Uncertain Future of Quebec Culture Gaetan Tremblay, a professor of communications at the University of Quebec at Montreal and deputy manager of the Group of research on cultural industries and social computerization (GRICIS), is a leading researcher for public policies in the field of communications. Tremblay is an advocate of public policy that defends against cultural imperialism by countries such as the United States . In particular, Tremblay studies the effects of the media on culture in Canada especially
The Challenge of Maintaining Quebecois Culture At first glance through Tremblay's article, "Is Quebec Culture Doomed to Become American?" he proposes that the vulnerable and threatened Quebec province is in danger of a cultural invasion by our Big Brother the United States. He fails to directly answer the question "Is Quebec Culture Doomed to Become American?" According to the statistics presented Quebec is hardly in such a bad state. The data outlined in the article assessed the degree of American
and Canadian Culture Gaëtan Tremblay is a professor at the University in Quebec in Montreal. As a concerned Quebecois, He wrote an article which discusses the Americanization of Canada, in particular Quebec. Tremblay seems to have a strong stand point about the future of Quebec. Using statistical and literary evidence, primary and secondary sources, he attempts to support his argument that Quebec is a victim of American cultural colonization. Tremblay fears that Canadian culture is going to disappear
years Canada has feared the increasing influence of its North American neighbors on its culture - the United States . It has become a matter of growing concern for the people of power and influence in Canada to maintain their separate cultural identity and to promote their own cultural norms. Gaetan Tremblay presents his views on this topic and does this from the perspective of a person living and working in Quebec. Tremblay, keeping in mind that the two regions – Canada and the United States , share
Is Canadian Culture Doomed to Become American? As Alvin Toffler once said, “The wider any culture is spread, the thinner it gets”1. Such holds true for the American culture, which is not only a dominating factor in its own internal market and known domestically but also a dictating force in countries around the world on the global scale, and the first on their list – Canada. This issue of cultural imperialism is touched upon by Gaëtan Tremblay in his article, “Is Quebec Culture Doomed to Become
comes solidarity among the people of Quebec and sometimes feelings of separation from the rest of Canada. One thing that no one can doubt that brings together the nation of Canada is their national sport- hockey. Everyone knows that hockey is a well-loved competitive sport all over Canada but in Quebec their home team the Montreal Canadiens takes all the cheers. With Quebec’s sense of “isolation” their hockey team becomes one of pride and unity all over Quebec. By taking a closer look at the Province
Should Quebec (or other provinces) Separate From Canada In Order To Best Protect Its Constitutional Rights? In my opinion, all provinces in Canada, including Quebec should not separate. Quebec has been one of the provinces of Canada for a long period of time. Most people in the world view that it is one of the component in Canada. French-Canadian and English-Canadian seem to live together peacefully without conflict, even many people with different cultures and languages come to Canada in recent
The Quebec separation all started when a separatist group called the “Front de Liberation du Quebec (also known as FLQ) began a terrorist campaign to win sovereignty for Quebec in 1963. However, not a lot of people supported the FLQ after they kidnapped the British commissioner, James Cross, and assassinated Quebec’s Labour Minister, Pierre Laporte, in 1970. On the other hand, Rene Lévesque, the leader of another separatist group called “Parti Quebecois” provided a more peaceful way to get separation
their cultures. He argues that cultural expression is key to individual freedom and allows for a greater freedom of opportunity. National minorities, as large ethnic minority populations within a nation that have historic and cultural ties to the land (Kymlicka, p. 79), should be given the utmost cultural freedom and protection culture as it enhances the nation as a whole. Immigrant groups, who by immigrating have given up their homeland, will in time assimilate into a dominant national culture, but
their country united, specifically Quebec and the First Nations. The 2 nations have both had their respective issues with the government. For example, the First Nations were not considered as First Nations, but Indians. They were forced to hold a status card to show proof that they were defined as an Indian. As time progressed, the Indian Act was made, which gave bands of the First Nations more authority, but no living conditions were improved. The people of Quebec did not carry any status card for
command of Quebec nationalism and the influence it has had on Canadian politics today. Quebec nationalism has shaped the structure and dynamics of Canadian federalism from a centralized to a decentralized form of federal government (Beland and Lecours 2010, 423). The decentralization of several sectors within the Canadian government has been a direct effect of Quebec nationalism. Decentralization has led to more autonomy among the provincial governments, especially in the province of Quebec. This paper
the Quebec province have been trying to reach a general conclusion by looking at the following three main aspects. Firstly, the diverse culture, history, and language between Quebec and the English speaking provinces. Secondly, the economical power preserved by the local government of Quebec. Thirdly, the relationship between Quebec’s local government and the federal government of Canada, including the discussed laws and policies. By viewing these three main perspectives, I believe that Quebec should
French Indian War, England gained control of Canada. This led to a large number of English speaking settlers who eventually became more numerous that the original French speaking settlers. Two distinct cultural groups evolved the French, mostly in Quebec, and the English in the other provinces. Initially, there was very little conflict between the two societies as they lived under the rule of the English crown. At the time of the Confederation in 1867, most Canadians wanted to establish a distinctive
the 2000s. Canada’s government had successfully responded to the rise of Québec separatism by addressing the appropriate political, cultural and social factors required to prevent the province from becoming sovereign. Canada strategically made political decisions
the type of constitutional politics in Canada is a very challenging one. The culture and faith of English Canada and French Canada are different and have caused arguments and clashes throughout Canada’s history. The 1836 rebellions are prominent events in the history of Quebec. After the rebellions, the British constitutionalists responded by “trying to assimilate the French Canadians into
French Canadians play a huge role in Canadian society, for it to separate is unimaginable. Canada is known as a multicultural and acceptance land. Yet, the hypocrisy comes in as the belief of Quebec sovereignty rises. Over the course of history, there was much unrest between the Anglophones and francophones, which leads to an unstable relation between the two ethnic groups today. In the past, the English-speaking community were always much more larger and tended to exercise control over the French-speaking
Topic: French language in Quebec: still under threat This research paper will be looking into and discussing, whether or not the French language in Quebec is still under threat. This project will discuss the existence of a threat to French language, and its culture. Also look into possible reasons why people may believe that there is a threat or not. According to research conducted after the 1995 referendum, a large number of Quebecers, who speak French, believe that there is a real threat to the
since Confederation. A well-known example of this in Quebec was during the Quiet Revolution which strengthened the need for change through Premier Lesage’s reforms and in turn, developed a strong sense of nationalism in Quebec. In contrast to beliefs that the rapid modernization of the Quiet Revolution had a positive impact on Quebec, it rather had a negative impact on Quebec and its citizens and identity. The three consequences which arose in Quebec as a result of the revolution are the encouragement
today. With that being said, French Canadians and Quebecers alike play a huge role in the history and development of Canada. Quebec would not be the same without Canada, and Canada would not be the same without Quebec. This is why the separatist movement is not only a threat to Canada, but to Quebec itself. Let's begin by talking about the sovereigntist movement in Quebec. The movement has been around since the early 60's but didn't really gain any wide scale support until the 1980's, when the first
sentiment based on common cultural characteristics that binds a population and often produces a policy of national independence or separatism (Dictionary.com, 2012). The nationalist movement in Quebec has been known to be one of the most powerful national movements in the developed West (Meadwell, 1993). Quebec is an ideal example of a sub-state nation that has claimed the right to sovereignty from a federal state. The reason for this is that provinces within the Canadian federal state have particular