Yale Sexual Misconduct Summary

1395 Words3 Pages

In the article “Implementing Yale’s Sexual Misconduct Policy: The Process of Institutional Change”, the authors Constance E. Bagley, Priyamvada Natarajan, Liena Vayzman, Laura Wexler and Shirley McCarthy, detail the sexual misconduct policy at Yale University and the effects it has had on the school. Sexual misconduct is a problem that has been plaguing college campuses for decades and as stated by the authors, most universities don’t know how to define sexual misconduct. This means that they cannot properly handle the issue they’re faced with. Yale University was faced with this problem and changed their sexual misconduct policy to better handle the situation of sexual misconduct. With the help of the Women Faculty Forum, the university was …show more content…

Hull, John H. Hull, and Erin Sheplavy start off with an inquiry to undergraduate students. This inquiry involves the students detailing their level of agreement on statements on sexual misconduct. This anonymous inquiry questioned the students on whether they, experienced acts of sexual misconduct, had committed them, or knew someone who did either. The authors who are performing this inquiry expand the knowledge of these students by telling them what the actual law against rape was and the consequences the school had and the consequences the would face should they be charged. The students who took the survey reported that they would report any actions of sexual misconduct after they were taught what the law actually had to say about sexual assault. This article provides an insightful view on different methods of preventing sexual assault and misconduct and how to solve the problem after it …show more content…

This article focuses on the Dear Colleague Letter and how it helped guide the sexual misconduct code at different universities. Under the Dear Colleague Letter or DCL for short states that the definition of sexual misconduct is too narrow and allows for a lot of different interpretation. The article also states that a policy for sexual misconduct should be implemented in increments to assure maximum results. This article touches base on different scenarios of sexual misconduct and how a university should structure its approach on handling each case. The DCL states that policies for sexual misconduct should be structured broadly to fit every possible contingency. This article implores different universities to change their sexual misconduct policy to make sure there aren’t very much loop holes. This article helps provide different policies to ensure that justice is

Open Document