The Bystander at the Switch case is a fundamental part of Thomson’s argument in “Trolley Problem.” The basis of her paper is to explain the moral difference between this case, which she deems morally permissible (1398), and the Transplant case, which she deems morally impermissible (1396). In the Bystander at the Switch case, a bystander sees a trolley hurtling towards five workers on the track and has the option of throwing a switch to divert the trolley’s path towards only one worker. Thomson finds
Thought experiments such as The Trolley Problem can help give insight into how people make moral decisions and from there, what they rely on to make the decision. In the first situation of The Trolley Problem, you could pull a switch and kill one person instead of five. Here most people would pull the switch. However, in the second situation you would push someone off of a bridge to stop the trolley before it reached the five other people. In the second situation
1. In The Trolley Problem by Thomson she says that she feels a bystander may intervene in a situation such as the trolley problem. She believes if they don’t intervene they aren’t causing the men any harm by not throwing the switch. However, she argues that the driver of the trolley does cause harm if he does not throw the switch. Her feelings lead her to an incorrect conclusion because there is no difference in the intentions or means of the bystander and the driver. If the bystander sees the trolley
The trolley problem is a moral dilemma that has been analyzed by people such as philosophers, professors, and others over the years. The question continues to change and develop as time passes. The version of the question in this paper asks if there is a trolley speeding down the tracks about to hit and kill five people would you divert the train causing it to only hit one person?
experience. This not only gives the knower a fuller comprehension of the claim at hand, but gives your claim credibility to others. Works Cited Paul. "2 Corinthians." The Holy Bible. New York: American Bible Society, 1992. N. pag. Print. Trolley Problem." Wikipedia. Wikimedia Foundation, 27 Jan. 2014. Web. 05 Feb. 2014.
degreesofclarity.com/writing/utilitarianism/ Gorr, M. (1990). THOMSON AND THE TROLLEY PROBLEM. Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 59(1), 91-100. Hinman, L. M. (2014). Utilitarianism: An Introduction. Ethics Matter. Retrieved from http://ethics.sandiego.edu/presentations/AppliedEthics/Theory/Utilitarianism.pdf Nucci, E. D. (n.d.). Self-Sacrifice and the Trolley Problem. Philosophical Psychology. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/1322471/Self-Sacrifice_and_the_Trolley_Problem
The famous trolley problem describes a scenario where the train track has lost its breaks and is speeding up toward a junction. There are two pathways the train operator can take, either continue the current course, where five people are working on the rails, or switch to the alternative route, where only one person is situated. Taking either direction would result in casualties. The philosophers add an extra twist to the scenario by offering an alternative option: imagining that there is a bridge
When given a choice between consequentialism and virtue ethics, which is the better theory when dealing with moral dilemmas such as the trolley problem? To make this determination we must first decide which theory produces the best answer, and how that answer is better. Using only moral dilemma based scenarios, much like the trolley problem case, consequentialism especially in its utilitarian form, always results in a better outcome then virtue ethics, in that the outcomes will always better the
Trolleyology In this week video discussion, the main subject is it ok for the trolley to kill five or one individual that are tied to the trolley track. The back ground of the scenario, remains a person is on a footbridge looking down on the unfolding disaster. However, a fat man, a stranger, is standing next to you: if you push him off the bridge, he will topple onto the line and, although he will die, his chunky body will stop the train, saving five lives. The question is, is it permissible to
in 1967: the Trolley Problem. This problem presents the following situation: A runaway trolley is heading down the tracks toward five workers who will all be killed if the trolley proceeds on its present course. You are standing next to a large switch that can divert the trolley onto a different track. The only way to save the lives of the five workers is to divert In this problem, the one worker on the second track is replaced by your friend or family member. As we can see the problem is not very
shall change the definition of my investigation. The problem/task I will be investigating is how the mass of a moving object – a trolley, affects its stopping distance. [IMAGE] [IMAGE] Stopping Distance m In order for a moving vehicle to stop a Braking Force is needed. The friction between the wheel and the ground usually does this. But in this experiment the trolley has no brakes therefore a weight is attached to the trolley to stop it when the string attached to the weight tightens
There’s always been this sense of “right or wrong” when a decision is made. There was study that was done to test the morals of people, it was called the “Trolley Cart Problem”(Judith Jarvis Thomson, Trolley Problem). The Trolley Cart Problem is a dilemma that was written some time ago by british researcher named Philippa Foot. The dilemma created a situation that will test one person’s morals in making their decision. Judith states in her writing
can integrate a large amount of information (Kalat 2004). Studies have shown that the prefrontal cortex is responsible for working memory. Working memory is defined as "the information that is currently available in memory for working on a problem" (Anderson 2005). The prefrontal cortex (PFC) also controls behaviors that depend on context (Kalat 2004). For example, if my cell phone rings when I am at the mall or grocery store I would answer it. If it rings while I am at the movies or
decision making, and consider how it affects the self, rather than the other. Sometimes, the analysis deals with whether the proposed behaviour promotes value in one person or at the expense of the value of a few people. I am going to discuss the Trolley Problem in analyzing deontology and utilitarian ethics in justifying principals, moral rules and who wins. Ethics It is hard when it comes to decision making when determining what is right or wrong. Ethics is very hard to define depending on an individual
Aim:- To investigate how the velocity of a trolley when different spring compressions are used. For this piece of coursework I am going to investigate how the velocity of the trolley over a set distance, is proportional to the compression of the spring. I plan to use two different methods of carrying out the investigation. These methods are :- A Light Gate : - The trolley had a piece of card attached to it, on the top.the spring of the trolley was then compressed and then released, as
of the Relationship Between Mass of a Vehicle and Its Stopping Distance Problem The problem to be investigated is "how does the mass of a vehicle affect its stopping distance when brakes are applied?" This problem is related to the conservation of energy and will be investigated through a trolley going down a ramp. A simple trolley will be used to represent the vehicle and weights attached to the rear of the trolley via a pulley system will act as the brakes. Throughout the experiment energy
ramp) is 10cm using the metre stick 3. Ensure there are no extra weights attached to the trolley 4. Hold the trolley with its front touching the start line 5. Simultaneously start the stop clock and release the trolley (be careful not to push it or exert any extra force on it) 6. Stop the clock when the front of the trolley reaches the finish line 7. Record the time taken for the trolley to reach the finish, next to the relevant height, in a table 8. Repeat from step 4 twice
suburbia. In the article "Joyride", Kunstler identifies the reasons for, and attraction of, a grand public relocation to previously uninhabited areas outside main city centres. Kunstler argues that it was, in part, the replacement of the streetcar (or trolley), and later the automobile, from the horse-powered transit of earlier 20th century life, that ignited weekend traffic to expand outside urban centres. "Joyriding" on weekends, as Kunstler explains, made suburban areas more accessible and attractive
and 30cm wide. 2. Bricks or wooden blocks 3. 2 dynamics, trolleys or toy cars 4. Plasticine 5. metre rule Method: 1. Two plasticine dummies weighing 20g each were made and placed on the trolleys. 2. Trolley B was placed 30-40cm in front of the ramp. 3. Trolley A was placed 100cm from the end of the ramp. Directly in line with the other trolley. 4. Trolley A was released and was let to collide into Trolley B, observations were made on what happened to the dummies. 5. The
Conditions • For this particular experiment the gain of the output for the strain gauges are set to 1 as 0 to 8 degrees slip angle is been measured. If smaller angles are measured a larger gain may be required. • The total displacement of the trolley that runs along the track is approximately 2.17 meters. However, this may slightly vary in the results, especially with higher slip angles due to the reaction force acting on the reversible hydraulic motor that drives the track. For consistency the