Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Propaganda and world war 1
Comparing and contrasting the soldier and dulce et decorum est
Analysis on war poems
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Propaganda and world war 1
Comparing The Soldier and Dulce et Decorum Est
The Soldier by Rupert Brooke and Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen
were both written during world war one. War and death are the themes
of both poems but they are written from different perspectives. Brooke
seems to base his poem on myth because overall he says that it is good
to die for your country while fighting at war is terrible and that it
is every soldier for himself and not for your country.
There are many reasons why Brooke and Owen have different attitudes to
war. For example Brook wrote The Soldier at the beginning of the war
but Owen wrote it in 1916. Brooks wrote his poem as someone who hasn't
been at war and at this time people thought that the war would not
last for long, but Owen did fight in the war but was written half way
through the war. Brooke says that it is good to die at war while
fighting for your country, yet Owen says that life is terrible at war
especially in the trenches
Paragraph Two
In The Soldier Brooke promotes the glory of war and portrays death so
a natural process. He sees it as a natural process because he believes
that thoughts that fight for their country and die in war are
honourable and are patriots to their country. He believes that where
an English man dies while fighting for his country will fall and where
they fall means that, that part of land is English.
While Brooke mentions nothing of the pain and of death and the
unpleasant ways soldiers die in war, in Dulce et Decorum Est, Owen
shows the horrific consequences of war. Owen seems to show the misery
of war by setting the scene effectively he does this by saying, "In
all ...
... middle of paper ...
...e begging of war ever one was very optimistic
that we would win the war quickly and efficiently. Brooke's poem also
gives the people at home the feeling that if one of their men dies it
is not the end. In contrast Owen's poem attacks the idealistic and
romantic view put forward by Brooke. He argues against the ideals of
heroism and self-sacrifice. He is more concerned with all the men
going into war thinking that it is heroic and glorious when actually
it is horrible and that millions of men die every day.
The poem which I prefer between Rupert Brooke's The Soldier and
Wilfred Owen's Dulce Et Decorum Est is Wilfred Owen's Dulce Et Decorum
because it describes the war as I believe it is and it is very
descriptive on how the gas attack happened and how all the men felt.
So I like Wilfred Owen's Dulce Et Decorum overall
“The Soldier” written by Rupert Brooke in 1914 is a pro-war poem to express the bravery of soldiers going to war and fighting for their nation. Brooke's poems use of extended metaphors “Earth a richer dust.” Is used to explain that when a brave soldier dies the ground will forever hold its value. This allows him to convey his message of bravery by fighting for your nation because the earth will forever be grateful of your brave actions. He also uses personification “A dust who England bore, shaped aware,” To compare England to a mother as it gave life to the soldier and molded the
Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen and Seaman, 1941 by Molly Holden both present different interpretations or views on war. These different views will have a variety of impact on the reader. The two poems also have several recognizable similarities, which connects them both together. There are many factors to be considered when comparing the similarities and differences between these poems, such as perspective, imagery, time period, etc. These, and many more, will be looked at and analysed in this essay.
seen as a hero if we look at the poem in the corrupt figures point of
The two poems, 'Dulce et decorum est' and 'Who's for the game?' are both very different war poems. Although they were both written about the First World War, they both had different purposes. The poems have aspects in which they are similar, but they also have very big differences.
The two poems I will be comparing and contrasting are ‘Dulce Et Decorum Est’ by Wilfred Owen along with ‘The Charge of the Light Brigade’ by Alfred, Lord Tennyson. Wilfred Owen wrote his poem in the duration of the World War one, the poem was first published in the 1920’s. Owens imagery shown in the poem is repulsive and presenting an ugly side of war, the language used by the poet is fierce. On the other hand Lord Tennyson wrote the poem at some point in the Battle of Balaclava in the 1854 however, Lord Tennyson has a diverse vision on war due to not understanding how war was, his imagery demonstrates a calm slow story explaining how he thought war would be. Both poems are similar however they tell there stories in different ways.
all young people may think it is a honour to die for your country, but
Poetry is more than just a correlation of words; poetry contains power. Poetry works by sculpting the English language in such a way that it produces sound, while endeavoring to recreate experiences. I really grasped this concept when we read Dulcem Et Decorum Est, by Wilfred Owen. Among other things, this poem contains haunting imagery, and a rhythm that produces the sound of being in the trenches. While reading this poem, Wilfred Owen’s words made me fearful and paranoid. The slightest sound could hold my attention. I also noticed how silent the room felt after we finished the poem. We were all struck and disturbed by the old phrase Dulcem Et Decorum Est.
Wilfred Owen’s “Dulce et Decorum Est” and E. E Cummings’, “next to of course god america i” are poems that critique patriotic propaganda. Both poems use words and images to effectively depict the influence that patriotic propaganda has on war. “Dulce et Decorum Est” uses descriptive words to create realistic images of the horrors soldiers are faced with during combat, whereas “next to of course god america i” uses sarcasm to inform readers that the abuse of propaganda can be used to manipulate others. The attitudes they convey are quite similar; both suggest that propaganda is a lie; it is not sweet and fitting to die for one’s country.
A poem which I have recently read is: “Dulce Et Decorum Est” by Wilfred Owen. The main point Wilfred Owen tries to convey in this poem is the sheer horror of war. Owen uses many techniques to show his feelings, some of which I’ll be exploring.
lingers on the last phrase to work out what it means and it makes more
is a poem about the nature of creation, much as is his earlier poem from
The Portrayal of War in Charge of the Light Brigade and Dulce et Decorum Est
such as "like a man in fire or lime" where the man is in pain and is
Ultimately, we have two poems which can be compared on the grounds of their subject, but are poles apart regarding their message. The structure of these poems is not what would be typically expected from a war poem, but are structured on the basis of these typical structures in order to create some sense of familiarity. Brooke’s poem expands on this familiarity while Owen attempts to deliberately sabotage it. In regards to content, Brooke shows throughout his perception of the nobility of dying for one’s country, whilst Owen uses all of his poetic techniques to show the opposite.
History is an important to today’s modern society because it shows the attitudes and culture of that society and shows patterns of society that can teach us how to avoid such things as genocide and war. The piece that will be adapted in this essay is Dulce et Decorum Est by Wilfred Owen which will be adapted into a movie. There will have to be some changes to the poem to the length of the plot and setting up the beginning of the story. The movie will also have to keep with the overall theme of the story that war is grim and the effect that war has on soldiers. With an adaptation to a new medium, aspects of the poem could be lost or strengthen. The visuals would be strengthened because the poem has descriptive imagery and the movie would be able to stress the imagery. But with a change to a movie the overall message could be lost because of the way that people would perceive the movie, if they just watch to see World War one in action then they will miss the message about war. The reason why this piece is interesting to adapt because of the message that Wilfred Owen had that war is horrible and the façade of the leaders of war.