Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Zoos are beneficial for animals
The consequences of zoos for animals
The consequences of zoos for animals
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Zoos are beneficial for animals
The treatment of animals is concept every human being must deal with because animals and humans inhabit the same planet and share space. Civilationas for thousands of years have had different viewpoints on how to treat animals. Eastern religions such as Jainism, Hinduism and Buddhism abandoned animal sacrifice, and the religions focus on nonviolence and non-killing towards animals (Source J). Islam believes that Allah has power over all of the animals and to treat animals badly is to treat Allah badly, which is similar to the Jewish belief that animals were made in god’s image and excessive harm shall not be inflicted upon them (source J). While these old religions and laws were made thousands of years ago, the ethics of treating animals has …show more content…
Zoos help education people about animals and bring people together. In Israel, the Jerusalem zoo is one of the few places where Jews and Arabs can come togethers and communicate (source C). Zoos additionally help with wildlife conservation. In 2014 zoos in the United States raised over $154 million dollars for conservative initiatives. Zoos also permit scientist to study things they could not in the wild and let biologist experience hands on training (source F). Another reason why people support zoos is because they help animals have a steady food source, no predators and no competition for female mates (Source E). While this life may seem nice for a human, the zoo takes away everything in a natural environment and it is unclear to what the animals want. The education zoos offer is more hands on and connective than books or television, making the experience and education better for those who cannot travel to the animals natural habitat. Even though zoos are not all bad and offer educational experiences and conservation, the benefit to society zoos contribute does not outway the harm it causes to the
Animal rights have become a very serious issue here in the United States over the last few decades. One issue that has been discussed is whether or not zoos serve a good purpose or are they just a torture chamber for the animals. Locked up in small cages so people can yell at them and stare. Or are zoos the key to save our species in an ever growing human population. Rachel Lu, a philosophy teacher and senior columnist, writes the article, “Let’s Keep Zoos: Learning stewardship is a good thing.”, published April 18, 2014, argues that zoos are worth keeping. Rachel Lu uses her personal experiences to appeal to her audience that zoos are valuable to people especially young children because it gives them a perspective on nature.
Zoos all over the world are keeping animals in environments that mimic their natural habitat. In the article “Should we have zoos?” by Shayna Orens, Zoos around the world are to help adults, animals, and kids. Zoos not only keep animals, but they also rescue animals.This means zoos are beneficial because Zoos take care and rescue animals for educational purposes Zoos also have many different programs like education for kids.
Considering the many challenges animals face in the wild, it is understandable that people may be eager to support zoos and may feel that they are protective facilities necessary for animal life. In the article “ Zoos Are Not Prisons. They Improve the Lives of Animals”, Author Robin Ganzert argues that Zoos are ethical institutions that enrich the lives of animals and ultimately protect them. Statistics have shown that animals held in captivity have limited utilitarian function resulting in cramped quarters, poor diets, depression, and early death for the animals thus, proving that Zoos are not ethical institutions that support and better the lives of animals as author Robin Ganzert stated (Cokal 491). Ganzert exposes the false premise in stating
Zoos have been with us throughout our history, and can provide a good barometer of public beliefs and values at any given time. Therefore it seems necessary to explore whether in today’s society contemporary zoos are a means of educating and conserving or still seek to control and exhibit animal others for human benefit. In order to make this assessment there are a number of contributing factors. Firstly it is important to establish context by considering the history of zoos and looking at the changes from the early menageries to contemporary zoos who strive to be institutions of refuge for animals facing twenty-first century global challenges. This links into how the physical space of zoos has changed over time and whether these advancements have made any crucial difference to the welfare of animals. Following this conservation, education and scientific research will be explored in detail in order to assess whether they provide good enough motives for keeping animals in captivity. I will seek to argue that although attempts have been made to point zoos in the direction of conservation and education, in my opinion the concepts of dominance and human superiority are still at the core of modern zoos.
Some supporters even acknowledge the ethical problems zoos face, but choose to ignore them for what they believe is the overall positive impact on society. In “Why zoos are good” Dr. Dave Hone highlights education as one of the main reasons he supports zoos, mentioning how many people who live in cities may never get to experience wild animals if it weren’t for zoos. Hone states educational videos and documentaries are an option, but they “pale next to seeing a living creature in the flesh, hearing it, smelling it, watching what it does and having the time to absorb details” (Hone). Not only do zoos provide interactive learning opportunities and a direct opportunity to experience how animals behave in the flesh, Hones notes zoos can be educational elsewhere, as a significant amount of work is being sent to conservatives to help educate others on how to improve conditions for the animals.
...d their viewers. There are so many benefits from having zoos. They give many gifts to the viewers and the captive animals. They aid in conservation, education, and entertainment. Without zoos, humans would not know enough about animals to treat their diseases, or to help wild animals with injuries. Many people would go without knowledge of the world’s different animal species. Several species would have seen extinction already. Zoos are a highly valuable commodity that should not be terminated.
Tigers, lions, giraffes, and other exotic animals are rarely seen in the wild. However the public, without humans and/or animals being harmed at the same time, can see exotic animals when a zoo opens. Zoos for many are a wonderful experience, but to others they see the animals as being treated poorly and not able to roam free. These people do not consider the beneficial sides of zoos. Zoos around the world help species that have been endangered by protecting and caring for them. Otherwise they would have became extinct and killed for their valuable fur or feathers. Zoos were created for a purpose that needed to be filled. If there were no purpose for them they would have not been created. Zoos are needed and if there is a need in this world, the spot will most likely be filled without hesitation. Some zoos were not trained properly and do not treat their animals very well. Some bad zoos do not feed their animals enough and keep them in a confined cage. Although some zoos are harmful for both animals and people, many of them are good zoos and take care of their animals better than most people take care of them selves. It is amazing to be able to see such care and love are associated with zoos. Not only do zoos help the endangered animals they also help people learn to respect such amazing creatures. Zoos are a good attribute to society because they promote education, research, protect, conserve, and outlook.
... Without these zoos, many animals such as the tortoises, American alligator, and the bald eagle would no longer exist. These zoos provide food, shelter, and the opportunity to recreate their species once more. Without zoos, many of these animals would have become extinct and many endangered animals argue that zoos are the perfect place to start a new life. With animal rights activists, scientists, parents, and animals being on different sides of the argument, this debate will continue.
Quarter 2 argumentative essay How would you feel if you were taken away from your family? Tilikum an orca whale was taken away from his family when he was captured. Tilikum could only swim in small circles for a year before being transferred to Seaworld. In 1991 a trainer named Keltie Byrne fell into the pool with three orcas.
I. living standards of animals and serve to entertain the human population. However, they serve little benefit to the animals themselves. A. Many of us have been to the zoo a few times in our lifetime and seen animals for the very first time that we have never seen anywhere else. a) We may justify zoos by stating that they teach us about different animals and allows us to view them up close. b)
Zoos display fascinating animals from all over the world for human entertainment, research, conservation, and education. Many scientists conduct studies on animals in captivity that they may not have been able to in the wild. Zoos educate all the visitors that come; they let people know everything that they know about the animals on display. We do learn a lot from these animals, but not all of the animals in the zoo are behaving like they normally would in the wild. Larger animals, such as elephants and orcas (commonly known as killer whales), have trouble with being confined in such a small area. However, many smaller animals benefit from zoos because they provide protection from predators, natural disasters, and poachers. They also benefit from conservation efforts; the babies being born get all the care they could ever need. Some animal rights activists are concerned that the conservation efforts are limiting the gene pool of the species. They argue that the small number of animals able to breed in captivity limits biodiversity and leads to weaknesses in the species overall. Zoos are wonderful places to study and learn about animals, but we need to improve the living standards for animals that struggle with captivity.
Zoos bring human kind closer to wild life. Though, sometimes that means taking the animal out of its natural habitat. Some animals have lost most of their habitat and are on the verge of extinction. In this way, the zoo helps the animals rather than using them as a form of human entertainment. Zoos also allow humans to study different kinds of animals more closely. Some zoos on the other hand manipulate the animals to acquire as much revenue as possible rather than being concerned with the welfare of each animal.
There are unlimited possibilities for what will happen to everyone if an animal goes extinct. The northern white rhinos are severely endangered and is starting to take notice, The "Frozen Zoo" is important to the survival of the white rhino, and population turmoil, efforts to save the population, and the costs and challenges of using the "Frozen Zoo" are factors to it. Notably, the population of the rhinos is decreasing by abnormal factors. A factor in the population turmoil of the northern white rhino is poaching.
Of the 2,323 zoos in the U.S, only 135 are accredited, a non-required status given to zoos by the AZA, the Association of Zoos and Aquariums. The accreditation states the zoo in question professionally cares for wildlife and is primarily focused on preserving the wildlife in an educational and scientific way(AZA). Moveover, the rest of the 2,188 U.S. zoos have to meet the Animal Welfare Act, an act from 1966 that requires only the minimal care and treatment for specific animals, to be in operation. These specific animals mentioned under the Animals Welfare Act are dogs, cats, guinea pigs, hamsters, rabbits, nonhuman primates, and marine mammals-including polar bears. This leaves no less than 5,000 mammal species unprotected(AZA).
Zoos are an unsuitable environment for wild animals and should, therefore, be abolished. Firstly, zoo animals are kept in a very confined area compared with their vast natural habitat. Secondly, breeding programmes are far less successful than zoos claim. Thirdly, zoo animals are exposed to many diseases and other dangers.