Wait a second!
More handpicked essays just for you.
More handpicked essays just for you.
Essay on Jealousy
Gender interactions in relationships
Introduction to an essay discussing the role played by jealousy
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Essay on Jealousy
In Zeno, Zeno mentions his idea of an ideal society. He says that in a society where women get to choose their partners the men would not be sure of who fathered the children, and as a result would treat them all as if they were their own. He says that this would eliminate jealousy because none of the women would belong to any of the men and neither would their children. Although the idea seems to make sense, there are a number of factors that prevent this mechanism from ever working. It assumes that men would happily raise a child that might not be theirs, which would cause them to go against their nature. Also, it ignores that humans are socially monogamous creatures and would inevitably become attached to each other. Finally, it doesn’t …show more content…
Zeno believed that if women chose their partners men wouldn’t become jealous because none of them would have any claim to the women. If a man isn’t in a monogamous relationship with a woman then he has no reason to get jealous if another man sleeps with her. This is wrong. It is in a man's nature to want to spread his genes and it is also in his nature to want to make sure that it is his blood running through his baby's veins. This is where a man’s need to control his female partner comes from. The more certain he can be that her child is also his, the more successful he has been in passing on his DNA. That means ensuring that his partner is faithful only to him. Although this impulse has changed with the advancement of civilization, at its core it remains the same. It can be seen in 1542 when King Henry VIII had his wife, Anne of Cleves, beheaded for adultery when he had had many mistresses himself. It can also be seen in ancient rituals that meant to check the virginity of young brides before marrying them to their husbands. These were both ways of ensuring the purity of a bloodline. An “impure” woman would only pose a risk to her male partner, as he would have less certainty that any offspring is his. This is why the men in Zeno’s ideal society would be even more jealous of the other men having intercourse with the same woman. Their natural instinct towards protecting the possible vessel of their genes would kick in and they would become jealous of any other man trying to take her from him, even if officially she belongs to no one. Since they would be expected to care for the child as their own, their desire for it to actually be theirs would be heightened and so would their jealousy towards the mother's other
“Giving birth in beauty” starts with two forms (206B). We can either be pregnant in body or soul. When you want to become pregnant with beauty, in body, you seek out a mate who is good and wise. Then you can be pregnant in body and give birth to a child and become immortal by leaving your children behind when you pass away. Being pregnant in soul can happen when you have moderation and justice. Which means having proper order in your home. When a boy, specifically, becomes pregnant in soul he is drawn to beautiful bodies and drawn to beautiful souls. Being around beautiful souls makes him “teem with ideas and arguments about virtue” (209C). When we become pregnant in soul we seek an older, wise person who can teach us and come up with ideas with
Perhaps the first thing one must consider is why there are increasing numbers of poor women having children out of wedlock. One explanation of this concept that Edin and Kefalas use is that the poor women view raising their own child as a sense of accomplishment. For instance, they explain “in the social world inhabited by poor women, a baby born into such conditions represents an opportunity to prove one 's worth.” (11.3). Essentially, the women of a low social class view their children as an opportunity for success. It represents a sense of hope and fulfillment that the mother feels when she has a child. Also, interestingly enough, women of a poor class viewed “marriage as a luxury” (11.2). There are also reasons that involve a sense of fear in control. For instance, Edin and Kefalas explain that “poor women do not want to marry until they are set… a young mother often fears marriage will mean a loss of control” (13.3). Essentially, a poor women who has a child
Just as girls are pushed into societal standards, a newly invented standard has been introduced for males in society, known as the “child-man” ethic. “Child Man in the Promised Land”, written by Kay S. Hymowitz, is an argument in which the author states that the “child-man” ethic is prevalent and harmful to society. Hymowitz explains this ethic using a variety of supporting evidences, and explains both the implications of the “child-man” ethic, as well as its effects on the next generation. The “child-man” ethic has many social and cultural implications, since this ethic has changed social implications from just 20-30 years ago. Back then, in a man’s late 20s, he was “married… met your wife in high school…you’ve already got one kid, with another
Dena Davis in the 5th chapter of “Genetic Dilemmas: Reproductive Technology, Parental Choices, and Children’s Futures” explores the global attitudes, policies, and morality towards determination of sex. She begins with presenting empirical evidence of some preferences held in countries such as India or China where there is a clear desire for male children. This inclination is so deeply held that mothers can be socially and physically harmed when, by pure biological chance, they fail to produce a male child. Davis and others allow sex selection in these cases, purely in the interest of harm reduction of mothers and their daughters born into such a situation. This example is contrasted with so-called “western” societies, where the preference
Throughout history, especially in the fifteenth century, it was extremely rare for a woman to choose her husband. The majority of marriages were planned by the head of the household, which was usually the father of the bride or groom. The purposes of these marriages were to gain power and social standings. This in turn also provided the chance for the heirs of the marriages to have possession of power, territory/land, and a set social standard for the family for all future heirs. This was more of a benefit for the men than the women, for the men could own territories and be the head of the household, women could not. Instead, a woman’s obligation was to fulfill their family’s jurisdiction in their future.
Men didn’t believe women could manage their personal affairs. Once a woman’s husband passed away, she was considered unable to manage her own life and was assigned a guardian to oversee her various affairs by a council or court system. This acting guardian was also assigned to her children and would oversee the affairs of the children until they turned legal age. Since the woman lost control of her children, it was the guardian who made decisions based upon what he thought was best for her children. The father of her deceased husband often had more to say about the children’s future than the mother. The only time the mother had full control of her children were if the children were illegitimate (Weisner 231).
Women are living in a patriarchal society which contributes to gender inequality. It dominates most of the institutions of society like; religion, the family politics, and the work place. The International Encyclopedia of Social Sciences describes patriarchy as a social structural phenomenon in which males have the privilege of dominance over females, both visibly and subliminally. The value of women is often reduced to the role of Trophies, housekeepers and reproductive tools. “Because the subordination of women to men is a feature in the majority of all societies, patriarchy is often argued to be due to biology, such as women’s principal role in childbearing.”(Darity) Patriarchy is the cultural norm of many societies so it is seen as natural. “Bloodchild” challenges how natural the role is by reversing the roles and showing a parasitic male pregnancy.
One of the biggest aspects of human nature is the desire for relationship. Humans crave a sense of belonging which is undoubtedly an evolutionary advantage given to us by our ancestors that traveled in packs. The more relationships they instinctively formed, the more likely they were to survive and pass of those genes. The more complex humans have become over the years corresponds to the difference in complexity that their relationships have undergone. Because humans will never stop evolving in their technologically advanced world, it is logical to think that relationships won’t either. Complex is better, right? The truth is that biological instincts such as craving belonging were introduced for survival. When relationships occur in an environments in which the members aren’t just trying to survive, deterioration becomes a possibility. Brave New World by Aldous Huxley suggests that the more society progresses, the more relationships deteriorate.
Also, if a family were fearful of excessive hardships that have multiple children brought they may choose to use coitus interruptus, these three reasons for using it [coitus interruptus] were not prohibited. While using it for fear of having female children and worrying about arranging a marriage for them and for fear of the pain that would come with birth were corrupt because they went against what the religion believed.
In the early centuries, in a relationship men were the unfaithful ones in dating and also in a marriage, women didn’t have the equality in rights as a worthy person. “Men did not commit infidelity more than women, and no sex differences were found regarding the type of
Truly, a new approach is being introduced, the idea that social conventions dictate the nature of love as we see it, that it all depends on the perspective of a person or a group.
...with the number of children being produced at the same time and based on the amount of time placed in between each mating period. Finally there is the separation of the children from their parents at birth and their placement with nurses for the extent of their rearing. This creates a problem because it goes against the maternal nature of most women and does not explain what would happen if a mother refused to give up her child.
One being financial support for the family. For years, men where the bread winners for the family now women are stepping up to the plate in being the financial support for the family. This has caused many problems in the household for men and women. Men start to feel as though they are less of a man and women start to feel as though they do not need the man not factoring in the children that are involved. One thing that men and women forget is that the father has the potential to influence, develop, and make a difference in the life of the child if he is involved in the child’s care and
People of around 150 years ago were very superstitious and marriage was important. If a woman did not marry by a certain age she was thought of as a witch, or 'spinster'. Her only roles were to be faithful to her husband and to bear a son to become heir. The role of women was very different from today's society - it was world dominated and run by men.
Sex out of wedlock, divorces, childbirth out of wedlock, etc. are all seen as normal circumstances currently. Marriage is an indissoluble bond which means it cannot be broken for the rest of the life after the bond is made. The Church wants to stress the importance of marriage to a relationship and the significance of marriage in reference to Jesus’ loving sacrifice to all. Marriage is a symbol of the sacrifice Jesus made of himself out of love for mankind. Through marriage, the Lord allows us to experience that love with one another as Jesus loves us. Conjugal love can reach that extent of love which all married people are called