Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Irrational decision making
Irrational decision making
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Irrational decision making
It is very rare that a book can be so compelling that it changes the way you think. Daniel Kahneman achieved this in his groundbreaking book Thinking, Fast and Slow. In his work, Kahneman challenges common notions of human psychology by offering a unique perspective of why we make certain decisions. Based off his contributions throughout his career, Kahneman compiles his experimental findings on human behavior into a complete manual to the human mind. The book delves into human nature and cognition, how we process our decisions and in what frame of mind do we create our perception of the world. More specifically, Kahneman deals with the irrationality of the way we think that leads to biases, mental shortcuts and defense mechanisms. His findings not only acts as an informative self-help but questions the very nature of everyday life.
Kahneman’s theory’s breaks down human thought into two systems. Our thought processes that are deliberate, rational and analytical are System 2. This type of thought is one that takes effort and time yet can yield a more accurate picture of a situation. The opposite system, System 1, is fast, quick to judge, superficial and automatic. It relies on instinct and first impression of a situation to make judgments. Kahneman explains the balance between the two systems as the equilibrium of one’s conscious and unconscious thoughts. While System 1 offers quick, apparent information about a situation, System 2 works to put the information in the correct context and fix any errors (44). Kahneman explains that the two modes are not always at work together and at times we rely on one system more in certain situations. For example, highway driving may only require System 1 as very little mental inp...
... middle of paper ...
... be avoided. When we look at an investment opportunity it is important to recognize the “gut” feeling as our initial response but not necessarily the right response. Being aware of this can help avoid falling into an optimist bias and poorly budgeting for the future.
An important question that must be asked is do we need to be completely rational always? Kahneman made clear how our System 1 can lead to bad decisions and poor planning. Yet it seems that our cognitive processes evolved in a way to protect us from aspects of reality. It is possible that our System 1 is protecting us from shattering anxiety and allows us to venture to new places. For example optimism bias allows us to take risks by shielding us from risk aversion. Kahneman’s work provides us with the valuable insight into our minds so that we can be aware of the faults and embrace its efficiency.
When we go about our daily lives there are many things that go undetected. One such undetected event goes on inside our own head. Thinking without thinking, an idea brought forth in Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink, where your brain is processing information that you aren't even aware of yet. Some of the best outcomes are produced from this “idea”. Another huge topic in this novel is the idea of “thin slicing”. Where your brain can come to a conclusion within seconds of analyzing the situation. Thin slicing is proven in this book to be more resourceful than putting any length of thought into a situation. But in order for Gladwell to drive home his ideas, he is going to need the help of some psychologists tests to prove that he is right.
The process of making a decision previously held two paths, rational and irrational, with rational having the mind at work to think about what were the choices and irrational with no really engagement. Anything beyond that process of thought was not taken until the topic of System 1 and System 2 along with effects of “Relativity” were expressed in Thinking Fast and Slow, by Kahnemna and Predictably Irrational by Ariely, respectfully. Along with the other readings, the process of our decision making were no longer solely based on two very simplified and underdeveloped ideas, but as series of network and systems of decisions the minds functions through.
To most people the blink of an eye is a very short span of time. Most people would not believe, however, that critical information can be gathered and a conclusion made in the blink of an eye. In Blink: The Power of Thinking Without Thinking, Malcolm Gladwell proves that split second decisions or what some call “gut decisions” can be just as reliable if not more reliable than drawn out, researched conclusions. Gladwell believes that this book will revolutionize the thought process and the world, he proves this by using exemplification and compare and contrast.
Dual-process models provide an attempt to describe how a phenomenon of two different mental processes, conscious and unconscious play a role in everyday decision making. The field of psychology has seen the development of numerous amounts of dual-process models over the
Malcolm Gladwell’s Blink explores the subconscious phenomenon “thin-slicing” and its manifestations in everyday life. “Thin-slicing” refers to the latent processes the brain executes, modeled from past experiences, which determine patterns in situations or behaviors. Gladwell expands upon this when he refers to “snap decisions” and “rapid cognition”, using the two terms interchangeably, as very quick “thin-slicing”. All three of these processes derive from neurological automaticity, which arises from repeat exposure to similar stimuli.
I did my primary source analysis assignment on the song “Born in the U.S.A” by singer and songwriter Bruce Springsteen. After listening to this song I analyzed what I thought that it meant. This song has a very clear meaning. It is an anti-War song, speaking of the memories and heavy heartache of a man returning from War after experiencing a personal loss not just as a citizen but also as a recruit. This song describes how he was unemployable for "doing the right thing". Springsteen basically wrote this song about the problems Vietnam veterans tend to encounter when they returned to America after serving their time. Vietnam was the first war the United States did not win. While veterans of other wars received a hero's welcome and a nice pat on the back, those who fought in Vietnam were very much ignored when they returned to back to the United States.
There are many instances when we have to be able to make decisions in an instance. Malcolm Gladwell’s nonfiction publication, Blink: The Power of Thinking without Thinking, highlights the psychology behind these split-second reactions. Throughout the book, Gladwell explains how these split-second decisions could actually be more effective than the ones that are carefully planned out. The theory of “thin-slicing”states that knowing less information about a topic can allow you to make a better decision. Gladwell uses many real life examples to show how we can interpret each other.
Stress on our rational mind can lead to risky decisions when spending our money. Almost every day, Americans spend most of the time in school or work, exerting self-control on miserable tasks. According to Kahneman’s work, “Baumeister’s group has repeatedly found that an effort of will or self-control is tiring; if you had to force yourself to do something, you are less willing or less able to exert self-control when the next challenge comes around” (41). This is described by Kahneman as the lazy system 2. After a long day of hard work, our brains refuse to make judgments, and instead rely on our emotions and instincts, rather than our rational. The reliance on emotions and instincts leads to impulsive decisions that can be risky. This lack of good judgment when we are ego-depleted can be seen in the experiment done with the judges who would review parole requests. When they were ego-depleted, the “tired and hungry judges [would] tend to fall back on the easier default position of denying requests for parole” (Kahneman 44). This portrays how lazy our system 2 really is and how ego-depletion leads to a lack of self-control, not allowing us to make good judgments by using our rational minds. Since we lack discipline to control ourselves, we tend to make impulsive decisions that can be risky. These impulsive decisions impact the economy dramatically, either helping it prosper or sending it into shambles.
JSMF explains heuristics; unconscious and fast ways of thinking that make reasoning easier. As heuristics are errors in thinking, these errors are related to poor encoding, as seen in UP. In addition, previous settings can sway how we react to information. JSMF outlines how private factors influence heuristic use more than outside factors. For example, past incidents can physically change the way the brain makes future choices (Chaiken, Liberman, & Eagly, 1989).
In Thinking, Fast and Slow, Daniel Kahneman goes to great lengths to explain the complex ways that humans think in the most simple and understandable fashion. Just as Kahneman’s title alludes, each person thinks in two distinct styles, one style is an automatic manner of thinking and the other is effortful, which he refers to as System 1 and System 2 throughout the book. Kahneman (2011) points out that when we perceive our own way of thinking “we identify with System 2, the conscious, reasoning self that has beliefs, makes choices, and decides what to think about and what to do” (p. 21), but he then immediately points out that that is not at all the case because System 1 is our dominate thinking process. We all rely heavily on System 1 because of it’s the easy and fast method, overlooking the fact that it is prone to errors and biases. System 1 and it’s short cuts are even used in important situations that we believe we have given adequate attention to, such as choosing who we will vote for in presidential elections, but even a decision such ...
Chapter thirty-four examined what Kahneman called “Empty Intuitions,” in which people are given two scenarios,
As discussed as an advantage, quick, automatic thinking can be useful for abstract ideas. However, this way of quick, automatic thinking is not always appropriate to use. There are times when an answer or decision is best to be thought out more thoroughly using the rational belief side of thinking (Witteman et al., 2009). An example of this can be found when looking at career and school work that needs a step-by-step process or plan. It would be in the best interest of the individual to use rational belief instead of intuitive thinking in this
Human beings have established an information base that has become the fulcrum of their thought process and have in turn impaired the independence of their brains and their ability to exercise autonomy. Less has been done to develop an understanding of how the brain works in terms of structuring the thought process, an aspect that prevents any efforts to adjust the general human view of the world around them and their cognitive process. Like robots, cultural norms have programmed human beings in a way that they can only respond to information from their environments in a certain manner and can only produce certain actions in response to the various stimuli from their environment, which are deemed culturally acceptable (Plattner, Meinel, & Leifer, 2016). Stanovich is keen to identify two types of brains within the human system, the primitive brain and the autonomous brain (Stanovich, 2004). Individuals tend to hide the primitive brain in favor of the autonomous brain, which is fast in making sense of the various stimuli form the environment. The primitive brain tries to question and discover the thinking process itself and how the brain works towards certain thoughts. By allowing for the dominance of conscious brain, humans have developed biasness in their
Lilienfeld, Scott, Steven, Jay Lynn, Laura Namy, Nancy Woolf. Psychology; a framework for Everyday Thinking. Boston, Massachussets: Allyn & Bacon, 2010. Print
In the book written by Daniel Goleman (1995) called ‘Emotional Intelligence: Why it can matter more than IQ’ explains how we have two minds. The emotional and rational mind, and they both operate in tight agreement for the most part. Usually there is a balance between the two, the rational mind mostly refining and time-to-time vetoing the inputs of our emotions. But still, they are semi-independent, each reflecting the operation of distinct, but interconnected, electrical structure in the brain.