Zinsser Writing Style Analysis

747 Words2 Pages

1. Have you established a writing style? What does it involve? What are the challenges you encounter when writing? What do you anticipate encountering when writing longer research papers? Personally, I cannot identify my exact writing style. I do write with clear, concise, fluidity; however, I have no sense of “personal style.” I construct each written assignment with the intention of being blunt and supporting my assertions with facts and details that will strengthen my argument. After reading Ch. 1 “The Transaction” I agree with that Zinsser proposes: my writing reflects who I am as a person (5). I am blunt and to the point. I get tasks done in the most efficient way. Maybe my personality does come through in my writing more than I thought. …show more content…

Not everyone can express themselves with such ease. He made a good point by encouraging authors of tougher subjects such as the sciences to use analogies and terms more relatable to the audience; however, Zinsser, an amazing writer himself, provided only examples of writers, such as Dr. Lewis Thomas who have already grasped this skill. Dr. Thomas is well recognized for his skill of providing clarity to such complicated scientific subjects, but what about the other scientific authors that leave audiences baffled (158)? When I have to read scientific work, I must often consult a dictionary or the glossary to grasps some sort of meaning regarding the matter regardless of the relatable explanations. I am just not a science person. Secondly, the expression of ideas does not only require clarity in thinking, but also the ability to transform the complex idea into a more relatable form that can be well received by an audience. This skill can only be developed over time for most writers. Zinsser’s assertion is possible, but only after many years of practice for those who struggle with the ideas of transformation and …show more content…

Conflicts themselves include multiple elements that often leave the analyzer dumbfounded. To present the parties within a conflict and explain their underlying grievances could take a lengthy explaination depending on what the area of conflict is. Writers in the I. E. E. E. Specturum, take a larger scientific idea and relate it to the human experience (159). In the same instance, one can take a complex conflict and relate it to a more interpersonal interaction. In many of the conflicts analysis I read, the major conflict is often explain through an interpersonal conflict of the same nature. Interpersonal conflicts are more relatable, which is one tip Zinsser gives to grasp and keep hold of an audience’s attention (152). Secondly, conflicts can also be too drawn out and the writer can lose the audience’s attention from the beginning. By exemplifying Roueché’s captivate language at the beginning of his piece, Zinsser makes it a point to employ a strong relatable attention grabber (154). In terms of conflict, one could give the complex dynamic of the conflict and the resolution at the beginning of the piece. Then, the readers will be intrigued to find out just how this seemingly unsolvable problem was resolved. Lastly, Stories are always fun to read and the reader most often wants to find out what happens in the end to the main characters or parties in the case of conflict. The idea that a conflict could be

More about Zinsser Writing Style Analysis

Open Document