Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Defining the self
Question about self concept
Question about self concept
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Defining the self
Berger and Luckmann’s The Social Construction of Reality and Irving Goffman’s The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life analyze human interaction in the context of actions we perform and the meanings that such actions take in social environments. I will analyze Goffman’s account of modification of the “self” through performance within the context of Berger and Luckmann’s hypothesis. The theatrical performance metaphor looks at how socialization and experience affect the use of fronts, expressions, and expressions given off.
Berger and Luckmann explain that everyday life presents itself to audiences as a reality interpreted through typifications that constitutes the fabric of social meaning. Goffman focuses on social interactions as dramaturgical performances that exhibit both “expressions given” and “expressions given off” within social sites made up of “front-stage” and “back-stage” environments. In both perspectives, to act solely for the sake of acting is not possible. All actions are social performances that give off impressions of “self” to other actors in society based upon past experiences and typifications.
Berger and Luckmann offer a treatise to the social construction of reality that outlines how we formulate the idea of the “self” in social society and how reality itself is socially constructed. “Knowledge must always be knowledge from a certain position.” It is our social position that guides our perceptions of reality and allows us to embrace our idea of “self” within reality. Everyday life presents itself as a reality that is interpreted by others and is subjectively meaningful because of such interpretations.
Goffman offers the same argument on a micro-sociological level. He claims, “information about the in...
... middle of paper ...
... we will act as such to keep up the expectation.
Through providing a micro-level analysis of the “self” through theatrical dramaturgy, Goffman supplies an adequate account of how modification of the “self” happens via performance. Taking parallel theories and ideas, each author builds upon the arguments of the other and Goffman provides enough detailed examples of social development through performance to satisfy the treatises of Berger and Luckmann’s account. Therefore, the arguments of Goffman and Berger and Luckmann work best when combined, giving us the most insight into the “self.”
Works Cited
Berger, Peter, and Thomas Luckmann. The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge. 1st ed. Garden City: Anchor Books, 1966. Print.
Goffman, Erving. The Presentation Of Self In Everyday Life. New York, NY, USA: Anchor, 1959. Print.
When meeting someone for the first time you are trying to do two things and so is the person you are meeting. The first thing each of you are doing is trying to size up and understand what type of person the other is. The second thing is that you both are trying to get the other person to see you in a certain way by the words said and unsaid and the actions done and not done. You both are acting in one way or another or putting on a performance so that the person you are meeting gets to see you as you are (gets to see you act as you do everyday) or as you want them to see you (act the in a way that makes them believe that this is the way you act in your day-to-day life).
Goffman, E. (1959). The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. New York: Doubleday Anchor Books.
In Goffman’s study of the symbolic interaction, in his book “the presentation of the self in everyday life” he did a dramaturgical analysis. Where he uses the imagery of theater to point out the importance of human action and social interaction. He compares human interaction to theatrical performances, where the person in the everyday life is like an actor on a stage. Where the audience is watching the actor role-play.
Adopted into sociology by Erving Goffman, he developed most terms and the idea behind dramaturgical analysis in his 1959 book The Presentation of Self in Everyday Life. This book lays out the process of human social interaction, sometimes called "impression management". Goffman makes the distinction between "front stage" and "back stage" behavior. “Front stage" actions are visible to the audience and are part of the performance. We change our hair color, eye color, complextion. Wearing make-up, the way our hair is styled, the clothes we wear. The demeanor we present to the world to the. All of these things lead to an outward appearance of what we want others to think we are. People engage in "back stage" behaviors when no audience is present. We whine and moan about the customers we deal with. Hair goes un-styled, make is wiped off. Clothing is comfortable and unrestricting. When a person conducts themselves in certain way not consistent with social expectations, it is often done secretly if this ...
The sociological perspective of dramaturgy is associated with Irving Goffman (1922 – 1982) who developed the concept in his book The Presentation Of The Self In Everyday Life (1959). Using theatre as an extended metaphor, dramaturgy explains how everyday interactions uphold social reality. Life is like a play and like actors in a play, people perform roles. Consequently, the social world is made up of teams working together to create the functional institutions of society. For example employment, school, home and hospitals. Social ‘performances’ are reliant on team-members understanding their role in the group and shared understanding of the scenario. Someone who undermines or disrupts a performance, by revealing hidden details, usually for their own benefit or opposing agenda, is considered a ‘discrepant identity’ (Goffman 1959:145). Two components of dramaturgy which explain the concept in more detail, are ‘impression management’ and ‘front and back’.
In his work, Goffman explains that ‘the self’ is the result of the dramatic interaction between the actor and the audience he or she performs to. There are many aspects of how an individual performs his or her ‘self’. One of the aspects of performing the self that Goffman labels as the ‘front.’ The front involves managing the individual’s impression.
How we perceive ourselves and how others perceive us. Throughout the interview I knew that the way I interacted within the group would determine whether or not I would be able to study as a student nurse. Subsequently, I wanted to appear socially desirable. Therefore, I believe there was a distortion of self-image because the interview was very important to me. Using Goffman 's theory of self (1959), the 'social mask ' I put on during the interview, could be seen as 'performance ', '...the term ‘performance’ refers to all activity of an individual in front of a particular set of observers, or audience... ' , I wasn 't my: bubbly, hyper self, I felt I had to keep this hidden as I was in a professional environment. Therefore, Johari 's window demonstrates mundane realism, because my self-image did change. My bubbly, hyper personality which is usually 'open/public ' was now 'Hidden/private '. However, Johari 's window see 's self-awareness constructed by the individual alone, which makes the theory over –simplified and not interactionist as it only considers 'nurture ' factors impacting on an individual’s self-awareness, when in reality it’s a combination of biological/genetic and social factors (nature nurture). Therefore the theory is reductionist as it over simplifies human behaviour. Although Johari 's window doesn 't give a holistic reflection for my own self-awareness and communication, the fact I can identify this as a result of using Gibb’s model means that I have a rounded analysis of my interviewing
Goffman’s legacy: For instance, on the one hand, for Goffman, the individual’s very identity is controlled, even determined, by such overwhelming societal forces as institutions, roles and social frames. In the most extreme case, the individual may undergo a mortification of self, the destruction of an individual’s personhood, as a result of the total control that a social situation exerts on him or her. On the other hand, Goffman shows how the individual, through a variety of small strategies of resistance (such as secondary adjustments” and “role distance”) even if not exactly able to achieve self-determination, can at least affirm and preserve authonomy of his or her personhood agains such powerful structural forces.
I look at myself and I list attributes: I am a Latina, American, Guatemalan, a college student, a learner, a daughter, a sister, a niece, a cousin, a lover, a girlfriend, loud, quiet, smart, naive, a fighter, submissive and yet dominant. The list goes on. I differ depending on where I am and who I am with. Goffman writes about people’s performances, “At one extreme, one finds that the performer can be fully taken in by his own act; he can be sincerely convinced that the impression of reality which he stages is the real reality...At the other extreme. we find that the performer may not be taken in at all by his own routine” (17). He breaks down our character, acknowledging it changes depending on where said person is, who they are with, if they
Erving Goffman uses a dramaturgical perspective in his discussion of impression management. Goffman’s analysis of the social world primarily centres around studies of the self and relationship to one’s identity created within a society. Through dramaturgy, Goffman uses the metaphor of performance theatre to convey the nature of human social interaction, drawing from the renowned quote “All the world’s a stage and all the men and women merely players” from Shakespeare’s ‘As You Like It.’ Much of our exploration of Goffman’s theories lies within the premise that individuals engage in impression management, and achieve a successful or unsuccessful performance. Impression management refers to the ways in which individuals attempt to control the impression that others have of them stemming from a basic human desire to be viewed by others in a favourable light. Goffman argues that our impressions are managed through a dramaturgical process whereby social life is played out like actors performing on a stage and our actions are dictated by the roles that we are playing in particular situations. In a social situation, the stage is where the encounter takes place, the actors are the people involved in the interaction, and the script is the set of social norms in which the actors must abide by. Just as plays have a front stage and back stage, this also applies in day-to-day interactions. Goffman’s theory of the front and back stage builds on Mead’s argument of the phases of the self. The front stage consists of all the public and social encounters with other people. It is similar to the ‘me’ which Mead talks about, as it involves public encounters as well as how others perceive you. Meanwhile the back stage, like the ‘I’, is the time spent with oneself reflecting on the interactions. Therefore, according to Goffman’s dramaturgical
Goffman argues that our sense of identity (who we believe ourselves to be) is also constructed socially through how we present ourselves to others.
The book surveys a host of social exchanges whereby the author demonstrates that we in our everyday lives participate in performances of ourselves in ways similar to actors depicting characters. Essentially to Dr. Goffman, it is acting -the presentation of oneself - whether recognized as such by individuals involved or not He begins quoting George Santayana in an exploration of mask. In chapter one, entitled “Performances,” the theatrical lens starts the analysis. He relays sociologist, Robert Ezra Park’s concept, “We come into the world as individuals, achieve character, and become persons” (p.20). These examples and all other pertinent information supporting his thesis are registered through theater. Previewing t...
Goffman, E. 1959. The presentation of self in everyday life. Garden City, NY: Double Day
Using the imagery of the theater to portray the social actions and interactions of human beings was the idea of Ervine Goffman. He thought that social situations were like theater, people of society were like actors on a stage, and that each person plays a variety of roles. The audience refers to the people that are in our surroundings that observe our actions on a daily basis. He said that like in theater performance there is a front region of the stage and a back region. The main concepts in Goffman’s theory, in which he refers to as the dramaturgical model of social life, are performance, setting, appearance, manner, front, front stage, back stage, and off stage. The term performance refers to the way a person acts in front observers or
Parsons, Talcott. (1938). The Role of Theory in Social Research. American Sociological Review. 3(1), 13-20.