Zaroff's 'Instinct In The Most Dangerous Game'

457 Words1 Page

The Most Dangerous Game Zaroff’s claim that “instinct is no match for reason” is wrong. Instinct is both more important and more powerful than reason. Reasoning is scientific. Humans go through a step-by-step process through their head when they reason. This process is easily influenced by a person’s values, biases, or desires. Instinct is an animal’s automatic and natural response to a situation. However, it is not a random guess; it is based on patterns in a person’s life experience. Our subconsciousness goes through its own reasoning process. Then, it comes to a conclusion we call “instinct”. When reason and instinct contradict each other, instinct is more accurate. Under pressure, our judgment may be clouded, but our instincts do not change. The successful person has a good instinct which he uses over his reason. …show more content…

On his first night, Rainsford strategizes by creating an intricate trail and sleeping on a tree, and he was certain Zaroff could not find him. In the morning, Rainsford received a terrifying surprise. “Rainsford did not want to believe what his reason told him was true, but the truth was as evident as the sun that had by now pushed through the morning mists. The general was playing with him! The general was saving him for another day’s sport!” (Page 15) Rainsford continued to rely on his reason on the next day. He made a trap, but Zaroff was but slightly wounded. He next dug a pit. “Rainsford had dug himself in in France, when a second’s delay meant death. That had been a placid pastime compared to his digging now. The pit grew deeper; when it was above his shoulders, he climbed out and from some hard saplings cut stakes and sharpened them to a fine point…” (Page 16) Rainsford clung desperately to his hunting skills and tried to outsmart Zaroff. Again, he failed. Zaroff was uninjured, but entertained. “Thank you for a most amusing evening.” (Page

Open Document