Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Dna testing law enforcement
Pros and cons of using dna in court
Critical analysis of DNA evidence in courts
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Dna testing law enforcement
How would you feel spending most of your life in prison for something you did not do? A man by the name of Wilton Dedge went through this exact situation. He was charged for sexuall battery, assault, and burglary. He was charged on 5/08/82 in Florida. Wilton was convicted by eyewitness identification, microscopic hair comparison, snitch testimony, and dog sniffing. He was later exonerated 22 years later, when the results excluded him as the contributor of the spermatozoa, conclusively proving his innocence for a second time. The reason this ties into The Crucible, because it suggest that no matter how little or how much evidence you have, anyone could be falsely accused and imprisoned for something they did not do.
After reading, DNA testing is has the biggest reason why people have been exonerated. An estimate of about 336 people have been exonerated by DNA testing and 20 of them who have served time on death row. “ To date 336 people in the United States have been exonerated by DNA testing, including 20 who served time on death row.” (“Exonerating the Innocent.”) This quote proves that I am credible, because it shows that I researched it, and found out facts about the innocent project.
…show more content…
This man had been accused for something he had never done. “In the early morning of May 4, 1992 the 3 year old of Kennedy Brewer’s girlfriend was abducted from her Mississippi home, raped and murdered.Her body was found two days later in a creek about 500 yards from the home.Kennedy Brewer immediately became a suspect.” (“Exonerating the Innocent") This is significant , because even though the suspect looked guilty further evidence proved his innocence. He ended up spending many years in prison for something he didn't
This conglomerate of tests and trials, legal and internal, display a deeper side of humanity, one that we often do not like to show. Sins of one come to haunt another, and sins of the past strike at the very heart of Salem. Sin is the open rebellion against God, which is what these people of Salem did by asserting themselves as the divine and holy judges of creation’s soul. However, these trials are not bound to fictional Salem nor are they dead in the real Salem. These trials are being held all over the world at different times and places as well as different hearts and minds. Internal confliction and past mistakes destroy the livelihood of people everyday, and The Crucible is one of the greatest fictional portrayals of this. The characters use the circumstances of the period for personal gain and to hide their sins. Gallows once used to deliver godly punishment become a dark place, absent of the deity, which destroys the lives of those hanging from the noose and their families. If it could happen then, would it not be accurate to assume it is happening
In today's society no crime is a perfect crime, with the use of DNA testing and modern advancements in health and forensics even the smallest piece of someone's genome can be cultured and used to identify even the most devious of criminals. The use of DNA testing was able to help change the life of Gene Bibbins for the better and further proved how DNA testing is able to be used to help clarify who the culprit actually is. Gene Bibbins life was forever changed the night that he was unjustifiably arrested for aggravated rape which resulted in his being sentenced to life in prison, only for his case to eventually be reevaluated sixteen years after his conviction, leading to his exoneration.
I personally feel that this is a much more reliable and accurate than relying on the testimony of witnesses. I believe through the use of science we as a society can now make sure that the guilty are caught and punished while the innocent are protected from wrongful prosecution. However the eyewitness should not be completely left out of the case against the possible offender. After it is determined through scientific evidence, in this case DNA, that the physically involved in the crime then witnesses can be brought in to give testimony that the offender was present at the crime scene or the victim can be sure that the accused was truly the one involved in the actual crime.
The Crucible was written to show people living during the Cold War how ridiculous their thoughts, actions and beliefs were. The sense of panic inspired by the accusations of one girl were very similar to that of the time when Senator McCarthy began claiming that he had evidence that certain people were Communists. For both Abigail Williams and the senator, the “evidence” each accrued was unable to be neither proven nor disproven by authorities due to the nature of the accusations, but was considered truthful as so many people supported it. The support mainly came from those who hoped to gain from the downfall of others, or as to not be accused themselves. This is furthe...
It was a mistaken identity case where the distressed raped women picked out the wrong black man. Even though the conviction was overturned due to DNA evidence, a mistaken eyewitness testimony led to a wrongful conviction that the Burlington Police upheld without question due to prejudice feelings toward determine Ronald Cotton (Thompson-Cannino, Cotton and Torneo 283). Ronald had his whole family testify that he had been home the night Jennifer was raped however because he had mixed up his dates when he originally confessed that police assumed he was lying despite what he and his family said. The other indication of racism on the police force was when the second rape victim did not pick Ronald Cotton out of the physical lineup; she claimed she was terrified of the black men standing in front of her and just needed to leave, even though she knew it saw Ronald that had raped her (Thompson-Cannino, Cotton and Torneo 129). Ronald was believed to be guilty and was trying to prove his innocence from the beginning. This simply cannot occur in a justice system where one is supposed to be innocent until proven guilty; racism played a part in convicting this innocent man. Even during the second court case when he was trying to prove his innocence he remembered feeling the jury turn and look at him, "every single one of their white faces" believed how terrible of a man he was (Thompson-Cannino, Cotton and Torneo
“DNA Testing and the Death Penalty.” ACLU: American Civil Liberties Union. 3 Oct. 2011. Web. 22 April 2014.
If that does not occur to the reader as an issue than factoring in the main problem of the topic where innocent people die because of false accusation will. In addition, this book review will include a brief review of the qualifications of the authors, overview of the subject and the quality of the book, and as well as my own personal thoughts on the book. In the novel Actual Innocence: When Justice Goes Wrong and How to Make It Right authors Barry Scheck, Peter Neufeld, and Jim Dwyer expose the flaws of the criminal justice system through case histories where innocent men were put behind bars and even on death row because of the miscarriages of justice. Initially, the text promotes and galvanizes progressive change in the legal
Now, it takes a lot of courage for an investigator to stand up and admit a wrongful conviction, especially in a case that he helped to convict. That brings me to think agree with the statement of Chief Justice William H. Rehmquist “the justice system has not yet learned to confront the fact that, even when there are no easily identifiable misstep, it can produce an unjust outcome.” (Clifford 4) It is because of this reason, that manyinnocent people end up in jail. Despite the efforts to get them out, many of them are denied. It took nine years for federal agents to even consider looking into the Edward Garry conviction case. In addition, it took another three years for Garry’s lawyer to get a post-conviction motion, which was denied by a Bronx judge, saying that the new evidence wasn’t credible. And still, Garry has yet to be absolved for this crime that he did not commit despite witnesses testifying on his behalf. This is a really depressing case because of the fact that Garry has become broken. “Garry gives the impression of a man who has been inside literally and figuratively for far too long.” Twenty one years of his innocent life that he may never get back. All because this justice system has failed him as a
Imagine that someone is accused of doing a crime and went to jail and died there, but then new evidence came up and that person was proven innocent. The people in the play The Crucible by Arthur Miller, would have the same fate. The play takes place in Salem, Massachusetts during the 1700s, during the witchcraft trials. People were being convicted of being a witch, just like what happened to John Procter during the Salem witch trials. Injustice of the courts is shown in Miller's The Crucible as well as in the unfortunate case of Robert “Bob” Doyle.
The Crucible also brings to light the theme of injustice in society. Not only does Judge Hathorne and Deputy-Governor Danforth have no proof of the crimes other than the word of the girls, but they leave the accused no options -- they either lie to save their lives, and hence 'admit' to the crime, or they die telling the truth which will not be believed by the public anyway. Even when Reverend Hale becomes suspicious that it is a hoax and informs the court of his fears, Danforth and Hathorne ignore his pleads for extra time to investigate and continue on with how they best see the court's proceedings.
evidence and the right of a condemned man to ask for testing.("A.B. Butler").He was exonerated by
In the Crucible, the accused were unfairly tried and convicted on limited evidence or even word of mouth from the girls.
On the morning of July 4, 1954, Marilyn Sheppard was violently beaten in her home in Bay Village, Ohio, on the shore of Lake Erie. She was four months pregnant and had been felled by 35 vicious blows (Quade). Right away Sam Sheppard was accused of being the victim to do this. Sheppard had told investigators that he had been asleep downstairs and was awakened by his wife’s screams. Sheppard said when he went upstairs and entered the room he was knocked unconscious by the intruder. He denied any involvement and described his battle with the killer he described as “bushy-haired” (Linder). After a police investigation, Dr. Sam Sheppard was convicted of second degree murder and sentenced to life in prison. With the hectic media covering it, they were quick in decision that it was him that committed the murder. This was an unfair trial, ruined a man’s life, and gave him no time for a career.
Many people are convicted on witness testimony, circumstantial evidence or basically no rock-solid proof at all. Do we require DNA evidence, forensic evidence, or complete admission of guilt before we lock someone away? The judicial system says innocent until proven guilty, however 387 people are proof that this is not always the case. How many more men and women that are in prison could be or currently falsely jailed. How many families are torn apart and people’s families and imagine are tarnished. It may only be a few people, but one person wrongfully convicted is morally wrong. I don’t have the answer to this problem and wish I did, nothing in life is perfect. However, I believe with organizations like The Innocence Project, advancement in DNA evidence, better forensic analyst and better trained crime scene detectives not as many people will be wrongfully jailed. I for one highly doubt the court system will ever be 100% right, but do believe that they try to be fair and hope more people can in a way listen to those that claim
"The Innocence Projectan." The Innocence Project - About Us: FAQs:How Many People Have Been Exonerated through DNA Testing? Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law at Yeshiva University, n.d. Web. 25 Mar. 2014.