Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Media influence on public opinion
Media influence on public opinion
Media influence on public opinion
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
To start off the new year, in January of 2018, a new “Ted Talk” was posted, perhaps to persuade its audience to add another resolution to their list. Justin Baldoni, famous actor, talks about,” Why I’m done trying to be ‘man enough’”. Justin discusses his journey of discovering that he has lived his life wrongly and in shame due to not expressing how he truly is because of the pressure society has put on him to be “masculine”. Justin uses personal stories, credibility, and body language to ensure his speech is effective to his audience. Along with other techniques, I will be analyzing the organization and delivery of Justin’s speech. To begin with, Justin’s introduction to the speech starts off with his personal background information, side …show more content…
by side with pictures as the first piece of evidence. Justin provides pictures with the audience, making him seem manly due to all the pictures showing off his muscular physique. By speaking of himself first and making it personal, this builds his credibility, which I will go more in depth to explain late on. He then transitions to the roles he has played as an actor, and goes on to say, “Every Time I got one of these roles, I was surprised, because most of the men I played oozed machismo, charisma and power, and when I look in the mirror, that’s just not how I see myself.” This introduction is effective because Justin uses himself as a hook, starting his speech off by displaying his vulnerabilities, and making it personal, intriguing the audience to continue to listen.
As Justin continues his speech, his transitions are clear and evident, from speaking about himself, to his father and childhood, to displaying his Instagram experiment, he never loses the audience’s focus. Justin’s use of evidence in his speech varied, from visual aids, to anecdotes, photos, quotes, and even the logos appeal. Justin manages to squeeze in a use of the logos appeal, by displaying a pie graph that depicts the statistics of the demographic he attracted the most via his initial Instagram posts. He goes on to explain this demographic as being a majority of females between the ages of 18-34 years of age. Justin’s use of logos was effective in being used as hard evidence, making it clear to the audience that he is speaking the truth of his issue. His evidence supported his …show more content…
claim, that his posts appealed more to women because men view emotions and public displays of affection as a feminine characteristic. When Justin started to post “manly” items, such as his meal plan, videos of him working out, he had a spike in followers of men. Justin explains, “And then, out of the blue for the first time in my career, a male fitness magazine called me, and they said they wanted to honor me as one of their game-changers.” Justin admits he did not change his game or his life, instead he conformed to the masculine stereotype, and gained popularity because of it, adding the perfect puzzle piece to finish his giant picture. To conclude his speech, Justin uses a quote, and specifically addresses women, men, and parents upon the issue of masculinity. He also goes back to his anecdote of his childhood, and he explains, “The resentment I had towards my dad, I now realize had nothing to do with him. It had everything to do with me and my longing to be accepted… he did teach me how to use my heart, and to me that makes him more a man than anything.” These last words making his conclusion effective, proving to the audience he became self aware of his own problems of dealing with masculinity publicly, and others can do the same. In addition to his organization, Justin’s delivery of his speech built off of his body language and establishing his credibility.
Within his introduction, Justin is builds his credibility by addressing his own personal issue, and then goes in to talk about how much this is an issue on a global scale that a various number of men face today in society. Although he explains his vulnerability many times, Justin’s body language shows the audience he is confident in his insecurities and vulnerabilities. It can be seen throughout his speech, that he consistently makes eye contact with the audience members, allowing for a deeper and more sensible connection to the audience. This proves his speech is genuine, hooking the audience to continue to listen to him even more. Simultaneously, his facial expressions always linked up perfectly to the tone of his voice and the words he had to say. Even towards his conclusion, it was clear how emotional Justin was becoming, proving how passionate he is about the issue he is addressing. In allowing himself to be emotional on stage, he was effective with his use of voice and facial expression, being himself, not holding any piece of him or his story
back. Generally speaking, Justin’s speech was clear, organized, and genuine. Although, he could improve on some aspects of his speech, such as, his body movement. Justin did give a solid amount of variation between his tone of voice, and facial expressions, but failed to use his body more in his delivery. Advice I would give to the speaker would be to utilize the size of the stage, it would have engaged the audience members on the outskirts of the stage more, and proven his passion towards wanting everyone to hear his story and learn from his own mistakes. Along with this, I think Justin could have used interviews or perhaps a video presentation of the press asking him questions about his body, or his masculinity displayed on screen. In doing so, it would provide more logos to his speech and prove to his audience that it is not only ordinary men and women who stimulate this issue, but it is the media that creates these masculine stereotypes. To conclude, “Ted Talks” allow for various speakers to address a worldwide audience by posting their speeches online, which often go viral. Justin Baldoni is another “Ted Talk” speaker who uses his popularity to explore and fight against the masculine stereotypes, as he admits he is a victim and a suspect in choosing his masculinity over his personality. Justin Baldoni’s speech, “Why I’m done trying to be man enough” is thoughtfully organized, from beginning to end, his speech is filled with meaningful gestures, smooth transitions, and hard evidence, making his delivery effective.
Steve Sheinkin, award-winning author, in his novel Bomb: The Race to Build- and Steal- the World’s Most Dangerous Weapon (2012) addresses the topic of nuclear war and proves that no matter what actions are taken (during war) there will be negative outcomes by depicting the characters with anxiety, describing horror-filled battle scenes and revealing the thirst for power during these times. Sheinkin supports his claim by using memorable moments in the novel such as when the bomb is dropped on Hiroshima and the entire city is close to being wiped out; also when Stalin is upset that the Americans completed the atomic bomb which leads to another race of building upwards
In 102 Minutes, Chapter 7, authors Dwyer and Flynn use ethos, logos, and pathos to appeal to the readers’ consciences, minds and hearts regarding what happened to the people inside the Twin Towers on 9/11. Of particular interest are the following uses of the three appeals.
Forty-fourth president Barack Obama on August 29, 2009 presents a eulogy for Edward Moore "Ted" Kennedy a few days after his passing. Obama’s purpose is to pay tribute to Ted and all of the good he has done. While employing pathos, altruism, and some anger, he adopts a respectful tone in order to look back with the Kennedy family and treasure him one more time.
Although there are many rhetorical strategies incorporated throughout Freakonomics, the most prominently used devices include alliteration, rhetorical questions, and counter arguments. Ethos, pathos, and logos are also used, but to a lesser degree. The authors, Steven Levitt and Stephen Dubner, use alliteration to keep the attention of the reader. Occasionally, Freakonomics can read more like an encyclopedia than a narrative. In using alliterations, Levitt and Dubner foster a greater interest in the book by making it more comprehensible and enjoyable. For example, the authors use alliteration in a particularly slow section about parenting experts, saying that many experts’ arguments “reek with restraint” (234).
He transitions with a striking remark: “Because simple tolerance, meek tolerance, is not enough”. He asserts the importance of the genuine acceptance of all “not-withstanding their thoughts, their values, their beliefs, their origins”, using anaphora to demonstrate the diversity in humanity. He brings forth this ideal, espoused by his father, using “we” in order to address the audience directly as a united force. He continues by directly comparing Pierre Trudeau’s duty towards his children and his duty towards his country; he uses this comparison to accentuate his father’s immense love: “love for his sons, Love for his country, and that’s why we love him so”. Throughout the remainder of this section, Justin repeats love often, ending his next two paragraphs with a phrase including the word. In doing so, he impresses on Canadians the depth of his father’s love and their capacity to return that genuine and deep love. Justin concludes this rhetorical section of his eulogy by thanking the audience, on behalf of his brother and him, for their love, again drawing them in for his final
“The role of a creative leader is not to have all the ideas; it's to create a culture where everyone can have ideas and feel that they're valued” (Ken Robinson). From the vast and varying array of “TED Talks,” situated on multiple topics, Kenneth Robinson’s speech explores and questions an argument understandable to students in an everyday educational environment. More in depth, English author, speaker, and advisor on education, Sir Kenneth Robinson confronts and challenges the modern day academic school system killing creativity. Robinson argues that; hence, “We are educating people out of their creativity” (Ken Robinson). Kenneth questions whether students, or in other words, future leaders and world changers are being subject to guidelines and rules put in
In Scotland, summer of 2012, Melissa Marshall spoke at a TED Talk titled “Talk Nerdy to me”. In this short and direct speech, she illustrated to the audience the importance of being knowledgeable of what was occuring in the scientific field. Coinciding with that, she said that scientists should want and need to make that knowledge accessible and comprehensible to the public. In her mind, it would be beneficial to everyone if scientists involved the public in discoveries about great issues in our world such as health care, the environment, energy resources, etc. In order to build a bridge of communication, Marshall outlined some general tips for scientists and engineers on how to better bring the public into their wonderland.
Being true to yourself during a speech is something the audience will take notice of. When a person speak genuinely, their speech is more conversational and the audience is more engaged. This notion can be witnessed throughout the
Today there are many defects acquiring as well as up rising in the academic field as teachers and parents alike teach a student and aid the needs these students need. The entire Ted talk is presented by RSA animation an interesting format not at all the usual Ted presentation. As well as not the only Ted presentation, Sir Ken Robinson has presented. As Sir Robinson conveys his thoughts and studies his words guide the animation in a very impressive visual. Sir Robinson will be conversing about three troubling trends: rising drop-out rates, schools' dwindling stake in the arts, and ADHD. RSA animation successfully presented a visual presentation simple and complicated at the same time that vividly guides the viewer on a journey with Sir Ken Robinson as the tour guide.
Throughout Dan Pallotta’s TED Talk he argues that the discrimination against nonprofits is limiting their ability to change the world. He believes that nonprofits operate under one rule book, while for-profits operate under another. And the book for-profits are encouraged to operate under, allows them to attract the best talent, spend money to make money, take risks, pay dividends, and take their time returning profits to investors.
Meaghan Ramsey believes in business growth that stems from real social change. She has origins in nutritional science and has worked across FMCG and multiple organizations dealing with media, charities, and pharmaceuticals. Ramsey was also the Global Director of the Dove Self-Esteem Project at Unilever in London. Her TED Talk, “Why Thinking You’re Ugly Is Bad For You” occurred in September of 2014 at TED@Unilever in London. The audience that Ramsey is trying to target is the parents of young men and women who are struggling or may begin to struggle with body image/low self-esteem. She speaks to the parents directly about what can be done to minimize the use of the internet and social media at such a young age. Ramsey’s talk is affected by the audience in the sense that she uses
The delivery of my speech portrays a sense of calmness and seriousness. I used this style of speaking to show the importance of my subject, lack of organ donors. Throughout the presentation I used note cards as a guide and frequently made eye contact with my audience. When giving facts that I felt were important I made sure to look at the camera to show there significance. I also added my input into some of the facts to try and convince my listeners to become organ donors
Berger and Luckmann explain that everyday life presents itself to audiences as a reality interpreted through typifications that constitutes the fabric of social meaning. Goffman focuses on social interactions as dramaturgical performances that exhibit both “expressions given” and “expressions given off” within social sites made up of “front-stage” and “back-stage” environments. In both perspectives, to act solely for the sake of acting is not possible. All actions are social performances that give off impressions of “self” to other actors in society based upon past experiences and typifications.
By this interaction Chris’s self concept took on new dimensions of him seeing himself as a shy or nervous person, someone not able to talk in front of a crowd or celebrity, and someone who has a social role of being just an ordinary person in front of a legendary celebrity like Paul Mccartney. But also this interaction affects the emotional side of self-concept which is self-esteem. In the video Chris said “I am so stupid” or “I am a idiot”. With this interaction Chris’s self-esteem decreased as he continued to self-talk negatively and put himself
“How am I supposed to portray something that is the complete opposite of me?” My voice had risen to the volume associated with anger, but I was more frustrated than angry. I squinted into the bright lights, set just below the stage. I could just make out my theater Director sitting in a chair with his arms crossed over his scrawny chest.