Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
A piont inside a production possibilities frontier
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: A piont inside a production possibilities frontier
In today’s society, economic decisions made involve the concept of scarcity.
There are “opportunity costs” associated with any choice that you make. In order for an
economy to produce more of one type of product, it will be forced to sacrifice units of
production of another product. The shifting of resources from the production of one good
to another involves increasing sacrifices of the first good in order to generate an equal
increase of the second good. This is known as the “law of increasing opportunity costs.”
The economic rational for the law of increasing opportunity costs is that economic
resources are not completely adaptable to alternative uses. The opportunity cost of
producing a product tends to increase as more of it is produced because resources less
suitable to its production must be employed. Prices are a measure of opportunity cost
because they provide information about the value of one product in relation to another.
The shape of the Productions Possibility Frontier, (PPF), illustrates the principle of increasing opportunity costs (Graph 3). As more of one product is produced, increasingly larger amounts of the other product must be given up. In Graph 3, some factors of production are suited for producing both Product A and Product B, but as the production of one of the other brands increases, resources better suited to production of the other must be diverted. Producers of product A are not necessarily efficient producers of product B and just the opposite, so the opportunity cost increases as one moves toward either extreme on the curve of the production possibility frontier. If two products are very similar to one another, the production possibility frontier may be
D’Orlando 2 shaped more like a straight line (Graph 2). As an example, let’s say that two brands of wine are produced, Brand A and Brand B. These two brands of wine use the same grapes and the production process is the same. The only thing that is different is the name on the label. The same factors of production can produce either brand equally efficiently. If an increase in production of Brand B goes from 0 to 3 bottles, the production of Brand A must be decreased by 3 bottles. In this case, the two products are almost identical and can be produced equally efficiently using the same resources. The opportunity cost of producing one over the other remain constant between the two extremes
These economic models are immensely useful and help us to understand what is going on in the world economically speaking. These particular economic models are usually shown in graph or diagram form as they are clear representations of data. The production possibilities curve is a model used to understand how the economic problem relates to a nation’s productive capacity. The PPC (Production possibilities curve) enables economists to gather information on what level of production is possible when all resources are being used and what will occur when there is no availability or unemployment of particular resources. This particular model, PPC, is represented by a two dimensional diagram, therefore assuming that resources can be used to produce either product on the model. The PPC can clearly visualize opportunity cost between two products as the model demonstrates that to produce more of one good, e.g. vegemite, whilst using the same amount of resources, economies must produce less of the other good, e.g.
The second premise (P2) states The challenge here does not lie in the prevention of something bad since this would seem rather uncontroversial given our acceptance of P1. But, the sacrifice clause requires clarification before proceeding. It means, from a moral point of view, c...
The success of a cost-leadership strategy is affected by opponents with lower or equal production costs, the bargaining power of suppliers, demand of lower prices, product substitutes entering the market, and companies that are able to conquer entry obstacles and enter an industry.
Increased demand on a global scale due to increase in manufacturing across the world, opposite in U.
The quantity of a commodity demanded depends on the price of the commodity, the prices of all other commodities, the incomes of the consumers as well as the consumer’s taste. The quantity of a commodity supplied depends on the price obtainable for the commodity as well the price obtainable for substitute goods, the techniques of production, the cost of labor and other factors of production. It is supply and demand that causes a market to reach equilibrium. If buyers wish to purchase more of a commodity than that of which is available at a given price, then the price will to tend to rise. If they wish to purchase less of a commodity than that of which is available, then the price will tend to drop. Consequently, the price will reach equilibrium at which the quantity demanded is just equal to the quantity supplied.
... the consumer was demanding. With over production the consumer don’t purchase the items that was once in demand and Farmers over produce their products and those products are lowered once it hits the local super market.
The Paradox of Choice has multiple points that can be considered the big take aways. First, choosing is not an easy procedure in daily life. The consumer must learn to be careful and choose strategically. Second, when making decisions, one cannot expect to get maximum results. Sometimes settling for less is necessary. Finally, the decision maker must account for loss, and be prepared to experience negative results from some decisions.
Schmidtz writes that the greatest problem with cost-benefit analysis is that it allows for some people to be sacrificed for the greater good, and thus may call for some violation of morals (154). Similar to Nussbaum’s idea of a tragic situation, Schmidtz agrees that one may have to make a decision that will ultimately require a violation of someone’s morals, but contrary to Nussbaum, Schmidtz claims that one can use cost-benefit analysis to determine which option will violate the morals of only some rather than all. Another limit of cost-benefit analysis that Schmidtz brings up is that it may not be easy or even possible for a decision maker to consider every possible externality: “Even if we know the costs and benefits of any particular factor, that does not guarantee that we have considered everything. In the real world, we must acknowledge that for any actual calculation we perform, there could be some cost or benefit or risk we have overlooked” (162). Schmidtz acknowledges that human decision makers cannot possibility account for every single external cost, but he does claim that this limit can be accounted for if the decision is opened to the public for scrutiny. For Schmidtz, public deliberation of a decision is a practical way for a decision maker to account for the most externalities to avoid moral
For instance, if a business wants to produce 5,000 more t-shirts, yet it will require the purchase of another machine, the marginal cost for the extra t-shirts includes the cost of the new machine. A marginal product describes the additional output that results from adding one more unit of input. It can be calculated by dividing the change in the total product by the change in the variable input. For example, in order to increase the t-shirt productivity by 1000 units, the company may hire two new employees to the production line. In which case, the total change in product is 1000 units. Although, hiring two more employees increases productivity, now the law of diminishing marginal product applies. Diminishing marginal product primarily indicates that increasing one input while retaining other inputs at the same level will initially increase output; however, further increase in the output level will eventually diminish. For example, hiring an extra two employees to increase productivity, will eventually have a limited effect or diminish the average income. Production function is a graph utilized to demonstrate the relationship between physical inputs and outputs, define marginal product, and distinguish allocative
A change in quantity supplied is just a movement from one point to another in the supply curve. In opposite, the cause of a change in supply is a change in one the determinants of supply that shifts the curve either to the left or the right. These determinants are the resource prices, technology, taxes and subsidies, producer expectations, and number of sellers. An equilibrium price is required to produce an equilibrium quantity and a price below that amount is referred as quantity supplied of zero no firms that are entering that particular business. If the coefficient of price is greater than zero, as the price of the output goes up, firms wants to produce more of that output. As the price of the output goes up it becomes more appealing for the firms to shift resources into the production of that output. Therefore, the slope of a supply curve is the change in price divided by the change in quantity. The constant in this equation is something less (negative number always) than zero because it requires strictly a positive...
incentive to producers to supply more and will discourage consumers from buying so much. Price will continue to rise until the shortage has thereby been eliminated. The exact
Products requiring similar resources (bread and pastry, for instance) will have an almost straight PPF and so almost constant opportunity costs. More specifically, with constant returns to scale, there are two opportunities for a linear PPF: if there was only one factor of production to consider or if the factor intensity ratios in the two sectors were constant at all points on the production-possibilities curve. With varying returns to scale, however, it may not be entirely linear in either
...ess supply, leading some producers to keep their goods, as they won’t be able to sell them. Consequently, producers tend to reduce their prices in order to make their product more appealing as well as remain competitive in the market. In response to lower prices, the demand will increase, moving the market toward of an equilibrium. As opposed to surplus, there is a shortage, which refers to the excess of demand. The shortage makes consumers unable to buy as much of a good as they would like. Therefore, producers will raise both the price of their product as well as the quantity they are keen to supply. Consequently, the increase in the price might be really significant for some people and they will no longer demand the product. On the other hand, the increased quantity of available product might satisfy other consumers, where eventually equilibrium will be reached.
When the price of raw material will go up or down, the production coats will rise or fall. Secondly, the price of substitute products also affect the supply curve. Because the relatived products are competitive relationship, when the price of one product goes up, another will goes down. It will affect suppy. Thirdly, production technology will affect the supply curve. When the level of technology is rising or falling , the production costs will go down or up. finally, the government policies will affect the supply curve. Positive policies will make the supply go up, conversely, it will go down. For example, the govenrment limit the amount of cars which people can buy, it will caused the supply curve down. In addition, the price of product in the future and the development of product company will also affect the supply
The Perceived Demand Curve for a Perfect Competitor and Monopolist (Principle of Microeconomics, 2016). A perfectly competitive firm (a) has multiple firms competing against it, making the same product. Therefore the market sets the equilibrium price and the firm must accept it. The firm can produce as many products as it can afford to at the equilibrium price. However, a monopolist firm (b) can either cut or raise production to influence the price of their products or service. Therefore, giving it the ability to make substantial products at the cost of the consumers. However, not all monopolies are bad and some are even supported by the