Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Case study of comparative advantage
International trade theory question
Global economy, international country business
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Case study of comparative advantage
The theory of comparative advantage is perhaps the most important concept in international trade theory. As the economies that exist in our world our becoming increasingly more intertwined, it is becoming even more important. Nearly every country in the world depends on other countries to supply them with goods that they cannot produce in their own country. I believe that comparative in necessary in today’s economy. In this paper I am going to discuss comparative advantage and it’s effect on globalization.
The idea of comparative advantage dates back to the early 19th century. The model that is used to describe the theory is known as the “Ricardian Model”. David Ricardo believed that the best way to describe the theory is by using numerical values. In his example Ricado used two countries, England and Portugal. The goods being produced are cloth and wine. Ricardo assumed that Portugal was more productive in producing the two goods. Ricardo then went on to explain that if England specialized in producing one of the two goods, and if Portugal produced the other, then the total output of the world would rise. The countries should choose the product that they want to specialize in by which country had a comparative advantage in production. In order to identify a country’s comparative advantage good, requires the opportunity cost to be identified.
Opportunity Cost refers to the “single most valuable opportunity given up when a choice is made, the opportunity cost is your next best alternative or your trade off”(www.richmond.edu). A country is said to have a comparative advantage in the production of a good, if it can produce the good at a lower opportunity cost than another country. “Therefore, England would have the comparative advantage in cloth production relative to Portugal if it must give up less wine to produce another unit of cloth than the amount of wine that Portugal would have to give up to produce another unit of cloth”(www.internationale.com, Ricado’s Numerical Example).
Another theory that can be easily confused with comparative advantage is known as absolute advantage. While comparative advantage is often represented numerically, absolute advantage is not. The idea that free trade can be advantageous for countries was based on...
... middle of paper ...
...s that it will take him three hours to complete the tasks alone. The father decides to let the son help. They split the tasks between the two of them. The son’s work is done simultaneously along with the fathers. The complete the garden in two hours instead of the estimated three. In other words it makes sense to employ the less efficient son. Efficiency is enhanced when resources are fully employed.
This can be compared to third world countries and countries that are less technologically advanced. Although they may not be the most efficient at producing any product, if they are able to help out overall efficiency will increase. The best way to do maximize output according to the Ricardian model is to:
1. Fully employ all resources world wide
2. Allocate those sources within countries to each country’s comparative advantage industries
3. Allow the countries to trade freely
Comparative advantage will help us to achieve a better way of life. We must look at the world and different countries and ask what they can bring to the world market. Comparative advantage is the way of producing goods in the future. The model of comparative advantage shows us what
To reiterate, let’s construct another example of two companies that produce oranges. Company number one is located in Florida where it’s the perfect environment to produce oranges. Company number two however is located in Toronto, which to be fair, isn 't a suitable environment to produce natural oranges, unless of course they’re produced in a green house. Although both companies are able to grow and produce oranges, company number one has the absolute advantage because they use the much cheaper and natural methods, hence the greater demand. This theory can be contradicted with the concept of comparative advantage, which in description means the ability to produce specific goods at a lower opportunity
This rising prosperity mentioned is a result of rising efficiency that pro-neoliberal economists believe develops through specialization. If a country is better than another at producing a certain good, then that country is said to have an absolute advantage over the other in that particular industry. When both countries have higher productivity rates in different industries and they concentrate their efforts in those respective industries, then both countries benefit through neoliberal trade as they are not wasting their time and efforts producing goods that the other country can produce faster. As a result of trade through countries with different absolute advantages, total world production and therefore productive efficiency will increase.
... is that it opens up new markets for more profits and lower the cost of goods if they were imported. This idea would increase the potential wealth of nation; however, the idea of mercantilism only supports the immediate nation’s wealth.
Globalization over the past twenty has become an issue in many countries. This industrialization of second and third world countries by Western Civilization creates many opportunities for the inhabitants. Not only does it expand trading markets, but also promotes productivity and efficiency; thus improving the country and integrating it into the industrial world. This process not only benefits third world counties, but also industrialized nations by allowing them to export goods to the developing world and increase their profit margin.
The first being that scarcity and tradeoff are a factor in every part of our life and always holds true. The second which is true a large portion of the time is that there is usually a catch. Focusing more on the first meaning of this phrase can explain a lot about the meaning in relation to opportunity cost. Another example of using the opportunity cost and showing TANSTAAFL would be if a manufacturer has two different ways to produce the same products; product option A is the most profitable bringing in 200 dollars per items but takes a 2 days to make. Product option B only brings in 50 dollars in profit but in the amount of time it takes to make one of product A there can be 30 of product B made. However, comparing the two products shows that even though the initial profits seems to be made by product A after a full analysis shows that product B have the competitive advantage. It is more profitable to produce product b due to the high volume the product can be made at, which leads to a higher profit. Although this demonstrates which a different theory we can use this to show opportunity cost. If the company would have gone with their original thought and produced a higher volume of product A than be then there is a very high cost they are wasting. There would be a loss in profit, time and
Specialization has been firstly established by Adam Smith theory, the absolute advantage. It is a method of production where a business focuses on one limited scope of products or services in order to gain productive efficiency within the entire system of businesses. Many countries, for instance, specialize in producing the goods and services that are native to their part of the world. On the other hand, incomplete specialization still exists with the modern theory, a result of the pure theory of international trade based on two-factors, two-goods Heckscher-Ohlin models. There are factors that make the specialization imperfect in practice; such as, endogenous growth, transportation cost, immobility, and interdependency.
Krugman defines comparative advantage as “the view that countries trade to take advantage of their differences” (1987, p. 132). Comparative advantage theories assume constant returns to scale and perfect competition. Krugman writes that trade exists when countries differ from one another in goods they have to offer, technology, or factor endowments. Although there are multiple models explaining the cause of trade, each differs as to what factors are included to explain why trade takes place. Economist Ohlin and authors Burenstam-Linder and Vernon began introducing counter-points to comparative advantage as early as the late 1950’s, saying that formal models of comparative advantage did not take into account all factors affecting international trade. International specialization and trade caused by increasing returns, as well as economies of scale and techn...
Comparative advantage means that an industry, firm, country or individual are able to produce goods and services at a lower opportunity cost than others which are also producing the same goods and services. Also, in order to be profitable, the number in exports must be higher than the number in import. From the diagram we seen above, Singapore is seen to have a comparative advantage in some services. The services are Transport, Financial, business management, maintenance & Repair and Advertising & Market Research, etc. These export services to other countries improve the balance of payment. On the other side, Singapore is seen to have a comparative disadvantage in some services. The services are Travel, Telecommunications, Computer & Information,
Competitive advantage is the advantage for the competitors and gained by the offerings from the consumers that have the greater value either by the low prices of the products and by providing the benefits and services to the consumers that denotes the high price. It is a set of the innovative and different features of the company and the products and services sale to the consumers so that company can achieve the targets what they have decided and it is the betterment for the enterprise in the competitive market (Porter, 2011). There are three determinants which can be used in the competitive advantage that what the company produce for their consumers, their target market that what they have to achieved and the competition from the other entity
Besides these, some other considerations may be counted. Employment, exchange rate, tariffs, quotas and other non-tariffs barriers may impact the comparativeness in one place. Tariffs are tax on goods that are shipped internationally. Government may set a high tariffs to protect dominate industry and employment. In recent years, solar energy becomes rising industry. America and China both want to export solar energy equipments. To protect local industry, America set a high tariff of import even a restriction of solar energy relative product import. Meanwhile, using the advantage of exchange rate and export duty refunds, China also encourages the local solar energy.These barriers impact the import and export action a lot. Not only has the availability of resources influenced the competitiveness in one place.
The article examines some of the influential theories in the domain of international trade including hyperglobalisation and comparative advantage. The publisher was keen to demonstrate how the theories need to be embraced since hyperglobalisation promotes investments flows from partners pursuing such trading agreements. The trading partners can still reduce their operation cost such as transportation while still navigating the complexities of hyperglobalisation. The author also endeavored to demystify the terminology of comparative advantage by issuing examples and previous concerns reported on the subject. It has been hailed that the traders often traded as per their factor endowments by concentrating on spheres of their specialty. The author also hinted to the readers that the theory of comparative advantage is a major concept since it is the first theory that economics students are briefed on. Arguments in support of the theory reveals that countries that have this level of visibility stand to benefit massively once they specialize in areas of their specialty. He purp...
All nations can get the benefits of free trade by being specialized in producing goods they have a comparative advantage and then trade them with goods produced by other nations in the world. This is evidenced by comparative advantage theory. Trade depends on many factors, country's history, institution, size and. geographical position and many more. Also, the countries put trade barriers for the exchange of their goods and services with other nations in order to protect their own company from foreign competition, or to protect consumers from undesirable products, or sometimes it may be inadvertent.
The Law of Comparative Advantage was introduced by David Ricardo in 1817 in his book ‘Principles of Political Economy and Taxation’. According to this classical theory, a comparative advantage exists for a country when it has a margin of superiority in the production of a certain commodity over others. Comparative advantage results from differing endowments in the factors of production like technology, natural endowments, climate, etc. among different countries. Therefore, each country exports the commodities which it can produce at a lower opportunity cost or, in other words, lower marginal cost of production and imports the rest. This would ultimately be beneficial for all countries engaging in free trade as each would gain through its specialization
Every year there is a ‘league table‘ published showing the level of economic growth achieved by each country. The comparison is made using each countries Gross Domestic Product, or GDP. An important factor to look at is the difference between actual and potential economic growth. Actual economic growth increases in real GDP. This increase can occur as result of using previously unemployed resources, or reallocating resources into more productive areas or improving existing resources. Whereas potential economic growth is the productive capacity of the economy. For example, it can be shown by the predicted ability of the country to produce goods and services. This changes when there is an increase in the quantity or quality of the resources. All countries have different ways of achieving this with the resources they have available to them. For this reason it party answers the question of why some countries are richer than others. It is widely thought that the productive capacity of an economy will increase each year largely due to improvements in education and technology. This will obviously differ from country to country. For example, in the UK the quality of fertilizer could be improved, hence forth increase the years fruit and vegetable output.
It is widely accepted that there are a lot of benefits globalization brought to our life. Firstly, advanced transportation system makes different places of the world closer. Considerable amount of exciting tourists can visit remote villages in the corner of the earth. Secondly, new telecommunication, such as internet and TV, makes people’s common life colorful. Fans in China who are interested in Manchester United can also share their joy with their counterparts in United Kingdom, when the team won a game. Moreover, we can buy the popular products of high quality made in other countries, such as automobiles of Volkswagen and furniture of IKEA. Finally, globalization can lead to cooperation in trade between different countries. Even though globalization can bring so many conveniences to us, we still worry about its severe negative aspects.