Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Anthem for doomed youth personification
Anthem for doomed youth tone
Anthem for doomed youth as an elegy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
A Comparison of Peace, Anthem for Doomed Youth and Dulce et Decorum Est
Works Cited Missing
All three poems are about the First World War but Peace has a highly
patriotic view and displays a positive feeling about war whereas
Anthem and Dulce concentrate more on the fact that people were killed
for no particular reason and they also look at the true horrors of
war. I will mainly be looking at the content and form of the three
poems and comparing them to each other.
Anthem and Dulce both portray Owen's bitterness and anger towards the
war and this is shown by the first few lines of both poems, in Dulce:
"beggars"(L.1) and "Hags"(L.2), he uses these words to describe the
soldiers and in Anthem: "die"(L.1) and "anger"(L.2) are used. Brook
however feels that in Peace the world is asleep and dirty without war
and only war can cleanse us and wake our youth, which shows that he
has a very different view towards war.
The fact that Dulce is written in a narrative form and is a real life
encounter make it more convincing and persuasive. It has much more
informal language than the other two and the language is hard hitting
and effective. Peace's language is more formal and it seems to flow
like a speech, with a build up to a dramatic end. Anthem has been
written in a way in which you have to solve a riddle in order to find
out what is being said.
Anthem has the same effect as Dulce in the way that both poems start.
In the third stanza, the language becomes much darker, words like: anger, explode, and against make this stanza seem even more warlike than the first stanza.
Through her use of the words “dreamed”, “sweet women”, “blossoms” and the Mythology of “Elysian fields” in lines one through three, she leads the reader to the assumption that this is a calm, graceful poem, perhaps about a dream or love. Within the first quatrain, line four (“I wove a garland for your living head”) serves to emphasise two things: it continues to demonstrate the ethereal diction and carefree tone, but it also leads the reader to the easy assumption that the subject of this poem is the lover of the speaker. Danae is belittled as an object and claimed by Jove, while Jove remains “golden” and godly. In lines seven and eight, “Jove the Bull” “bore away” at “Europa”. “Bore”, meaning to make a hole in something, emphasises the violent sexual imagery perpetrated in this poem.
result it has on people. In all three poems the last line of the poems
Both poets want to be loved in the poems in their own way. While both poem’s present a theme of love, it is obvious that the poet’s view on love changes from how they view love at the beginning of the poem from how they see it at the end.
On the first read-through of Wilfred Owen’s Dulce et Decorum Est it seems to just be a poem describing a soldiers experience in World War I, but there is much more to the story than that. Through the use of several literary techniques, Owen is able to vividly describe the speaker’s experiences and at the same time make them relatable to the people reading the poem. He also is able to criticize the people who he thinks are at least partly responsible for “tricking” a younger, more gullible him into the situation in the first place.
all young people may think it is a honour to die for your country, but
Chaos and drudgery are common themes throughout the poem, displayed in its form; it is nearly iambic pentameter, but not every line fits the required pattern. This is significant because the poem’s imperfect formulation is Owen making a statement about formality, the poem breaks the typical form to show that everything is not functioning satisfactorily. The poem’s stanza’s also begin short, but become longer, like the speaker’s torment and his comrades movement away from the open fire. The rhyming scheme of ABABCDCD is one constant throughout the poem, but it serves to reinforce the nature of the cadence as the soldiers tread on. The war seems to drag on longer and longer for the speaker, and represents the prolonged suffering and agony of the soldier’s death that is described as the speaker dwells on this and is torn apart emotionally and distorts his impressions of what he experiences.
Comparing The Soldier and Dulce et Decorum Est The Soldier by Rupert Brooke and Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen were both written during world war one. War and death are the themes of both poems but they are written from different perspectives. Brooke seems to base his poem on myth because overall he says that it is good to die for your country while fighting at war is terrible and that it is every soldier for himself and not for your country. There are many reasons why Brooke and Owen have different attitudes to war.
middle of paper ... ... Ultimately, we have two poems which can be compared on the grounds of their subject, but are poles apart regarding their message. The structure of these poems is not what would be typically expected from a war poem, but are structured on the basis of these typical structures in order to create some sense of familiarity.
of the war on him, and also because of the way he directs the poem at
In several of his poems, Wilfred Owen tells of vicious memories returning to him in dreams, convicting and horrifying. Dulce et Decorum Est is certainly one of those, perhaps even the most powerful of all of them. His use of imagery paints an ugly picture of death, mutilation, and suffering in the service of country, conjuring feelings of revulsion and desolation. These feelings are further accentuated by use of poetic structure, bracing an already strong presence. But Dulce et Decorum Est isn’t simply a tale of horror. Owen is personally condemning the exaltation of the death suffered on the battlefield, even in service of one's homeland.
There a few things more frustrating in this world than an unsolved riddle. There is something in the idea that the answer is trapped within the question, trapped within you, that is maddening. They’re presented as a game, but they can become a type of metaphorical torture if the player doesn’t get the answer. That is what happened to Oskar Schell in Foer’s novel, Extremely Loud and Incredibly Close. Oskar created a riddle out of a chance occurrence and used it to channel his feelings about his father’s death.