annotation

685 Words2 Pages

Annotation

This activity is designed for year 9 stage 5.1 class. One mathematical tool called autograph is used to help students learn the gradient of a line. In this annotation, I will explain how the curriculum outcomes are linked to the activity, how autograph assists the students in better understanding of gradient, how I modify this activity to meet the needs of students and how I carry assessment for learning in the process.

In this activity, students are asking to use appropriate terminology, diagram and symbols in linear relationship to answer the questions (MA5.1-1WM). They needed to provide reasoning to support conclusions (MA5.1-3WM). For example, they are asking to give reasons for the graph they think has the smallest gradient and explain why the gradient in question 2 part i is equal to 1. They are also asking to determine the gradient of an interval and graph the linear relationship with use of the technology (MA5.1-6NA).

A large- scale study suggested that mathematic software increase students’ engagement and test scores. Barrow et al. (2009) tested a computer program designed to improve pre-algebra and algebra skills. They found that students learn through computer lab were scores 27% ahead students on traditional classroom. Similarly Rochelle et al. (2007) found that using Sim Calc Mathworlds improves student’s understanding of mathematics. Students who used Sim Calc had a better understanding than students who study in standard class. By use of autograph, students could gain a better understanding of what gradient are, what gradient look like and how gradient formed. Use autograph to create interval between two points and form a right-angle triangle where interval as the hypotenuse of the triangle could l...

... middle of paper ...

... tool could be very helpful to demonstrate knowledge and help student learn the mathematical concept. However, the activity link to the mathematical tool should be carefully designed to meet the needs of all students as well as the assessment for learning in the progress.

Reference:
Barrow, L., Markman, L., and Rouse, C.E (2009) Technologies edge: The educational benefits of computer aided instruction. American Economic Journal: Economic policy 1 (1) 52-74
Roschelle, J. et al. (2007). Scaling up SimCalc project: Can a technology enhanced curriculum improve student learning of important mathematics? (Technical Report 01). Menlo Park, CA: SRI International.
Gardner, H. (1999).Intelligence reframed: Multiple intelligences for the 21st century. New York: Basic Books.
Brown, S. (2004). Assessment for learning. Learning and teaching in higher education, 1(1), 81-89.

Open Document