Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Conclusion for zoos should be banned
Benefits of zoos
Controversy of zoos
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Conclusion for zoos should be banned
Zoos attract hundreds of thousands visitors every year that range from newborns to the elderly as they tend to fascinate and provide entertainment for them. Although zoos provide enjoyment of a lifetime there are people who defend that zoos are not as exceptional as they seem. Through many controversies, organizations such as “People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals” have arised advocating zoos are not beneficial to communities but in fact harmful, yet advocates that zoos are beneficial counter them. The members of PETA argue that the animals in zoos and suffer immensely from poor physical and mental health. On the contrary, promoters of zoos say that many species are saved from going extinct through zoo's extensive help in species-survival …show more content…
Millfield School graduate Damian Aspinall in a newspaper article for the Daily Mail argues, “ In the wild, these creatures roam hundreds of miles. They hunt their prey, raise their offspring and enjoy complex social relationships … Little wonder they develop self-destructive behaviours known as 'zoochosis' - repetitively walking in tight circles, rocking, swaying and sometimes mutilating themselves … All too often they are left on permanent display with nowhere to hide. They have no shade, little shelter, no privacy at all … If zoos are really being honest with the public about their motives, why are 75 per cent of the animals they keep not even endangered?” (1-3). Zoos are shown as having a …show more content…
In an article Jeremy Hooper, University of Tennessee graduate and advocate of the Red Wolf Species Survival Plan explains, “The AZA approved the red wolf for the SSP program in 1984, leading to the development of a new management plan to ensure the persistence of a ‘healthy, genetically diverse, and demographically varied captive population’ … The Red Wolf Species Survival Plan (RWSSP) initiated a network of facilities across the country with a common goal of restoring the red wolf to its native range. This network provided more space for housing red wolves, increased opportunities for breeding and research, and a broader outreach campaign ... In 1987, ten years after the first pups were born in captivity and seven years after the species was declared biologically extinct in the wild, eight red wolves were released into Alligator River National Wildlife Refuge in eastern North Carolina”(2-4). This one example is a part of many successful species-survival programs that are orchestrated by organizations of zoos. The red wolf was a species that became extinct in the wild. Since they were extinct in the wild that proves that zoos were beneficial to the community because rather than going completely extinct they were instead reintroduced in the wild with zoos help. Reintroducing a species as no small feat either.
Have you ever seen an animal sitting in a cage all alone with nothing to do. Well, zoos are trying to change that fact. They will allow the animals to live in an environment that is like their home. Many people don't realize this, but zoo are keeping and breeding these animals because they would not survive in the wild alone. In the three passages, ¨The Stripes Will Survive,¨ ¨The Zood Go Wild from No More Dodos,¨ ¨Our Beautiful Macaws and Why They Need Enrichment.¨ All of these articles present one claim, that is that the role of zoos is no longer to keep animal, but to protect them.
Since the recent event with a gorilla in the Cincinnati Zoo, people have questioned ethics. The author wrote this argument to explain why the safety of animals, as well as their survival in the future, depends on these enclosures. Some readers would accept that zoos and aquariums conduct a lot of research, but for those who are skeptical, the argument discusses that the “Zoological Society of London, for instance, is developing innovative methods to assess the risks of animals contracting disease when they are reintroduced into the wild” (2016, p. 2, para. 7). The effective evidence Ganzert brings in shows readers the benefits of zoos and aquariums in order to appeal to the value of the animals being well contained and protected while they are in the enclosures. Another strong example of Ganzert’s appeal to an audience that wants the facts is “The Phoenix Zoo helped lead the ensuing breeding and reintroduction programs, which ultimately birthed more than 200 calves from just nine individuals. Now between Oman and Jordan, there are about 1,000 Arabian Oryx living in the wild” (2016, p. 2, para. 4). In result, the audience receives information about an existing program as well as what has happened due to the creation of this program at the Phoenix Zoo.
On one hand, people see zoos as a place for endangered and neglected animals that need assistance to survive. It has been a tradition for decades to visit a zoo and spend time with family and friends. By visiting a zoo, the public is educated and can personally see the beauty of nature, unlike a documentary. Visitors may then be encouraged to donate money to conserve and research wildlife. Not only do zoos benefit mankind, but they also work for the welfare of the animals. Take into consideration the story of orphan Leo, a snow leopard cub from Pakistan. Although once abandoned, Leo is now alive and well, thanks to the Bronx Zoo. Many endangered species have be...
Read Response 1 Health metrics play a critical role in shaping policy decisions and guiding the allocation of resources within healthcare systems. Among these metrics, Quality-Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) and Disability-Adjusted Life Years (DALYs) stand out as prominent instruments for evaluating health interventions. These measurements serve as invaluable tools for policymakers and healthcare professionals to facilitate the allocation of resources to maximize cost-effectiveness and benefit the most people possible. As healthcare systems increasingly emphasize evidence-based decision-making, the discussion surrounding these health metrics becomes more necessary and relevant. In his work 'QALYs, DALYs, and their critics,' Greg Bognar delves into
Zoos have been with us throughout our history, and can provide a good barometer of public beliefs and values at any given time. Therefore it seems necessary to explore whether in today’s society contemporary zoos are a means of educating and conserving or still seek to control and exhibit animal others for human benefit. In order to make this assessment there are a number of contributing factors. Firstly it is important to establish context by considering the history of zoos and looking at the changes from the early menageries to contemporary zoos who strive to be institutions of refuge for animals facing twenty-first century global challenges. This links into how the physical space of zoos has changed over time and whether these advancements have made any crucial difference to the welfare of animals. Following this conservation, education and scientific research will be explored in detail in order to assess whether they provide good enough motives for keeping animals in captivity. I will seek to argue that although attempts have been made to point zoos in the direction of conservation and education, in my opinion the concepts of dominance and human superiority are still at the core of modern zoos.
From a Ted Talk said by Gabriela Mastromonaco from the Toronto Zoo, she says “That zoos serve and important purpose beyond from this entertainment and are vital to the future of the animal world.” She tells us how the zoos today save many endangered species. “1. We care for and breed animals that have been wiped from the wild, or reduced to very small numbers. 2. We store genetic material, such as sperm and eggs, that can be used in the future to breed offspring.” She concludes by telling us how zoos save many species every year and how they can save a whole group of animals.
Animal cruelty is the abuse or failure to care for an animal. Before the past couple of years, people did not have to worry about how the animals in zoos were treated. For centuries, families have gone to zoos to be educated on the different species of animals. As years have gone by, zoos have become a trending topic of animal cruelty. While zoos do not physically abuse the animals, they have been known to not properly care for them. “According to the American Zoo and Aquarium Association (AZA), there are over 10,000 zoos worldwide” (Fravel 2). Of these 10,000 zoos, only some of them actually care about their animals. Caring for wild animals is extremely hard because zoos have to recreate the animals’ natural habitat. Zoos believe that they are protecting the animals’, yet; they tend to forget how it affects the animals. In reality, the animals are depressed and bored. These wild animals are being taken out of their natural habitats and are enclosed in small cages and habitats. Wild animals should live in their natural habitats, the wild, not in a zoo for the entertainment of zoo visitors. Therefore, banning zoos will end the horrible cycle of animal cruelty.
"How Zoos Are Saving Our Animals." – Features – ABC Environment (Australian Broadcasting Corporation). N.p., n.d. Web. 03 May 2015.
Among many other fun and exciting attraction to visit around our community, a visit to the zoo has always been a memorable experience. This cost effective priceless lifetime experience is being undermined by a group of activists all around the country. People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (PETA), world largest animal rights organization, argue that zoos deprived animals from satisfying their most basic needs. They urge not to patronized zoos and claims that the money spent on ticket purchases pays for animals to be imprisoned and traded, not rescued and rehabilitated. They go on saying in summary that zoos strip animals from their rights. So this heated debate revolves around the animal rights and how the zoo industry inhibits it. Are zoo really bad for the animals? Should we get rid of the zoo and let the animals back to the wilderness? Mazur and Clark (2001) state that zoo is a monument to a long-standing tradition of people’s fascination with non-human nature. Since the early societies of the Egyptians, Greeks, and Chinese, wild animals have been maintained in captivity in order to satisfy human curiosity with exotica (p 185). Most western zoos today, however, embrace far more benevolent values such as supporting the conservation of biodiversity through specialized animal breeding, research, and education programs.
Since approximately 1250 B.C., ancient Egyptians had created and practiced the capture and display of animals in what are now known as zoos (Fravel). Records describe such exotic animals as birds, lions, giraffes, and tigers in captivity (Fravel). Since then, zoos have continued to entertain millions with the exciting chance to view exotic animals up close and personal. Even in ancient Greece, exotic animals were on display in fighting arenas, and in enclosed viewing areas. Originally in America, zoos were just created so that royalty and the wealthy could flaunt their exotic animals to the public (Leolupus). Today, with species threatened and habitats disappearing worldwide, zoos are serving a new purpose other than the mere exhibition of animals – conservation. (Fravel). When you think of a zoo, you either think of a fun, entertaining place that provides close-up and exciting exhibits of wild animals that you would otherwise never get the chance to see, or a place where people keep suffering, unhappy animals captive just for entertainment and display. However, despite whichever view you hold, and despite the stereotypes, some zoos have evolved to serve alternative and helpful purposes. Although some zoos face controversy due to allegations such as lack of space and quality care, neglect, and cruelty, some zoos have programs specifically designed to help and protect animal species. For example, these zoos have programs that help such conservation efforts as breeding.
Some people may argue that zoos protect animals and species under this polluted world, however, do animals in zoos really need our “help”? Yes, but surely not that many. According to Captive Animals Protection Society (CAPS), 79% of animals in United Kingdom zoos and over 70% of elephants in European zoos are wild-caught. It seems that zoos need them rather than they need zoos.
Morals, “the distinction between right and wrong”, are what make a person’s decisions ethical or not (“morals”). For decades zoos have been one of America’s most common pastimes, but it has also been questioned whether they should exist. Zoos are meant for recreation and education, but the question is whether or not it is beneficial to its’ inhabitants. The treatment of animals in any zoo has been a controversial argument over what is correct, if the animal’s welfare is in the best interest of the animal or the zoo’s profit, and if captivity is beneficial to the animals, not just the public. (Captivity in certain cases can be beneficial to animals, but also can be detrimental to their well being.)
Do you remember going to the zoo as a child and seeing the animals sunbathing, nursing young, or playing with each other? Do you remember reading signs with fun facts about the animals? Do you also remember leaving the zoo knowing more than you did before you went? That’s what zoos do, but that’s not all they do. Not only do zoos find creative and fun ways to educate children, but they also save many animals that would not have lived without help.
Wildlife species are facing global extinction on a large scale about 21 percent of mammals, 12 percent of the bird species and 33 percent of all amphibian species are in danger of extinction (“Why Zoos Matter”). Zoos deal with this problems because they care for the lives of animals. Most responsible zoos emphasis the need for protection of natural habitat and public education of the people (“Zoo”). By providing this programs zoos hope to increase the amount of people who actually care for other then their own kind. The Association of Zoos and Aquariums focuses on preserving the life’s of endanger species by breeding the species and increasing the number of healthy offspring born to zoo animals (“What’s New at the Zoo?”). Some zoos even raise money to buy land for private nature
Another reason why people support zoos is because they help animals have a steady food source, no predators and no competition for female mates (Source E). While this life may seem nice for a human, the zoo takes away everything in a natural environment and it is unclear to what the animals want. The education zoos offer is more hands on and connective than books or television, making the experience and education better for those who cannot travel to the animals natural habitat. Even though zoos are not all bad and offer educational experiences and conservation, the benefit to society zoos contribute does not outway the harm it causes to the