Zero Tolerance Policy

1591 Words4 Pages

Imagine that you are a child again, and there is this one guy that taunts you mercilessly, but you can’t report him for bullying. Now imagine that the situation escalates and he starts to physically assault you. As much as you want to defend yourself, you know that sticking up for yourself might force the school to expel you. This is the current state of bullying in the United States. With a definition that is exceedingly broad and the zero tolerance policies allowing for no concept of self-defense, youth in America are left with no help with it comes to bullies. That is why I believe that we must make a change for the children that can’t stand up for themselves so that they know they are cared for by the authority figures they trust.
Currently, …show more content…

The main purpose for zero tolerance policies was to prevent violence within school grounds, so as to protect every student on school grounds. “However, research indicates that zero-tolerance policy expulsions are primarily for non-violent offenses, because the definition of bullying includes verbal aggression and other forms of non-physical intimidation” (Borgwald 150). These policies are ineffective in how they are implemented because expelling a student for any infraction gives them no chance to learn from their mistakes. In addition, the policies actually lead to an increase in covert bullying, such as cyberbullying, as opposed to direct bullying (Borgwald …show more content…

Complaining after being called a silly name is usually fairly immature, but in the case of more severe insults, there should be an exception. With regards to the zero tolerance policy, there needs to be some provision that allows for self-defense. In addition, instead of taking it out fully on the children committing violence, bullying prevention programs and policies should target the households of both bully victims and perpetrators. This is because a major source of bullying stems from “a lack of warmth and involvement on the part of their parents” or “A lack of supervision or intervention by parents, guardians, teachers and other adults” ("Bullying Prevention and Intervention"). Catherine P. Bradshaw, PhD, MeD, states that, bullying prevention programs that include at least some basic parent programming (eg, information about bullying) are more effective than programs that do not including such activities.” In addition, Bradshaw states that family dinners are important because they allow for children to effectively communicate major portions of their day. This effective communication between children and parts has shown, “reduced rates of youth conduct problems and delinquency, substance use, and some mental health problems (eg, depression)” (Bradshaw 992). Targeting the parents and household of victims and bullies would allow for

Open Document