Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Key aspect of leadership
Importance of ethics in military leadership management
Principles of army leadership
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Key aspect of leadership
If Soldiers and leaders adhered to the Army Values and the Leadership Requirements Model, many ethical dilemmas that Noncommissioned Officers face on a daily basis would not occur. In the Army today, Soldiers constantly discuss values and leadership, unfortunately not everyone takes them seriously. The abuse of authority and command influence sometimes displayed by leaders puts subordinates into ethical dilemmas. Often, command influence will challenge the Loyalty, Duty, Respect, and Honor values that a leader attempts to live by. There are times when adhering to and living the Army Values results in Soldiers and leaders facing ethical dilemmas with their superior(s). Introduction An Army White Paper, The Profession of Arms (2010), defines Army Ethic as, “The moral values, principles, and martial virtues embedded in its culture that inspire and regulate behavior by both Soldiers and the U.S. Army in the application of land combat in defense of and service to the Nation” (p.12). Army Values and ethos in the Soldiers Creed, and Creed of the Non Commissioned Officer provide the foundation of Army Ethic. The Army creates and establishes regulations, policies, standards, and guidelines that serve as the basis for controlling the behavior, and administration of the institution. When a standard that contradicts an established policy or regulation occurs, Soldiers and leaders must take appropriate action to address the issue. The action taken by a Soldier is living the Army value of duty. Out of respect, leaders will confer with their superior(s) for guidance, as well as keeping him or her abreast of a situation. Unfortunately, the guidance and command influence provided by that superior will contradict what a Soldier and l... ... middle of paper ... ... Soldiers and leaders to live the Army Values. Moreover, leaders need to demonstrate the attributes and competencies outlined in the Leadership Requirements Model. Leaders must lead by example and develop subordinates and organizations with the Army Values and Leadership Requirements Model as a foundation for their behavior. Subsequently, when leaders do not live the Army Values and achieve the leadership attributes, it often results in a dilemma. Most leaders live the Army values on a daily basis. There are times when Soldiers and leaders will face ethical dilemmas while living the Army Values due to their superior(s) command influence. This pressure and directive style of leadership is an abuse of authority. Works Cited Center for the Army Profession and Ethic (CAPE), Combined Arms Center, TRADOC. (2010) An Army white paper: the profession of arms, (p. 12).
Not only must the commander expect ethical behavior from his soldiers, but he must also live an ethical command. In order to provide and ethical command climate, the commander must be an ethical role model that is able to gain the trust and confidence of his soldiers. The fifth issue will automatically be resolved upon the successful completion of the institution of an ethical command climate. With this culture in place, soldiers will not place items like the kill board in their company headquarters because they will understand the ethical implications of such an action. The commander will have provided the leadership necessary to set and maintain an ethical command climate. The soldiers will see the Iraqi population as fellow humans and will make the ethical decisions that can lead to winning the hearts and minds of the local population.
LM01, Ethical Leadership. (2012). Maxwell Gunter AFB. Thomas N. Barnes Center for Enlisted Education (AETC)
Professional Military Education schools teach the Army Ethic and evaluation reports for leaders affirm this ethic. The Army punishes individuals, especially leaders, who violate this code. The Army administratively punishes Soldiers who do not adhere to this code, and the severity of punishment increases with rank. One recent and highly visible example of this is former General Petraeus’s adultery and the subsequent professional sanctions he experienced. The Army grows its own ethical code and maintains it through the American people.
In A Tactical Ethic, Moral Conduct in the Insurgent Battlespace, author Dick Couch addresses what he believes to be an underlying problem, most typical of small units, of wanton ethical and moral behavior partly stemming from the negative “ethical climate and moral culture” of today’s America (Couch, D., 2010, p. 15). In chapter one, he reveals what A Tactical Ethic will hope to accomplish; that is identify the current ethics of today’s military warriors, highlight what is lacking, and make suggestions about what can be done to make better the ethical behavior of those on the battlefield and in garrison. He touches on some historic anecdotes to highlight the need for high ethics amongst today’s military warriors as well as briefly mentions
LM01, Ethical Leadership Student Guide. (2012). Maxwell-Gunter AFB. Thomas N. Barnes Center for Enlisted Education (AETC).
...e military has different chains of command, and each branch is called something different. I will have to implement the NASW Code of Ethics by understanding that my superior can have superior as well, and in times I will have to recognize and follow their ranking system. In the end however I do have a code to follow, and I have to adapt to following the ethics, and respecting their rules as well.
When then leader measures what was supposed to happen with what actually happened, the leader and involved personnel will then find out if the job was completed to standard. Also the leader needs to know from the personnel involved, what to keep doing and what can be done different to get those same or better results. All feedback should be honest and factual. This is the information that the leader will use to makes thing better; to make the operation run more smoothly. All of this defines the most successful and impactful Army leaders.
Soldiers are charged with many different missions as long as they serve their countries and some require the choice between “easy right and a hard left.” What is good, bad, right, and wrong will always weigh on Soldiers minds; it’s their integrity that will ensure they make the best decision available for the circumstance they are facing. “The military needs soldiers who will resist peer pressure to misbehave and who will do what is right not only when the gaze of others is upon them, but also when it is not,” (Robinson, P., 2007) . When a Soldier receives orders to clean his/her weapon and decides to not thoroughly clean their weapon, they run the risk of their weapon not operating properly. If challenged by their superiors ab...
Moral courage is to raise your hand, overcome one’s fear, and claim for something that is wrong. A military leader exerts his power influencing with his positon power (in case of military the rank) and/or personal power (how does one person is seen in the organization). The leader, who has a position power, and doesn’t claim for something that is wrong or exerts moral courage, take the risk of loosing personal power and credibility within his organization. If the senior leader exerts moral courage within an cohesive organization he will probably gain personal power and credibility throught the organization. It means that his organization will support and trust on him. For this reason the leader should has to take into account many factors: The culture of his organization, if there is cohesion in his organization, what is his superior’s behavior, and how to built trust between superiors and subordinates. In both cases, a military senior officer will not loose his position power. On the other hand, the subordinate that doesn’t have position power (young officers, warrant officers, and enlisted officers) and claims for something that is wrong or exercise their moral courage, will probably gain personal power within his group or organization. So there is a close relationship between personal and position power and there always be risks if there is not communication and a cohesive organization. There is also a huge risk with a person that has power and claim for something that is wrong, in this person can loose the opportunity to log in better positions if the system is corrupt.
As an officer in the United States Army, it has been imperative for me to understand every facet of leadership and why it remains important to be an effective leader. During this course, I have learned some valuable lessons about myself as a leader and how I can improve on my leadership ability in the future. The journal entries along with the understanding of available leadership theories have been an integral part of my learning during this course. For all of the journals and assessments that I completed, I feel it has given me a good understanding of my current leadership status and my future potential as a leader. All of the specific assessments looked at several areas in regards to leadership; these assessments covered several separate focus areas and identified my overall strengths and weaknesses as a leader. Over the course of this paper I will briefly discuss each one of these assessments and journal entries as they pertained to me and my leadership.
The core values are Loyalty, Duty, Respect, Selfless service, Honor, Integrity, and Personal Courage. The Army’s definition respect is, “Treat people as they should be treated. In the Soldier’s Code, we pledge to “treat others with dignity and respect while expecting others to do the same.” Respect is what allows us to appreciate the best in other people. Respect is trusting that all people have done their jobs and fulfilled their duty. And self-respect is a vital ingredient with the Army value of respect, which results from knowing you have put forth your best effort. The Army is one team and each of us has something to
NCOs are leaders of Soldiers, Soldiers are leaders themselves; we are authority figures of leaders, and as such we should seek to be mentors and encouragers. An NCO is only as effective as their relationship is strong with their Soldiers. The only way an NCO will “know” their Soldiers well enough to “place their needs above their own” is if the Soldier is willing to approach that NCO. An unapproachable NCO is an ineffective NCO. Disciplining can require immediate attention or pulling the individual aside, but it should not be a tool for embarrassment or vengeance (McCullough, 2008, 257). Regardless if it is mandated by the Military Code of Justice, and regardless of any Oath made we are a volunteer army, and therefore have free will to strive for excellence or do the bare minimum required. Disrespect is more likely to slow down the mission and disrupt the unit; an NCO’s time is better spent learning how to inspire instead. Disrespect can rear its ugly head often without us realizing it. Asking Soldiers to miss a disproportionate amount of family time, ignoring a Soldier’s socializations and value systems, or assigning tasks that is “beneath” their title or position can solicit resentment (Figliuolo, 2011). The Golden Rule is always the best rule for respect, “Treat others how you want to be
The kind of theory I will be using to approach the question, should one obey and unjust or illegal orders given by one’s military superiors? Using Philosophers Kant principles on deontological theory that emphasis on the relationship between duty and the morality of human. I will explain the action a soldier may or may not be responsible for based on morals and ethics. Are military personal actions be based on their own ethical standers or can you deem their action ethical correct because their actions are not their own will but the will of their superiors. I will include other Philosophers thoughts on this matter. A large investigation occurred in 2005. Military man and women were accused of inhumanly missed treated and torturing prisoners of war.
This paper offers an overview of the military Code of Conduct. An explanation of the lay out and a historical overview of how military service members handled themselves prior to the implementation of an official Code of Conduct. An understanding of the progression of harsh tactics being used by enemy combatants which will show a need for the creation and implementation of the Code of Conduct. Also discussed are documents that lead up to the creation the military Code of Conduct and how it has been amended to apply to US service members today. Additionally incorporated is information that will show how its practical implementation
To What Extent is it Ethical for a Soldier to Disobey the Orders of a Superior?