous rape case, was first picked from mug shots, then from a line up"(Evan). If he didn't have a rape case he wouldn't have even been in the options. Not only in the case was the person committing the crime an issue, but it could also have been the woman who reported him. Sometimes people make mistakes. The victim in this case, a young white woman, reported that she had been abducted from a parking lot and raped by a black male ("A.B. Butler"). The victim reported a black male of rape, but was not positive it was him. Secondly, She had been forced to drive to a rural area before the assailant raped her twice ("A.B. Butler").She was forced to drive around and was raped so she should have known who it was. Proof is the key to everything in a case.When Gov. George W. Bush of Texas, who had always denied pleas for reprieves, finally granted, acknowledging the importance of DNA evidence and the right of a condemned man to ask for testing.("A.B. Butler").He was exonerated by DNA testing with the help of the Gov. Lastly, Butler was released in January 2000 and
On June 7th 2008, Sarah May Ward was arrested for the murder of Eli Westlake after she ran him over in a motor vehicle in St. Leonards. Prior to the incident the offender had been driving the wrong way down Christine Lane which was a one way street. Whilst this was occurring she was intoxicated, under the influence of marijuana, valium, and ecstasy and was unlicensed to drive. The victim and his brother who were also intoxicated, where walking down the lane and where nearly hit by the offender. This prompted the victim to throw cheese balls at the car and make a few sarcastic remarks regarding her driving ability. After a brief confrontation between the two parties the victim and his brother turned away and proceeded to walk down Lithgow Street. The offender followed the victim into the street and drove into him while he was crossing a driveway.
However, police should have acknowledged that individuals can make mistakenly identify the wrong person, especially an individual who had just tragically witnessed his wife’s death, and that the positive identification can not be the only evidence used to confirm the identity of a suspect. In addition, a search was never conducted on Butler’s home to see if any evidence was there. Unless my memory fails me, police officers also did not perform a gun residue test on Butler to see if he had recently fired a gun. Regardless, police did not find any physical evidence, such as blood, on Butler’s clothes or body. In fact, there was no forensic investigation of evidence conducted at all. Mary Ann Stephen’s purse was later discovered in a trash can, but it wasn’t until after the acquittal of Brenton Butler that a fingerprint belonging to the real killer was found on her purse. Overall, the ethical issues involved in the Brenton Butler case are astounding. The best solution to resolve those issues is to thoroughly perform job duties with integrity. Investigators had to know that more evidence than just a positive identification made by one, rightly upset individual was not substantial enough to confirm the identity of the
in jeopardy than how he may have driven a young girl down a spiral to
The author gives an example of the other similar case, when the black girl was accused of striking the white male student with a book without any evidences. And she was presumed guilty.
Immediately there were problems with both how the identification was obtained and the testimony of the witness. For starters, Butler was not identified out of a line up, but rather a show up identification. One of Butler's lawyers, noted that the description match many men in Florida and Butler could have possibly just been in the wrong place at the wrong time. This leads to the issue of race. Stephens is white while Bulter is black.
The Merseyside police had accused Butler of murdering a woman, Anne Marie Foy, in 2005. This was because his DNA sample was on record after he had willingly given it to the police as part of an investigation into a burglary at his mother's home some years earlier.The DNA sample was only a partial match to Butler, but it was also of poor quality, and forensic experts at the time said
This man had been accused for something he had never done. “In the early morning of May 4, 1992 the 3 year old of Kennedy Brewer’s girlfriend was abducted from her Mississippi home, raped and murdered.Her body was found two days later in a creek about 500 yards from the home.Kennedy Brewer immediately became a suspect.” (“Exonerating the Innocent") This is significant , because even though the suspect looked guilty further evidence proved his innocence. He ended up spending many years in prison for something he didn't
Her brother was one year older than she was, making him 11 years old at the time. Furthermore, she began to trade sex for money, cigarettes, drugs and alcohol throughout the neighborhood. This tradeoff went on for 2 years, until she was raped by a family friend, that lived in the neighborhood. In 1970, she was pregnant with a child at 13 years old by this man. In March 1971, she deliver her son but was forced to put the son up for adoption. (Golden, 2003)
This case was publicized way too much on national television. Just like the rape case for the Kobe Bryant trial, there was way too much media involvement, resulting in the leak of the victim’s name which started the case to downhill from there. If the media was not heavily involved which led to the victim being pressured by scrutiny and threats, Kobe Bryant probably would have been convicted of rape with the victim being a witness on the stand with her testimony.
In 1991, 11 year old Jaycee Lee Dugard was taken right in front of her stepfather’s eyes on her way to school in South Lake Tahoe, by what police believed was a man and a women. Years had went by and nothing had turned up about the missing Jaycee Lee Dugard. In 2009, one of Jaycee’s abductors Phillip Garrido went into his parole office with Jaycee (going by Alyssa at the office), telling police that Jaycee was his neice. Police began suspicious, because along with Jacy and Phillip were two young girls claiming those were his nieces as well. Phillip eventually confessed to a parole officer that he had kidnapped and raped Jacy. She had been held captive behind and series of tents for eighteen years at Phillip and his wife Nancy’s home. While
brought up in a bad way. Looking back at the witnesses I think it is
On the night of the crime, a drunk Leslie Black beat a drunk woman—Marlene Bird—with a board with a nail in it. After that, he raped her, then set her on fire before leaving. But after all of that, Bird survived; however, her legs needed to be amputated and her destroyed left eye covered. Black ruined Bird’s life. Bird already drank a lot before the crime, but she drank even more afterwards. People want Black to pay for what he did. But there are some who think he should not be given the title of dangerous offender because, as a child, he watched his mother get murdered on his ninth birthday. Even so, a decision as to what should be done must be made.
First of all, the butler is not guilty, because he was envisioning things that didn’t happen. To illustrate, after the neighbor reported that he heard a shriek during midnight, two police officers were appointed to gather information at the old man’s house. At first, the butler greeted and talked to the officers with great composure, but he started to hear a low, dull noise. He assumed the officers heard the noise, too. The story stated that before the butler’s confession at the old man’s house, he thought to himself, “they heard! -- they suspected! -- they knew! -- they were making a mockery of my horror! -- this I thought, and this I think,” (Poe, 83). The butler thinks the officers suspected him of murder or foul play. Furthermore, he sees
Two former Vanderbilt football players face the possibility of decades in prison. Corey Batey and Thomas Thurman were the two perpetrators that were captured raping a woman on video that had done viral. Corey Batey was known to be a hard drinker and had many easy hook ups at Vanderbilt University, in which he violated the in multiple ways and urinated on her. The other perpetrator was Brandon Vandenburg, who briefly dated the woman who was raped. Brandon was “not accused of touching the woman sexually, but was found guilty for being the ringleader, gave condoms and egged others on, voice heard on video, instructing them, and laughing” (Blinder, Alan, and Richard PÉrez-peÑa). Security camera images found the men carrying an unconscious woman into a dormitory room. “Several people knew of the assault, but failed to report it” (Blinder, Alan, and Richard PÉrez-peÑa), therefore bystanders need to speak up to consequent the perpetrators. Thomas Thurman, prosecutor in this case, said alcohol was an excuse football players had fallen back on and “these young men appeared to think they were entitled because they were athletes and rules didn’t apply.” Before the case even went to trial, the men were expelled. Another rape case that is very recent is with a Louisville basketball