Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Civil action procedure
Civil action and trial procedure
Civil action procedure
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Richard Arzu v. Frank Arzu and Estanisalo Arzu
597 N.Y.S. 2d 322
Brief
PROCEDURAL HISTORY:
Richard Arzu brought action against his father, Frank Arzu, and step-mother, Estanisalo Arzu, alleging misrepresentation and fraud in connection with a medical malpractice action settlement monies which Frank entrusted to his father; and seeking compensatory damages and related relief. The Supreme Court, Bronx County, Silver J. , vacated ex parte order of attachment against defendants’ real and personal property. The son appealed to the Supreme Court, Appellate Division. Justice Sullivan held that the son was entitled to attachment of defendant’s property in light of evidence that they had disposed of or secreted son’s money, with intent to defraud son. The Supreme Court, Appellate Division, reversed the decision of the lower court.
STATEMENT OF FACTS:
Richard Arzu underwent a surgical procedure to correct a condition he was born with; known as dwarfism. He became paralyzed from the waist down as a result of the operation. Through legal representatives, Richard was awarded a substantial structured settlement from his malpractice action against the hospital that performed the said surgical procedure. The settlement payments were deposited into a joint account between Richard and Frank. Over a period of a few years, the father withdrew numerous times, large amounts of money. These transactions were not authorized or to the knowledge of the son. When Richard turned eighteen, the fund...
Doris Reed bought a house for $76,000.00 from Robert King. Mr. King and his real estate agent failed to disclose to Mrs. Reed that a murder had taken place in the home ten years ago. Neighbors told Mrs. Reed about the murders and the stigma associated with the house after she moved in. The property appraised in the amount of $65,000.00 with reference to the history of the house. Reed sued King on allegations of misrepresentation for the purchase of the home seeking rescission and damages to terminate the contact.
Stuart v. Nappi was class lawsuit Stuart’s mother filed against school personnel and the Danbury Board of Education because she claimed that her daughter was not receiving the rights granted in the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). Kathy Stuart was a student at Danbury High School in Connecticut with serious emotional, behavior, and academic difficulties. She was suppose to be in special education classes, but for some reason she hardly ever attended them. Kathy was involved in a school-wide disturbance. As a result of her complicity in these disturbances, she received a ten-day disciplinary suspension and was scheduled to appear at a disciplinary hearing. The Superintendent of Danbury Schools recommended to the Danbury Board of Education
In the book “The Things They Carried”, O’Brien uses imagery, figurative language and repetition to convey his message. O’Brien’s purpose for story telling, is to clear his conscience of war and to tell the stories of soldiers who were forgotten by society. Many young men were sent to war, despite opposing it. They believed it was “wrong” to be sent to their deaths. Sadly, no one realizes a person’s significance until they die. Only remembering how they lived rather than acknowledging their existence when they were alive.
Ida B. Wells (1862-1931) was a newspaper editor and journalist who went on to lead the American anti-lynching crusade. Working closely with both African-American community leaders and American suffragists, Wells worked to raise gender issues within the "Race Question" and race issues within the "Woman Question." Wells was born the daughter of slaves in Holly Springs, Mississippi, on July 16, 1862. During Reconstruction, she was educated at a Missouri Freedman's School, Rust University, and began teaching school at the age of fourteen. In 1884, she moved to Memphis, Tennessee, where she continued to teach while attending Fisk University during summer sessions. In Tennessee, especially, she was appalled at the poor treatment she and other African-Americans received. After she was forcibly removed from her seat for refusing to move to a "colored car" on the Chesapeake & Ohio Railroad, the Tennessee Supreme Court rejected her suit against the railroad for violating her civil rights in 1877. This event and the legal struggle that followed it, however, encouraged Wells to continue to oppose racial injustice toward African-Americans. She took up journalism in addition to school teaching, and in 1891, after she had written several newspaper articles critical of the educational opportunities afforded African-American students, her teaching contract was not renewed. Effectively barred from teaching, she invested her savings in a part-inte...
Ida B. Wells-Barnett is first among many. She was a civil servant and fought injustices amongst the black community. Ida was born a slave in Holly Springs, Mississippi in 1862. There she witnessed the Civil War and the dramatic changes it brought to her life. During Reconstruction she found possession of previously unheard-of freedoms, her civil rights. The most dramatic change was the institution of schools for the education of blacks. The establishment of the Freedman’s Aid Society founded by Shaw University, later renamed Rust College, and was where Ida attended classes. Ida possessed an interest in school, and she quickly worked her way through every book in the Rust College library. At an early age she demonstrated leadership and a strong liking to journalism. Growing up in Memphis opened opportunities for Ida to further her education at LeMoyne Institution and Fisk University. Her impact among the Negro community was first felt in May 1884. On her way to work, Ida boarded her usual seat on the first-class ladies coach, she was asked by the conductor to move to the forward car, which was a smoker. Wells refused, got off the train, returned to Memphis, and filed suit against the Chesapeake, Ohio, and SouthWestern Railroad Company for refusing to provide her the first-class accommodations for which she paid. In December, 1884 the Memphis Circuit Court ruled in her favor and awarded her $500 in damages. The reaction within the white community was expressed in the Memphis Appeal, “Darky Damsel Gets Damages” (Klots, 32) Although her success was short lived when the company appealed the case to the Tennessee Supreme Court, which reversed the decision.
Liability in restitution with disgorgement of profit is an alternative to liability for contract damages measured by injury to the promisee.” (2011)
He also lists some of the personal item delivering hints of his characters’ personalities to the readers and what these items meant to them. He writes how Henry Dobbins, “the big guy”, carries extra food supplies and his girlfriend’s pantyhose around his neck because he thought that it brought him good luck during battle. “The pantyhose, he said, had a properties of a good-luck charm.”… “He liked putting his nose into the nylon and breathing the scent of his girlfriend’s body; he liked the memories they inspired.” Rat Kiley a nineteen-year-old carries comic books which symbolized his youth and memories of home and childhood. “Rat Kiley carried comic books”… “He’s nineteen years old, [the war] it’s too much for him.” Dave Jensen, “the hygienist”, carries toothbrush, dental floss and bar soaps and Ted Lavender “the scared one” carries tranquilizers. The items Jensen and Lavender carried were strong symbols of weakness. Lavender used the tranquilizers to keep himself from being nervous and frightened, “Ted Lavender, who was scared, carried tranquilizers.” And it’s clear that the toothbrush, the dental floss and the soaps symbolized Jensen’s inability to adapt to Vietnam. Both Lavender and Jensen were killed during missions. Lastly, Kiowa, “a man of faith” who carries a New Testament bible which represents his faith and background as it is a gift from his father. “he opened his new Testament and arranged it beneath his head as a pillow.” Sleeping on is bible not only gives a possible physical comfort but an emotional too. O’Brien asserts that the emotional burdens are heavier than the physical stuff by talking about the internal baggage men who might die carry. He states “grief, terror, fear, love, and hopes – These were intangible, but the intangibles had their own mass and specific gravity, they had tangible
Before O’Brien introduces the characters, he introduces the items they carry as symbols of their humanity. The reader has a chance to develop curiosity for the depth of each character presented and is not instantly alienated by the war setting. In the first paragraph O’Brien introduces the letters Lieutenant Cross carries by writing, “First Lieutenant Jimmy Cross carried letters from a girl named Martha, a junior at Mount Sebastian College in New Jersey. They were not love letters, but Lieutenant Cross was hoping” (O'Brien 337). The letters are one of the most prominent symbols the reader encounters and at the story’s opening, act as a symbol of home, youth, and hope. Because he carries these dainty baubles, Cross seems more vulnerable, therefore, more human. The reader sees this again when introduced to more of the soldiers inventory, “Among the necessities or near-necessities were P-38 can openers, pocket knives, heat tabs, wristwatches, dog tags, mosqui...
Wells was born into slavery in Holly Springs, Mississippi. Her father, James Wells, was a carpenter and her mother was a cook. After the Civil War her parents became politically active. Her father was known as “race'; man, a term given to African Americans involved in the leadership of the community. He was a local businessman, a mason, and a member of the Board of Trustees of Shaw University. Both parents provided Ida with strong role models. They worked hard and held places of respect in the community as forward-looking people. James and Elizabeth (mother) Wells instilled their daughter a keen sense of duty to God, family, and community.
Ida Barnett Wells’ parents were extremely involved in the Republican Party throughout the Reconstruction. Unfortunately, they died in a yellow fever outbreak in the late 1870s as well as one of Ida’s sibling. This catastrophe unfortunately left Ida B. Wells to take care of her other brothers and sisters. However, Ida Wells was once a student at Rust College, where she obtained her early education, unfortunately she stopped going to school at the age of sixteen (Biography.com Editors, 2016).
O'Brien describes the variety of encounters him and the Alpha Company experience while in Vietnam. O'Brien also describes the various items his fellow soldiers carried. Most of these things are physical items such as pocket-knives, dog tags and matches. Other things the men carried are burdens of emotional fear and guilt. O'Brien's many descriptions of what is carried on these men's backs makes the reader feel the weight of what these men were fighting for. This powerful writing also makes the reader feel as though they too are walking next to the Alpha Company in the battle field.
In the Things They Carried plot is the least important element of fiction, character is more important setting is the most important element when considering theme. Plot while crucial at points, loses credibility as most events are meta-fiction and structure is not important. Character is important because O’Brien’s main purpose is to keep his friends alive. While this is true he would have never met his friends and discovered immortality if he did not go to Vietnam. Goldstein states that the Vietnam War was the most traumatic American event of the 20th Century. The trauma from this horrific however, leads O’Brien to discover that death is impossible.
Everything that the soldiers carry can be defined as symbols; for example, all the heavy and basic military items as ammunition, guns, and personal items are symbols of everything that a soldier needs to survive in war time. Also, these men carry emotional items; for example, one of them wears his girlfriend’s underwear around his neck, he apparently carries it as a good luck charm and also to remind him that even though he is isolated somewhere in Vietnam, there is somebody waiting for him back home. Another one carries a bible the entire time, which shows that he is a religious man; the bible also reminds him of his family since it was a gift from his father. Jimmy Cross carries pictures, letters, and a pebble that Martha sent him; which symbolizes how much he loves her and how much he misses her, even though she does not have any feelings for him. O’Brien displays through symbolism how different each one of them are from each other, but at the same time he shows that no matter how different they are, they all need to carry something important or valuable in order to
Masculinity is a subject that has been debated in our society for quite some time. Many wonder what it means to be masculine, as it is difficult to define this one –sided term. Pairing this already controversial term with “feminist studies” can bring about some thought - provoking conversation. Feminist studies of men have been around for many years with regards to the feminist movement. It seeks to create gradual improvements to society through its main principle of modifying the ways in which everyone views what it means to be a man. Feminist studies of men bring forth the discussion of hegemonic masculinity; how this contributes to the gender hierarchy, the radicalized glass escalator and ultimately the faults of this theory.
In today’s world, social inequality seems to be so apparent that the issue cannot escape anyone’s radar. The ways men and women are treated in their society have become so different and possibly full of prejudiced intentions that feminism emerged to establish and protect what women truly deserve in our society. But in the midst of all the movements and agendas of the feminists, one group of people are left vulnerable to the struggles and rejections they have to face yet unable to protest due to society’s expectations of them being strong, confident, and dependable. This group consists of the other half of the human population, men. It is not always easy, as it may seem to be, to live as a man.