Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Effects of alcohol on the body
Effects of alcohol on the body
What is the effect of alcohol on human health
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Effects of alcohol on the body
Starting off with the patterns of irrational or unethical decision making. These patterns can turn out to be bad habits. For example, smoking, drinking, and the excess use of drugs can be harmful. Engaging in these types of activities can be known as irrational or unethical decisions. Another example, eating unhealthy foods on a regular basis. This is an irrational decision people tend to make, especially when trying to stay on a healthy lifestyle or diet. Corresponding with eating unhealthy foods, not exercising and doing physical activities can be another irrational or unethical decision people make. Staying in shape will be better for one’s being in the long-run and short-run (Evaluating Patterns in Decision Making (n.d.)). Continuing on with patterns of unethical and irrational …show more content…
This example feels morally wrong in my point of view, but was to make another individual happy. Christmas time was coming around and I did not get a present for my girlfriend at the time. Reason why is because I was suppose to be moving before Christmas, however that did not happen. One of my friends, Dakota, had a gift for her already. It was a fifteen dollar gift card for iTunes. Dakota was switching over to an alternative school for his behavior and told me to give it to her. Granted, this was just a few days after my birthday, so around the 13th of December. Before winter break, I gave her the iTunes gift card, but did not say it was from Dakota. She automatically assumed it was from me due to the fact, I did not say anything about the gift being from someone else. The aftermath of that was not too bad because I felt wrong for what I did and got her something else and said it was from Dakota. This decision I made could have turned out to harm all three of us. It would have harmed my girlfriend’s friendship with Dakota and our relationship. Also, it could have damaged the friendship Dakota and I
Kody Scott, later known as Shanyika Shakur, was born in Los Angeles in 1963. Before last imprisonment he committed various crimes, such as, robbery, assault, and murder. Kody’s childhood was pretty rough. He grew up as the fifth of six children in a broken home. His mother, Birdy Scott, worked odd jobs and long hours to support her children. While his father, Ernest Scott, left the family in 1970 and was completely out of Kody’s life by 1975. Shortly after completing sixth grade at Horace Mann, Kody joined a subgroup of the infamous L.A. Crips on June 15th, 1975. Kody committed his first murder on the night of his initiation. This would be the start of Kody’s descent into becoming “Monster Kody”. It was two years after his initiation that Kody first donned the name Monster. Scott had beaten a robbery victim so bad that the police said it was “The work of a
Is it more unethical to give only when you get something in return, or to not give at all? Giving is always beneficial, and charitable donations can always be put to good use. Whether or not the donator gets something in return does not change the fact that their donation is helping others. While incentives should not always be employed to inspire people to give, generally, the end results and donations justify the incentives used.
Early speculation regarding weight conscientiousness and the estimation of calories in a meal suggested that those with more concern over their weight status would be more likely to correctly guess the amount of calories in a given meal. However, Chernev presents an experiment conducted surrounding the “dieter’s paradox,” a concept that describes how those who more closely monitor their weight are often most susceptible to overestimating the power of adding one healthy item to an overall unhealthy meal. It has been documented that when paired with a single “virtue,” or healthy food, a “vice,” or unhealthy meal will become overall healthier for consumption. The researcher anticipated to gain results demonstrating the dieter’s paradox
Rational choice theorist says that social emotions such as guilt, shame, and anxiety are feelings or thoughts that prevent us from doing things and giving in to our temptations. These social cues helps us to place boundaries on what is right and what is wrong and what the outcome of negative delinquent behaviors may be. Not everyone has the same idea of what behavior is rational versus
Criminals have been committing crimes for centuries, and they are always fooling the police detectives and federal agencies sometimes. If the justice departments would actually look at the persons thought processes and reasoning before a crime is committed, the justice departments will be able to answer the reason for the crime. The different departments could possibly figure out why the criminal did what they did in the first. For instance, they should use a couple of criminology theories to help them with certain cases that are more difficult than the rest. The theories that the justice departments should use in their systems are the rational choice and biological theories of criminology.
Ethical decision making is the process of deciding what someone believes is morally right or wrong in a situation. Our decisions may be based on our feelings and knowledge of what we believe is morally right. Sometimes, the moment or circumstance can have an impact on the decisions that we make.
The second example of when this case study involves the rational choice perspective is when Danny lied to Laura about having the job at GM. Danny used his rational thinking that if he told Laura he had a good job, that she would stay with Danny. Danny was desperate at this point and attempted to make Laura and the children stay. In his mind, he had to lie in order to gain his reward. He believed that the benefit of him saying he had a job would make his marriage
prudence, justice, fortitude, and temperance are vital facets in the decision-making process. Prudence affects moral judgment, sensitivity, and intention. It is concerned with the knowledge and practical wisdom. Justice, on the other hand, refers to the permanent attitude to perform what is fair. Another virtue; temperance refers to the desire to pursue what is just while avoiding dangerous undertakings. The fortitude virtue then controls the passions of humans like despair, fear, anger, audacity, and hope. All these elements affect both individual and organizational factors of ethical decision-making (Cabello-Medina,
Ethics are influence from many demographics which include family influences, peer influences, past experiences, religion, and situations. People decide whether something is ethical and whether or not it is right or wrong based on these influences. Individuals decide whether something is ethical or unethical based on family influences because people absorb about the ethical status or something family members based on how our families act. Also individuals also conduct their decisions based on peer influences because classmates and friends that surround us, usually impact a person’s believes on what is right or wrong overtime. Furthermore, people also resolve to their decisions on whether something is right or wrong established on past experiences because they predict their benefits on demographics that had happened to them in the past. Additionally, people select some decisions based on religion because a person’s religious beliefs will usually inspire he or she on what is right or wrong. Finally, another way people base their ethical decisions is based on the situations they are in because people sometimes change their beliefs depending on the circumstances they are in.
One element that the rational-choice perspective and the routine-activity approach have in common is the consideration of target vulnerability. The rational-choice perspective assumes that an offender thinks about a variety of factors such as how vulnerable is the target, before committing the crime. According to the routine-activity approach that for a crime to occur there has to be a suitable target.
“What You Don’t Know About Making Decisions” by David A. Garvin and Michael A. Roberto explores the ways successful leaders can design an effective decision-making process, and the areas one needs to avoid. Some areas that are mention are how leaders should focus on maintaining an Inquiry style decision process, and avoid an Advocacy style decision process. They explore how constructive conflict is desired if its cognitive conflict which allows people to openly express their differences which allows everyone to introduce new ideas. Affective conflict is to be desired, as it is emotional based and cause problems amongst teams. Garvin and Roberto talk about how leaders need to show they were listening to the discussion, and once a final choice is made, leaders need to show logic as to why the decision was made. Garvin and Roberto discuss closure within deliberations, and they talk about a Litmus Test. Throughout the paper Garvin and Roberto discuss many do’s and don’ts about decision making and ways leaders can be successful in running a team.
When people commit crime, some of those people understand that consequences come along the way. They understand the means, ends and cost of their actions, the benefits that come for committing a crime. In criminology, rational choice theory plays a role when people commit crime. People will act in their self-interest and make choices to commit crime after weighing the potential risks against the rewards. In two different articles, it will demonstrate how rational choice theory comes into play, as for the second one, why this theory would not work in this particular crime.
The world we live in is overflowing with choices and chances. Every day, each and every human must make thousands of decisions. Some decisions may be rather simple to make, or not present a high chance for an unfavorable outcome. While one may decide the apple they picked up from the store is not very sweet, the cost lost on the apple is rather minimal and the consumer will most likely be presented with many more opportunities to pick a delicious apple. However, some choices are much more complicated. Decisions such as where to invest one’s money, or what physical challenges to endure, present very serious consequences. If the wrong decision is made, one could lose their financial security, or even their life.
Structured conflict is a positive kind of conflict that can lead to much better group cohesion and decision making. There are two types of conflict that may occur in a group decision process. These are c-type conflict or cognitive and a-type conflict, affective conflict (McWilliams & Williams 2014).
The first bad habit we will talk about is drinking. Drinking is not a bad habit when done responsibly. Anyone should be able to consume alcohol when they want, as long as they have a sane mental state and recollection of what they are doing. Drinking becomes a problem when people consume too much alcohol and they cannot make good, rational decisions. When this happens the alcohol content in your blood flow to your brain and affects your decision-making and reaction time. This makes perfectly normal human beings think that they can do superhuman things. Most people end up injur...