Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Racial Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System
Sample literature review papers on forensic psychology
Racial Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Racial Discrimination in the Criminal Justice System
In May of 2000, Mary Stephens was shot to death while on in Jacksonville, Florida in what was presumed to be a robbery attempt. With her at the time was her husband, James Stephens who was the sole eyewitness to the crime. He gave a description of the assailant to the first uniformed officer on the scene. This description would later be repeated in court as follows: Black male, shorts that went down to the knees, a dark shirt with no logo, and hat with "narrow brim". Mr Stephens also testified that the assalient told his wife to give him her pocketbook. Within a few hours of the crime 15 year old Brenton Butler was spotted walking down the street and stopped by a police officer because he was a match for the description given by James Stephens. Butler willingly answered questions from detectives and got into a police car. Butler was then identified by Mr. Stephens and subsequently arrested and charged. Immediately there were problems with both how the identification was obtained and the testimony of the witness. For starters, Butler was not identified out of a line up, but rather a show up identification. One of Butler's lawyers, noted that the description match many men in Florida and Butler could have possibly just been in the wrong place at the wrong time. This leads to the issue of race. Stephens is white while Bulter is black. …show more content…
Experiment 1 showed that in the case where there was a weapon, subjects were more likley to look at the weapon then the assailant. This helps contradict Stephens' testimony that he was looking at the assalient's fact the entire time. Supplementing this is the results of the lineup. Both experiments show that even without a weapon present subjects had a very difficult time identifying the suspect. The highest persentage of correct answers in either experiment was just 38.9%. In the case of a weapon it was an abysmal
Mary Domsky-Abrams; one of the few to get out of the building, in the beginning of the fire, she recalls talking to one of the managers named: Bonstein. “ As he came near us on that fateful day, one girl asked him, “Mr. Bonstein, why theres is not water buckets?. In case of fire, there would be nothing with which to fight it.” He became enraged at our group of price committee members, and with inhuman anger replied” If you’ll burn, there’ll be something to put out the fire.”
While in jail he had no one to support him or keep him level except for his journal. His parents didn't visit and Kathy O’Brien, his defense attorney, wasn’t believing in Steve ad as only there to do her job. On the contrary, in Murder on a Sunday Monday, Brenton Butler had a huge amount of support from his parents and from his defenders: Patrick McGuiness and Anne Finnell. Similarly, both were treated without respect from people around them. The case came to close for both of the boys after everyone was done after defending their side on the
Mary Musgrove was a very influential woman of her time. Her heritage of both Native American and English blood gave her the perfect advantage for prosperity in the time period in which she lived. She had a great impact on the state of Georgia as an interpreter, a trading post owner, and a tribe member.
Mary McLeod Bethune was an innovative leader because she took a story which was largely latent in the population, equal education rights for black children, and brought it to national prominence through the creation of the Bethune-Cookman college. She was also a visionary leader because of the incredible success she was able to attain in advancing the cause of equal education.
One of the leading black female activists of the 20th century, during her life, Mary Church Terrell worked as a writer, lecturer and educator. She is remembered best for her contribution to the struggle for the rights of women of African descent. Mary Terrell was born in Memphis, Tennessee at the close of the Civil War. Her parents, former slaves who later became millionaires, tried to shelter her from the harsh reality of racism. However, as her awareness of the problem developed, she became an ardent supporter of civil rights. Her life was one of privilege but the wealth of her family did not prevent her from experiencing segregation and the humiliation of Jim Crow laws. While traveling on a train her family was sent to the Jim Crow car. This experience, along with others led her to realize that racial injustice was evil. She saw that racial injustice and all other forms of injustice must be fought.
The book Murder in the Bayou: Who Killed the Women Known as the Jeff Davis 8?, written by independent journalist and private investigator Ethan Brown, tells the horrific true story of the bayou town of Jennings, Louisiana located in the heart of the Jefferson Davis parish. During the four year duration between 2005 and 2009, the town of Jennings was on edge after the discovery of the bodies of eight murdered women were found in the filthy canals and swamps. The victims became known as the “Jeff Davis 8.” For years, local law enforcement suspected a serial killer, and solely investigated the murders based on that theory alone. The victims were murdered in varying manors, but when alive they all shared many commonalities and were connected to
This paper will consider eye witness testimony and its place in convicting accused criminals. Psychology online (2013) defines “eye witness testimony” as a statement from a person who has witnessed a crime, and is capable of communicating what they have seen, to a court of law under oath. Eye witness testimonies are used to convict accused criminals due to the first hand nature of the eye witnesses’ observations. There are however many faults within this system of identification. Characteristics of the crime is the first issue that will be discussed in this paper, and the flaws that have been identified. The second issue to be discussed will be the stress impact and the inability to correctly identify the accused in a violent or weapon focused crime. The third issue to be discussed is inter racial identification and the problems faced when this becomes a prominent issue. The fourth issue will be time lapse, meaning, the time between the crime and the eye witness making a statement and how the memory can be misconstrued in this time frame. To follow this will be the issue of how much trust jurors-who have no legal training-put on to the eye witness testimony, which may be faltered. This paper references the works of primarily Wells and Olsen (2003) and Rodin (1987) and Schmechel et al. (2006) it will be argued that eye witness testimony is not always accurate, due to many features; inter racial identification, characteristics of the crime, response latency, and line up procedures therefore this paper will confirm that eyewitness testimonies should not be utilised in the criminal ju...
Gladys Smith was a small town girl that became famous as a young child. As a young child Gladys Smith no longer Gladys Smith, she was renamed by a director by the name of David Belasco. He changed her name from Gladys Smith to Mary Pickford from then on everyone has known her as Mary Pickford.
Connie Williams, the defendant’s half-sister, testified that she had been dating the victim, Isiah Barnes, for two years at the time of his death. On September 18, 1986, Connie and Isiah were drinking at Robert Cobb’s home along with the defendant and his girlfriend. The Defendant left and returned hours later to Cobb’s home. The defendant arrived at Cobb’s house around midnight where the defendant found him in his bedroom. The defendant asked Cobb to keep a ticket for the numbers he played. Cobb was confused on why the defendant wanted him to keep it. Without another word, the defendant walked around the foot of the bed and pulled a gun out from his belt and shot Barnes. Barnes’ girlfriend, Ms. Pettaway cried out for the defendant to
Summary:On the night of August 22nd, Rodney Wyman and his coworker were at a local motel watching television, when he heard a noise from the back room. When he got up to check it out he was approached by a gunman at the door. The gunman shot him in the chest and the shot was fatal. Twenty-three latent prints were collected and ran through the AFIS database,but no leads came back.Then, 27 years later, fingerprints were collected from the television set that the gunman had tried to steal but was unsuccessful at doing so. The fingerprints were ran through IAFIS. The prints matched a man named Shawn Marsh. Investigators located Marsh and collected fingerprints and palm prints from him. The prints were a match. In April of 2013 Marsh was put in prison
When someone points their finger to a specific person in a courtroom and identifies them as the criminal, it is very powerful. Most people think that that is a case closer. Often these people have identified the same person in photos and line ups prior to being in court. But, is it possible that they could be wrongly identifying an innocent man? Even if they completely believe it and would pass a lie detector test when asked if they believed that this person was truly the one who committed the crime? “Picking Cotton”, the story of Jennifer Thompson’s accusation of Ronald Cotton, is a perfect example of the faults of eyewitness news.
In the summer of 1984, 22 - year old Jennifer Thompson’s life drastically changed when a man broke into her apartment, held a knife to her throat and raped her. During the attack, Thompson was determined to stay alert; she studied his face, his voice and any other details that could be used to help identify the perpetrator. Her intention was to survive, and with the information from the attack she planned to help the police catch her rapist. After a composite sketch, photo identification, physical line-up identification and trial, Thompson identified Ronald cotton as her attacker. Her testimony and memory alone was enough to sentence Cotton to life in prison. After a few years in prison, Cotton met a man named Bobby Poole, who had previously
When Mary Perrine was entered in the google search engine there was one thing that came up with reliable information. It says that Mary left her house on February 18, 1985 at about 6:30 pm in Miami Township to go to the Dayton Mall. She left in her dark blue Plymouth reliant. When she arrived at the mall there was witnesses that said they saw a black male with a gun by the car. Some witnesses
He was presented to a witness in a lineup where no other fillers looked like the culprit. With all odds against him, the witness couldn’t help but guess which man looked like her rapist. She thought the answer to her question was in the lineup, thus chose the “closest” option. If the victim had been cautioned against guessing, informed that the offender may or may not be present in the lineup, and was presented before a lineup that contained similar fillers, Steve Titus and others, would have never been wrongfully convicted. These victims of the misidentification effect would have been declared not guilty, and would have lived their lives freely, as innocent human beings deserve to
The trial today commenced with the accused entering a not-guilty plea. Soon after, the Crown proceeded to call upon their witnesses. The neighbour was the first to be called, and his testimony was clear and concise. His unwavering surety when he said “I’m certain that I saw [the accused] point a firearm at me”, rendered his claims credible and convincing.